1
|
Lu X, Li Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Shi J, Feng H, Yu Z, Gao Y. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1117. [PMID: 37974093 PMCID: PMC10655341 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11600-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND RAS mutations affect prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and have been identified as strong negative predictive markers for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (anti-EGFR mAb) therapy, but many tumors containing wild-type RAS genes still do not respond to these therapies. Some additional biomarkers may have prognostic or predictive roles, but conclusions remain controversial. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-EGFR mAb therapy with alternative therapy that investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of additional biomarkers in RAS wild-type (wt) mCRC patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were calculated. The prognostic value of biomarkers was investigated by separately pooling HR and OR for different treatment groups in an individual study. The predictive value was assessed by pooling study interactions between treatment effects and biomarker subgroups. RESULTS Thirty publications reporting on eighteen trials were selected, including a total of 13,507 patients. In prognostic analysis, BRAF mutations were associated with poorer PFS [HRs = 3.76 (2.47-5.73) and 2.69 (1.82-3.98)] and OS [HRs = 2.66 (1.95-3.65) and 2.45 (1.55-3.88)] in both the experimental and control arms; low miR-31-3p expression appeared to have longer PFS and OS. In terms of predictive effect, a lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy was observed in patients with BRAF mutant tumors (Pinteraction < 0.01 for PFS). Patients with tumors with any mutation in the KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA gene also showed similar results compared with all wild-type tumors (Pinteraction for PFS, OS, and ORR were < 0.01, < 0.01 and 0.01, respectively). While low miR-31-3p expression could predict PFS (Pinteraction = 0.01) and OS (Pinteraction = 0.04) benefit. The prognostic and predictive value regarding PIK3CA mutations, PTEN mutations or deletions, EGFR, EREG/AREG, HER2, HER3, and HER4 expression remains uncertain. CONCLUSIONS In RAS wt mCRC patients receiving EGFR-targeted therapy, BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic and therapy-predictive biomarker, with no effect found for PIK3CA mutation, PTEN mutation or deletion, but the combined biomarker KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. Low miR-31-3p expression may have positive prognostic and therapy predictive effects. Evidence on the prognostic and predictive roles of EGFR and its ligands, and HER2/3/4 is insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaona Lu
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Yuyao Li
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Xuemei Zhang
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Jia Shi
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Hai Feng
- Institute of Infectious Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
| | - Zhuo Yu
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
| | - Yueqiu Gao
- Department of Liver Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
- Institute of Infectious Disease, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin H, Amonkar M, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Thosar M, Chase M, Keeping S. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of pembrolizumab versus other interventions for previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic, microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2155-2171. [PMID: 35332802 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare pembrolizumab with competing interventions for previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. Method: Trials were identified via a systematic literature review and synthesized using a Bayesian network meta-analysis with time-varying hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Using intention-to-treat data, HRs for overall survival were generally in favor of pembrolizumab but not statistically significant; however, statistical significance was reached versus all comparators by month 16 when accounting for crossover. Estimated HRs for progression-free survival significantly favored pembrolizumab versus all comparators by month 12. Pembrolizumab was also superior to all comparators in terms of grade ≥3 adverse events. Conclusion: These analyses suggest that pembrolizumab is a highly efficacious and safe treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Jin
- PRECISIONheor, New York, NY 10165, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sam Keeping
- PRECISIONheor, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3Y4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
García-Foncillas J, Sunakawa Y, Aderka D, Wainberg Z, Ronga P, Witzler P, Stintzing S. Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Front Oncol 2019; 9:849. [PMID: 31616627 PMCID: PMC6763619 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cetuximab and panitumumab are two distinct monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and both are widely used in combination with chemotherapy or as monotherapy to treat patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Although often considered interchangeable, the two antibodies have different molecular structures and can behave differently in clinically relevant ways. More specifically, as an immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 isotype mAb, cetuximab can elicit immune functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity involving natural killer cells, T-cell recruitment to the tumor, and T-cell priming via dendritic cell maturation. Panitumumab, an IgG2 isotype mAb, does not possess these immune functions. Furthermore, the two antibodies have different binding sites on the EGFR, as evidenced by mutations on the extracellular domain that can confer resistance to one of the two therapeutics or to both. We consider a comparison of the properties of these two antibodies to represent a gap in the literature. We therefore compiled a detailed, evidence-based educational review of the known molecular, clinical, and functional differences between the two antibodies and concluded that they are distinct therapeutic agents that should be considered individually during treatment planning. Available data for one agent can only partly be extrapolated to the other. Looking to the future, the known immune activity of cetuximab may provide a rationale for this antibody as a combination partner with investigational chemotherapy plus immunotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús García-Foncillas
- Cancer Institute, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Dan Aderka
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Zev Wainberg
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | | | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Price TJ, Tang M, Gibbs P, Haller DG, Peeters M, Arnold D, Segelov E, Roy A, Tebbutt N, Pavlakis N, Karapetis C, Burge M, Shapiro J. Targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:991-1006. [PMID: 30019590 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1502664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer are improving, with better understanding and use of targeted therapies. Areas covered: A review of the literature and recent conference presentations was undertaken on the topic of systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This article reviews the current evidence for targeted therapies in advanced colorectal cancer, including up-to-date data regarding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, the relevance of primary tumor location and novel subgroups such as BRAF mutated, HER2 amplified, and mismatch-repair-deficient cancers. Expert commentary: EGFR-targeted and VEGF-targeted antibodies are now routinely incorporated into treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The use of EGFR-targeted antibodies should be restricted to patients with extended RAS wild-type profiles, and there is evidence that they should be further restricted to patients with left-sided tumors. Clinically, mCRC can be divided into subgroups based on RAS, BRAF, HER2, and MMR status, each of which have distinct treatment pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Price
- a Medical Oncology , The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, and University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Monica Tang
- b Medical Oncology , NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- c Medical Oncology , Western Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,d Medical Oncology , Walter and Eliza Hall Institute , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Daniel G Haller
- e Medical Oncology , Abrahamson Cancer Centre at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , USA
| | - Marc Peeters
- f Medical Oncology , University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgiumg Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- g Medical Oncology , Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg , Germany
| | - Eva Segelov
- h Medical Oncology , Monash University School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre , Clayton , Australia
| | - Amitesh Roy
- i Medical Oncology , Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer , Bedford Park , Australia.,j Medical Oncology , Flinders University , Bedford Park , Australia
| | - Niall Tebbutt
- k Medical Oncology , Austin Health , Heidelberg , Australia
| | - Nick Pavlakis
- l Medical Oncology , Royal North Shore Hospital , St Leonards , Australia
| | - Chris Karapetis
- i Medical Oncology , Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer , Bedford Park , Australia
| | - Matthew Burge
- m Medical Oncology , Royal Brisbane Hospital , Brisbane , Australia
| | - Jeremy Shapiro
- n Medical Oncology , Cabrini Hospital and Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| |
Collapse
|