1
|
Schouten TJ, van Goor IWJM, Dorland GA, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Los M, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, van Tienhoven GJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Daamen LA. The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4956-4965. [PMID: 38386198 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15070-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel definitions suggest that resectability status for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) should be assessed beyond anatomical criteria, considering both biological and conditional factors. This has, however, yet to be validated on a nationwide scale. This study evaluated the prognostic value of biological and conditional factors for staging of patients with resectable PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A nationwide observational cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent upfront resection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectable PDAC in the Netherlands (2014-2019) with complete information on preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. PDAC was considered biologically unfavorable (RB+) if CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL and favorable (RB-) otherwise. ECOG ≥ 2 was considered conditionally unfavorable (RC+) and favorable otherwise (RC-). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analysis, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Overall, 688 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 20 months (95% CI 19-23). OS was 14 months (95% CI 10 months-median not reached) in 20 RB+C+ patients (3%; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-2.70), 13 months (95% CI 11-15) in 156 RB+C- patients (23%; HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50-2.31), and 21 months (95% CI 12-41) in 47 RB-C+ patients (7%; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62) compared with 24 months (95% CI 22-27) in 465 patients with RB-C- PDAC (68%; reference). CONCLUSIONS Survival after upfront resection of anatomically resectable PDAC is worse in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL, while performance status had no impact. This supports consideration of CA19-9 in preoperative staging of resectable PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Galina A Dorland
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+,, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Jan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franklin O, Sugawara T, Ross RB, Rodriguez Franco S, Colborn K, Karam S, Schulick RD, Del Chiaro M. Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Multiagent Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4966-4975. [PMID: 38789615 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved pancreatic cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. However, whether adjuvant treatment should include radiotherapy is unclear in this setting. METHODS This study queried the National Cancer Database for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019 and received adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (external beam, 45-50.4 gray) was compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression was used to assess survival associations. Analyses were repeated in a propensity score-matched subgroup. RESULTS Of 1983 patients who received adjuvant treatment after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection, 1502 (75.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone and 481 (24.3%) received concomitant adjuvant radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). The patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were younger, were treated at non-academic facilities more often, and had higher rates of lymph node metastasis (ypN1-2), positive resection margins (R1), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI+). The median survival was shorter for the chemoradiotherapy-treated patients according to the unadjusted analysis (26.8 vs 33.2 months; p = 0.0017). After adjustment for confounders, chemoradiotherapy was associated with better outcomes in the multivariable model (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.93; p = 0.008). The association between chemoradiotherapy and improved outcomes was stronger for the patients with grade III tumors (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74) or LVI+ tumors (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75). In a subgroup of 396 propensity-matched patients, chemoradiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit only for the patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors. CONCLUSION After multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for pancreatic cancer, additional adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone is associated with improved survival for patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Franklin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard Blake Ross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathryn Colborn
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sana Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vardevanyan H, Hager M, Renneberg F, Forstner R. Pancreatic infiltrative malignancy masquerading as autoimmune pancreatitis: Case report, review of radiological criteria, and literature. Radiol Case Rep 2024; 19:3496-3502. [PMID: 38881618 PMCID: PMC11179569 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
We report a case of a 44-year-old male patient, who presented to the University Hospital of Salzburg, Austria with abdominal pain, persistent jaundice, and lack of appetite. Radiological work-up (CT, MRI, PET/CT) indicated a suspicious mass of the uncinate process of the pancreatic head with adjacent infiltration and regional lymphadenopathy. The differential diagnosis was between primary pancreatic cancer and focal autoimmune pancreatitis. Further laparoscopic biopsies from multiple areas, showed only fibrous scarring processes, with no malignancy. Treatment with steroids didn't give any benefits. After multiple follow-up CTs and MRs within 6 months-additional biopsies were done, which eventually demonstrated adenocarcinoma. Evidently the cancer diagnosis was much delayed and the patient started receiving chemotherapy, but radical surgery was not possible. Multiple articles and case reports can be found in the literature, that are reviewing the fact that pancreatic inflammatory processes are mimicking pancreatic tumor, but not many articles or case reports are available in the literature, where neoplastic processes are misinterpreted as inflammatory and incorrectly proven with histological examination. One of the main reasons for improper diagnosis is the desmoplastic reaction around the pancreatic malignancy. Another important aspect is the acceptance of histological diagnosis as conclusive, where no opposing arguments are specified, based on radiological criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hovhannes Vardevanyan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Armenian-American Wellness Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Martina Hager
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Salzburg, PMU, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Renneberg
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Salzburg, PMU, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Rosemarie Forstner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Salzburg, PMU, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miyahara S, Takahashi H, Tomimaru Y, Kobayashi S, Sasaki K, Iwagami Y, Yamada D, Akita H, Noda T, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Organ-specific variations in tumor marker dynamics in postoperative pancreatic cancer recurrence: Trends in lung and liver recurrence highlighting biological heterogeneity. Surg Oncol 2024; 55:102103. [PMID: 38986312 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Although tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites. METHODS Patients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence. RESULTS Patients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Both TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Miyahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Akita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marschner N, Haug N, Hegewisch-Becker S, Reiser M, Dörfel S, Lerchenmüller C, Linde H, Wolf T, Hof A, Kaiser-Osterhues A, Potthoff K, Jänicke M. Head-to-head comparison of treatment sequences in advanced pancreatic cancer-Real-world data from the prospective German TPK clinical cohort study. Int J Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38956837 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
There are no clear guidelines regarding the optimal treatment sequence for advanced pancreatic cancer, as head-to-head phase III randomised trials are missing. We assess real-world effectiveness of three common sequential treatment strategies by emulating a hypothetical randomised trial. This analysis included 1551 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 613) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GEMNAB; n = 938) as palliative first-line treatment. We used marginal structural modelling to compare overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between three common first- to second-line treatment sequences, adjusting for time-varying potential confounding. The sequences were: FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and GEMNAB→nanoliposomal irinotecan (NALIRI) + 5-fluorouracil. Outcome was also calculated stratified by patients' prognostic risk according to the Pancreatic Cancer Score. Median OS and TTD of HRQoL independent of risk were 10.7 [8.9, 11.9] and 6.4 [4.8, 7.7] months for FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, 8.4 [7.4, 9.7] and 5.8 [4.6, 7.1] months for GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF and 8.9 [7.8, 10.4] and 4.6 [4.1, 6.1] months for GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil. Compared to FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB, OS and TTD were worse for poor-risk patients with GEMNAB→FOLFOX/OFF (OS: HR 2.09 [1.47, 2.98]; TTD: HR 1.97 [1.19, 3.27]) and those with GEMNAB→NALIRI+5-fluorouracil (OS: HR 1.35, [0.76, 2.39]; TTD: HR 2.62 [1.56, 4.42]). Brackets denote 95%-confidence intervals. The estimated real-world effectiveness of the three treatment sequences evaluated were largely comparable. Poor-risk patients might benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX→GEMNAB in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Future randomised trials on sequential treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Marschner
- Med. Klinik 1, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Haug
- Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Reiser
- PIOH-Praxis Internistische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Köln, Germany
| | | | | | - Hartmut Linde
- MVZ für Blut- und Krebserkrankungen, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Thomas Wolf
- BAG, Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie-Onkologie, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anna Hof
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Martina Jänicke
- Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Modest DP, Heinemann V, Schütt P, Angermeier S, Haberkorn M, Waidmann O, Graeven U, Wille K, Kunzmann V, Henze L, Constantin C, de Wit M, Denzlinger C, Ballhausen A, Kurreck A, Jelas I, Alig AHS, Stahler A, Stintzing S, Oettle H. Sequential therapy of refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer with 5-FU/LV/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) vs. 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin (OFF). The PANTHEON trial (AIO PAK 0116). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:332. [PMID: 38951245 PMCID: PMC11217046 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05827-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this trial compares the efficacy of second-line therapy with FOLFIRI vs. OFF (1:1 randomisation) with cross-over to the vice-versa regimen as third-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death) of second-line therapy. The trial aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of FOLFIRI vs OFF (non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5, power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 196 events needed). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival of third-line therapy and safety. The trial is registered with EudraCT Nr. 2016-004640-11. RESULTS The trial was terminated with 60 evaluable (37 with FOLFIRI, 23 with OFF) patients due to insufficient recruitment. PFS of second-line therapy was 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.6) months with FOLFIRI vs 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.7) months with OFF (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.42, P = 0.43). OS was comparable between the arms (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.66), P = 0.84). Only 4 out of 28 (14%) patients receiving third-line therapy achieved a disease control (partial remission or stable disease). Both second-line regimens were well tolerated without new or unexpected safety signals being observed. CONCLUSION The exploratory analysis of this early terminated trial suggests that FOLFIRI and OFF have similar efficacy ant toxicity as second-line therapy of PDAC after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Third-line therapy regardless of regimen does not provide satisfactory efficacy in this sequential treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Paul Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Volker Heinemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medicine III & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hospital of the University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Angermeier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Waidmann
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Im Prüfling 17-19, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ullrich Graeven
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Klinken Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Kai Wille
- University Clinic for Haematology, Oncology, Haemostaseology and Palliative Care, Johannes Wesling Medical Center Minden, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Volker Kunzmann
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II - IOT, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Larissa Henze
- Department of Medicine, Clinic III, Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christian Constantin
- Department for Oncology and Hematology, Clinical Center Lippe-Lemgo, Lemgo, Germany
| | - Maike de Wit
- Department for Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, VIVANTES Hospital Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alexej Ballhausen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivan Jelas
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annabel Helga Sophie Alig
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arndt Stahler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helmut Oettle
- Practice for Internal Medicine, Joint Practice and Day Clinic, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yasrab M, Thakker S, Wright MJ, Ahmed T, He J, Wolfgang CL, Chu LC, Weiss MJ, Kawamoto S, Johnson PT, Fishman EK, Javed AA. Factors associated with radiological misstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective observational study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2024; 53:458-463. [PMID: 38522966 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate staging of disease is vital in determining appropriate care for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It has been shown that the quality of scans and the experience of a radiologist can impact computed tomography (CT) based assessment of disease. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of the rereading of outside hospital (OH) CT by an expert radiologist and a repeat pancreatic protocol CT (PPCT) on staging of disease. METHODS Patients evaluated at the our institute's pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic (2006 to 2014) with OH scan and repeat PPCT performed within 30 days were included. In-house radiologists staged disease using OH scans and repeat PPCT, and factors associated with misstaging were determined. RESULTS The study included 100 patients, with a median time between OH scan and PPCT of 19 days (IQR: 13-23 days.) Stage migration was mostly accounted for by upstaging of disease (58.8 % to 83.3 %) in all comparison groups. When OH scans were rereviewed, 21.5 % of the misstaging was due to missed metastases, however, when rereads were compared to the PPCT, occult metastases accounted for the majority of misstaged patients (62.5 %). Potential factors associated with misstaging were primarily related to imaging technique. CONCLUSION A repeat PPCT results in increased detection of metastatic disease that rereviews of OH scans may otherwise miss. Accessible insurance coverage for repeat PPCT imaging even within 30 days of an OH scan could help optimize delivery of care and alleviate burdens associated with misstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Yasrab
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sameer Thakker
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Wright
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Taha Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Linda C Chu
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Satomi Kawamoto
