1
|
Ochiai K, Bhutiani N, Ikeda A, Uppal A, White MG, Peacock O, Messick CA, Bednarski BK, You YQN, Skibber JM, Chang GJ, Konishi T. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: Which Regimens to Use? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2093. [PMID: 38893212 PMCID: PMC11171181 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a novel strategy for rectal cancer that administers both (chemo)radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery. TNT is expected to improve treatment compliance, tumor regression, organ preservation, and oncologic outcomes. Multiple TNT regimens are currently available with various combinations of the treatments including induction or consolidation chemotherapy, triplet or doublet chemotherapy, and long-course chemoradiotherapy or short-course radiotherapy. Evidence on TNT is rapidly evolving with new data on clinical trials, and no definitive consensus has been established on which regimens to use for improving outcomes. Clinicians need to understand the advantages and limitations of the available regimens for multidisciplinary decision making. This article reviews currently available evidence on TNT for rectal cancer. A decision making flow chart is provided for tailor-made use of TNT regimens based on tumor location and local and systemic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Ochiai
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Atsushi Ikeda
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Michael G. White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Craig A. Messick
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Brian K. Bednarski
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Yi-Qian Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - John M. Skibber
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - George J. Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (K.O.); (N.B.); (A.I.); (A.U.); (O.P.); (C.A.M.); (B.K.B.); (Y.-Q.N.Y.); (J.M.S.); (G.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin W, Li C, Clement EA, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Karimuddin AA, Ghuman A, Phang PT. Surgical Outcomes in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Versus Standard Long-course Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Ann Surg 2024; 279:620-630. [PMID: 38009646 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the impact of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal cancers on surgical complications and surgical pathology when compared with standard long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT). BACKGROUND The oncological benefits of TNT are well published in previous meta-analyses, but there is little synthesized information on how it affects surgical outcomes. A recent study has suggested an increase in local recurrence and higher rates of breached total mesorectal excision (TME) plane in TNT patients. METHODS This study conformed to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search was performed in Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane databases, EMBASE and CINAHL to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between TNT and LCRT. Meta-analyses of pooled proportions between TNT and LCRT were performed, comparing primary outcomes of surgical mortality, morbidity and all reported complications; surgical-pathology differences, namely mesorectal quality, R0 resection rates, circumferential resection margin positive rates, and sphincter preservation rates. Death and progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period was also compared. Risk of bias of RCTs was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS A total of 3185 patients with rectal cancer from 11 RCTs were included in the analysis: 1607 received TNT and 1578 received LCRT, of which 1422 (TNT arm) and 1391 (LCRT arm) underwent surgical resection with curative intent. There was no significant difference in mortality [risk ratio (RR)=0.86, 95% CI: 0.13-5.52, P =0.88, I2 =52%] or major complications (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.86-1.26, P =0.70, I2 =0%) between TNT and LCRT. There was a significantly higher risk of breached TME in TNT group on pooled analysis (RR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.03-12.16, P =0.03, I2 =0%), and on subgroup analysis there is higher risk of breached TME in those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (>17 weeks from start of treatment to surgery) when compared with LCRT (RR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.06-2.44, P =0.03). No difference in R0 resection rates (RR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.66-1.10, P =0.21, I2 =15%), circumferential resection margin positive rates (RR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.65-1.16, P =0.35, I2 =10%) or sphincter preservation rates (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.83-1.25, P =0.88, I2 =57%) were observed. There was a significantly lower risk of progression of disease to an unresectable stage during the neoadjuvant treatment period in TNT patients (RR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92, P =0.03, I2 =18%). On subgroup analysis, it appears to favor those receiving extended duration of neoadjuvant treatment (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P =0.002), and those receiving induction-type chemotherapy in TNT (RR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.07-0.88, P =0.03). CONCLUSIONS TNT increases rates of breached TME which can contribute to higher local recurrence rates. TNT, however, improves systemic control by reducing early progression of disease during neoadjuvant treatment period. Further research is warranted to identify patients that will benefit from this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Lin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Christine Li
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elizabeth A Clement
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carl J Brown
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Manoj J Raval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ahmer A Karimuddin
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Amandeep Ghuman
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul T Phang
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janczak J, Ukegjini K, Bischofberger S, Turina M, Müller PC, Steffen T. Quality of Surgical Outcome Reporting in Randomised Clinical Trials of Multimodal Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:26. [PMID: 38201454 PMCID: PMC10778098 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) continue to provide the best evidence for treatment options, but the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical outcomes and complication data vary widely. The aim of this study was to measure the quality of reporting of the surgical outcome and complication data in RCTs of rectal cancer treatment and whether this quality has changed over time. METHODS Eligible articles with the keywords ("rectal cancer" OR "rectal carcinoma") AND ("radiation" OR "radiotherapy") that were RCTs and published in the English, German, Polish, or Italian language were identified by reviewing all abstracts published from 1982 through 2022. Two authors independently screened and analysed all studies. The quality of the surgical outcome and complication data was assessed based on fourteen criteria, and the quality of RCTs was evaluated based on a modified Jadad scale. The primary outcome was the quality of reporting in RCTs and the completeness rate of reporting of surgical results and complication data. RESULTS A total of 340 articles reporting multimodal therapy outcomes for 143,576 rectal cancer patients were analysed. A total of 7 articles (2%) met all 14 reporting criteria, 13 met 13 criteria, 27 met from 11 to 12 criteria, 36 met from 9 to 10 criteria, 76 met from 7 to 8 criteria, and most articles met fewer than 7 criteria (mean 5.5 criteria). Commonly underreported criteria included complication severity (15% of articles), macroscopic integrity of mesorectal excision (17% of articles), length of stay (18% of articles), number of lymph nodes (21% of articles), distance between the tumour and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (26% of articles), surgical radicality according to the site of the primary tumour (R0 vs. R1 + R2) (29% of articles), and CRM status (38% of articles). CONCLUSION Inconsistent surgical outcome and complication data reporting in multimodal rectal cancer treatment RCTs is standard. Standardised reporting of clinical and oncological outcomes should be established to facilitate comparing studies and results of related research topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Janczak
- Clinic for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital for the Region Fürstenland Toggenburg, CH-9500 Wil, Switzerland;
| | - Kristjan Ukegjini
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Stephan Bischofberger
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| | - Matthias Turina
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Philip C. Müller
