A phase III, randomized, open-label study of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with advanced stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer

First-line treatment for advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

Several head-to-head meta-analyses have compared the efficacy and safety of different first-line treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (M+) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC). However, there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation encompassing multiple treatment strategies. Our objective is to conduct a network meta-analysis that includes various treatment modalities, enabling both direct and indirect comparisons for a more thorough assessment.

Methods

We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception until May 8, 2024, to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Stata 15.0 and R 4.3.2 software were utilized for the network meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 30 RCTs, comprising 8654 participants, were included. The study encompassed the following 19 treatments: Chemotherapy; Afatinib; Afatinib + Cetuximab; Apatinib + Gefitinib; Befotertinib; Cetuximab + Chemotherapy; Erlotinib; Erlotinib + Bevacizumab; Erlotinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib; Gefitinib + Chemotherapy; Gefitinib + Olaparib; Icotinib; Icotinib + Chemotherapy; Lazertinib; Naquotinib; Osimertinib; Osimertinib + Bevacizumab; Osimertinib + Chemotherapy. The network meta-analysis results indicated that, in terms of PFS, Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 93.4%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 84.61%) were the most effective. Regarding OS, Lazertinib (SUCRAs: 89.72%), Gefitinib (SUCRAs: 72.07%), and Osimertinib + Chemotherapy (SUCRAs: 70.74%) emerged as the top three options. Afatinib (SUCRAs: 92.27%) was associated with the best ORR improvement. For ≥3AEs, Afatinib (SUCRAs: 74.93%) and Osimertinib (SUCRAs: 69.42%) were likely the best choices.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that, considering both survival and safety, Osimertinib stands out as the preferred first-line treatment for untreated EGFR M + advanced or metastatic nsq-NSCLC. Notably, the combination of Osimertinib with chemotherapy demonstrated superior survival benefits. However, due to the limitations in the number and quality of included studies, these conclusions await further validation through more high-quality research.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024562981, identifier CRD42024562981.

Third generation vs first generation EGFR-TKIs in the first line treatment for EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Background: The prevailing belief is that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (TGET) outperform first-generation EGFR-TKIs (FGET) in managing advanced-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this standpoint lacks substantiation in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of these two categories. Methods: We searched seven databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on primary endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system PFS (CNS-PFS). Additional factors considered included treatment responses and AEs. Results: We analyzed 15 studies from 6 RCTs on six third-generation TKIs: Osimertinib, Lazertinib, Furmonertinib, Aumolertinib, Naquotinib, and Befotertinib. TGET showed better efficacy in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55 [0.41, 0.75]), CNS-PFS (HR: 0.48 [0.35, 0.66]), CNS-objective response rate (CNS-ORR, risk ratio [RR]: 1.40 [1.19, 1.65]), and duration of response (DOR, HR: 0.52 [0.38, 0.72]). Most subgroups confirmed the PFS advantage. With longer survival time, the superiority in PFS, OS, and CNS-PFS of TGETs became more evident. Both groups had similar OS (HR: 0.86), ORR, CNS-DOR, total AEs, and grade 3-5 AEs. However, TGETs had more severe AEs (RR: 1.17 [1.02, 1.35]). Additionally, there were more grade 3-4 cases of diarrhea, decreased platelet count, pulmonary embolism, fatigue, decreased neutrophil count, and rash, and fewer grade 3-4 increases in alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) in the TGET group. The top 5 AEs in the TGET group were diarrhea (36.32%), rash (30.24%), decreased platelet count (29.15%), elevated serum creatinine (23.63%), and decreased white blood cell count (22.02%). Conclusions: Except for Naquotinib, TGETs demonstrate superiority over FGETs in treating EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, showing improved survival and responses. However, the increased incidence of AEs necessitates careful consideration.

