Cancer risk among 21st century blood transfusion recipients

Transposon DNA sequences facilitate the tissue-specific gene transfer of circulating tumor DNA between human cells

The exchange of genes between cells is known to play an important physiological and pathological role in many organisms. We show that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) facilitates cell-specific gene transfer between human cancer cells and explain part of the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. As ctDNA migrates into the nucleus, genetic information is transferred. Cell targeting and ctDNA integration require ERVL, SINE or LINE DNA sequences. Chemically manufactured AluSp and MER11C sequences replicated multiple myeloma (MM) ctDNA cell targeting and integration. Additionally, we found that ctDNA may alter the treatment response of MM and pancreatic cancer models. This study shows that retrotransposon DNA sequences promote cancer gene transfer. However, because cell-free DNA has been detected in physiological and other pathological conditions, our findings have a broader impact than just cancer. Furthermore, the discovery that transposon DNA sequences mediate tissue-specific targeting will open up a new avenue for the delivery of genes and therapies.

Trial-related blood sampling and red blood cell transfusions in preterm infants

AIM

To determine if trial-related blood sampling increases the risk of later red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in very preterm infants, we compared the volume of clinical- and trial-related blood samples, in a specific trial and correlated to subsequent RBC transfusion.

METHODS

For 193 very preterm infants, participating in the FortiColos trial (NCT03537365), trial-related blood volume drawn was in accordance with ethical considerations established by the European Commission. Medical records were reviewed to assess the number and accumulated volume (mL/kg) of blood samples (both clinical- and trial-related). Data were compared with the need of RBC transfusions during the first 28 days of life.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight was 28 ± 1 weeks and 1168 ± 301 g. In total, 11% of total blood volume was drawn for sampling (8.1 ± 5.1 mL/kg) and trial-related sampling accounted for 1.6 ± 0.6 mL/kg. Trial-related blood sampling had no impact on RBC transfusion (p = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Clinical blood sampling in very preterm infants is associated with blood loss and subsequent need for RBC transfusions. In a specific trial requiring blood samples, we found no additional burden of trial-related blood sampling. The study suggests that trial-related sampling is safe if European criteria are followed.

The science…or not behind deferrals of blood donors with a history of cancer

BACKGROUND

In the United States (US), each blood center's medical director sets policy for donors with a cancer history.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A subgroup of America's Blood Centers' (ABC) Scientific, Medical, and Technical Committee developed a survey to measure the determination of eligibility, policies for deferral and/or lookback when a donor reports a current diagnosis or history of cancer. A 31-question survey was sent to 47 ABC blood centers in North America via email. Survey results were compiled and literature evaluating the risk of cancer transmission by transfusion was reviewed.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 37 centers (79%). Donors with a history of carcinoma or sarcoma who had completed treatment were accepted at 73% of centers with no further deferral. Donors with a history of leukemia or lymphoma were permanently deferred at 76% of centers. Donors with a myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndrome were deferred permanently at 86% of centers. Handling of donors with high white cell counts varied. Donors with cancer not in active treatment (i.e., prostate cancer) were subject to various deferrals. Center response to post-donation reports of cancer vary widely. Literature review yielded no evidence of transfusion-transmitted cancer.

CONCLUSION

Cancer deferral policies vary widely among blood centers, and are not generally based on evidence, but on some aspect of the precautionary principle. As the donor population ages and so becomes more at risk of cancer, this approach may further reduce the available donor pool.

Indications and hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell transfusion and iron replacement in adults with gastrointestinal bleeding: An algorithm proposed by gastroenterologists and patient blood management experts