- Department of Surgery, Clarunis—University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Thomas Steffen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the Canton of St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (K.U.); (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu Z, Hao Y, Huang Y, Ling L, Hu X, Qiao S. Radiotherapy in the preoperative neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1300535. [PMID: 38074690 PMCID: PMC10704030 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1300535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are effective treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and can significantly improve the likelihood of R0 resection. Radiotherapy can be used as a local treatment to reduce the size of the tumor, improve the success rate of surgery and reduce the residual cancer cells after surgery. Early chemotherapy can also downgrade the tumor and eliminate micrometastases throughout the body, reducing the risk of recurrence and metastasis. The advent of neoadjuvant concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has brought substantial clinical benefits to patients with LARC. Even so, given increasing demand for organ preservation and quality of life and the disease becoming increasingly younger in its incidence profile, there is a need to further explore new neoadjuvant treatment options to further improve tumor remission rates and provide other opportunities for patients to choose watch-and-wait (W&W) strategies that avoid surgery. Targeted drugs and immunologic agents (ICIs) have shown good efficacy in patients with advanced rectal cancer but have not been commonly used in neoadjuvant therapy for patients with LARC. In this paper, we review several aspects of neoadjuvant therapy, including radiation therapy and chemotherapy drugs, immune drugs and targeted drugs used in combination with neoadjuvant therapy, with the aim of providing direction and thoughtful perspectives for LARC clinical treatment and research trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aschele C, Glynne-Jones R. Selecting a TNT Schedule in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Can We Predict Who Actually Benefits? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092567. [PMID: 37174033 PMCID: PMC10177050 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Many consider the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to be preoperative chemoradiotherapy, radical surgery involving a total mesorectal excision, and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the pathology of the specimen. The poor impact on distant control is a major limitation of this strategy, with metastasis rates remaining in the 25-35% range and recovery after radical surgery leading to reluctance with prescription and inconsistent patient compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy. A second limitation is the low rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) (around 10-15%) despite multiple efforts to potentiate preoperative chemoradiation regimens, which in turn means it is less effective at achieving non-operative management (NOM). Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) is a pragmatic approach to solving these problems by introducing systemic chemotherapy at an early timepoint. Enthusiasm for delivering TNT for patients with LARC is increasing in light of the results of published randomized phase III trials, which show a doubling of the pCR rate and a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent metastases. However, there has been no demonstrated improvement in quality of life or overall survival. A plethora of potential chemotherapy schedules are available around the radiotherapy component, which include preoperative induction or consolidation with a range of options (FOLFOXIRI, FOLFOX, or CAPEOX,) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, prior to long course chemoradiation (LCCRT) or consolidation NACT following short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5 Gy or LCCRT using 45-60 Gy, respectively. The need to maintain optimal local control is a further important factor, and preliminary data appear to indicate that the RT schedule remains a crucial issue, especially in more advanced tumors, i.e., mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion. Thus, there is no consensus as to the optimum combination, sequence, or duration of TNT. The selection of patients most likely to benefit is challenging, as clear-cut criteria to individuate patients benefiting from TNT are lacking. In this narrative review, we examine if there are any necessary or sufficient criteria for the use of TNT. We explore potential selection for the individual and their concerns with a generalized use of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Aschele
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Via Vittorio Veneto 197, 19121 La Spezia, Italy
| | - Robert Glynne-Jones
- Radiotherapy Department, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Rd., Northwood, London HA6 2RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gabbani M, Giorgi C, Napoli G, Tebano U, Perrone MS, Missiroli S, Berretta M, Mandarà M, Zaninelli M, Luca N, Grigolato D, Muraro M, Rinaldi G, Pinton P, Fiorica F. Outcomes of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Meta-Anaysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:297-308. [PMID: 36210320 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Determining outcomes using the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with local advanced rectal cancer is important for stratifying patients according to expected outcomes in future studies in the era of treatment combination. The present meta-analysis estimated the pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival probabilities of rectal cancer patients and identified predictors of outcomes. METHODS Studies reporting pathological complete response rate and time-dependent outcomes (progression or death) after total neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were identified in MEDLINE through January 2022. Three independent observers extracted data on patient populations and outcomes and combined the data using a distribution-free summary survival curve. The primary outcomes were actuarial probabilities of recurrence and survival. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs, including 18 TNT arms, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of pathological complete response (pCR) probability was 23.6%, with moderate heterogeneity between studies. The pooled estimates of actuarial disease-free survival rate were 70.6% at 3 years and 65.4% at 5 years. The pooled estimates of actuarial survival rates were 93% at 3 years and 81.6% at 5 years. In both these outcomes, heterogeneity between studies was highly significant. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that Total Neoadjuvant Therapy is an optimal approach for LARC patients. The results provide a useful benchmark for future comparisons of the benefits of combinations of other drug families as target therapies or immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gabbani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlotta Giorgi
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Napoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Tebano
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Sole Perrone
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Sonia Missiroli
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Berretta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinico "G. Martino" University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | - Nicoletta Luca
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Grigolato
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Muraro
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Rinaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Pinton
- Dept. of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pathology, Oncology and Experimental Biology, Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiorica
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nevolskikh AA, Avdeenko VA, Belokhvostova AS, Mikhaleva YY, Pochuev TP, Zibirov RF, Ivanov SA, Kaprin AD. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treatment patients with rectal cancer with adverse prognostic factors: A review. JOURNAL OF MODERN ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.26442/18151434.2022.3.201806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the leading tumor location in the structure of the incidence of malignant neoplasms in the Russian Federation and the world. And the standard approach to the treatment of patients with locally advanced forms of RC is preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) with delayed surgery. The use of such sort of approach in the recent decades has led to the reduction of the frequency of local recurrence up to 10% and even less. However, approximately a third of patients die of distant metastases. In this regard, one of the main tasks in the treatment of patients with locally advanced forms of RC with adverse prognostic factors is the prevention of distant metastasis formation. Early initiation of the systemic therapy before surgery is aimed at solving this issue. Conducting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) instead of CRT in RC treatment allows to avoid radiation reactions and injuries, occurring in some patients. Two-component oxaliplatin-containing regimens are the most well studied types of NCT in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic RC. In this connection, despite the differences in the treatment regimens and the number of cycles, a good tolerability of the method as well as no effect on the frequency of postoperative complications and in general a satisfactory results comparable to the effects of CRT were observed. The use of NCT in combination with targeted treatment modalities as well as three-component chemotherapy regimens are promising and encouraging treatment options for patients with RC with adverse prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma Z, Tan L, Liu ZL, Xiao JW. Total neoadjuvant therapy or standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:911538. [PMID: 36090336 PMCID: PMC9458916 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim The effectiveness of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) on patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is controversy. This study aims to compare the prognostic value of TNT with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LARC. Methods We searched databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 10, 2022. Studies on evaluating the effects of TNT and standard CRT on the prognosis of LARC were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results 19 primary studies, involving 10 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective studies and 6 retrospective studies, with data on 5,074 patients treated for LARC were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analyses revealed that, compared with standard CRT, TNT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65–0.90, I2 = 30%, P = 0.17), DFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74–0.97, I² = 11%, P = 0.35), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS, HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.90, I² = 0%, P = 0.50), pathological complete response rate (pCR, OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.61–2.22, I² = 0%, P = 0.47), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.07–1.67, I² = 16%, P = 0.28), but local recurrence-free survival (LRFS, HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.90–1.39, I² = 4%, P = 0.37). Conclusions Comprehensive literature research shows that TNT showed excellent short-term efficacy in terms of pCR and R0 resection rate while also improved the long-term outcomes of OS, DFS and DMFS, might become a new standard of treatment in patients with LARC. Even so, more studies and longer follow-up were still warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Ma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BaZhong Central Hospital, Bazhong, China