Strategies and influencing factors for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the primary treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, significantly enhancing patient prognosis. Despite the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs, monotherapy faces challenges such as variability among individuals and early drug resistance. This article aims to explore the treatment strategies and influencing factors for advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, optimize treatment plans, and improve the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

We undertook a comprehensive, narrative review of the latest literature to define the current application and progress of EGFR-TKIs in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

Key Content and Findings

The efficacy and promise of EGFR-TKIs, both as monotherapy and combined with other agents, for treating patients with advanced NSCLC are outlined. The study delves into the mechanisms of resistance and the ongoing development of EGFR-TKIs. Various factors influencing the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-TKIs are also examined.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKIs alone improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC. Combined with other agents, some regimens have shown improved benefits in overcoming drug resistance and prolonging patient survival. It is imperative to focus on developing novel EGFR-TKIs and investigate innovative combination therapies to maximize patient benefit.

Leucine Zipper Downregulated in Cancer-1 Interacts with Clathrin Adaptors to Control Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Internalization and Gefitinib Response in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a common driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clathrin-mediated internalization (CMI) sustains EGFR signaling. AXL is associated with resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated (EGFRM) NSCLC. We investigated the effects of Leucine zipper downregulated in cancer-1 (LDOC1) on EGFR CMI and NSCLC treatment. Coimmunoprecipitation, double immunofluorescence staining, confocal microscopy analysis, cell surface labelling assays, and immunohistochemistry studies were conducted. We revealed that LDOC1 interacts with clathrin adaptors through binding motifs. LDOC1 depletion promotes internalization and plasma membrane recycling of EGFR in EGFRM NSCLC PC9 and HCC827 cells. Membranous and cytoplasmic EGFR decreased and increased, respectively, in LDOC1 (-) NSCLC tumors. LDOC1 depletion enhanced and sustained activation of EGFR, AXL, and HER2 and enhanced activation of HER3 in PC9 and HCC827 cells. Sensitivity to first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib and erlotinib) was significantly reduced in LDOC1-depleted PC9 and HCC827 cells. Moreover, LDOC1 downregulation was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with poor overall survival in patients with EGFRM NSCLC receiving gefitinib (n = 100). In conclusion, LDOC1 may regulate the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKIs by participating in the CMI of EGFR. Accordingly, LDOC1 may function as a prognostic biomarker for EGFRM NSCLC.

Targeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway in anticancer research: a recent update on inhibitor design and clinical trials (2020-2023)

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have seen significant strides in drug developmenttargeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway which is critical forcell growth and proliferation. Protein-protein interaction networksamong EGFR, RAS, and RAF proteins offer insights for drug discovery. This review discusses the drug design and development efforts ofinhibitors targeting these proteins over the past 3 years, detailingtheir structures, selectivity, efficacy, and combination therapy.Strategies to combat drug resistance and minimize toxicities areexplored, along with future research directions.

AREA COVERED

This review encompasses clinical trials and patents on EGFR, KRAS,and BRAF inhibitors from 2020 to 2023, including advancements indesign and synthesis of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) forprotein degradation.

EXPERT OPINION

To tackle drug resistance, designing allosteric fourth-generationEGFR inhibitors is vital. Covalent, allosteric, or combinationaltherapies, along with PROTAC degraders, are key methods to addressresistance and toxicity in KRAS and BRAF inhibitors.

The advance of the third‑generation EGFR‑TKI in the treatment of non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Lung cancer is currently the second most common type of cancer with the second incidence rate and the first mortality rate worldwide. Non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of the total number of cases of lung cancers. Concerning the treatment of NSCLC, targeted therapy has become a research hotspot in recent years because of its favorable efficacy, high selectivity and minimal adverse reactions. Among the drugs used in targeted therapy, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the most common and are categorized into four generations. The use of first and second‑generation drugs leads to drug resistance within 8‑14 months. This resistance is primarily caused by the T790M mutation, which is the most observed mechanism. A third‑generation drug has been developed to address this issue and a fourth‑generation drug is expected to overcome multiple resistance mechanisms, including third‑generation drug resistance. However, the fourth‑generation drug has not been launched yet. At present, multiple third‑generation targeted drugs have been launched globally, with three being launched in China and several being at research and clinical trial stages. The present article provides a review of the development process, mechanism of action and clinical trials of the third‑generation EGFR‑TKIs, aiming to provide some reference and suggestions for the clinical treatment of NSCLC and scientific research on third‑generation targeted drugs.