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pamela T Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Goor IWJM, Andel PCM, Buijs FS, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Koerkamp BG, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, Meijer G, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Wit F, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Intven MPW, Daamen LA. Prediction of Isolated Local Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15664-4. [PMID: 38937412 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15664-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distinguishing postoperative fibrosis from isolated local recurrence (ILR) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging. A prognostic model that helps to identify patients at risk of ILR can assist clinicians when evaluating patients' postoperative imaging. This nationwide study aimed to develop a clinically applicable prognostic model for ILR after PDAC resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS An observational cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent PDAC resection in the Netherlands (2014-2019; NCT04605237). On the basis of recurrence location (ILR, systemic, or both), multivariable cause-specific Cox-proportional hazard analysis was conducted to identify predictors for ILR and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A predictive model was developed using Akaike's Information Criterion, and bootstrapped discrimination and calibration indices were assessed. RESULTS Among 1194/1693 patients (71%) with recurrence, 252 patients (21%) developed ILR. Independent predictors for ILR were resectability status (borderline versus resectable, HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.03-1.96; P = 0.03, and locally advanced versus resectable, HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.68-1.82; P = 0.66), tumor location (head versus body/tail, HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.00-2.25; P = 0.05), vascular resection (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.41-2.45; P < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01-2.13; P = 0.02), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = 0.02), and resection margin status (R1 < 1 mm versus R0 ≥ 1 mm, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25-2.14; P < 0.001). Moderate performance (concordance index 0.66) with adequate calibration (slope 0.99) was achieved. CONCLUSIONS This nationwide study identified factors predictive of ILR after PDAC resection. Our prognostic model, available through www.pancreascalculator.com , can be utilized to identify patients with a higher a priori risk of developing ILR, providing important information in patient evaluation and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - P C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F S Buijs
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S Festen
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E van der Harst
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - G Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - D Roos
- Department of Surgery, Renier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F Wit
- Department of Surgery, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, The Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Daamen LA, van Goor IWJM, Groot VP, Andel PCM, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, Mohammad NH, Heerkens HD, de Hingh IHJT, Hoogwater F, van Laarhoven HWM, Los M, Meijer GJ, de Meijer VE, Pande R, Roberts KJ, Stoker J, Stommel MWJ, van Tienhoven G, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, Wessels FJ, Wilmink JW, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Intven MPW, Molenaar IQ. Recurrent disease detection after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using a recurrence-focused surveillance strategy (RADAR-PANC): protocol of an international randomized controlled trial according to the Trials within Cohorts design. Trials 2024; 25:401. [PMID: 38902836 PMCID: PMC11188210 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease recurrence remains one of the biggest concerns in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, most patients experience local and/or distant PDAC recurrence within 2 years. High-level evidence regarding the benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance after PDAC resection is missing, and the impact of early detection and treatment of recurrence on survival and quality of life is unknown. In most European countries, recurrence-focused follow-up after surgery for PDAC is currently lacking. Consequently, guidelines regarding postoperative surveillance are based on expert opinion and other low-level evidence. The recent emergence of more potent local and systemic treatment options for PDAC recurrence has increased interest in early diagnosis. To determine whether early detection and treatment of recurrence can lead to improved survival and quality of life, we designed an international randomized trial. METHODS This randomized controlled trial is nested within an existing prospective cohort in pancreatic cancer centers in the Netherlands (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project; PACAP) and the United Kingdom (UK) (Pancreas Cancer: Observations of Practice and survival; PACOPS) according to the "Trials within Cohorts" (TwiCs) design. All PACAP/PACOPS participants with a macroscopically radical resection (R0-R1) of histologically confirmed PDAC, who provided informed consent for TwiCs and participation in quality of life questionnaires, are included. Participants randomized to the intervention arm are offered recurrence-focused surveillance, existing of clinical evaluation, serum cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 testing, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of chest and abdomen every three months during the first 2 years after surgery. Participants in the control arm of the study will undergo non-standardized clinical follow-up, generally consisting of clinical follow-up with imaging and serum tumor marker testing only in case of onset of symptoms, according to local practice in the participating hospital. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include quality of life, patterns of recurrence, compliance to and costs of recurrence-focused follow-up, and the impact on recurrence-focused treatment. DISCUSSION The RADAR-PANC trial will be the first randomized controlled trial to generate high level evidence for the current clinical equipoise regarding the value of recurrence-focused postoperative surveillance with serial tumor marker testing and routine imaging in patients after PDAC resection. The Trials within Cohort design allows us to study the acceptability of recurrence-focused surveillance among cohort participants and increases the generalizability of findings to the general population. While it is strongly encouraged to offer all trial participants treatment at time of recurrence diagnosis, type and timing of treatment will be determined through shared decision-making. This might reduce the potential survival benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance, although insights into the impact on patients' quality of life will be obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04875325 . Registered on May 6, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Division of Imaging, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
| | - V P Groot
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - P C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H D Heerkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - F Hoogwater
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R Pande
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K J Roberts
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Stoker
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yao S, Yao D, Huang Y, Qin S, Chen Q. A machine learning model based on clinical features and ultrasound radiomics features for pancreatic tumor classification. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1381822. [PMID: 38957447 PMCID: PMC11218542 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1381822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to construct a machine learning model using clinical variables and ultrasound radiomics features for the prediction of the benign or malignant nature of pancreatic tumors. Methods 242 pancreatic tumor patients who were hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 2020 and June 2023 were included in this retrospective study. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=169) and a test cohort (n=73). We collected 28 clinical features from the patients. Concurrently, 306 radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images of the patients' tumors. Initially, a clinical model was constructed using the logistic regression algorithm. Subsequently, radiomics models were built using SVM, random forest, XGBoost, and KNN algorithms. Finally, we combined clinical features with a new feature RAD prob calculated by applying radiomics model to construct a fusion model, and developed a nomogram based on the fusion model. Results The performance of the fusion model surpassed that of both the clinical and radiomics models. In the training cohort, the fusion model achieved an AUC of 0.978 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) during 5-fold cross-validation and an AUC of 0.925 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98) in the test cohort. Calibration curve and decision curve analyses demonstrated that the nomogram constructed from the fusion model has high accuracy and clinical utility. Conclusion The fusion model containing clinical and ultrasound radiomics features showed excellent performance in predicting the benign or malignant nature of pancreatic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunhan Yao
- Medical College, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dunwei Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The People’s Hospital of Baise, Baise, China
| | - Yuanxiang Huang
- School of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
| | - Shanyu Qin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Qingfeng Chen
- School of Computer, Electronic and Information, Guangxi University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stoop TF, Oba A, Wu YHA, Beaty LE, Colborn KL, Janssen BV, Al-Musawi MH, Franco SR, Sugawara T, Franklin O, Jain A, Saiura A, Sauvanet A, Coppola A, Javed AA, Groot Koerkamp B, Miller BN, Mack CE, Hashimoto D, Caputo D, Kleive D, Sereni E, Belfiori G, Ichida H, van Dam JL, Dembinski J, Akahoshi K, Roberts KJ, Tanaka K, Labori KJ, Falconi M, House MG, Sugimoto M, Tanabe M, Gotohda N, Krohn PS, Burkhart RA, Thakkar RG, Pande R, Dokmak S, Hirano S, Burgdorf SK, Crippa S, van Roessel S, Satoi S, White SA, Hackert T, Nguyen TK, Yamamoto T, Nakamura T, Bachu V, Burns WR, Inoue Y, Takahashi Y, Ushida Y, Aslami ZV, Verbeke CS, Fariña A, He J, Wilmink JW, Messersmith W, Verheij J, Kaplan J, Schulick RD, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M. Pathological Complete Response in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Preoperative Chemotherapy. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417625. [PMID: 38888920 PMCID: PMC11185983 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, leading to pathological complete response (pCR) in a small subset of patients. However, multicenter studies with in-depth data about pCR are lacking. Objective To investigate the incidence, outcome, and risk factors of pCR after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational, international, multicenter cohort study assessed all consecutive patients with pathology-proven localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) in 19 centers from 8 countries (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018). Data collection was performed from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, and analyses from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Median follow-up was 19 months. Exposures Preoperative chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) followed by resection. Main Outcomes and Measures The incidence of pCR (defined as absence of vital tumor cells in the sampled pancreas specimen after resection), its association with OS from surgery, and factors associated with pCR. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and pCR were investigated with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, respectively. Results Overall, 1758 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; 879 [50.0%] male) were studied. The rate of pCR was 4.8% (n = 85), and pCR was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.83). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95%, 82%, and 63% in patients with pCR vs 80%, 46%, and 30% in patients without pCR, respectively (P < .001). Factors associated with pCR included preoperative multiagent chemotherapy other than (m)FOLFIRINOX ([modified] leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.87), preoperative conventional radiotherapy (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.00-4.10), preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (OR, 8.91; 95% CI, 4.17-19.05), radiologic response (OR, 13.00; 95% CI, 7.02-24.08), and normal(ized) serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after preoperative therapy (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.79-7.89). Conclusions and Relevance This international, retrospective cohort study found that pCR occurred in 4.8% of patients with resected localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Although pCR does not reflect cure, it is associated with improved OS, with a doubled 5-year OS of 63% compared with 30% in patients without pCR. Factors associated with pCR related to preoperative chemo(radio)therapy regimens and anatomical and biological disease response features may have implications for treatment strategies that require validation in prospective studies because they may not universally apply to all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y. H. Andrew Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laurel E. Beaty
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Kathryn L. Colborn
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Boris V. Janssen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed H. Al-Musawi
- Clinical Trials of Office, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Salvador Rodriguez Franco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Oskar Franklin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ajay Jain
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Ammar A. Javed
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Braden N. Miller
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Claudia E. Mack
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Damiano Caputo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabetta Sereni
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Truty, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jacob L. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Keiichi Akahoshi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kimitaka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Knut J. Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Michael G. House
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Motokazu Sugimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Paul S. Krohn
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rohan G. Thakkar
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Stefan K. Burgdorf
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milano, Italy
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Steven A. White
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Trang K. Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Toru Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Vismaya Bachu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William R. Burns
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Ushida
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Zohra V. Aslami
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Caroline S. Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arantza Fariña
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wells Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Kaplan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - Richard D. Schulick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kosinski J, Sechi A, Hain J, Villwock S, Ha SA, Hauschulz M, Rose M, Steib F, Ortiz‐Brüchle N, Heij L, Maas SL, van der Vorst EPC, Knoesel T, Altendorf‐Hofmann A, Simon R, Sauter G, Bednarsch J, Jonigk D, Dahl E. ITIH5 as a multifaceted player in pancreatic cancer suppression, impairing tyrosine kinase signaling, cell adhesion and migration. Mol Oncol 2024; 18:1486-1509. [PMID: 38375974 PMCID: PMC11161730 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 5 (ITIH5) has been identified as a metastasis suppressor gene in pancreatic cancer. Here, we analyzed ITIH5 promoter methylation and protein expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and three tissue microarray cohorts (n = 618), respectively. Cellular effects, including cell migration, focal adhesion formation and protein tyrosine kinase activity, induced by forced ITIH5 expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines were studied in stable transfectants. ITIH5 promoter hypermethylation was associated with unfavorable prognosis, while immunohistochemistry demonstrated loss of ITIH5 in the metastatic setting and worsened overall survival. Gain-of-function models showed a significant reduction in migration capacity, but no alteration in proliferation. Focal adhesions in cells re-expressing ITIH5 exhibited a smaller and more rounded phenotype, typical for slow-moving cells. An impressive increase of acetylated alpha-tubulin was observed in ITIH5-positive cells, indicating more stable microtubules. In addition, we found significantly decreased activities of kinases related to focal adhesion. Our results indicate that loss of ITIH5 in pancreatic cancer profoundly affects its molecular profile: ITIH5 potentially interferes with a variety of oncogenic signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT pathway. This may lead to altered cell migration and focal adhesion formation. These cellular alterations may contribute to the metastasis-inhibiting properties of ITIH5 in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kosinski