| | - Ling Tan
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, China
| | - Zi-lin Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiang-wei Xiao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Clinical Medical College and The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Correspondence: Jiang-wei Xiao
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tailored Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma (GRECCAR 4): Long-term Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:986-995. [PMID: 34759247 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic preoperative radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision are the standard of care for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Some patients can be over- or undertreated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the long-term oncological, functional, and late morbidity outcomes after tailored radiochemotherapy and induction high-dose chemotherapy. DESIGN This is a prospective, phase II, multicenter, open-label study at 16 tertiary centers in France. SETTINGS Patients were operated on by surgeons from the French GRECCAR group. PATIENTS Two hundred six patients were randomly assigned to treatment: good responders after chemotherapy (≥75% tumor volume reduction) to immediate surgery (arm A) or standard radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 50) plus surgery (arm B) and poor responders to capecitabine 50 (arm C) or intensive radiochemotherapy (capecitabine 60; 60 Gy irradiation; arm D) before surgery. INTERVENTIONS Treatment was tailored according to MRI response to induction chemotherapy. RESULTS After induction treatment, 194 patients were classified as good (n = 30, 15%) or poor (n = 164, 85%) responders; they were included in arms A and B (16 and 14 patients) or C and D (113 and 51 patients). The primary objective was obtained: R0 resection rates (90% CI) in the 4 arms were 100% (74-100), 100% (85-100), 83% (72-91), and 88% (77-95). At 5 years, overall survival rates were 90% (47.3-98.5), 93.3% (61.3-99.0), 84.3% (71.0-91.8), and 86.1% (71.6-93.5); disease-free survival rates were 80% (40.9-94.6), 89.5% (64.1-97.3), 72.9% (58.5-82.9), and 72.8% (57.7-83.2); local recurrence rates were 0%, 0%, 2.1% (0.3-13.9), and 9.3% (3.6-23.0); and metastasis rates were 20% (5.4-59.1), 10.5% (2.7-35.9), 18% (31.8-94.6), and 18.8% (10.2-33.0). Late morbidity and quality-of-life evaluations showed no significant difference between arms. LIMITATIONS Limitations were due to the small number of patients randomly assigned in the good responder arms, especially arm A without radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Tailoring preoperative radiochemotherapy based on induction treatment response appears to be promising. Future prospective trials should confirm this strategy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Identifier: NCT01333709. ESTRATEGIA HECHA A MEDIDA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DEL CARCINOMA DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO GRECCAR RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DE UN ESTUDIO ALEATRIO MULTICNTRICO Y ABIERTO DE FASE II ANTECEDENTES:La radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria sistemáticas y la excisión total del mesorrecto son el estándar en el tratamiento del carcinoma de recto localmente avanzado. En éste sentido, algunos pacientes podrían recibir un sobre o un infra-tratamiento.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados oncológicos, funcionales y de morbilidad a largo plazo después de radio-quimioterapia personalizada y quimioterapia de inducción a dosis elevadas.DISEÑO:Estudio aleatório multicéntrico y abierto de Fase II° realizado en 16 centros terciarios en Francia.AJUSTE:Aquellos pacientes operados por cirujanos del grupo GRECCAR francés.PACIENTES:206 pacientes fueron asignados aleatoriamente al tratamiento: los buenos respondedores después de quimioterapia (reducción del volumen tumoral ≥75%) a la cirugía inmediata (brazo A) o a la radio-quimioterapia estándar (Cap 50) asociada a la cirugía (brazo B); los malos respondedores a Cap 50 (brazo C) o a la radio-quimioterapia intensiva (Cap 60 (irradiación de 60 Gy) (brazo D) previas a la cirugía.INTERVENCIONES:Tratamiento adaptado según la respuesta de la RM a la TC de inducción.RESULTADOS:Después del tratamiento de inducción, 194 pacientes fueron clasificados como buenos (n = 30, 15%) o malos (n = 164, 85%) respondedores, y se incluyeron en los brazos A y B (16 y 14 pacientes) o C y D (113 y 51 pacientes). Se alcanzó el objetivo principal: las tasas de resección R0 [intervalo de confianza del 90%] en los cuatro brazos respectivamente, fueron del 100% [74-100], 100% [85-100], 83% [72-91] y 88% [77-95]. A los 5 años, las tasas fueron: de sobrevida global 90% [47,3-98,5], 93,3% [61,3-99,0], 84,3% [71,0-91,8], 86,1% [71,6-93,5]; de sobrevida libre a la enfermedad 80% [40,9-94,6], 89,5% [64,1-97,3], 72,9% [58,5-82,9], 72,8% [57,7-83,2]; de recidiva local 0, 0, 2,1% [0,3-13,9], 9,3% [3,6-23,0]; de metástasis 20% [5,4-59,1], 10,5% [2,7-35,9], 18% [31,8-94,6], 18,8% [10,2-33,0]. La evaluación tardía de la morbilidad y la calidad de vida no mostraron diferencias significativas entre los brazos.LIMITACIONES:Debido al pequeño número de pacientes asignados al azar en los brazos de buenos respondedores, especialmente en el brazo A de aquellos sin radioterapia.CONCLUSIÓN:Parecería muy prometedor el adaptar la radio-quimioterapia pré-operatoria basada en la respuesta al tratamiento de inducción. Estudios prospectivos en el futuro podrán confirmar la presente estrategia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B761 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo )IDENTIFICADOR DE CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:NCT01333709. Groupe de REcherche Chirurgicale sur le CAncer du Rectum.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ominelli J, Valadão M, Araujo RODC, Cristina de Melo A, Araujo LH. The Evolving Field of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally-advanced Rectal Cancer: Evidence and Prospects. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:288-298. [PMID: 34340916 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer comprises neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision. This strategy provides low local recurrence rate, however distant recurrence is still an issue and may impact on survival rates. Novel approaches in the neoadjuvant setting have been tested to improve early and late outcomes, as well as to reduce treatment-related toxicity and morbidity. In this review, we discuss the current literature of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer, including total neoadjuvant methods, protocols for radiation delivery, chemotherapy regimen and efforts to add novel targeted therapies, selective withdrawal of surgery or radiotherapy, and future perspectives. Moreover, we highlight relevant issues that have emerged with these new treatment possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Ominelli
- Division of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Marcus Valadão
- Department of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Luiz H Araujo
- Division of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Câncer (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wilson K, Flood M, Narasimhan V, Pham T, Warrier S, Ramsay R, Michael M, Heriot A. Complete pathological response in rectal cancer utilising novel treatment strategies for neo-adjuvant therapy: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1862-1874. [PMID: 33814240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer is routinely treated with neo-adjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy or short course radiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision. Not all patients respond to this treatment and there has been an emergence of novel treatment strategies designed to improve outcomes for these patients. This systematic review aims to assess the current novel neo-adjuvant treatment strategies being utilised in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer and how these impact pathological complete response (pCR) rates. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate pathological response in patients with rectal cancer receiving novel neo-adjuvant therapy. EMBASE and Medline electronic databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles published between January 2008 and February 2019 were retrieved. Included studies underwent critical appraisal and complete pathological response rates were recorded. RESULTS Of the initial 1074 articles identified, 217 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of these 60 articles (4359 patients) were included. Neo-adjuvant therapy delivered included novel long course chemoradiation therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, addition of a biological agent, total neo-adjuvant therapy, novel short course radiation therapy and studies utilising biomarkers to select patients for therapy. Complete pathological response rates ranged from 0 to 60%. CONCLUSION A validated novel neo-adjuvant therapy that significantly increases pCR rates in patients with rectal cancer has not been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Wilson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Differentiation and Transcription Laboratory, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - M Flood
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Differentiation and Transcription Laboratory, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - V Narasimhan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Differentiation and Transcription Laboratory, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - T Pham