Resistance of Lung Cancer to EGFR-Specific Kinase Inhibitors: Activation of Bypass Pathways and Endogenous Mutators

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have changed the landscape of lung cancer therapy. For patients who are treated with the new TKIs, the current median survival exceeds 3 years, substantially better than the average 20 month survival rate only a decade ago. Unfortunately, despite initial efficacy, nearly all treated patients evolve drug resistance due to the emergence of either new mutations or rewired signaling pathways that engage other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), such as MET, HER3 and AXL. Apparently, the emergence of mutations is preceded by a phase of epigenetic alterations that finely regulate the cell cycle, bias a mesenchymal phenotype and activate antioxidants. Concomitantly, cells that evade TKI-induced apoptosis (i.e., drug-tolerant persister cells) activate an intrinsic mutagenic program reminiscent of the SOS system deployed when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics. This mammalian system imbalances the purine-to-pyrimidine ratio, inhibits DNA repair and boosts expression of mutation-prone DNA polymerases. Thus, the net outcome of the SOS response is a greater probability to evolve new mutations. Deeper understanding of the persister-to-resister transformation, along with the development of next-generation TKIs, EGFR-specific proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), as well as bispecific antibodies, will permit delaying the onset of relapses and prolonging survival of patients with EGFR+ lung cancer.

Overall survival in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer using different tyrosine kinase inhibitors in The Netherlands: a retrospective, nationwide registry study

Background

Clinical guidelines advise osimertinib as preferred first line treatment for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with deletions in exon 19 (del19) or exon 21 L858R mutation. However, for first-line osimertinib the real world overall survival (OS) in mutation subgroups remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world OS of those patients treated with different generations of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and to identify predictors of survival.

Methods

Using real-world data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) we assessed patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC with del19 or L858R mutation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, primarily treated with then regularly available TKIs (including osimertinib).

Findings

Between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, 57,592 patients were included in the NCR. Within this cohort we identified 1109 patients, 654 (59%) with del19 and 455 (41%) with L858R mutations, respectively; 230 (21%) patients were diagnosed with baseline brain metastases (BM). Patients were treated with gefitinib (19%, 213/1109), erlotinib (42%, 470/1109), afatinib (15%, 161/1109) or osimertinib (24%, 265/1109). Median OS was superior for del19 versus L858R (28.4 months (95% CI 25.6-30.6) versus 17.7 months (95% CI 16.1-19.5), p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, no difference in survival was observed between various TKIs in both groups. Only in the subgroup of patients with del19 and baseline BM, a benefit was observed for treatment with osimertinib.

Interpretation

In this nationwide real-world cohort, survival of Dutch patients with advanced NSCLC and an EGFR del19 mutation was superior versus those harboring an L858R mutation. Osimertinib performed only better as first-line treatment in patients with del19 and BM.

Funding

None.

Small Molecule EGFR Inhibitors as Anti-Cancer Agents: Discovery, Mechanisms of Action, and Opportunities

Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are a class of receptor tyrosine kinase that are also called ErbB1 and HER1. EGFR tyrosine kinase activity inhibition is considered a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer. Many small-molecule inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK), from medicinally privileged molecules to commercial drugs, have been overviewed. Particular attention has been paid to the structure of the molecule and its mechanism of action if reported. Subsequent classification of the molecules under discussion has been carried out. Both natural and synthetic and reversible and irreversible EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been discussed. Various types of cancers that are caused by overexpression of the EGFR gene, their possible molecular origins, and their natures have also been counted in this article. Because the EGFR signaling pathway controls the proliferation, growth, survival, and differentiation of cells, and the mutated EGFR gene overproduces EGFR protein, which ultimately causes several types of cancer, proper understanding of the molecular dynamics between the protein structure and its inhibitors will lead to more effective and selective EGFR-TKIs, which in turn will be able to save more lives in the battle against cancer.