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Antonio Sechi
- Department of Cell and Tumor BiologyRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
| | - Johanna Hain
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Sophia Villwock
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Stefanie Anh Ha
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Maximilian Hauschulz
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Michael Rose
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Florian Steib
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Nadina Ortiz‐Brüchle
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
| | - Lara Heij
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital EssenGermany
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Medical FacultyRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Department of PathologyErasmus Medical Center RotterdamThe Netherlands
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in MetabolismMaastricht UniversityThe Netherlands
| | - Sanne L. Maas
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), Institute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR)Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
| | - Emiel P. C. van der Vorst
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), Institute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR)Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK)Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University MunichGermany
| | - Thomas Knoesel
- Institute of PathologyLudwig‐Maximilians‐University MunichGermany
| | | | - Ronald Simon
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfGermany
| | - Guido Sauter
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfGermany
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Medical FacultyRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
| | - Danny Jonigk
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
- RWTH centralized Biomaterial Bank (RWTH cBMB)Medical Faculty of the RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), BREATHHanoverGermany
| | - Edgar Dahl
- Institute of PathologyMedical Faculty of RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD)Germany
- RWTH centralized Biomaterial Bank (RWTH cBMB)Medical Faculty of the RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reike MJ, Bahlburg H, Brehmer M, Berg S, Noldus J, Roghmann F, Bach P, Tully KH. Side effects of drug-antibody conjugates enfortumab-vedotin and sacituzumab-govitecan in targeted therapy in cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 90:102574. [PMID: 38657392 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab-govitecan are new drugs in the treatment of urologic tumors, whose safety profile has not been fully investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate adverse events related to both agents reported to VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database. METHODS We employed Bayesian disproportionality analysis based on the information component (IC) to explore the safety profile associated with both therapies. Additionally, we used the proportional reporting ratio approach to examine the safety profile further. RESULTS We identified 41,752 reports connected to ADC therapy (EV: n=5359; SG: n=36,393). In the EV subgroup, most reports were associated with dermatologic (38.6%), neurologic adverse events (16.5%), or adverse laboratory assessments (19.4%). In contrast, reports in the SG subgroup were mainly associated with gastrointestinal adverse events (24.2%) and adverse laboratory assessments (39.0%). Adverse laboratory assessments in both cohorts were often based on haematotoxic adverse events. CONCLUSION We could provide a comprehensive real-world safety profile of EV and SG using a global pharmacovigilance database. Based on the safety signals explored in this study, further research regarding the impact of these side effects on patient outcomes is justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz J Reike
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Henning Bahlburg
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Mirco Brehmer
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Sebastian Berg
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Peter Bach
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bilreiro C, Andrade L, Santiago I, Marques RM, Matos C. Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100553. [PMID: 38357385 PMCID: PMC10864763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning. Review aims and findings This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested. Conclusion Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bilreiro
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luísa Andrade
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Santiago
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rui Mateus Marques
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
- Radiology Department, Hospital de S. José, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Celso Matos
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tran KV, Vo NP, Nguyen HS, Vo NT, Thai TBT, Pham VA, Loh EW, Tam KW. Palliative procedures for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38641337 DOI: 10.1055/a-2309-7683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) remains uncertain. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively investigate the efficacy and safety of four palliative treatments for malignant GOO: gastrojejunostomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PGJ), and endoscopic stenting. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the four treatments for malignant GOO. We included studies that reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: clinical success, 30-day mortality, reintervention rate, or length of hospital stay. Evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs was naïve combined to perform network meta-analysis through the frequentist approach using an inverse variance model. Treatments were ranked by P score. RESULTS This network meta-analysis included 3617 patients from 4 RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 32 retrospective cohort studies. PGJ was the optimal approach in terms of clinical success and reintervention (P scores: 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). EUS-GE had the highest probability of being the optimal treatment in terms of 30-day mortality and complications (P scores: 0.82 and 0.99, respectively). Cluster ranking to combine the P scores for 30-day mortality and reintervention indicated the benefits of PGJ and EUS-GE (cophenetic correlation coefficient: 0.94; PGJ and EUS-GE were in the same cluster). CONCLUSION PGJ and EUS-GE are recommended for malignant GOO. PGJ could be the alternative choice in centers with limited resources or in patients who are unsuitable for EUS-GE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khoi Van Tran
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Nguyen-Phong Vo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Hung Song Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
- Intensive Care Unit Department, Children's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Nhi Thi Vo
- Faculty of Nursing, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - Thi Bao Trang Thai
- International PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Vu Anh Pham
- Department of Surgery, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Viet Nam
| | - El-Wui Loh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ang A, Michaelides A, Chelala C, Ullah D, Kocher HM. Prognostication for recurrence patterns after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:248-261. [PMID: 38556877 PMCID: PMC11128784 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims This study aimed to investigate patterns and factors affecting recurrence after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC (2011-21) and consented to data and tissue collection (Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank) were followed up until May 2023. Clinico-pathological variables were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of 91 people (42 males [46%]; median age, 71 years [range, 43-86 years]) with a median follow-up of 51 months (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 40-61 months), the recurrence rate was 72.5% (n = 66; 12 loco-regional alone, 11 liver alone, 5 lung alone, 3 peritoneal alone, 29 simultaneous loco-regional and distant metastases, and 6 multi-focal distant metastases at first recurrence diagnosis). The median time to recurrence was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.6-10.5 months). Median survival after recurrence was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.3 months). Stratification by recurrence location revealed significant differences in time to recurrence between loco-regional only recurrence (median, 13.6 months; 95% CI, 11.7-15.5 months) and simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence (median, 7.5 months; 95% CI, 4.6-10.4 months; p = 0.02, pairwise log-rank test). Significant predictors for recurrence were systemic inflammation index (SII) ≥ 500 (hazard ratio [HR], 4.5; 95% CI, 1.4-14.3), lymph node ratio ≥ 0.33 (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Conclusions Timing to loco-regional only recurrence was significantly longer than simultaneous loco-regional with distant recurrence. Significant predictors for recurrence were SII, lymph node ration, and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Ang
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Athena Michaelides
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Claude Chelala
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Dayem Ullah
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Hemant M. Kocher
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kodama T, Imajima T, Shimokawa M, Otsuka T, Kawahira M, Nakazawa J, Hori T, Shibuki T, Arima S, Ido A, Miwa K, Okabe Y, Koga F, Ueda Y, Kubotsu Y, Shimokawa H, Takeshita S, Nishikawa K, Komori A, Otsu S, Hosokawa A, Sakai T, Sakai K, Oda H, Kawahira M, Arita S, Honda T, Taguchi H, Tsuneyoshi K, Kawaguchi Y, Fujita T, Sakae T, Shirakawa T, Mizuta T, Mitsugi K. A multicenter retrospective observational NAPOLEON2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12422. [PMID: 38816500 PMCID: PMC11139902 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63172-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (NFF) is a standard regimen after gemcitabine-based therapy for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, there are limited clinical data on its efficacy and safety in the real-world. We therefore initiated a retrospective and prospective observational study (NAPOLEON-2). The results of the retrospective part were reported herein. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 161 consecutive patients who received NFF as second-or-later-line regimen. The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the other endpoints were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), dose intensity, and adverse events (AEs). The median age was 67 years (range, 38-85 years). The median OS and PFS were 8.1 and 3.4 months, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 5% and 52%, respectively. The median relative dose intensity was 81.6% for nanoliposomal irinotecan and 82.9% for fluorouracil. Grade 3 or 4 hematological and nonhematological AEs occurred in 47 and 42 patients, respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (24%), anorexia (12%), and leukocytopenia (12%). Subanalysis of patients treated with second-line and third-or-later-line demonstrated no statistical significant difference in OS (7.6 months vs. 9.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.35; p = 0.68). In conclusion, NFF has acceptable efficacy and safety profile even in real-world clinical settings. The prospective study is in progress to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoko Kodama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-Cho, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan
| | - Takashi Imajima
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sasebo Kyosai Hospital, 10-17 Shimanji-Cho, Sasebo-Shi, Nagasaki, 857-8575, Japan
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi‑ku, Fukuoka-Shi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Shimokawa
- Clinical Research Institute, National Kyushu Cancer Center, 3-1-1 Notame, Minami-Ku, Fukuoka-Shi, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
- Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minamikogushi, Ube-Shi, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan
| | - Taiga Otsuka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Minato Medical Clinic, 3-11-3 Nagahama, Chuo-Ku, Fukuoka-Shi, Fukuoka, 810-0072, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kawahira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-Cho, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan
| | - Junichi Nakazawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-Cho, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan
| | - Takeshi Hori
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-Cho, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan
| | - Taro Shibuki
- Department for the Promotion of Drug and Diagnostic Development, Division of Drug and Diagnostic Development Promotion, Translational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-Shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-Shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Shiho Arima
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Akio Ido
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Keisuke Miwa
- Multidisciplinary Treatment Cancer Center, Kurume University Hospital, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume-Shi, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Okabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume-Shi, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Futa Koga
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatology, Saga Medical Center Koseikan, 400 Kase-Machi, Saga-Shi, Saga, 840-8571, Japan
| | - Yujiro Ueda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, 2-1-1 Nagamine-Minami, Higashi-Ku, Kumamoto-Shi, Kumamoto, 861-8520, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Kubotsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Karatsu Red Cross Hospital, 2430 Watada, Karatsu-Shi, Saga, 847-8588, Japan
| | - Hozumi Shimokawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Kyushu Hospital, 1-8-1 Kishinoura, Yahatanishi-Ku, Kitakyushu-Shi, Fukuoka, 806-8501, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Takeshita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, 3-15 Morimachi, Nagasaki-Shi, Nagasaki, 852-8511, Japan
| | - Kazuo Nishikawa
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-Machi, Yufu-Shi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Azusa Komori
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-Machi, Yufu-Shi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minamiumemoto-Machi, Matsuyama-Shi, Ehime, 791-0280, Japan
| | - Satoshi Otsu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama-Machi, Yufu-Shi, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Ayumu Hosokawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, 5200 Kiyotakechoukihara, Miyazaki-Shi, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Sakai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, 1-5 Ninomaru, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto-Shi, Kumamoto, 860-0008, Japan
| | - Kenji Sakai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, 1-5 Ninomaru, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto-Shi, Kumamoto, 860-0008, Japan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Hitoyoshi Medical Center, 35 Oikamimachi, Hitoyoshi-Shi, Kumamoto, 868-8555, Japan
| | - Hisanobu Oda
- Division of Integrative Medical Oncology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, 5-3-1 Chikami, Minami-Ku, Kumamoto-Shi, Kumamoto, 861-4193, Japan
| | - Machiko Kawahira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima Kouseiren Hospital, 1-13-1 Yojirou, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-0062, Japan
| | - Shuji Arita
- Department of Chemotherapy, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, 5-30 Kita-Takamatsucho, Miyazaki, 880-8510, Japan
| | - Takuya Honda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-Shi, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| | - Hiroki Taguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Izumi General Medical Center, 520 Myoujin-Cho, Izumi-Shi, Kagoshima, 899-0131, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-Cho, Kagoshima-Shi, Kagoshima, 890-8760, Japan
| | - Kengo Tsuneyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Izumi General Medical Center, 520 Myoujin-Cho, Izumi-Shi, Kagoshima, 899-0131, Japan
| | - Yasunori Kawaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asakura Medical Association Hospital, 422-1 Raiha, Asakura-Shi, Fukuoka, 838-0069, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Fujita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Sendai Hospital, 2-46 Harada-Cho, Satsumasendai-Shi, Kagoshima, 895-0074, Japan
| | - Takahiro Sakae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Sendai Hospital, 2-46 Harada-Cho, Satsumasendai-Shi, Kagoshima, 895-0074, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Shirakawa
- Department of Medical Checkup Center, Eikoh Hospital, 3-8-15 Befu-Nishi, Shime-Machi, Kasuya-Gun, Fukuoka, 811-2232, Japan.