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Differentiation and Transcription Laboratory, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Warrier
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia
| | - R Ramsay
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Differentiation and Transcription Laboratory, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia
| | - M Michael
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Heriot
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Surgical Oncology, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs. Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123655. [PMID: 33291454 PMCID: PMC7762140 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Multimodality therapy is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The optimal treatment sequence is, however, a matter of debate. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent fluoropyrimidines followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard treatment for the past years. Alternative therapeutic strategies such as total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) are gaining momentum, although results from individual clinical trials are not conclusive regarding its impact on survival. In this context, we aimed to systematically review available evidence from randomized trials comparing different sequencing strategies. The results from our meta-analysis show that TNT not only provides increased complete pathological response rates, but also improves disease-free and overall survival at 3 years compared to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with no substantial increase in severe adverse events. These results support the use of induction or consolidation chemotherapy before surgery in LARC and TNT as a valuable treatment strategy in these patients. Abstract Multimodality treatment is a standard of care for LARC, but the optimal sequencing of the treatment modalities remains unclear. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) vs. standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with inconsistent results. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of complete pathological response (pCR) rate, disease-free and overall survival vs. standard CRT in LARC. A systematic search was performed through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and meeting abstracts up to May 2020. RCTs comparing CRT vs. TNT followed by surgery in LARC were eligible for the study. Study selection and data extraction were done following PRISMA guidelines by two independent reviewers. The Mantel–Haenzel method was used to obtain a fixed-effects model of pooled odds or hazard ratios for the main outcomes. Eight RCTs, including 2301 patients, met the eligibility criteria. TNT significantly improved pCR rate (OR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59–2.49; p < 0.001), 3-year disease-free-survival (DFS) (HR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.71–0.95; p = 0.01) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, p = 0.04). Grade 3–4 adverse events were not significantly different in both strategies (OR = 1.58; p = 0.14). An improved pCR rate was documented regardless of the type of radiotherapy administered (long vs. short fractionation schedules). No significant heterogeneity was found. The results of this meta-analysis show that TNT improves pCR and survival rates vs. standard preoperative CRT in patients with LARC. TNT may become a new standard of care in LARC, although longer follow-up is needed to properly assess its long-term impact on survival.
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou Y, Guo Z, Wu Z, Shi J, Zhou C, Sun J, Hidasa I, Lu X, Lu C. The efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Oncol 2020; 14:100964. [PMID: 33248411 PMCID: PMC7704460 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are more likely to suffer local recurrence and distant metastases, contributing to worse prognoses. Considering the provided dramatic reduction of local recurrences, neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) followed by curative resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard therapy for LARC patients. However, the efficacy of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy, especially in induction therapy-containing nCRT for LARC patients remains uncertain. Materials PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to retrieve records on the application of bevacizumab in a neoadjuvant setting for LARC patients. The endpoints of interest were pCR and the rates of patients suffering Grade 3/4 bevacizumab-specific adverse events, namely bleeding, wound healing complications, and gastrointestinal perforation. Results 29 cohorts covering 1134 subjects were included in this systematic review. The pooled pCR rate for bevacizumab-relevant cohorts was 21% (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 17–25%; I2 = 61.8%), the pooled estimates of Grade 3/4 bleeding, Grade 3/4 wound healing complication, Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal perforation were 1% (95% CI, 0–3%; I2 = 0%), 2% (95% CI, 1–5%; I2 = 4.7%), and 2% (95% CI, 0–5%; I2 = 0%), respectively. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab in the nCRT, especially in the TNT, for LARC patients provides promising efficacy and acceptable safety. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small amount of relevant data and need further confirmation by future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110001, China
| | - Zhexu Guo
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Zhonghua Wu
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Jinxin Shi
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Cen Zhou
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Jie Sun
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Iko Hidasa
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China
| | - Xuefei Lu
- Department of Pediatrics, People's Hospital of Yifeng County, 24 Chengnanmen Road, Yifeng County, Yichun 336300, China
| | - Chong Lu
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang City, 110001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roeder F, Meldolesi E, Gerum S, Valentini V, Rödel C. Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:262. [PMID: 33172475 PMCID: PMC7656724 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01695-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of (colo)-rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past decades. Introduced with the aim of reducing the high rates of local recurrences after conventional surgery, major developments in imaging, surgical technique, systemic therapy and radiation delivery have now created a much more complex environment leading to a more personalized approach. Functional aspects including reduction of acute or late treatment-related side effects, sphincter or even organ-preservation and the unsolved problem of still high distant failure rates have become more important while local recurrence rates can be kept low in the vast majority of patients. This review summarizes the actual role of radiation therapy in different subgroups of patients with rectal cancer, including the current standard approach in different subgroups as well as recent developments focusing on neoadjuvant treatment intensification and/or non-operative treatment approaches aiming at organ-preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Roeder
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Landeskrankenhaus, Müllner Hautpstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - E Meldolesi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - S Gerum
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Landeskrankenhaus, Müllner Hautpstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - V Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - C Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1355-1369. [PMID: 32488419 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03621-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy persists about whether additional induction chemotherapy (ICT) before neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) yields improved oncological outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare ICT+ NCRT+ surgery(S) with NCRT+ S in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases. The data were analyzed with Stata version 12.0 software. RESULTS We identified 9 relevant trials that enrolled 1538 patients. We detected no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.48-4.64), disease-free survival (DFS) (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.73-1.46), local recurrence (LR) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.43), and distant metastasis (DM) rates (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.55-1.93) between patients who did and did not receive ICT. The addition of ICT before NCRT had a similar pathological complete response rate compared to NCRT (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.90-1.77). Our findings suggest that between the ICT + NCRT+S and NCRT+S groups, ICT improved the incidence of grade 3 to 4 toxicity effects (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.38-9.37), but between the ICT + NCRT+S and NCRT+S+ adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) groups, ICT might reduce toxicity (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.50). ICT had no significant impact on surgical complications (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.63-1.51). CONCLUSIONS The addition of ICT before NCRT seemingly shows no survival benefit on patients with LARC, and might increase the toxicity.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4319-4336. [PMID: 32524461 PMCID: PMC7497700 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hoendervangers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J P M Burbach
- Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - M M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hur H, Cho MS, Koom WS, Lim JS, Kim TI, Ahn JB, Kim H, Kim NK. Nomogram for prediction of pathologic complete remission using biomarker expression and endoscopic finding after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2020; 32:228-241. [PMID: 32410800 PMCID: PMC7219094 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.02.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to develop a nomogram for prediction of pathologic complete remission (pCR) after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. Methods mRNA expression levels of seven molecular markers [p53, p21, Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD133, CD24, CD44] were measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 120 rectal cancers. Endoscopic findings of clinical complete remission (cCR) and biologic variables were used to construct nomogram in the training group (n=80), which was validated in the validation group (n=40). Results mRNA expression levels of four markers (p53, p21, Ki67, CD133) correlated with pCR (24/80, 30.0%) in the training group. Low expression of p53 and/or high expression of p21, Ki67 and CD133 showed greater pCR rate. pCR was shown in 18 (69.2%) of 26 cases showing endoscopic cCR in the training group. Higher pCR rate was demonstrated in lower tumor location than middle tumor (19/49, 38.8% vs. 5/31, 16.1%). A nomogram for prediction of pCR was developed from the multivariate prediction model using these six variables, which showed good discrimination ability in the training group [area under the curve (AUC)=0.945] and validation group (AUC=0.922). The calibration plot showed good agreement between actual and predicted pCR in both patient groups.
Conclusions Nomogram for assessment of pCR can be useful for making treatment decisions after CRT according to predicted responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyuk Hur
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Min Soo Cho
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | - Joon Seok Lim
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science
| | - Tae Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology
| | | | - Hoguen Kim
- Department of Pathology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Efficacy and Safety of Two Neoadjuvant Strategies With Bevacizumab in MRI-Defined Locally Advanced T3 Resectable Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized, Noncomparative Phase 2 INOVA Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:200-208.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
19
|
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in Rectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-018-0415-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
20
|
Kawai K, Ishihara S, Nozawa H, Hata K, Kiyomatsu T, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Otani K, Yasuda K, Murono K, Sasaki K, Watanabe T. Recent advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2018; 1:39-44. [PMID: 31583299 PMCID: PMC6768670 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2017-005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been actively used in Europe and the United States to treat advanced low rectal cancer, and provides excellent local control. In Japan, however, the standard treatment is lateral lymph node dissection, and to date CRT has not been actively used. In recent years, an increasing number of Japanese institutions have been using preoperative CRT to treat locally advanced rectal cancer. In this review, we describe the latest trends in CRT under five headings: short-course or long-course radiation, efforts to improve combined chemotherapy, the addition of preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the watch and wait strategy, and the significance of lateral lymph node dissection in patients receiving CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo
| | - Keisuke Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo
| | | | | | | | - Kensuke Otani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo
| | - Koji Yasuda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dautruche A, Belin L, Cottu P, Bontemps P, Lemanski C, de la Lande B, Baumann P, Missohou F, Lévy C, Peignaux K, Reynaud-Bougnoux A, Denis F, Gobillion A, Pernin V, Kirova Y. Evaluation at 3 years of concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy for breast cancer: Results of a prospective study. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:222-228. [PMID: 29650388 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the 3 years late toxicity among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of bevacizumab and radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Toxicity was assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 during the radiotherapy and follow-up clinics at 12 and 36 months after its completion. The study was designed to evaluate the toxicity at one year, 3 years and 5 years. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included from October 2007 to August 2010. All of them received concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and bevacizumab (in 24 cases after primary systemic treatment). All patients received non-fractionated radiotherapy to breast or chest wall with or without irradiation of regional lymph nodes. Early toxicity has been previously reported. Median follow-up was 46.4 months (range: 18-77 months). Median age was 53 years old (range: 23-68 years). The 3-years overall survival was 93% (range: 87-100%). Evaluation of the toxicity at 3 years was available for 67% of the patients. There was a low rate of toxicity: 14% grade 1 pain, 9% grade 1 fibrosis, 2% grade 1 telangiectasia, 2% grade 1 paresis, 7% grade 1 lymphedema and 2% grade 3 lymphedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. No patient had a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional radiotherapy is associated with acceptable 3-years toxicity in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dautruche
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - L Belin
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Cottu
- Oncology department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Radiotherapy department, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - C Lemanski
- Radiotherapy department, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - B de la Lande
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, René-Huguenin hospital, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - P Baumann
- Radiotherapy department, centre d'oncologie de Gentilly, 54000 Nancy, France
| | - F Missohou
- Radiotherapy department, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - C Lévy
- Radiotherapy department, centre François-Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K Peignaux
- Radiotherapy department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 21079 Dijon, France
| | | | - F Denis
- Radiotherapy department, centre Jean-Bernard, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - A Gobillion
- Biostatistics department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - V Pernin
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Radiotherapy department, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhong X, Wu Z, Gao P, Shi J, Sun J, Guo Z, Wang Z, Song Y. The efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2018; 7:565-582. [PMID: 29464874 PMCID: PMC5852374 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are at tremendous risk of metastatic diseases. To improve the prognoses of LARC patients, the efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy has been investigated by many researchers but remains controversial. A literature search of relevant databases was conducted through December 2016, 804 studies were identified and 32 investigations were ultimately included. A total of 1196 patients from 31 cohorts of 29 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis in this single‐arm setting meta‐analysis. As pathologic complete response (pCR) shows promise as a prognosis indicator, we focused on pCR rates to evaluate whether adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapies improves the outcome of LARC patients. In our study, we revealed pooled estimates of pCR of 27% (95%CI, 21–34%) and 14% (95%CI, 9–21%) for bevacizumab‐relevant cohorts and cetuximab‐relevant cohorts, respectively. The safety of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy was also evaluated by pooling the data of Grade 3/4 toxicity. In conclusion, our study revealed that adding bevacizumab to the neoadjuvant therapy regimens provides appreciable pCR for LARC patients. Meanwhile, the efficacy of cetuximab remains inconclusive, RCTs with larger scale and better study design that stress more on mutational status are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Zhong
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Zhonghua Wu
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Peng Gao
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Jinxin Shi
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Jingxu Sun
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Zhexu Guo
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Zhenning Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Yongxi Song
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 North Nanjing Street, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Omar Carrim Y, Gaxa L, van der Schyff F, Bida NM, Omar F, Lockhat Z. Does radiotherapy prior to surgery improve long term prognosis in pediatric colorectal cancer in lower- and upper-middle income countries with limited resources? Our experience and literature review. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2017; 29:201-206. [PMID: 29233454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma in children and adolescents is extremely rare, with an annual incidence <0.3 cases per million, most frequently reported in the second decade of life. It accounts for severe morbidity and poor prognosis owing to the low index of suspicion, delayed diagnosis, advanced stage at presentation and the aggressive tumor nature. Patients present with abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, abdominal distension, rectal tenesmus, iron-deficiency anemia, change in bowel habit and weight loss. Rectal bleeding is an uncommon presentation in children. Bowel obstruction presents frequently in children compared to adults. In 90% of pediatric cases, colorectal carcinoma occurs sporadically. In 10%, predisposing conditions and syndromes are identified. We present a case study of a 12-year-old female with advanced colorectal cancer without a predisposing disease or syndrome, who received radio-chemotherapy ten weeks prior to radical abdominopelvic surgery, followed by radio-chemotherapy postoperatively, with a positive outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yacoob Omar Carrim