Overview of the multifaceted resistances toward EGFR-TKIs and new chemotherapeutic strategies in non-small cell lung cancer

The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been vastly studied over the last decade. This has led to the rapid development of many generations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, patients treated with third-generation TKIs (osimertinib, avitinib and rociletinib) targeting the EGFR T790M mutation have shown emerging resistances and relapses. Therefore, further molecular understanding of NSCLC mutations, bypass signalling, tumour microenvironment and the existence of cancer stem cells to overcome such resistances is warranted. This will pave the way for designing novel and effective chemotherapies to improve patients' overall survival. In this review, we provide an overview of the multifaceted mechanism of resistances towards EGFR-TKIs, as well as the challenges and perspectives that should be addressed in strategising chemotherapeutic treatments to overcome the ever evolving and adaptive nature of NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR‑TKIs plus Shenqi Fuzheng injection for non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the impact on efficacy and safety between epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) alone and in combination with Shenqi Fuzheng injection (SFI) in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations.

METHODS

Retrospectively, information of 88 patients receiving EGFR-TKIs as first-line targeted treatment or in combination with SFI in the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical College and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology was collected. The primary endpoint was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination with SFI.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and December 2019, a total of 88 patients were enrolled in this research, including 50 cases in the EGFR-TKIs single agent therapy group and 38 cases in the SFI combined with EGFR-TKIs targeted-therapy group. The median PFS (mPFS) of monotherapy group was 10.50 months (95%CI 9.81-11.19), and 14.30 months (95%CI 10.22-18.38) in the combination therapy group. Compared to the single EGFR-TKIs administration, combinational regimen with SFI exhibited a lower incidence of rash and diarrhea in patients and was even better tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

SFI combined with the first-generation EGFR-TKIs are more efficient, can prominently prolong the PFS and attenuate the adverse reactions in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR-sensitive mutations.

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Mechanisms and management of 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKI resistance in advanced non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Targeted therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‑tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a standard modality of the 1st‑line treatments for patients with advanced EGFR‑mutated non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and substantially improves their prognosis. However, EGFR T790M mutation is the primary mechanism of 1st‑ and 2nd‑generation EGFR‑TKI resistance. Osimertinib is a representative of the 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKIs that target T790M mutation, and has satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of T790M‑positive NSCLC with disease progression following use of 1st‑ or 2nd‑generation EGFR‑TKIs. Other 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKIs, such as abivertinib, rociletinib, nazartinib, olmutinib and alflutinib, are also at various stages of development. However, the occurrence of acquired resistance is inevitable, and the mechanisms of 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKI resistance are complex and incompletely understood. Genomic studies in tissue and liquid biopsies of resistant patients reveal multiple candidate pathways. The present review summarizes the recent findings in mechanisms of resistance to 3rd‑generation EGFR‑TKIs in advanced NSCLC, and provides possible strategies to overcome this resistance. The mechanisms of acquired resistance mainly include an altered EGFR signaling pathway (EGFR tertiary mutations and amplification), activation of aberrant bypassing pathways (hepatocyte growth factor receptor amplification, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification and aberrant insulin‑like growth factor 1 receptor activation), downstream pathway activation (RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR) and histological/phenotypic transformations (SCLC transformation and epithelial‑mesenchymal transition). The combination of targeted therapies is a promising strategy to treat osimertinib‑resistant patients, and multiple clinical studies on novel combined therapies are ongoing.

A Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Prognosis of Stage III Unresectable Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Therapy

Background

For unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy is nowadays the standard treatment. Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring driver-gene mutations benefit from Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Therapy. In a real-world setting, there is room for exploring the benefit of TKIs in stage III unresectable NSCLC patients with mutation.