- Clinical Hematology Oncology Treatment Study Group, 1-14-6 Muromi-Gaoka, Nishi-Ku, Fukuoka-Shi, Fukuoka, 819-0030, Japan.
| | - Toshihiko Mizuta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fujikawa Hospital, 1-2-6 Matsubara, Saga-Shi, Saga, 840-0831, Japan
| | - Kenji Mitsugi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sasebo Kyosai Hospital, 10-17 Shimanji-Cho, Sasebo-Shi, Nagasaki, 857-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paramythiotis D, Karlafti E, Tsavdaris D, Arvanitakis K, Protopapas AA, Germanidis G, Kougias L, Hatzidakis A, Savopoulos C, Michalopoulos A. Comparative Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies vs. Percutaneous Biopsies of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3108. [PMID: 38892819 PMCID: PMC11172871 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer ranks as the fourth deadliest form of cancer. However, it is essential to note that not all pancreatic masses signal primary malignancy. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the correct differential diagnosis, a process further supported by pre-operative biopsy procedures. This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic performance of two minimally invasive biopsy approaches for pancreatic tissue sampling: percutaneous biopsies guided by computed tomography or ultrasound, and transduodenal biopsies guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The included studies analyzed the diagnostic performance of the two biopsy methods, and they were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Statistical analysis was carried out using the RevMan and MetaDisc software packages. Results: The statistical analysis of the results demonstrated the superiority of the percutaneous approach. Specifically, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-and DOR for the percutaneous approach were 0.896 [95% CI: 0.878-0.913], 0.949 [95% CI: 0.892-0.981], 9.70 [95% CI: 5.20-18.09], 0.20 [95% CI: 0.12-0.32] and 68.55 [95% CI: 32.63-143.98], respectively. The corresponding values for EUS-guided biopsies were 0.806 [95% CI: 0.775-0.834], 0.955 [95% CI: 0.926-0.974], 12.04 [95% CI: 2.67-54.17], 0.24 [95% CI: 0.15-0.39] and 52.56 [95% CI: 13.81-200.09], respectively. Nevertheless, it appears that this statistical superiority is also linked to the selection bias favoring larger and hence more readily accessible tumors during percutaneous biopsy procedures. Conclusions: Concisely, our meta-analysis indicates the statistical superiority of the percutaneous approach. However, selecting the optimal biopsy method is complex, influenced by factors like patient and tumor characteristics, clinical resources, and other relevant considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Paramythiotis
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| | - Eleni Karlafti
- Emergency Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Dimitrios Tsavdaris
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| | - Konstantinos Arvanitakis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Adonis A. Protopapas
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Georgios Germanidis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (K.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Leonidas Kougias
- Department of Radiology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Adam Hatzidakis
- Department of Radiology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Christos Savopoulos
- First Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.A.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Antonios Michalopoulos
- First Propaedeutic Surgery Department, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (D.P.); (D.T.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brown NF, Murray ER, Cutmore LC, Howard P, Masterson L, Zammarchi F, Hartley JA, van Berkel PH, Marshall JF. Integrin-αvβ6 targeted peptide-toxin therapy in a novel αvβ6-expressing immunocompetent model of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2024; 24:445-455. [PMID: 38519394 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Previously we reported that a novel αvβ6-specific peptide-drug conjugate (SG3299) could eliminate established human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) xenografts. However the development of effective therapies for PDAC, which is an essential need, must show efficacy in relevant immunocompetent animals. Previously we reported that the KPC mouse transgenic PDAC model that closely recapitulates most stages of development of human PDAC, unlike in humans, failed to express αvβ6 on their tumours or metastases. In this study we have taken the KPC-derived PDAC line TB32043 and engineered a variant line (TB32043mb6S2) that expresses mouse integrin αvβ6. We report that orthotopic implantation of the αvβ6 over-expressing TB32043mb6S2 cells promotes shorter overall survival and increase in metastases. Moreover, systemic treatment of mice with established TB32043mb6S2 tumours in the pancreas with SG2399 lived significantly longer (p < 0.001; mean OS 48d) compared with PBS or control SG3511 (mean OS 25.5d and 26d, respectively). Thus SG3299 is confirmed as a promising candidate therapeutic for the therapy of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas F Brown
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Elizabeth R Murray
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Lauren C Cutmore
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Philip Howard
- Spirogen, QMB Innovation Centre, 42 New Road, London, E1 2AX, UK
| | - Luke Masterson
- Spirogen, QMB Innovation Centre, 42 New Road, London, E1 2AX, UK
| | - Francesca Zammarchi
- ADC Therapeutics (UK) Ltd, Translation & Innovation Hub Building, Imperial College White City Campus, 84 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK
| | - John A Hartley
- Cancer Research UK Drug-DNA Interactions Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Patrick H van Berkel
- ADC Therapeutics (UK) Ltd, Translation & Innovation Hub Building, Imperial College White City Campus, 84 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK
| | - John F Marshall
- Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bilreiro C, Andrade L, Marques RM, Matos C. Diffusion-weighted imaging for determining response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3238-3248. [PMID: 37907761 PMCID: PMC11126427 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10381-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to assess response to NAT. Data extracted included ADC pre- and post-NAT, for predicting response as defined by imaging, histopathology, or clinical reference standards. ADC values were compared with standardized mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2). RESULTS Of 337 studies, 7 were included in the analysis (161 patients). ADC values reported for the pre- and post-NAT assessments overlapped between responders and non-responders. One study reported inability of ADC increase after NAT for distinguishing responders and non-responders. A correlation with histopathological response was reported for pre- and post-NAT ADC in 4 studies. DWI's diagnostic performance was reported to be high in three studies, with a 91.6-100% sensitivity and 62.5-94.7% specificity. Finally, heterogeneity and high risk of bias were identified across studies, affecting the domains of patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. CONCLUSION DWI might be useful for determining response to NAT in pancreatic cancer. However, there are still too few studies on this matter, which are also heterogeneous and at high risk for bias. Further studies with standardized procedures for data acquisition and accurate reference standards are needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Diffusion-weighted MRI might be useful for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer. However, further studies with robust data are needed to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice. KEY POINTS •The role of DWI with ADC measurements for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer is still unclear. •Pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy ADC values overlap between responders and non-responders. •DWI has a reported high diagnostic performance for determining response when using histopathological or clinical reference standards; however, studies are still few and at high risk for bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bilreiro
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Luísa Andrade
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rui Mateus Marques
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
- Radiology Department, Hospital de S. José, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Celso Matos
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lu B, Chen Y, Qin S, Chen J. Value of preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic head cancer patients with severe obstructive jaundice: A multicenter retrospective study. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:154-161. [PMID: 37988064 PMCID: PMC11198917 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_296_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic head cancer accompanied by obstructive jaundice is a common clinical situation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on clinical outcomes in patients with severe obstructive jaundice. METHODS Patients with a bilirubin level of ≥250 μmol/L at diagnosis who underwent PBD were included. The primary endpoints and secondary endpoints were the postoperative severe complications rates. Secondary endpoints were the degree of improvement in general condition, predictors of severe postoperative complications, and the impact of PBD on patients with bilirubin levels >300 μmol/L. RESULTS In total, 289 patients were included, and 188 patients (65.1%) underwent PBD. The patients who met the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification II-III stages decreased from 119 to 100 ( P = 0.047) after PBD. The overall severe complications were significantly more frequent in the direct surgery (DS) group than in the PBD group (34.7% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.031), especially the postoperative hemorrhage (6/43 [14.0%] vs. 9/35 [25.7%], P = 0.038) and intra-abdominal infection (6/43 [14.0%] vs. 10/35 [28.6%], P = 0.018). The ASA classifications II-III (odds ratio [OR]=2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-4.31), P = 0.01) and DS (OR = 3.65, 95% CI: 1.45-7.08; P = 0.003) were independently associated with severe postoperative complications. The occurrence rate of severe postoperative complications in patients with a bilirubin level >300 μmol/L who underwent PBD was significantly lower than in patients who underwent DS (25.6% vs. 40.6%, P = 0.028), but the benefit of PBD was not observed in patients who had a bilirubin level between 250 and 300 μmol/L. CONCLUSION PBD is useful in reducing severe postoperative complications, especially in patients with bilirubin levels >300 μmol/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Lu
- Second Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Armed Police Force Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Rudong County People’s Hospital, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Songyuan Qin
- Second Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Armed Police Force Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiansheng Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing University School of Medicine, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abdelrahim M, Esmail A, Kasi A, Esnaola NF, Xiu J, Baca Y, Weinberg BA. Comparative molecular profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head versus body and tail. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:85. [PMID: 38582894 PMCID: PMC10998911 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00571-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head (H) and body/tail (B/T) differ in embryonic origin, cell composition, blood supply, lymphatic and venous drainage, and innervation. We aimed to compare the molecular and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) profiles of PDAC of the H vs. B/T. A total of 3499 PDAC samples were analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS) of RNA (whole transcriptome, NovaSeq), DNA (NextSeq, 592 genes or NovaSeq, whole exome sequencing), and immunohistochemistry (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Significance was determined as p values adjusted for multiple corrections (q) of <0.05. Anatomic subsites of PDAC tumors were grouped by primary tumor sites into H (N = 2058) or B/T (N = 1384). There were significantly more metastatic tumors profiled from B/T vs. H (57% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). KRAS mutations (93.8% vs. 90.2%), genomic loss of heterozygosity (12.7% vs. 9.1%), and several copy number alterations (FGF3, FGF4, FGF19, CCND1, ZNF703, FLT4, MUTYH, TNFRS14) trended higher in B/T when compared to H (p < 0.05 but q > 0.05). Expression analysis of immuno-oncology (IO)-related genes showed significantly higher expression of CTLA4 and PDCD1 in H (q < 0.05, fold change 1.2 and 1.3) and IDO1 and PDCD1LG2 expression trended higher in B/T (p < 0.05, fold change 0.95). To our knowledge, this is one of the largest cohorts of PDAC tumors subjected to broad molecular profiling. Differences in IO-related gene expression and TIME cell distribution suggest that response to IO therapies may differ in PDAC arising from H vs. B/T. Subtle differences in the genomic profiles of H vs. B/T tumors were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maen Abdelrahim
- Section of GI Oncology, Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center and Cockrell Center for Advanced Therapeutics, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdullah Esmail
- Section of GI Oncology, Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center and Cockrell Center for Advanced Therapeutics, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anup Kasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Nestor F Esnaola
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Benjamin A Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Woeltjen MM, Niehoff JH, Roggel R, Michael AE, Gerdes B, Surov A, Borggrefe J, Kroeger JR. Pancreatic cancer in photon-counting CT: Low keV virtual monoenergetic images improve tumor conspicuity. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173:111374. [PMID: 38422607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of the study was to identify differences in the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in different monoenergetic or polyenergetic reconstructions and contrast phases in photon-counting CT (PCCT). MATERIAL AND METHODS 34 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Quantitative image analysis was performed with region of interest (ROI) measurements in different monoenergetic levels ranging from 40 up to 70 keV (5-point steps) and polyenergetic series. Tumor-parenchyma attenuation differences and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were calculated. A qualitative image analysis was accomplished by 4 radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "not recognizable" up to 5 = "easy recognizable"). Differences between groups were evaluated for statistical significance using the Friedman test and in case of significant differences pair-wise post-hoc testing with Bonferroni correction was applied. RESULTS Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly different between the different image reconstructions for both arterial- and portal-venous-phase-images (p < 0.001). Tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on arterial-phase-images at mono40keV compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono55keV images or higher (p < 0.001). For portal-venous-phase-images tumor-parenchyma attenuation difference was significantly higher on mono40keV images compared to polyenergetic images (p < 0.001) and mono50keV images (p = 0.03) or higher (p < 0.001). The same trend was seen for CNR. Tumor conspicuity was rated best on mono40keV images with 4.3 ± 0.9 for arterial-phase-images and 4.3 ± 1.1 for portal-venous-phase-images. In contrast, overall image quality was rated best on polyenergetic-images with 4.8 ± 0.5 for arterial-phase-images and 4.7 ± 0.6 for portal-venous-phase-images. CONCLUSION Low keV virtual monoenergetic images significantly improve the tumor conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinomas in PCCT based on quantitative and qualitative results. On the other hand, readers prefer polyenergetic images for overall image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Michael Woeltjen
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Julius Henning Niehoff
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ruth Roggel
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Arwed Elias Michael
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Berthold Gerdes
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Thoracic- and Endocrine Surgery, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Alexey Surov
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jan Borggrefe
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jan Robert Kroeger