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| | - Luvo Gaxa
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| | - Francisca van der Schyff
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| | - Nndweleni Meshack Bida
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| | - Fareed Omar
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| | - Zarina Lockhat
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag x323, Arcadia 0007, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Teo MTW, McParland L, Appelt AL, Sebag-Montefiore D. Phase 2 Neoadjuvant Treatment Intensification Trials in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:146-158. [PMID: 29254769 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multiple phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant treatment intensification in locally advanced rectal cancer have reported promising efficacy signals, but these have not translated into improved cancer outcomes in phase 3 trials. Improvements in phase 2 trial design are needed to reduce these false-positive signals. This systematic review evaluated the design of phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant long-course radiation or chemoradiation therapy treatment intensification in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant treatment intensification from 2004 to 2016. Trial clinical design and outcomes were assessed, with statistical design and compliance rated using a previously published system. Multivariable meta-regression analysis of pathologic complete response (pCR) was conducted. RESULTS We identified 92 eligible trials. Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage II and III equivalent disease were eligible in 87 trials (94.6%). In 43 trials (46.7%), local staging on magnetic resonance imaging was mandated. Only 12 trials (13.0%) were randomized, with 8 having a standard-treatment control arm. Just 51 trials (55.4%) described their statistical design, with 21 trials (22.8%) failing to report their sample size derivation. Most trials (n=84, 91.3%) defined a primary endpoint, but 15 different primary endpoints were used. All trials reported pCR rates. Only 38 trials (41.3%) adequately reported trial statistical design and compliance. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled pCR rate of 17.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.7%-19.4%) across treatment arms of neoadjuvant long-course radiation or chemoradiation therapy treatment intensification and substantial heterogeneity among the reported effect sizes (I2 = 55.3%, P<.001). Multivariable meta-regression analysis suggested increased pCR rates with higher radiation therapy doses (adjusted P=.025). CONCLUSIONS Improvement in the design of future phase 2 rectal cancer trials is urgently required. A significant increase in randomized trials is essential to overcome selection bias and determine novel schedules suitable for phase 3 testing. This systematic review provides key recommendations to guide future treatment intensification trial design in rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T W Teo
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lucy McParland
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Maingon P, Simon JM, Canova CH, Troussier I, Besson N, Caillot É, Huguet F. [Clinical research for rectal carcinoma: State of the art and objectives]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:533-535. [PMID: 28890092 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of rectal carcinoma is based on multidisciplinary strategy and multimodal approaches including gastrointestinal tract specialists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and surgery. The different objectives should be declined according to the characteristics of the tumours. The aim of the therapist would be to select the best strategy offering to the patient to be cured with as less as possible late adverse toxicity. The challenge of the treatment of small tumours is to maintain a functional anal sphincter while minimizing the risk of local recurrence. The standard treatment of locally advanced disease is aiming firstly to cure the patient and secondly to prevent late complications. Each of these clinical presentations of the disease has to be considered as a whole taking into account the new surgical techniques and a personalized approach adapted to the tumour. Nowadays they should be studied with dedicated clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Maingon
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, GHU La Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Sorbonne université, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - J-M Simon
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, GHU La Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - C-H Canova
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, GHU La Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - I Troussier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, GHU La Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - N Besson
- Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Sorbonne université, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France; Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 20, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - É Caillot
- Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Sorbonne université, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France; Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 20, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Sorbonne université, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France; Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 20, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tailored Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Based on the Tumor Response to Induction Chemotherapy: Preliminary Results of the French Phase II Multicenter GRECCAR4 Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60:653-663. [PMID: 28594714 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative radiochemotherapy and total mesorectal excision are the standard-of-care for locally advanced rectal carcinoma, but some patients could be over- or undertreated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the feasibility of radiochemotherapy tailored based on the tumor response to induction chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX) to obtain a minimum R0 resection rate of 90% in the 4 arms of the study. DESIGN This study is a multicenter randomized trial (NCT01333709). SETTING This study was conducted at 16 French cancer specialty centers. PATIENTS Two hundred six patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma were enrolled between 2011 and 2014. INTERVENTIONS Good responders (≥75% tumor volume reduction) were randomly assigned to immediate surgery (arm A) or standard radiochemotherapy (Cap 50: 50 Gy irradiation and 1600 mg/m oral capecitabine daily) plus surgery (arm B). Poor responders were randomly assigned to Cap 50 (arm C) or intensive radiochemotherapy (Cap 60, 60 Gy irradiation, arm D) before surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was a R0 resection rate (circumferential resection margin >1 mm). STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS The experimental strategies were to be considered effective if at least 28 successes (R0 resection) among 31 patients in each arm of stratum I and 34 successes among 40 patients in each arm of stratum II were reported (Simon 2-stage design). RESULTS After induction treatment (good compliance), 194 patients were classified as good (n = 30, 15%) or poor (n = 164, 85%) responders who were included in arms A and B (16 and 14 patients) and arms C and D (113 and 51 patients). The trial was prematurely stopped because of low accrual in arms A and B and recruitment completion in arms C and D. Data from 133 randomly assigned patients were analyzed: 11, 19, 52, and 51 patients in arms A, B, C, and D. Good responders had smaller tumors than poor responders (23 cm vs 45 cm; p < 0.001). The surgical procedure was similar among groups. The R0 resection rates [90% CI] were 100% [70-100], 100% [85-100], 83% [72-91], and 88% [77-95]. Among the first 40 patients, 34 successes were reported in arms C and D (85% R0 resection rate). The circumferential resection margin ≤1 rates were 0%, 0%, 12%, and 5% in arms A, B, C, and D. The rate of transformation from positive to negative circumferential resection margin was 93%. LIMITATIONS There was low accrual in arms A and B. CONCLUSION Tailoring preoperative radiochemotherapy based on the induction treatment response appears safe for poor responders and promising for good responders. Long-term clinical results are needed to confirm its efficacy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A359.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hamming LC, Slotman BJ, Verheul HMW, Thijssen VL. The clinical application of angiostatic therapy in combination with radiotherapy: past, present, future. Angiogenesis 2017; 20:217-232. [PMID: 28364160 PMCID: PMC5437175 DOI: 10.1007/s10456-017-9546-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Although monotherapy with angiostatic drugs is still far from effective, there is abundant evidence that angiostatic therapy can improve the efficacy of conventional treatments like radiotherapy. This has instigated numerous efforts to optimize and clinically implement the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. The results from past and present clinical trials that explored this combination therapy indeed show encouraging results. However, current findings also show that the combination has variable efficacy and is associated with increased toxicity. This indicates that combining radiotherapy with angiostatic drugs not only holds opportunities but also provides several challenges. In the current review, we provide an update of the most recent insights from clinical trials that evaluated the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. In addition, we discuss the outstanding questions for future studies in order to improve the clinical benefit of combining angiostatic therapy with radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne C Hamming