Methods

A total of 81 patients from the Jinling Hospital and the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital with stage III unresectable mutant NSCLC applied targeted therapy were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with first-line application of TKIs were followed up to gain the situation of surgery qualifications, progression-free survival and overall survival, so as to evaluate the survival prognosis, then whether patients benefit and what kind of patients benefit most from TKI monotherapy treatment or its combination are explored.

Results

The median progression-free survival of involved 81 patients was 13.87 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.66-16.08), and the median survival was 41.47 months (95%CI: 20.11-62.83). The 5-year survival rates were 91.0, 80.3, 56.1, 45.5, and 32.5%, respectively. After first-line TKI therapy, seven patients (8.6%) were reevaluated as eligible for surgery and proceeded to surgery. Although no characteristics were found to be statistical prognostic, younger female non-smokers still tended to have a better prognosis with longer progression free survival and overall survival.

Conclusions

TKIs are a viable option for mutant stage III unresectable NSCLC patients who have achieved good clinical benefit from TKI. Patients who cannot tolerate chemoradiotherapy, especially those with driver gene mutations, can choose targeted therapy for first-line treatment.

Next-Generation Kinase Inhibitors Targeting Specific Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Recent Overview

Lung cancer causes many deaths globally. Mutations in regulatory genes, irregularities in specific signal transduction events, or alterations of signalling pathways are observed in cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Over the past two decades, a few kinases have been identified, validated, and studied as biomarkers for NSCLC. Among them, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, MET, RET, NTRK, and BRAF are regarded as targetable biomarkers to cure and/or control the disease. In recent years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved more than 15 kinase inhibitors targeting these NSCLC biomarkers. The kinase inhibitors significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) of NSCLC patients. Challenges still remain for metastatic diseases and advanced NSCLC cases. New discoveries of potent kinase inhibitors and rapid development of modern medical technologies will help to control NSCLC cases. This article provides an overview of the discoveries of various types of kinase inhibitors against NSCLC, along with medicinal chemistry aspects and related developments in next-generation kinase inhibitors that have been reported in recent years.

Impact of Radiotherapy Pattern on the Prognosis of Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinomas Harboring EGFR Mutations

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of local radiotherapy in the management of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Materials and Methods

Patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with radiotherapy concomitant to EGFR TKIs from May 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively identified. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoints of the study.

Results

A total of 205 patients were enrolled in the study. One hundred eleven patients received one-time single-site radiotherapy (SSR), and 94 patients received multiple-site radiotherapy (MSR). Patients who received MSR had longer OS (median OS, 40.0 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29.6 to 50.4) than those who received SSR (median OS, 28.9 months; 95% CI, 24.3 to 33.5; P=0.031). Thoracic radiotherapy was associated with prolonged median OS (41.7 months, 95% CI, 29.0 to 54.4 vs 27.1 months, 95% CI 22.7 to 31.5; log-rank P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that thoracic radiotherapy was independently associated with improved OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.514; 95% CI 32.3% to 81.8%; P=0.005).

Conclusion

MSR improves survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage, EGFR-mutant, lung adenocarcinoma, with thoracic radiotherapy having the most significant effect on prognosis.

Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Tolerance, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of the Broad-Spectrum ErbB Family Inhibitor Larotinib Mesylate in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Background: The presented phase I, first-in-human study evaluated the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of larotinib mesylate in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: Cancer patients were assigned to receive larotinib mesylate at 50–400 mg dose levels until disease progression or intolerance. Dose-limiting toxicities were assessed during Cycles 0 and 1. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed after the first dose and at steady-state.

Results: Twenty-five patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dose-escalation study. No DLTs were observed. Acne-like rash (68.0%), diarrhea (48.0%), paronychia (48.0%), and anemia (48.0%) were the most reported treatment-related adverse events. No clear linear pharmacokinetic characteristic could be drawn, and obvious accumulation was observed. Two patients with non-small cell lung cancer experienced a partial response, and 15 patients had stable disease after treatment.