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Willems RAL, Biesmans C, Campello E, Simioni P, de Laat B, de Vos-Geelen J, Roest M, Ten Cate H. Cellular Components Contributing to the Development of Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost 2024; 50:429-442. [PMID: 38049115 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive type of cancer and has a poor prognosis. Patients with PDAC are at high risk of developing thromboembolic events, which is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following cancer progression. Plasma-derived coagulation is the most studied process in cancer-associated thrombosis. Other blood components, such as platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells, have been gaining less attention. This narrative review addresses the literature on the role of cellular components in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with PDAC. Blood cells seem to play an important role in the development of VTE. Altered blood cell counts, i.e., leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and anemia, have been found to associate with VTE risk. Tumor-related activation of leukocytes leads to the release of tissue factor-expressing microvesicles and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, initiating coagulation and forming a scaffold for thrombi. Tissue factor-expressing microvesicles are also thought to be released by PDAC cells. PDAC cells have been shown to stimulate platelet activation and aggregation, proposedly via the secretion of podoplanin and mucins. Hypofibrinolysis, partially explained by increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity, is observed in PDAC. In short, PDAC-associated hypercoagulability is a complex and multifactorial process. A better understanding of cellular contributions to hypercoagulability might lead to the improvement of diagnostic tests to identify PDAC patients at highest risk of VTE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Anne Laura Willems
- Department of Functional Coagulation, Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Thrombosis Expert Center Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Biesmans
- Department of Functional Coagulation, Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Thrombosis Expert Center Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Campello
- General Medicine and Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Simioni
- General Medicine and Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Bas de Laat
- Department of Functional Coagulation, Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Platelet Pathophysiology, Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Roest
- Department of Platelet Pathophysiology, Synapse Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Thrombosis Expert Center Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM, School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Imamura H, Tomimaru Y, Kobayashi S, Yamada D, Noda T, Takahashi H, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Diagnostic impact of postoperative CA19-9 dynamics on pancreatic cancer recurrence: a single-institution retrospective study. Updates Surg 2024; 76:479-486. [PMID: 38349569 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Postoperative CA19-9 elevation after pancreatic cancer resection suggests recurrence but can also occur in benign conditions. This study aimed to investigate the interpretation of postoperative CA19-9 elevation after pancreatic cancer surgery in terms of cancer recurrence. A cohort of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at our hospital was included. Among them, 52 patients exhibited postoperative CA19-9 elevation without radiological evidence of recurrence. These patients were evaluated with follow-up CA19-9 measurements. The CA19-9 increase rates were calculated based on the first elevation and the follow-up measurement. The association between the CA19-9 increase rate and tumor recurrence was assessed. Patients with a CA19-9 increase rate of ≥ 30% had a significantly higher frequency of recurrence within 3 months compared to those without such an increase (p = 0.0002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a CA19-9 increase rate of ≥ 30% was an independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio 8.17, p = 0.0309). The CA19-9 value at the first elevation (p = 0.1794) and at the follow-up measurement (p = 0.1121) were not associated with recurrence. After the first postoperative CA19-9 elevation, the CA19-9 increase rate based on follow-up measurements can serve as a predictive factor for tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Imamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka E-2, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sawai G, Dainaka K, Juichiro Y, Inada Y, Fukui A, Nishimura T, Fujii H, Tomatsuri N, Okuyama Y, Sato H. A case of needle tract seeding with endoscopic findings of progression over time. DEN OPEN 2024; 4:e368. [PMID: 38650734 PMCID: PMC11033486 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
An 83-year-old male underwent three transgastric punctures with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the examination of a pancreatic body tumor. After a diagnosis of resectable pancreatic cancer and undergoing distal pancreatectomy, the patient was administered postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with oral S-1 for 6 months, and carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were bimonthly evaluated. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels continually increased to 4638.1 U/mL at 45 months post-fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided showed a 25 mm low-echoic, irregularly shaped, and heterogeneous tumor with clear margins protruding from the mucosa outside the gastric wall, and biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. Since the immunostaining findings of the specimen matched those of the previously resected specimen, needle tract seeding (NTS) due to puncture of the pancreatic cancer was identified as the cause. After a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy at 46 months post-fine-needle aspiration, postoperative chemotherapy initiation, comprising gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, was initiated; however, the patient died despite these interventions as he developed multiple peritoneal dissemination. Although rare, the incidence of NTS will increase in the future owing to the expected extended survival in post-pancreatic cancer resection cases. We suggest regular upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided evaluations for patients who are at risk for NTS can facilitate early detection. Furthermore, it is extremely relevant to share experiences of encountered NTS cases in practice and extend knowledge of its varying endoscopic appearances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Sawai
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Katsuyuki Dainaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Yoshida Juichiro
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Yutaka Inada
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Akifumi Fukui
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Takeshi Nishimura
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Hideki Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Naoya Tomatsuri
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Yusuke Okuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Hideki Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fogliati A, Zironda A, Fiorentini G, Adjei S, Amro A, Starlinger PP, Grotz TE, Warner SG, Smoot RL, Thiels CA, Kendrick ML, Cleary SP, Truty MJ. Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Compared with de Novo Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2632-2639. [PMID: 38319513 PMCID: PMC10908613 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14875-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous cystic neoplasm (I-IPMN) does not differ from de novo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, I-IPMNs are debated to have better prognosis. Despite being managed similarly to PDAC, no data are available on the response of I-IPMN to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS All patients undergoing pancreatic resection for a pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2011 to 2022 were included. The PDAC and I-IPMN cohorts were compared to evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS This study included 1052 PDAC patients and 105 I-IPMN patients. NAT was performed in 25% of I-IPMN patients and 65% of PDAC patients. I-IPMN showed a similar pattern of pathological response to NAT compared with PDAC (p = 0.231). Furthermore, positron emission tomography (PET) response (71% vs. 61%; p = 0.447), CA19.9 normalization (85% vs. 76%, p = 0.290), and radiological response (32% vs. 37%, p = 0.628) were comparable between I-IPMN and PDAC. A significantly higher OS and disease-free survival (DFS) of I-IPMN was denoted by Kaplan-Meier analysis, with a p-value of < 0.001 in both plots. In a multivariate analysis, I-IPMN histology was independently associated with lower risk of recurrence and death. CONCLUSIONS I-IPMN patients have a longer OS and DFS after surgical treatment when compared with PDAC patients. The more favorable oncologic outcome of I-IPMNs does not seem to be related to early detection, as I-IPMN histological subclass is independently associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence. Moreover, neoadjuvant effect on I-IPMN was non-inferior to PDAC in terms of pathological, CA19.9, PET, and radiological response and thus can be considered in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fogliati
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Zironda
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Statale, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Fiorentini
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stella Adjei
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Abdelrahman Amro
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susanne G Warner
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cornelius A Thiels
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael L Kendrick
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark J Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Muzzolini M, Lupinacci R, Bachet JB, Lassoued D, Sauvanet A, Gaujoux S. Should liver metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma be resected? J Visc Surg 2024; 161:129-140. [PMID: 38262871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Muzzolini
- Department of hepato-biliary, pancreatic surgery and liver transplantation, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Renato Lupinacci
- UFR des sciences de la santé Simone-Veil, université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines/Paris Saclay, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France; Digestive and oncological surgery department, université Paris Saclay, hôpital Ambroise-Paré. AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Sorbonne université, Paris, France; Oncology department, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Donia Lassoued
- Oncology department, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France; Department of hepato-biliary, pancreatic surgery and liver transplantation, hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, Clichy, France
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of hepato-biliary, pancreatic surgery and liver transplantation, hôpital la Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Trevisani F, Vitale A, Kudo M, Kulik L, Park JW, Pinato DJ, Cillo U. Merits and boundaries of the BCLC staging and treatment algorithm: Learning from the past to improve the future with a novel proposal. J Hepatol 2024; 80:661-669. [PMID: 38266658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
In this Expert Opinion, we thoroughly analyse the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging and treatment algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that, since 1999, has standardised HCC management, offering a structured approach for the prognostic evaluation and treatment of patients with HCC. The first part of the article presents the strengths and evolutionary improvements of the BCLC staging system. Nevertheless, both patient characteristics and available treatments have changed in the last two decades, limiting the role of the BCLC criteria for treatment allocation in a growing number of patients. As therapeutic options expand and become more effective, the stage-linked treatment decision-making algorithm may lead to undertreatment and suboptimal outcomes for patients with disease beyond early-stage HCC. Consequently, strict adherence to BCLC criteria is limited in expert centres, particularly for patients diagnosed beyond early-stage HCC. Although the BCLC system remains the benchmark against which other therapeutic frameworks must be judged, the era of precision medicine calls for patient-tailored therapeutic decision-making (by a multidisciplinary tumour board) rather than stage-dictated treatment allocation. Acknowledging this conceptual difference in clinical management, the second part of the article describes a novel "multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy", which integrates a comprehensive assessment of clinical factors, biomarkers, technical feasibility, and resource availability. Lastly, considering the increasing efficacy of locoregional and systemic treatments, the concept of "converse therapeutic hierarchy" is introduced. These treatments can increase the feasibility (conversion approach) and effectiveness (adjuvant approach of systemic therapy) of potentially curative approaches to greatly improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Trevisani
- Unit of Semetiotics, Liver and Alcohol-related Disease, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Units of Semetiotics, Liver and Alcohol-related disease, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vitale
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Joon-Won Park
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), The University of Piemonte Orientale "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Song X, Nihashi Y, Imai Y, Mori N, Kagaya N, Suenaga H, Shin-ya K, Yamamoto M, Setoyama D, Kunisaki Y, Kida YS. Collagen Lattice Model, Populated with Heterogeneous Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts, Facilitates Advanced Reconstruction of Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:3740. [PMID: 38612551 PMCID: PMC11011612 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a solid-tumor malignancy. To enhance the treatment landscape of PDAC, a 3D model optimized for rigorous drug screening is essential. Within the PDAC tumor microenvironment, a dense stroma comprising a large extracellular matrix and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is well-known for its vital role in modulating tumor growth, cellular heterogeneity, bidirectional paracrine signaling, and chemoresistance. In this study, we employed a fibroblast-populated collagen lattice (FPCL) modeling approach that has the ability to replicate fibroblast contractility in the collagenous matrix to build dense stroma. This FPCL model allows CAF differentiation by facilitating multifaceted cell-cell interactions between cancer cells and CAFs, with the differentiation further influenced by mechanical forces and hypoxia carried within the 3D structure. Our FPCL models displayed hallmark features, including ductal gland structures and differentiated CAFs with spindle shapes. Through morphological explorations alongside in-depth transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling, we identified substantial molecular shifts from the nascent to mature model stages and potential metabolic biomarkers, such as proline. The initial pharmacological assays highlighted the effectiveness of our FPCL model in screening for improved therapeutic strategies. In conclusion, our PDAC modeling platform mirrors complex tumor microenvironmental dynamics and offers an unparalleled perspective for therapeutic exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Song
- Tsukuba Life Science Innovation Program (T-LSI), School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan;
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Yuma Nihashi
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Yukiko Imai
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan;
| | - Nobuhito Mori
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Noritaka Kagaya
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Hikaru Suenaga
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Kazuo Shin-ya
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
| | - Masamichi Yamamoto
- Department of Research Promotion and Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Ki-shibe-Shimmachi, Suita 564-8565, Japan;
| | - Daiki Setoyama
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
| | - Yuya Kunisaki
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
| | - Yasuyuki S. Kida
- Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba 305-8565, Japan; (Y.N.); (N.M.); (N.K.); (H.S.); (K.S.-y.)