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion has long been the cornerstone of treatment for anemia due to GI bleeding. However, blood is not devoid of potential adverse effects, and it is also a precious resource, with limited supplies in blood banks. Nowadays, all patients should benefit from a patient blood management (PBM) program that aims to minimize blood loss, optimize hematopoiesis (mainly by using iron replacement therapy), maximize tolerance of anemia, and avoid unnecessary transfusions. Integration of PBM into healthcare management reduces patient mortality and morbidity and supports a restrictive RBC transfusion approach by reducing transfusion rates. The European Commission has outlined strategies to support hospitals with the implementation of PBM, but it is vital that these initiatives are translated into clinical practice. To help optimize management of anemia and iron deficiency in adults with acute or chronic GI bleeding, we developed a protocol under the auspices of the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology, in collaboration with healthcare professionals from 16 hospitals across Spain, including expert advice from different specialties involved in PBM strategies, such as internal medicine physicians, intensive care specialists, and hematologists. Recommendations include how to identify patients who have anemia (or iron deficiency) requiring oral/intravenous iron replacement therapy and/or RBC transfusion (using a restrictive approach to transfusion), and transfusing RBC units 1 unit at a time, with assessment of patients after each given unit (i.e., “don’t give two without review”). The advantages and limitations of oral versus intravenous iron and guidance on the safe and effective use of intravenous iron are also described. Implementation of a PBM strategy and clinical decision-making support, including early treatment of anemia with iron supplementation in patients with GI bleeding, may improve patient outcomes and lower hospital costs.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Blood Transfusion in Orthognathic Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to establish a nomogram to predict the probability of blood transfusion in patients with preoperative autologous blood donation before orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective case-control study on consecutive orthognathic patients with preoperative autologous blood donation from January 2014 to December 2020. The outcome variable was the actual transfusion of autologous blood (ATAB). Predictors included patients' demographics, preoperative blood cell test, vital signs, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgical procedure, operation duration, and blood loss. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with ATAB. A nomogram was constructed to predict the risk for ATAB. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve and the consistency index.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients (75 males and 67 females) with an average age of 22.72 ± 5.34 years donated autologous blood before their orthognathic surgery. Patients in the transfusion group (n = 56) had significantly lower preoperative red blood cell counts (4.74 ± 0.55 × 109/L versus 4.98 ± 0.45 × 109/L, P = 0.0063), hemoglobin (141.48 ± 15.18 g/dL versus 150.33 ± 14.73 g/dL, P = 0.0008), and hematocrit (41.05% ± 4.03% versus 43.32% ± 3.42%, P = 0.0006), more bimaxillary osteotomies (92.86% versus 56.98%, P < 0.001), longer operation duration (348.4 ± 111.10 minutes versus 261.6 ± 115.44 minutes, P < 0.001), and more intraoperative blood loss (629.23 ± 273.06 ml versus 359.53 ± 222.84 ml, P < 0.001) than their counterparts (n = 86) in the non-transfusion group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only hemoglobin (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.864, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.76-0.98, P = 0.026), operation procedures (adjusted OR 8.14, 95% CI:1.69-39.16, P = 0.009), and blood loss (adjusted OR 1.006, 95% CI:1.002-1.009, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for ATAB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram was 0.823. The consistency index of the nomogram was 0.823. The calibration curve illustrated that the nomogram was highly consistent with the actual observation.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram is a simple and useful tool with good accuracy and performance in predicting the risk for blood transfusion.

Incidence, aetiology and outcomes of major postoperative haemorrhage after pulmonary lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

Post-lobectomy bleeding is uncommon and rarely studied. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of post-lobectomy haemorrhage and compare the outcomes of reoperation and non-operative management.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution review of lobectomy cases from 2009 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment for postoperative bleeding: reoperation or transfusion of packed red blood cells with observation. Transfusion correcting intraoperative blood loss was excluded. One or more criteria defined postoperative bleeding: (i) drop in haematocrit ≥10 or (ii) frank, sustained chest tube bleeding with or without associated hypotension. Covariates included demographics, comorbidities and operative characteristics. Outcomes were operative mortality, complications, length of hospital stay and readmission within 30 days.

RESULTS

Following 1960 lobectomies (92% malignant disease, 8% non-malignant), haemorrhage occurred in 42 cases (2.1%), leading to reoperation in 27 (1.4%), and non-operative management in 15 (0.8%). The median time to reoperation was 17 h. No source of bleeding was identified in 44% of re-explorations. Patients with postoperative haemorrhage were more often male (64.3% vs 41.2%; P < 0.01) and more likely to have preoperative anaemia (45.2% vs 26.5%; P = 0.01), prior median sternotomy (14.3% vs 6.0%; P = 0.04), an infectious indication (7.1% vs 1.8%; P = 0.01) and operative adhesiolysis (45.2% vs 25.8%; P = 0.01). Compared with non-operative management, reoperation was associated with fewer units of packed red blood cells transfusion (0.4 vs 1.9; P < 0.001), while complication rates were similar and 30-day mortality was absent in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Haemorrhage after lobectomy is associated with multiple risk factors. Reoperation may avoid transfusion. A prospective study should optimize timing and selection of operative and non-operative management.