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor L Thijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ludmir EB, Palta M, Willett CG, Czito BG. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: An emerging option. Cancer 2017; 123:1497-1506. [PMID: 28295220 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has benefited from improved surgical techniques and from the implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), which have markedly decreased the rates of local recurrence. However, distant metastatic disease remains the most significant cause of death for these patients. Although adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) after neoadjuvant CRT and definitive surgery is commonly recommended, the value of adjuvant systemic therapy remains less clear. Trials evaluating adjuvant ChT for rectal cancer have been handicapped by poor compliance rates and inconsistent survival results. Shifting systemic therapy delivery to the neoadjuvant setting has the promise to improve compliance rates, reduce toxicity, and decrease distant relapse rates. Recently, multiple prospective trials have reported on the use of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with LARC, incorporating both ChT and CRT in the neoadjuvant setting. Here, the authors review the promising results from those trials. Because the studies have largely focused on pathologic outcomes (primarily pathologic complete response rates), ongoing phase 2 and 3 trials are now underway assessing the long-term disease-related outcomes with TNT. In addition to improving survival, TNT has the potential to increase the pool of patients with LARC who are eligible for organ preservation, which is also being evaluated. Cancer 2017;123:1497-1506. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher G Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cunningham D, Stenning SP, Smyth EC, Okines AF, Allum WH, Rowley S, Stevenson L, Grabsch HI, Alderson D, Crosby T, Griffin SM, Mansoor W, Coxon FY, Falk SJ, Darby S, Sumpter KA, Blazeby JM, Langley RE. Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2-3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:357-370. [PMID: 28163000 PMCID: PMC5337626 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30043-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery is a standard of care for patients with resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, improves the proportion of patients responding to treatment in advanced gastric cancer. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of adding bevacizumab to peri-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric, oesophagogastric junction, or lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS In this multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 2-3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with histologically proven, resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma from 87 UK hospitals and cancer centres. We randomly assigned patients 1:1 to receive peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, in addition to surgery. Patients in the control group (chemotherapy alone) received three pre-operative and three post-operative cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy: 50 mg/m2 epirubicin and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 1-21. Patients in the investigational group received the same treatment as the control group plus 7·5 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab on day 1 of every cycle of chemotherapy and for six further doses once every 21 days following chemotherapy, as maintenance treatment. Randomisation was done by means of a telephone call to the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, where staff used a computer programme that implemented a minimisation algorithm with a random element to establish the allocation for the patient at the point of randomisation. Patients were stratified by chemotherapy centre, site of tumour, and tumour stage. The primary outcome for the phase 3 stage of the trial was overall survival (defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause), analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we report the primary analysis results of the trial; all patients have completed treatment and the required number of primary outcome events has been reached. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 46020948, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00450203. FINDINGS Between Oct 31, 2007, and March 25, 2014, 1063 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone (n=533) or chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (n=530). At the time of analysis, 508 deaths were recorded (248 in the chemotherapy alone group and 260 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group). 3-year overall survival was 50·3% (95% CI 45·5-54·9) in the chemotherapy alone group and 48·1% (43·2-52·7) in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·08, 95% CI 0·91-1·29; p=0·36). Apart from neutropenia no other toxic effects were reported at grade 3 or worse severity in more than 10% of patients in either group. Wound healing complications were more prevalent in the bevacizumab group, occurring in 53 (12%) patients in this group compared with 33 (7%) patients in the chemotherapy alone group. In patients who underwent oesophagogastrectomy, post-operative anastomotic leak rates were higher in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group (23 [10%] of 233 in the chemotherapy alone group vs 52 [24%] of 220 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group); therefore, recruitment of patients with lower oesophageal or junctional tumours planned for an oesophagogastric resection was stopped towards the end of the trial. Serious adverse events for all patients included anastomotic leaks (30 events in chemotherapy alone group vs 69 in the chemotherapy plus bevacizumab group), and infections with normal neutrophil count (42 events vs 53). INTERPRETATION The results of this trial do not provide any evidence for the use of bevacizumab in combination with peri-operative epiribicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine chemotherapy for patients with resectable gastric, oesophagogastric junction, or lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Bevacizumab might also be associated with impaired wound healing. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, and F Hoffmann-La Roche Limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cunningham
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Sally P Stenning
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alicia F Okines
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - William H Allum
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sam Rowley
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Stevenson
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Section of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Derek Alderson
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas Crosby
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Michael Griffin
- Northern Oesophagogastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Wasat Mansoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fareeda Y Coxon
- Department of Oncology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen J Falk
- Department of Oncology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Suzanne Darby
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kate A Sumpter
- Department of Oncology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth E Langley
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Biomarker-Based Scoring System for Prediction of Tumor Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59:1174-1182. [PMID: 27824703 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous molecular markers have been investigated to predict tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of biomarkers for the prediction of tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. DESIGN & SETTING Tumor specimens have been collected prospectively from 80 patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection at 8 weeks after completing preoperative chemoradiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES With the use of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis, mRNA expression levels of 7 candidate biomarkers (p53, p21, Ki-67, VEGF, CD133, CD24, and CD44) were evaluated from fresh tumor samples collected before preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The correlation between biomarker expression levels and the pathologic response was assessed based on histopathological staging (pTNM) and tumor regression grade. RESULTS The mRNA expression levels of 4 biomarkers (p53, p21, Ki67, and CD133) significantly correlated with tumor regression grade response and pathologic complete response. Patients showing low expression of p53 and/or high expression of p21, Ki67, and CD133 exhibited a significantly greater tumor regression grade response and pathologic complete response rate. A scoring system devised so that 1 point was given for each biomarker whose expression level correlated with pathologic complete response (score range: 0-4) showed that 9 of 62 patients with scores of 0 to 2 achieved pathologic complete response, whereas 15 of 18 patients with scores of 3 to 4 achieved pathologic complete response (14.5% vs 83.3%, p < 0.001). For prediction of pathologic complete response, the scoring system showed 62.5% sensitivity, 94.6% specificity, an 83.3% positive predictive value, and an 85.5% negative predictive value. LIMITATIONS Small patient numbers have limitations related to the reproducibility and ability to provide quantitative information. In addition, this study lacks test and validation sets. CONCLUSIONS The pretreatment mRNA expression levels of 4 biomarkers correlated with pathologic tumor response after intraoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Furthermore, the scoring system combining values of biomarker expression might have predictive power with high positive and negative predictive values.