- School of Integrative & Global Majors, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
De La Fouchardière C, Malka D, Cropet C, Chabaud S, Raimbourg J, Botsen D, Launay S, Evesque L, Vienot A, Perrier H, Jary M, Rinaldi Y, Coutzac C, Bachet JB, Neuzillet C, Williet N, Desgrippes R, Grainville T, Aparicio T, Peytier A, Lecomte T, Roth GS, Thirot-Bidault A, Lachaux N, Bouché O, Ghiringhelli F. Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Alone After 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Phase III PRODIGE 65-UCGI 36-GEMPAX UNICANCER Study. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1055-1066. [PMID: 38232341 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE GEMPAX was an open-label, randomized phase III clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel versus gemcitabine alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who previously received 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. METHODS Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed mPDAC were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive GEMPAX (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2; IV; once at day (D) 1, D8, and D15/arm A) or gemcitabine (arm B) alone once at D1, D8, and D15 every 28 days until progression, toxicity, or patient's decision. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life, and safety. RESULTS Overall, 211 patients (median age, 64 [30-86] years; 62% male) were included. After a median study follow-up for alive patients of 13.4 versus 13.8 months in arm A versus arm B, the median OS (95% CI) was 6.4 (5.2 to 7.4) versus 5.9 months (4.6 to 6.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.63 to 1.20]; P = 0.4095), the median PFS was 3.1 (2.2 to 4.3) versus 2.0 months (1.9 to 2.3; HR, 0.64 [0.47 to 0.89]; P = 0.0067), and the ORR was 17.1% (11.3 to 24.4) versus 4.2% (0.9 to 11.9; P = 0.008) in arm A versus arm B, respectively. Overall, 16.7% of patients in arm A and 2.9% in arm B discontinued their treatment because of adverse events (AEs). One grade 5 AE associated with both gemcitabine and paclitaxel was reported in arm A (acute respiratory distress), and 58.0% versus 27.1% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs in arm A versus arm B, among which 15.2% versus 4.3% had anemia, 15.9% versus 15.7% had neutropenia, 19.6% versus 4.3% had thrombocytopenia, 10.1% versus 2.9% had asthenia and 12.3% versus 0.0% had neuropathy. CONCLUSION While GEMPAX did not meet the primary end point of OS versus gemcitabine alone in patients with mPDAC in the second-line setting, both PFS and ORR were significantly improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Malka
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Claire Cropet
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Chabaud
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon, France
| | - Judith Raimbourg
- Medical Oncology Department, ICO René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Damien Botsen
- Medical Oncology Department, Godinot Institute, Unicancer Champagne, Reims, France
| | - Simon Launay
- Medical Oncology Department, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Pole of Medicine/Gastro-enterology, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Nice, France
| | - Angélique Vienot
- Medical Oncology Department, Jean Minjoz Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Hervé Perrier
- Oncology Department, Saint Joseph Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Jary
- Oncology Department, Nord Franche Comté Hospital, Montbéliard, France
| | - Yves Rinaldi
- Hepato-gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, European Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Clélia Coutzac
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Leon Bérard, University Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Bachet
- Hepato-gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Cindy Neuzillet
- Medical Oncology Department, Curie Institute, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Nicolas Williet
- Hepato-gastroenterology Department, University Institute of Cancerology and Hematology of Saint-Etienne (ICHUSE), Targeting Research Unit in Oncology at the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne (URCAS), Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Romain Desgrippes
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Broussais Hospital, Saint-Malo, France
| | | | - Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Cancerology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Annie Peytier
- Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Centre of Bayeux, Bayeux, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Hepato-gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Tours, Tours, France
- Department of Nutrition, Growth and Cancer, INSERM UMR1069, University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Gaël S Roth
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309-INSERM U1209, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Anne Thirot-Bidault
- Institute of Cancerology Paris Sud-Private Hospital of Antony, Antony, France
| | | | - Olivier Bouché
- Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Cancerology Department, CHU Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nicolle R, Bachet JB, Harlé A, Iovanna J, Hammel P, Rebours V, Turpin A, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei A, Mitry E, Lopez A, Biagi J, François E, Artru P, Lambert A, Renouf DJ, Monard L, Mauduit M, Dusetti N, Conroy T, Cros J. Prediction of Adjuvant Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using the GemPred RNA Signature: An Ancillary Study of the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1067-1076. [PMID: 37963313 PMCID: PMC10950182 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE GemPred, a transcriptomic signature predictive of the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM), was developed from cell lines and organoids and validated retrospectively. The phase III PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial has demonstrated the superiority of modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) over GEM as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at the expense of higher toxicity. We evaluated the potential predictive value of GemPred in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Routine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens of 350 patients were retrieved for RNA sequencing and GemPred prediction (167 in the GEM arm and 183 in the mFOLFIRINOX [mFFX] arm). Survival analyses were stratified by resection margins, lymph node status, and cancer antigen 19-9 level. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients' tumors (25.5%) were GemPred+ and were thus predicted to be gemcitabine-sensitive. In the GEM arm, GemPred+ patients (n = 50, 30%) had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) than GemPred- patients (n = 117, 70%; median 27.3 v 10.2 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.65]; P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; median 68.4 v 28.6 months, HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66]; P < .001). GemPred had no prognostic value in the mFFX arm. DFS and CSS were similar in GemPred+ patients who received adjuvant GEM and mFFX (median 27.3 v 24.0 months, and 68.4 v 51.4 months, respectively). The statistical interaction between GEM and GemPred+ status was significant for DFS (P = .008) and CSS (P = .004). GemPred+ patients had significantly more adverse events of grade ≥3 in the mFFX arm (76%) compared with those in the GEM arm (40%; P = .001). CONCLUSION This ancillary study of a phase III randomized trial demonstrates that among the quarter of patients with a GemPred-positive transcriptomic signature, survival was comparable with that of mFOLFIRINOX, whereas those receiving adjuvant gemcitabine had fewer adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Nicolle
- Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, F-75018, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Service d'Hépato—Gastro—Entérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Harlé
- Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy CEDEX, France
| | - Juan Iovanna
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Digestive and Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, F-75018, Paris, France
- Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology Department, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy and Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares du Pancréas—PAncreaticRaresDISeases (PaRaDis), Paris, France
| | - Anthony Turpin
- Department of Oncology, Lille University Hospital; CNRS UMR9020, INSERM UMR1277, University of Lille, Institut Pasteur, Lille, France
| | | | - Alice Wei
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Hepatogastroenterology Department, University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - James Biagi
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Eric François
- Hepatogastroenterology department, Hôpital Jean-Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Artru
- Medical Oncology department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Aurélien Lambert
- Medical Oncology department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Daniel J. Renouf
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Nelson Dusetti
- Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes; Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, France
| | - Jérome Cros
- Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM, U1149, CNRS, ERL 8252, F-75018, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Department of Pathology, Beaujon/Bichat University Hospital (APHP), Clichy/Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Muchiri SW, Ogutu EO, Oyiro PO, Aabakken L. Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients at a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1682. [PMID: 38566769 PMCID: PMC10984841 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
The global incidence of pancreatic cancer (PC) continues to steadily increase whereas its prognosis remains poor. Previous studies have suggested worse outcomes among individuals of African descent. The characteristics of patients with PC in Kenya, and their contemporary management and survival outcomes remain largely unknown. This study aimed to describe the clinical and pathologic characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with PC at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya. Records of 242 patients diagnosed with PC at KNH between 1st January 2014 and 30th September 2021 were assessed in this retrospective cohort study. Data on their clinical, histopathologic, and treatment characteristics was presented as mean (± standard deviation) and/or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for survival analysis. PC occurred in a young population, the median age being 58.5 years (inter-quartile range 35-88). The majority of tumours (54%) were metastatic at diagnosis, while 28% and 14% were stage III and stage I/II, respectively. Surgical resections with curative intent were performed on 7% overall and 44% of stage I/II cases. The majority of patients with stage I/II disease (52.9%) received chemotherapy whereas the majority with stage III and IV disease received the best supportive care only (62.7% and 64.9%, respectively). Patients who underwent surgical resection (HR for mortality 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.83, p = 0.021) and chemotherapy (HR for mortality 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.29, p < 0.001) had significantly improved survival, reflecting a more favourable stage of the disease more amenable to aggressive therapies. The median survival time was 3 months and the 1-year survival rate was 32%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila W Muchiri
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
| | - Elly O Ogutu
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
- World Gastroenterology Organisation Nairobi Training Center, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
| | - Peter O Oyiro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
| | - Lars Aabakken
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo 0318, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jiménez DJ, Javed A, Rubio-Tomás T, Seye-Loum N, Barceló C. Clinical and Preclinical Targeting of Oncogenic Pathways in PDAC: Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for the Deadliest Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2860. [PMID: 38474109 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. It is commonly diagnosed in advanced stages and therapeutic interventions are typically constrained to systemic chemotherapy, which yields only modest clinical outcomes. In this review, we examine recent developments in targeted therapy tailored to address distinct molecular pathway alteration required for PDAC. Our review delineates the principal signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms implicated in the initiation and progression of PDAC. Subsequently, we provide an overview of prevailing guidelines, ongoing investigations, and prospective research trajectories related to targeted therapeutic interventions, drawing insights from randomized clinical trials and other pertinent studies. This review focus on a comprehensive examination of preclinical and clinical data substantiating the efficacy of these therapeutic modalities, emphasizing the potential of combinatorial regimens and novel therapies to enhance the quality of life for individuals afflicted with PDAC. Lastly, the review delves into the contemporary application and ongoing research endeavors concerning targeted therapy for PDAC. This synthesis serves to bridge the molecular elucidation of PDAC with its clinical implications, the evolution of innovative therapeutic strategies, and the changing landscape of treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego J Jiménez
- Translational Pancreatic Cancer Oncogenesis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Hospital Universitari Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Aadil Javed
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Teresa Rubio-Tomás
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, 70013 Herakleion, Crete, Greece
| | - Ndioba Seye-Loum
- Translational Pancreatic Cancer Oncogenesis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Hospital Universitari Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Carles Barceló
- Translational Pancreatic Cancer Oncogenesis Group, Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (IdISBa), Hospital Universitari Son Espases, 07120 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Qiu L, Liu C, Li H. Successful immunotherapy with PD-1 Iinhibitor for advanced pancreatic cancer: report of two cases and review of literature. Anticancer Drugs 2024; 35:263-270. [PMID: 38194502 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000001546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor, and most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Unfortunately, due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of pancreatic cancer, the benefits of immunotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer are still unclear. Here, we present two cases of advanced pancreatic cancer being controlled by immunotherapy, with pathological diagnoses of ductal adenocarcinoma and acinar cell carcinoma, respectively. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of both patients is high tumor mutation burden (tumor mutation burden-High) and microsatellite stable. The patient with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was diagnosed as a locally advanced disease (stage III). She received irreversible electroporation, used the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor (pembrolizumab) combined with chemotherapy (S-1), and then used only the PD-1 inhibitor as a maintenance treatment. As a result, the patient's lesion was significantly reduced, with a partial response time of up to 31 months. The patient with acinar cell carcinoma was diagnosed as a metastatic disease (stage IV), next-generation sequencing revealed mutations in SMAD4 and KMT2D, and two chemotherapy regimens were used unsuccessfully. Then, the combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 (tislelizumab) and vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (anlotinib) inhibitors were used, and the lesions of the patient were significantly reduced, and the progression-free survival after immunotherapy was 19 months. In advanced pancreatic cancer, a prognosis of this magnitude is rare. Our cases reveal the potential of immunotherapy as a cornerstone treatment in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijie Qiu
- Department of Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital
- Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Heping Li
- Department of Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Park SH, Zhassanov Z, Kang CM. Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic radical pancreatosplenectomy in left-sided pancreatic cancer. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:104-108. [PMID: 38178691 PMCID: PMC10896680 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite debates regarding the safety of well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer, minimally invasive distal pancreatosplenectomy is considered safer and more effective than open distal pancreatosplenectomy in well-selected patients. Previous studies have shown that minimally invasive surgery yields comparable oncologic outcomes to open surgery. While patients who undergo minimally invasive distal pancreatosplenectomy also experience recurrences and metastases after surgery, port-site metastasis is particularly rare. In this report, we report an extremely rare case of port-site metastasis following minimally invasive distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyeong Park
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Zhanay Zhassanov
- Division of Multidisciplinary Surgery, Tau Sunkar, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Clinic, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Caputo C, Falco M, Grimaldi A, Lombardi A, Miceli CC, Cocule M, Montella M, Pompella L, Tirino G, Campione S, Tammaro C, Cossu A, Fenu Pintori G, Maioli M, Coradduzza D, Savarese G, Fico A, Ottaiano A, Conzo G, Tathode MS, Ciardiello F, Caraglia M, De Vita F, Misso G. Identification of Tissue miRNA Signatures for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:824. [PMID: 38398215 PMCID: PMC10887387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, is the most common pancreatic malignancy (90%) and the fourth highest cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Surgery intervention is currently the only strategy able to offer an advantage in terms of overall survival, but prognosis remains poor even for operated patients. Therefore, the development of robust biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognostic stratification in clinical practice is urgently needed. In this work, we investigated deregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) in tissues from PDAC patients with high (G3) or low (G2) histological grade and with (N+) or without (N-) lymph node metastases. miRNA expression profiling was performed by a comprehensive PCR array and subsequent validation by RT-qPCR. The results showed a significant increase in miR-1-3p, miR-31-5p, and miR-205-5p expression in G3 compared to G2 patients (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.001). miR-518d-3p upregulation and miR-215-5p downregulation were observed in N+ compared to N- patients. A statistical analysis performed using OncomiR program showed the significant involvement (p < 0.05) of two miRNAs (miR-31 and miR-205) in the histological grade of PDAC patients. Also, an expression analysis in PDAC patients showed that miR-31 and miR-205 had the highest expression at grade 3 compared with normal and other tumor grades. Overall, survival plots confirmed that the overexpression of miR-31 and miR-205 was significantly correlated with decreased survival in TCGA PDAC clinical samples. A KEGG pathway analysis showed that all three miRNAs are involved in the regulation of multiple pathways, including the Hippo signaling, adherens junction and microRNAs in cancer, along with several target genes. Based on in silico analysis and experimental validation, our study suggests the potential role of miR-1-3p, miR-31-5p, and miR-205-5p as useful clinical biomarkers and putative therapeutic targets in PDAC, which should be further investigated to determine the specific molecular processes affected by their aberrant expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Caputo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Michela Falco
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
- Laboratory of Precision and Molecular Oncology, Institute of Genetic Research, Biogem Scarl, Contrada Camporeale, 83031 Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Anna Grimaldi
- U.P. Cytometric and Mutational Diagnostics, AOU Policlinico, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luciano Armanni 5, 83031 Naples, Italy;
| | - Angela Lombardi
- U.P. Cytometric and Mutational Diagnostics, AOU Policlinico, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luciano Armanni 5, 83031 Naples, Italy;
| | - Chiara Carmen Miceli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.M.); (M.C.); (L.P.); (G.T.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Mariateresa Cocule
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.M.); (M.C.); (L.P.); (G.T.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Marco Montella
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, UOC Pathological Anatomy, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luciano Armanni 5, 83031 Naples, Italy;
| | - Luca Pompella
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.M.); (M.C.); (L.P.); (G.T.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Tirino
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.M.); (M.C.); (L.P.); (G.T.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Severo Campione
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, A.O.R.N. Antonio Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Chiara Tammaro
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Antonio Cossu
- Department of Medical, Surgical, and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy;
| | - Grazia Fenu Pintori
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (G.F.P.); (M.M.); (D.C.)