Blood Transfusion and the Risk of Cancer in the US Population: Is There an Association?

Purpose

We aimed to test if blood transfusion is a risk factor for the prevalence of cancer.

Patients and Methods

We conducted secondary analyses using the NHANES database from 1999 to 2016. We included all individuals who received a blood transfusion with known cancer comorbidity (diseased or not). We used univariate logistic regression to identify any possible association between history of blood transfusion and the prevalence of cancer with adjustment for different co-founders was done. Regression results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for both adjusted and unadjusted models.

Results

A total of 48,796 individuals were included in the final analysis: 6333 of them received a blood transfusion, while the other 42,463 individuals did not. In individuals who received a blood transfusion, the most prevalent cancer was breast cancer (3.4%), followed by prostate (3.0%), non-melanoma skin (2.4%) cancers, while non-melanoma skin (1.2%), prostate (1.1%) and breast (1.1%) cancers were the most prevalent in the no transfusion individuals. There was a significant association between the reported history of blood transfusion and the overall prevalence of cancer in both the unadjusted (OR= 3.47; 95% CI= 3.23–0.72; P-value< 0.001) and adjusted model (OR= 1.86; 95% CI= 1.72–0.2.01; P-value< 0.001). On the level of individual cancers, a significant reduction in cancer prevalence was found in patients with breast, cervix, larynx, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, melanoma, prostate, skin (non-melanoma), skin (unspecified), soft tissue, testicular, thyroid, and uterine cancers.

Conclusion

Results did not imply any concrete association between cancer risk and history of blood transfusion. These findings would help in debunking the myth of increased cancer risk following blood transfusion.

Peripartum Blood Transfusions are Associated with Increased Risk of Cancer: A National Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

The effect of blood transfusions on the risk of developing primary cancer remains unclear, especially when administered in the peripartum period.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 270,529 pregnant women who delivered between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009, with data obtained from three national databases in South Korea. From this cohort, we identified 4569 patients who received peripartum blood transfusions. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for new diagnoses of cancer and adjusted them for relevant clinical factors using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

During follow-up, patients who received peripartum transfusions had an increased risk of developing cancer, with an adjusted HR of 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.34). In a subgroup analysis, this risk was significant only among patients who received 3 or more units of blood, with an adjusted HR of 1.40 (95% CI, 1.10–1.79). Increased risk after transfusions were seen with brain, lung, ovarian, and gallbladder cancers. The difference in cancer risk between the transfusion and no-transfusion groups remained significant during both the first (1.29% vs 1.07%, p < 0.01) and second year (0.74% vs 0.56%, p < 0.01) after delivery.

Conclusion

Receipt of 3 or more blood transfusions in the peripartum period was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing cancer. Prospective studies should be pursued to further understand the link between blood transfusions and long-term oncologic risks.

Intraoperative cell salvage use reduces the rate of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy

Blood loss during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is variable, with losses ranging from 100 to 3900 ml in published series. Perioperative allogenic blood transfusion is frequently utilized although is associated with significant risk of morbidity. Cell salvage (CS) is a common blood conservation tool; however, evidence supporting its use with PAO is lacking. Our aim was to assess whether CS affects perioperative allogenic blood transfusion rate in patients undergoing PAO. The clinical records of 58 consecutive PAOs in 54 patients (median age 24.7 years, interquartile range 17.8-29.4 years) performed by a single surgeon between 1 January 2016 and 30 April 2018 were reviewed. Autologous blood pre-donation and surgical drains were not used. Due to variable technician availability, CS was intermittently used during the study period. PAOs were allocated into a CS group or no cell salvage group (NCS group), according to whether an intraoperative CS system was used. There was no significant difference in patient age, gender, body mass index, dysplasia severity, regional anesthetic technique, tranexamic acid administration, surgical duration or estimated blood loss (all P > 0.05) between the two groups. The CS group had a lower preoperative hemoglobin compared to the NCS group (median, 13.4 g/dl versus 14.4 g/dl, P = 0.006). The incidence of allogenic blood transfusion was significantly lower in the CS group compared to the NCS group (2.5% versus 33.3% patients transfused, P = 0.003). Multivariate modeling showed CS use to be protective against allogenic blood transfusion (P = 0.003), with an associated 80-fold reduction in the odds of transfusion (odds ratio, 0.01; 95th% CI, 0-0.57). To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the effect of CS use on allogenic transfusion rate in patients undergoing PAO. Our results demonstrate CS to be a mandatory component of blood conservation for all patients undergoing PAO.