Conclusion: Continuous oral administration of larotinib mesylate at 50–400 mg daily demonstrated a favorable safety profile, and anti-tumor activity was observed in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients: Data from the Czech TULUNG Registry

BACKGROUND

Data regarding real-life effectiveness of any treatment may improve clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life effectiveness of tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, bevacizumab and pemetrexed as first-line treatments in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We analyzed data of 2157 patients of the Czech TULUNG Registry of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who received modern-era treatments between 2011 and 2018. Patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, bevacizumab (+ maintenance), pemetrexed (+ maintenance) as first-line therapy were included in the study. A systematic literature search separately identified clinical trials suitable for calculation of comparator pooled OS and PFS for each regimen. For each subgroup, basic characteristics and survival data (Kaplan-Meier estimates) are shown. We propose the "index of real-life effectiveness" (IRE), a ratio of real-life OS/PFS and comparator pooled OS/PFS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified factors were associated with longer OS (ie, IRE>1.1).

RESULTS

Survival analysis showed median OS of 23 months for erlotinib, 29.3 months for afatinib, 19.6 months for gefitinib, 12.2 months for pemetrexed, 17.5 months for pemetrexed maintenance, 15.8 months for bevacizumab and 15.8 months for bevacizumab maintenance. Calculated IREs for OS for the regimens were: erlotinib 1.013, afatinib 1.184, gefitinib 0.736, pemetrexed 1.188, pemetrexed maintenance 1.294, bevacizumab 1.178, and bevacizumab maintenance 1.189. Multivariate regression analysis showed that these factors were associated with longer OS: lower PS for afatinib; lower PS, absence of adverse events and female sex for bevacizumab; and lower PS and female sex for pemetrexed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clearly demonstrated that real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems, and comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens. Lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival in most regimens.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens; for most regimens, lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems.

The prediction potential of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for the therapeutic outcomes of programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have been demonstrated to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with chemotherapy. However, there were still some non-responders. Thus, how to effectively screen the responder may be an important issue. Recent studies revealed the immune-related indicator, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), may predict the therapeutic effects of anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies; however, the results were controversial. This study was to re-evaluate the prognostic potential of NLR for NSCLC patients receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors by performing a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching online databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The predictive values of NLR for overall survival, (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) were estimated by hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 2196 patients were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that elevated NLR before PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was a predictor of poor OS (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.64 - 2.87, P < .001), PFS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.34 - 1.78, P < .001) and low ORR (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44 - 0.95, P = .027) in NSCLC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed the predictive ability of NLR for OS and PFS was not changed by ethnicity, sample size, cut-off, HR source, study design or inhibitor type (except the combined anti-PD-L1 group); while its association with ORR was only significant when the cut-off value was less than 5 and the studies were prospectively designed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest patients with lower NLR may benefit from the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to prolong their survival period.

Gefitinib induced severe hyponatremia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Evolution of targeted molecular therapies has greatly improved patient survival in cancer. Gefitinib is an oral, reversible, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor used in advance non-small cell lung cancer. Skin rashes and diarrhea are common adverse effects associated with gefitinib. However, electrolytes disorders are rarely reported with gefitinib, particularly hyponatremia.

CASE REPORT

We describe a 65-year-old male with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib for the last three weeks. He presented to our hospital with complaints of acute onset drowsiness. On evaluation of drowsiness, patient was diagnosed with severe hyponatremia.Management and outcome: After ruling out other common causes of hyponatremia, gefitinib was attributed as a cause of hyponatremia. Gefitinib was immediately stopped and IV hypertonic saline (3% sodium chloride) was started due to severe symptomatic hyponatremia. After seven days of cessation of gefitinib, he became asymptomatic with normalisation of serum sodium levels.

DISCUSSION

Hyponatremia in cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis and prolonged hospital stay. Possibility of gefitinib-induced hyponatremia should be considered in order to achieve early diagnosis and prevent significant mortality in cancer patients.