| | - Margherita Maioli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (G.F.P.); (M.M.); (D.C.)
- Center for Developmental Biology and Reprogramming (CEDEBIOR), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Donatella Coradduzza
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (G.F.P.); (M.M.); (D.C.)
| | - Giovanni Savarese
- AMES Center, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale SRL, Via Padre Carmine Fico 24, 80013 Casalnuovo Di Napoli, Italy; (G.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Antonio Fico
- AMES Center, Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale SRL, Via Padre Carmine Fico 24, 80013 Casalnuovo Di Napoli, Italy; (G.S.); (A.F.)
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, SSD-Innovative Therapies for Abdominal Metastases, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, National Cancer Institute, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Conzo
- Division of General, Oncological, Mini-Invasive and Obesity Surgery, University of Study of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Madhura S. Tathode
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Michele Caraglia
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
- Laboratory of Precision and Molecular Oncology, Institute of Genetic Research, Biogem Scarl, Contrada Camporeale, 83031 Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.M.); (M.C.); (L.P.); (G.T.); (F.D.V.)
| | - Gabriella Misso
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; (C.C.); (M.F.); (C.T.); (M.S.T.); (F.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sun Y, Zhang X, Zhu H. Identify novel inflammation-related prognostic signature in pancreatic cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e36932. [PMID: 38363947 PMCID: PMC10869063 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a malignant tumor of the digestive system with a poor prognosis. PC patients with pancreatitis have a worse prognosis. But nobody reported the relationship between inflammation and prognosis in PC. Based on this, we are going to explore inflammation-related prognostic signature to predict patients' survival and potential therapeutic target. We screened gene expression profile and corresponding clinical information of patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between tumor and normal tissues with P value < .05. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to identify possible prognostic inflammation genes and establish an inflammation-related risk score system, which was validated by Kaplan-Meier and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Finally, we used the TISIDB database to predict targeted drugs for up-regulated gene hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) and used AUTODOCK software for molecular docking. We built a prognostic model consisted of 3 inflammation-related genes (tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 1/TFAR1, tyrosine kinase 2/TYK2, MET). According to the median value of those genes' risk score, PC patients were ranked into high- (88) and low-risk (89) groups. Then, the results of the Kaplan-Meier curves and the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curves showed this model had a good predictive power (P < .001, AUC = 0.806). The result of human protein atlas (HPA) database showed the expression of TRAF1 and TYK2 were low in pancreatic cancer, the expression of MET was high. TISIDB database founded brigatinib could target to MET. And AUTODOCK showed brigatinib had a nice docking with MET. Taken together, our study suggested that inflammation-associated prognostic signature might be used as novel biomarkers for predicting prognosis in PC patients and potential therapeutic target of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- Central Sterile Supply Department, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Haiyan Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chandana SR, Woods LM, Maxwell F, Gandolfo R, Bekaii-Saab T. Risk factors for early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic literature review. Eur J Cancer 2024; 198:113471. [PMID: 38154392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging cancer trends suggest an increase in pancreatic cancer incidence in individuals younger than its typical age of onset, potentially reflecting changes in population exposures and lifestyles. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review to identify non-heritable risk factors for early-onset pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (PROSPERO number: CRD42022299397). Systematic searches of MEDLINE and Embase bibliographic databases were performed (January 2022), and publications were screened against predetermined eligibility criteria; data were extracted using standardised data fields. The STROBE checklist was used to assess the completeness of reporting as a proxy for publication quality. Data were categorised by risk factor and analysed descriptively. RESULTS In total, 24 publications were included. All publications reported observational study data; thresholds for age group comparisons ranged between 40 and 65 years. Lifestyle factors investigated included smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, physical inactivity, meat intake, socioeconomic status and geographical residence. Clinical factors investigated included pancreatitis, diabetes/insulin resistance, prior cancer and cancer stage at diagnosis, hepatitis B infection, metabolic syndrome and long-term proton pump inhibitor exposure. Publication STROBE scores were 6-21 (maximum, 22). Eight studies reported results adjusted for confounders. Potential non-heritable risk factors for early-onset PDAC that warrant further investigation included smoking, alcohol consumption, pancreatitis and hepatitis B infection. CONCLUSION Evidence for non-heritable risk factors for early-onset PDAC is heterogeneous, but four factors were identified that might aid the identification of at-risk individuals who may benefit from screening and risk reduction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sreenivasa R Chandana
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Cancer and Hematology Centers, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
| | - Laura M Woods
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Deng H, Yao H, Zhou S, He C, Huang Y, Li Y, Chen H, Shu J. Pancancer analysis uncovers an immunological role and prognostic value of the m6A reader IGF2BP2 in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cell Probes 2024; 73:101948. [PMID: 38122949 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2023.101948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most malignant gastrointestinal tumors worldwide with a dismal prognosis and high relapse rate. PDAC is considered a "cold cancer" for which immunotherapy is not effective. Therefore, to improve the prognosis for PDAC patients, it is urgent to explore the mechanism driving its insensitivity to immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted pancancer analyses to test IGF2BP family expression and survival in patients with different cancers via TCGA and GETx databases. Then, we determined the immunological role and prognostic value of IGF2BP2 in vitro, in vivo and in clinical specimens. RESULTS In the present study, we found that the m6A reader IGF2BP2 was the most clinically relevant member of the IGF2BP family for pancreatic cancer. High expression of IGF2BP2 was most associated with poor prognosis and an immunosuppressive microenvironment in PDAC. By IGF2BP2 knockdown, we found that tumor cell proliferation and invasive ability were significantly diminished. Importantly, we found that IGF2BP2 expression was closely associated with high expression of immunosuppressive molecules such as PD-L1. IGF2BP2 modulated downstream PD-L1 expression by regulating its mRNA stability via m6A methylation control, and we obtained the same verification in animal experiments and human tissue specimens. CONCLUSION Our study contributes to existing knowledge regarding the IGF2BP2-regulated PD-L1 signaling pathway as a potential prognostic and immune biomarker in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Deng
- Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 511400, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, 8 East Fuyu Road Qiaonan Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511400, China
| | - Hanming Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Shurui Zhou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Chong He
- Key Laboratory of Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Yuzhou Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Yunlong Li
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Hanwei Chen
- Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 511400, China; Department of Radiology, Panyu Health Management Center (Panyu Rehabilitation Hospital), 688 West Yushan Road Shatou Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511400, China; Medical Imaging Institute of Panyu, 8 East Fuyu Road Qiaonan Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511400, China.
| | - Jianchang Shu
- Jinan University, 601 Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, 511400, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510220, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck CHJ, Wolfgang CL, van Tienhoven G, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Wilmink JW, Del Chiaro M, Katz MHG, Hackert T, Besselink MG. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:101-124. [PMID: 38036745 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rutger T Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Huguet F, Riou O, Pasquier D, Modesto A, Quéro L, Michalet M, Bordron A, Schipman B, Orthuon A, Lisbona A, Vendrely V, Jaksic N. Radiation therapy of the primary tumour and/or metastases of digestive metastatic cancers. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:66-74. [PMID: 37806823 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic gastrointestinal cancer is not an uncommon situation, especially for pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers. In this setting, few data are available on the impact of the treatment of the primary tumour. Oligometastatic disease is associated with longer survival in comparison with more advanced disease. Metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy, seems related to better outcomes, but the level of evidence is low. In most tumour locations, prospective data are very scarce and inclusion in ongoing trials is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, DMU Orphé, Sorbonne université, Paris, France; Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, U938, Inserm, Paris, France.
