Trastuzumab use in patients with durable complete response in HER2-amplified metastatic breast cancer: to continue or not to continue

Termination of trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received trastuzumab beyond progression

The purpose of the study was to assess the prognosis of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received trastuzumab beyond progression and investigate the predictors of complete response. HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received long-term trastuzumab were included in the study. Predictors of complete response were analyzed with binary regression analysis. The prognosis of patients who had their trastuzumab-based treatment terminated was assessed. Eighty patients were involved in the study. The patients were received with trastuzumab for a median of 62 months (12-191). A complete response was observed in 60 (75%) patients. The median duration to development of complete response was found as 14.8 months (2.4-55). In logistic regression analysis: using endocrine therapy with trastuzumab (p = 0.04), menopausal status (p = 0.03), and the number of metastatic sites (p = 0.01) were found to be statistically significant factors for a complete response. Trastuzumab-based therapy of fifteen patients was terminated, six (40%) patients continued to receive an aromatase inhibitor, and nine (60%) patients were followed up without treatment. After termination of trastuzumab, at a median follow-up of 32 months (11-66), recurrence was detected in two (13.3%) patients. We detected that menopausal status, the number of metastatic sites, and using endocrine therapy with trastuzumab were predictors of complete response in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received long-term trastuzumab-based therapy. We observed that HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients may be completely cured with trastuzumab-based therapy. There are no defined criteria for termination of trastuzumab treatment in this selected patient group. It is necessary to confirm our data with multicenter studies involving a large number of patients.

HER2-Directed Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Benefits and Risks

Around 20% of breast cancers are associated with amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). In this setting, anti-HER2-targeted agents are the cornerstone of cancer therapeutic strategies. This includes monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and, recently, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the advent of these new alternatives, the decision-making process has become more complex, especially with regard to the treatment sequence possibilities. In spite of the fact that overall survival has significantly improved accordingly, resistance to treatment remains a challenge in HER2-positive breast cancer. The introduction of new agents has created awareness regarding new potential specific adverse events, and consequently, their increasing application pose major challenges in daily patient care. This review describes the therapeutic landscape for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and evaluates its benefits and risks in the clinical setting.

No evidence of disease versus residual disease in long-term responders to first-line HER2-targeted therapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Long-term response to HER2-targeted therapies is infrequent in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We evaluated clinical characteristics of HER2-positive MBC patients with no evidence of disease (NED) vs residual disease (RES) experiencing long-term response to first-line HER2-targeted therapy.

METHODS

Patients receiving first-line chemotherapy-trastuzumab (CT) or taxane-trastuzumab-pertuzumab (THP) with response duration ≥2-fold higher than in phase II/III trials (CT [18.2 months]; THP [40.4 months]) were included. Clinical characteristics and radiographic review for NED or RES was evaluated by Cox-regression (hazard ratio; HR) or Kaplan-Meier (log-rank). Characteristics associated with NED were evaluated by logistic regression (Odds; OR).

RESULTS

From 01/2005-01/2016, N = 103 (4.6%) patients were identified. In multivariate analyses, NED (N = 46) showed improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [p < 0.001] versus RES (N = 57), with high 5-year PFS/OS for NED (93.2%/97.4%) relative to RES (10.6%/61.3%). Premenopausal status (p = 0.006), de-novo metastases (p = 0.002), and no palliative radiotherapy (p = 0.01) were associated with NED. Overall, 6/7 (85.7%) patients with NED were alive and disease-free after discontinuing HER2 treatment (≥1 year) versus 1/17 (5.9%) with RES.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term responders with NED have better survival compared to RES. Premenopausal status and de novo metastatic disease are associated with NED. Prospective studies of HER2 therapy discontinuation with NED in MBC are warranted.

Dual HER2 Blockade in Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Review

Background:

To investigate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer.

Methods:

We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using dual HER2 blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 5, 2020, and all included studies were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias of RCTs, and the statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 software.

Results:

A total of 9 RCTs involving 2758 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that the pCR rates of lapatinib/pertuzumab/neratinib plus trastuzumab versus trastuzumab [relative risk (RR) = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.43; p < 0.001)] and lapatinib plus trastuzumab versus lapatinib (RR = 1.39; 95%CI: 1.25-1.53; p < 0.001) showed a significant statistical difference between dual HER2-blockade treatment and single-agent treatment in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47-1.09; p = 0.123), incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR = 1.04; 95%CI: 0.81-1.33; p = 0.778) and cardiotoxicity(RR = 1.30; 95%CI: 0.81-2.08; p = 0.280), and the pCR rate was unaffected by hormone receptor status.

Conclusions:

The pCR rate of neoadjuvant dual-target therapy for HER2+ breast cancer was significantly higher than that of single-target therapy. Furthermore, the results indicated that the safety of dual-target therapy is similar to that of single-target therapy.