Blood transfusion history and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an InterLymph pooled analysis

PURPOSE

To conduct a pooled analysis assessing the association of blood transfusion with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We used harmonized data from 13 case-control studies (10,805 cases, 14,026 controls) in the InterLymph Consortium. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for study design variables.

RESULTS

Among non-Hispanic whites (NHW), history of any transfusion was inversely associated with NHL risk for men (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65-0.83) but not women (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.83-1.03), pheterogeneity = 0.014. Transfusion history was not associated with risk in other racial/ethnic groups. There was no trend with the number of transfusions, time since first transfusion, age at first transfusion, or decade of first transfusion, and further adjustment for socioeconomic status, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, and HCV seropositivity did not alter the results. Associations for NHW men were stronger in hospital-based (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.70) but still apparent in population-based (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.98) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a literature reporting mainly null and some positive associations, and the lack of a clear methodologic explanation for our inverse association restricted to NHW men, the current body of evidence suggests that there is no association of blood transfusion with risk of NHL.

Red blood cell transfusion and its alternatives in oncologic surgery-A critical evaluation

Although blood transfusions have been used for more than 100 years and their potential to save lives is indisputable, there is still limited data on medium- and long-term outcomes after hemotherapy. Until recently, red blood cell transfusions represented the most commonly employed treatment for cancer anemia. As transfusions have been related to worse patient outcome in oncologic surgery, preventive strategies and alternative treatment approaches in the perioperative setting are warranted. This review aims to evaluate the evidence concerning the impact of transfusion on the course of malignant diseases with a focus on oncologic surgery and to provide a bundle of measures to improve patient care. The perioperative period is pivotal in determining long-term cancer outcome. An increasingly recognized area for improvement during this highly sensitive period is the treatment of anemia for three main reasons: Firstly, anemia has been recognized as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in cancer patients. Secondly, anemia is largely undertreated. Thirdly and probably most importantly, anemia therapy relied and often still relies heavily on red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which may be an often suboptimal stopgap treatment. Perioperative RBC transfusions should be kept to a minimum due to growing concerns regarding the associated risks, which this review tries to clarify by providing an update of recent literature. This review furthermore discusses treatments for anemia and provides best-practice approaches to improve perioperative management of oncology patients undergoing surgery.

New cancer cases in France in 2015 attributable to infectious agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To provide an assessment of the burden of cancer in France in 2015 attributable to infectious agents. A systematic literature review in French representative cancer cases series was undertaken of the prevalence of infectious agents with the major associated cancer types. PubMed was searched for original studies published up to September 2016; random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Cancer incidence data were obtained from the French Cancer Registries Network, thereby allowing the calculation of national incidence estimates. The number of new cancer cases attributable to infectious agents was calculated using population-attributable fractions according to published methods. Of the 352,000 new cancer cases in France in 2015, 14,336 (4.1% of all new cancer cases) were attributable to infectious agents. The largest contributors were human papillomavirus (HPV) and Helicobacter pylori, responsible for 6333 and 4406 new cancer cases (1.8 and 1.3% of all new cancer cases) respectively. Infectious agents caused a non-negligible number of new cancer cases in France in 2015. Most of these cancers were preventable. The expansion of vaccination (i.e., for hepatitis B virus and HPV) and screen-and-treat programs (for HPV and hepatitis C virus, and possibly for H. pylori) could greatly reduce this cancer burden.