| | - O Riou
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France; Université de Lille, CNRS, école centrale de Lille, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | - A Modesto
- Département de radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre de recherche du cancer de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Inserm, université Toulouse-III Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - L Quéro
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP Nord, DMU Icare, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, U1160, Inserm, Paris, France
| | - M Michalet
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Bordron
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - B Schipman
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Lisbona
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - N Jaksic
- Institut de cancérologie et radiothérapie Brétillien, Saint-Malo, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
de la Pinta C. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:14-19. [PMID: 36990839 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer allows high delivery of radiation doses on tumors without affecting surrounding tissue. This review aimed at the SBRT application in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. DATA SOURCES We retrieved articles published in MEDLINE/PubMed from January 2017 to December 2022. Keywords used in the search included: "pancreatic adenocarcinoma" OR "pancreatic cancer" AND "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)" OR "stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)" OR "chemoradiotherapy (CRT)". English language articles with information on technical characteristics, doses and fractionation, indications, recurrence patterns, local control and toxicities of SBRT in pancreatic tumors were included. All articles were assessed for validity and relevant content. RESULTS Optimal doses and fractionation have not yet been defined. However, SBRT could be the standard treatment in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in addition to CRT. Furthermore, the combination of SBRT with chemotherapy may have additive or synergic effect on pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is an effective modality for patients with pancreatic cancer, supported by clinical practice guidelines as it has demonstrated good tolerance and good disease control. SBRT opens a possibility of improving outcomes for these patients, both in neoadjuvant treatment and with radical intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina de la Pinta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, Alcalá University, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang X, Liu C, Yang Y, Huang X, Yu J. Burden of pancreatic cancer in older adults globally, regionally, and in 204 countries: 1990-2019 and projections to 2030. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:121-131. [PMID: 38445933 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Global aging is increasing; however, the epidemiologic characteristics of pancreatic cancer in older adults have not been systematically studied. METHODS This study used data on pancreatic cancer in older adults from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 project. Temporal trends were measured using average annual percentage change and predicted using a Bayesian age-period-cohort model. In addition, the inequality slope index and the health concentration index scores were calculated to quantify the unequal distribution of the burden of pancreatic cancer in older adults. RESULTS Between 1990 and 2019, the number of pancreatic cancer deaths in older adults, age-standardized death rate (ASDR), disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and age-standardized DALY rate increased globally. In 2019, ASDR and age-standardized DALY rate for pancreatic cancer in older adults were the highest in Southern Latin America, whereas the burden has grown the fastest over the past 30 years in the Caribbean. The burden is predominantly distributed among those aged 65 to 74 years, with males having a higher burden than that of females. The global proportion of pancreatic cancer deaths in older adults attributed to smoking, high fasting plasma glucose, and high body mass index were 21.7%, 10.3%, and 5.8%, respectively. Both absolute and relative cross-national inequalities declined over the past 30 years but remained at medium-high levels of relative inequality. Deaths from pancreatic cancer among older adults are expected to continue to increase over the next 11 years. CONCLUSION The global burden of pancreatic cancer among older adults has continued to rise over the past 30 years, and cross-national health inequalities remain high. Therefore, targeted measures must be taken to address this inequality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Wang
- Department of Surgery, Suixi County Hospital, Anhui, China; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China
| | - Chunlong Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of Surgery, Suixi County Hospital, Anhui, China
| | - Xiachun Huang
- Department of Surgery, Suixi County Hospital, Anhui, China.
| | - Jiangtao Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Fuyang People's Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Fuyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nagashima S, Kobayashi S, Tsunoda S, Yamachika Y, Tozuka Y, Fukushima T, Morimoto M, Ueno M, Furuse J, Maeda S. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in older patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:188-194. [PMID: 37991558 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02432-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global phase 3 NAPOLI -1 trial of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit from using liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) after treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) compared to 5-FU/LV alone. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in older patients are not well studied. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between older and younger patients with cutoff ages of 70 and 75 years, respectively. We included patients with a prior history of one or more GEM-based regimens for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. RESULTS Of the 115 patients, 54 (47.0%) and 24 (20.9%) were aged ≥ 70 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort were 8.5 and 3.6 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS hazard ratios using age cutoffs of 70 (P = 0.90 and 0.99, respectively) and 75 (P = 0.90 and 0.76, respectively) years. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between patients aged ≥ 70 and < 70 years or those aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Other than hematological toxicity, no trAEs higher than Grade 4 were observed in either age group. CONCLUSION The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged ≥ 70 years compared to younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Nagashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan.
| | - Shotaro Tsunoda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Yui Yamachika
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tozuka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Taito Fukushima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Manabu Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-Ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ganju V, Marx G, Pattison S, Amaro-Mugridge NB, Zhao JT, Williams BRG, MacDiarmid JA, Brahmbhatt H. Phase I/IIa Trial in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with Cytotoxic Drug-Packaged, EGFR-Targeted Nanocells and Glycolipid-Packaged Nanocells. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:304-314. [PMID: 37976042 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the safety and efficacy of an EGFR-targeted, super-cytotoxic drug, PNU-159682-packaged nanocells with α-galactosyl ceramide-packaged nanocells (E-EDV-D682/GC) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who had exhausted all treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS ENG9 was a first-in-man, single-arm, open-label, phase I/IIa, dose-escalation clinical trial. Eligible patients had advanced PDAC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0 to 1, and failed all treatments. Primary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 25 enrolled patients, seven were withdrawn due to rapidly progressive disease and one patient withdrew consent. All 25 patients were assessed for toxicity, 24 patients were assessed for OS, which was also assessed for 17 patients completing one treatment cycle [evaluable subset (ES)]. Nineteen patients (76.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (graded 1 to 2) resolving within hours. There were no safety concerns, dose reductions, patient withdrawal, or treatment-related deaths. Median OS (mOS) was 4.4 months; however, mOS of the 17 ES patients was 6.9 months [208 days; range, 83-591 days; 95.0% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-10.3 months] and mOS of seven patients who did not complete one cycle was 1.8 months (54 days; range, 21-72; 95.0% CI, 1.2-2.2 months). Of the ES, 47.1% achieved stable disease and one partial response. Ten subjects in the ES survived over 6 months, the longest 19.7 months. During treatments, 82.0% of the ES maintained stable weight. CONCLUSIONS E-EDV-D682/GC provided significant OS, minimal side effects, and weight stabilization in patients with advanced PDAC. Advanced PDAC can be safely treated with super-cytotoxic drugs via EnGeneIC Dream Vectors to overcome multidrug resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinod Ganju
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Peninsula and Southeast Oncology (PASO), Frankston Private Hospital, Frankston, Australia
| | - Gavin Marx
- Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Bryan R G Williams
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Feng Y, Yang J, Duan W, Cai Y, Liu X, Peng Y. LASSO-derived prognostic model predicts cancer-specific survival in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma over 50 years of age: a retrospective study of SEER database research. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1336251. [PMID: 38288098 PMCID: PMC10822877 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1336251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to develop a prognostic model for patients with advanced ductal adenocarcinoma aged ≥50 years. Methods Patient information was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was performed to screen the model variables. Cases from Nanchang Central Hospital were collected for external validation. The new nomogram and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria were evaluated using integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI) indicators. Survival curves presented the prognosis of the new classification system and AJCC criteria. Results In total, 17,621 eligible patients were included. Lasso Cox regression selected 4 variables including age, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and AJCC stage. The C-index of the training cohort was 0.721. The C-index value of the validation cohort was 0.729. The AUCs for the training cohorts at 1, 2, and 3 years were 0.749, 0.729, and 0.715, respectively. The calibration curves showed that the predicted and actual probabilities at 1, 2, and 3 years matched. External validation confirmed the model's outstanding predictive power. Decision curve analysis indicated that the clinical benefit of the nomogram was higher than that of the AJCC staging system. The model evaluation indices preceded the AJCC staging with NRI (1-year: 0.88, 2-year: 0.94, 3-year: 0.72) and IDI (1-year: 0.24, 2-year: 0.23, 3-year: 0.22). The Kaplan-Meier curves implied that the new classification system was more capable of distinguishing between patients at different risks. Conclusions This study established a prognostic nomogram and risk classification system for advanced pancreatic cancer in patients aged ≥50 years to provide a practical tool for the clinical management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yong Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Spleen Surgery, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gouton E, Gilabert M, Launay S, Loir E, Tyran M, Rochigneux P, Turrini O, Garnier J, Mitry E, Chanez B. Management and outcomes of brain metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pooled analysis and literature review. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1326676. [PMID: 38260832 PMCID: PMC10800932 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1326676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BM) are rare in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and little data exists concerning these patients and their outcomes. Aim We aimed to analyze the management, practices, and outcomes of patients presenting BM from PDAC both in our institution and in all cases reported in the literature. Methods We conducted a retrospective, monocentric analysis using a data mining tool (ConSoRe) to identify all patients diagnosed with PDAC and BM in our comprehensive cancer center (Paoli-Calmettes Institute), from July 1997 to June 2022 (cohort 1). Simultaneously, we reviewed and pooled the case reports and case series of patients with PDAC and BM in the literature (cohort 2). The clinical characteristics of patients in each cohort were described and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In cohort 1, 19 patients (0.3%) with PDAC and BM were identified with a median age of 69 years (range: 39-81). Most patients had metastatic disease (74%), including 21% with BM, at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 58% of patients. 68% of patients had neurological symptoms and 68% were treated by focal treatment (surgery: 21%, radiotherapy: 42%, Gamma Knife radiosurgery: 5%). In cohort 2, among the 61 PDAC patients with BM described in the literature, 59% had metastatic disease, including 13% with BM at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 36% of patient and BM treatments included: surgery (36%), radiotherapy (36%), radiosurgery (3%), or no local treatment (25%). After the pancreatic cancer diagnosis, the median time to develop BM was 7.8 months (range: 0.0-73.9) in cohort 1 and 17.0 months (range: 0.0-64.0) in cohort 2. Median overall survival (OS) in patients of cohort 1 and cohort 2 was 2.9 months (95% CI [1.7,4.0]) and 12.5 months (95% CI [7.5,17.5]), respectively. Conclusion BM are very uncommon in PDAC and seem to occur more often in younger patients with lung metastases and more indolent disease. BM are associated with poor prognosis and neurosurgery offers the best outcomes and should be considered when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Gouton
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marine Gilabert
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Simon Launay
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Elika Loir
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marguerite Tyran
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Olivier Turrini
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Jonathan Garnier
- Digestive Surgery Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Brice Chanez
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ristau P, Oetting-Roß C, Büscher A. Coping in patients with pancreatic cancer: a scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e695-e706. [PMID: 34880064 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with one of the highest cancer-specific mortality rates. Coping with it probably differs from other malignant diseases. This scoping review was intended to explore and characterise academic literature related to the coping in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS Eight databases were searched for primary and secondary studies and reviews reporting on coping with pancreatic cancer (adenocarcinoma) in adults in English or German language, regardless of publication date or study design, which were then analysed and summarised by narrative synthesis. RESULTS Of 1472 publications identified, 9 articles and book contributions published from 1989 to 2020 in the USA, Europe and Australia met the inclusion criteria. The two main aspects covered were the confrontation with coping tasks, and the reciprocally associated coping with these challenges. In particular, the coping tasks revealed some pancreatic cancer-specific features, such as an increased incidence of depression and anxiety or certain digestive problems, whereas applying of coping strategies seems to be more like the coping behaviours known from the literature for other severe or cancer diseases. CONCLUSIONS Patients with pancreatic cancer experience various health issues and face various quality of life changes and coping tasks. Disease-specific contextual factors, usually consisting of late diagnosis at an advanced stage, rapid progression and often poor prognosis, as well as disease-specific challenges are major differences compared with other malignancies or serious illnesses. However, the coping strategies applied do not seem to differ in principle. Currently, no pancreatic cancer-specific coping model exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Ristau
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Büscher
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
- Faculty of Business Management and Social Sciences, Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pande R, Liu W, Raza SS, Papamichail M, Suthananthan AE, Bartlett DC, Marudanayagam R, Dasari BVM, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ, Wadhwani S, Chatzizacharias N. Staging Computed Tomography Parameters Predict the Need for Vein Resection during Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:135. [PMID: 38248012 PMCID: PMC10814156 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14020135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery-first approach is the current standard of care for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and a proportion of these cases will require venous resection. This study aimed to identify parameters on staging computed tomography (CT) that predict the need for venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for resectable PDAC. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent PD for resectable staged PDAC (as per NCCN criteria) between 2011 and 2020. Staging CTs were independently reviewed by two specialist radiologists blinded to the clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate risk analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 296 PDs were included. Venous resection was performed in 62 (21%) cases. There was a higher rate of resection margin positivity in the vein resection group (72.6% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.001). Tumour at the neck of the pancreas, superior mesenteric vein involvement of ≥10 mm and pancreatic duct dilatation were identified as independent predictors for venous resection. DISCUSSION Staging CT parameters can predict the need for venous resection during PD for resectable cases of PDAC. This may assist in surgical planning, patient selection and counselling. Future efforts should concentrate on validating these results or identifying additional predictors in a multicentre and prospective setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupaly Pande
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Wingyan Liu
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (W.L.); (S.W.)
| | - Syed S. Raza
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Michail Papamichail
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Arul E. Suthananthan
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - David C. Bartlett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sharan Wadhwani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (W.L.); (S.W.)
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (R.P.); (S.S.R.); (M.P.); (A.E.S.); (D.C.B.); (R.M.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.P.S.); (K.J.R.)
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|