Collapse
|
31
|
Avallone A, Pecori B, Bianco F, Aloj L, Tatangelo F, Romano C, Granata V, Marone P, Leone A, Botti G, Petrillo A, Caracò C, Iaffaioli VR, Muto P, Romano G, Comella P, Budillon A, Delrio P. Critical role of bevacizumab scheduling in combination with pre-surgical chemo-radiotherapy in MRI-defined high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the BRANCH trial. Oncotarget 2016; 6:30394-407. [PMID: 26320185 PMCID: PMC4745808 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have previously shown that an intensified preoperative regimen including oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (OXATOM/FUFA) during preoperative pelvic radiotherapy produced promising results in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Preclinical evidence suggests that the scheduling of bevacizumab may be crucial to optimize its combination with chemo-radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This non-randomized, non-comparative, phase II study was conducted in MRI-defined high-risk LARC. Patients received three biweekly cycles of OXATOM/FUFA during RT. Bevacizumab was given 2 weeks before the start of chemo-radiotherapy, and on the same day of chemotherapy for 3 cycles (concomitant-schedule A) or 4 days prior to the first and second cycle of chemotherapy (sequential-schedule B). Primary end point was pathological complete tumor regression (TRG1) rate. RESULTS The accrual for the concomitant-schedule was early terminated because the number of TRG1 (2 out of 16 patients) was statistically inconsistent with the hypothesis of activity (30%) to be tested. Conversely, the endpoint was reached with the sequential-schedule and the final TRG1 rate among 46 enrolled patients was 50% (95% CI 35%-65%). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥ 3 toxicity with both schedules, but it was less pronounced with the sequential than concomitant-schedule (30% vs. 44%). Postoperative complications occurred in 8/15 (53%) and 13/46 (28%) patients in schedule A and B, respectively. At 5 year follow-up the probability of PFS and OS was 80% (95%CI, 66%-89%) and 85% (95%CI, 69%-93%), respectively, for the sequential-schedule. CONCLUSIONS These results highlights the relevance of bevacizumab scheduling to optimize its combination with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy in the management of LARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Avallone
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Biagio Pecori
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Franco Bianco
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Pietro Marone
- Endoscopy Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alessandra Leone
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Gerardo Botti
- Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Corradina Caracò
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo R Iaffaioli
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Muto
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giovanni Romano
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Pasquale Comella
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alfredo Budillon
- Experimental Pharmacology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" - IRCCS, 80131, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Baumann R, Depping R, Delaperriere M, Dunst J. Targeting hypoxia to overcome radiation resistance in head & neck cancers: real challenge or clinical fairytale? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:751-8. [PMID: 27253509 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1192467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor hypoxia is a major cause for failure of therapy in patients with inoperable head and neck cancers. AREAS COVERED Various anti-hypoxic treatment strategies (e.g. hyperbaric oxygenation, hypoxic cell sensitizers) have been tested in clinical trials in head and neck cancer over the past 30 years and have shown modest improvements in combination with radiotherapy in meta-analyses. Anemia worsens tumor hypoxia, but anemia correction had no significant effect. New approaches (e.g. anti-HIF-directed molecular therapies) have just entered early clinical studies and data are lacking. Expert commentary: A new attractive and promising approach derives from recent advances in imaging and radiotherapy delivery. Progress in imaging of hypoxia (e.g. by positron emission tomography) can select patients for specific therapies and may, in particular, facilitate anti-hypoxia-directed radiotherapy which has become feasible with advanced radiotherapy techniques (IMRT with 'dose-painting'). The combination of both methods may offer a powerful tool for effective targeting of hypoxia in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Baumann
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel , Kiel , Germany
| | - Reinhard Depping
- b Institute of Physiology , University of Luebeck , Luebeck , Germany
| | - Marc Delaperriere
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel , Kiel , Germany
| | - Juergen Dunst
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel , Kiel , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Preoperative radiotherapy has an accepted role in reducing the risk of local recurrence in locally advanced resectable rectal cancer, particularly when the circumferential resection margin is breached or threatened, according to magnetic resonance imaging. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation can obtain a significant down-sizing response and a curative resection can then be achieved. Approximately, 20% of the patients can also obtain a pathological complete response, which is associated with less local recurrences and increased survival. Patients who achieve a sustained complete clinical response may also avoid radical surgery. In unresectable or borderline resectable tumors, around 20% of the patients still fail to achieve a sufficient down-staging response with the current chemoradiation schedules. Hence, investigators have aspired to increase pathological complete response rates, aiming to improve curative resection rates, enhance survival, and potentially avoid mutilating surgery. However, adding additional cytotoxic or biological agents have not produced dramatic improvements in outcome and often led to excess surgical morbidity and higher levels of acute toxicity, which effects on compliance and in the global efficacy of chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Habr-Gama A, Fernandez LM, Perez RO. What more do we want from neoadjuvant treatment strategies in rectal cancer? COLORECTAL CANCER 2015. [DOI: 10.2217/crc.15.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Angelita Habr-Gama
- Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura M Fernandez
- Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Hospital Britanico, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Angelita & Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Colorectal Surgery Division, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Focal or combined modality for the management of brain metastasis: did high tech radiotherapy superseded drug-radiotherapy combination? Ann Oncol 2014; 25:2293-2294. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|