Osimertinib beyond disease progression in T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients: a multicenter study of clinicians' attitudes

BACKGROUND

In most cases, T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib developed "non-drugable" progression, as the patients with common EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with first-line osimertinib. In both settings, chemotherapy represents the standard treatment and local ablative treatments (LATs) are potential useful options in the case of oligo-progression.

METHODS

We conducted a study on "post-progression" (pp) outcomes of T790M EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib, according to the therapeutic strategy applied: osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs), "switched therapies" or best supportive care only (BSC).

RESULTS

144 consecutive patients were evaluated: 53 (36.8%) did not received post-progression treatments (BSC), while 91 (63.2%) patients received at least 1 subsequent treatment; 50 patients (54.9%) received osimertinib beyond disease progression [19 (20.9%) of them with adjunctive LATs] and 41 (45.1%) a switched therapy. Median ppPFS (progression-free survival) and median ppOS (overall survival) of patients who received osimertinib beyond progression vs. switched therapies were 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.35-0.92), p = 0.0239] and 11.3 months vs 7.8 months, respectively [HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.33-0.98), p = 0.0446]. Among patients who received osimertinib beyond progression with and without LATs median ppPFS was 6.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively [HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.68-1.18), p = 0.4560], while median ppOS was 20.2 months and 9.9 months, respectively [HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-1.03), p = 0.0748]. At the univariate analysis, the only factor significantly related to the ppPFS was the therapeutic strategy in favor of osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs). Moreover, the only variable which was significantly related to ppOS at the multivariate analysis was osimertinib beyond progression (± LATs).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that in clinical practice, in case of "non-druggable" disease progression, maintaining osimertinib beyond progression (with adjunctive LATs) is an effective option.

Discovery of a novel third-generation EGFR inhibitor and identification of a potential combination strategy to overcome resistance

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations initially respond to first-generation EGFR inhibitors; however, the efficacy of these drugs is limited by acquired resistance driven by the EGFR T790M mutation. The discovery of third-generation EGFR inhibitors overcoming EGFR T790M and their new resistance mechanisms have attracted much attention.

METHODS

We examined the antitumor activities and potential resistance mechanism of a novel EGFR third-generation inhibitor in vitro and in vivo using ELISA, SRB assay, immunoblotting, flow cytometric analysis, kinase array, qRT-PCR and tumor xenograft models. The clinical effect on a patient was evaluated by computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

We identified compound ASK120067 as a novel inhibitor of EGFR T790M, with selectivity over EGFR WT. ASK120067 exhibited potent anti-proliferation activity in tumor cells harboring EGFR T790M (NCI-H1975) and sensitizing mutations (PC-9 and HCC827) while showed moderate or weak inhibition in cells expressing EGFR WT. Oral administration of ASK120067 induced tumor regression in NSCLC xenograft models and in a PDX model harboring EGFR T790M. The treatment of one patient with advanced EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC was described as proof of principle. Moreover, we found that hyperphosphorylation of Ack1 and the subsequent activation of antiapoptotic signaling via the AKT pathway contributed to ASK120067 resistance. Concomitant targeting of EGFR and Ack1 effectively overrode the acquired resistance of ASK120067 both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results idenfity ASK120067 as a promising third-generation EGFR inhibitor and reveal for the first time that Ack1 activation as a novel resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibitors that guide to potential combination strategy.

Therapeutic options for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian network secondary analysis

The most favorable treatments for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC are less indicated. Forty-one studies were eligible for this Bayesian network secondary analysis. For PFS, erlotinib (Erlo)+bevacizumab (Bev) (HR 0.26, 95% CrI: 0.08-0.75 vs placebo), osimertinib (Osi) (HR 0.29, 0.11-0.70 vs placebo), and afatinib (Afa) were top-ranking individual treatments, while immunotherapy (IT)+anti-VEGFR (aVEGFR)+platinum-based therapy (Plat) (HR 0.42, 0.06-2.63 vs placebo), EGFR-TKI (ET)+aVEGFR (HR 0.35, 0.14-0.85 vs placebo), and ET+aVEGFR+Plat were top-ranking medication classes. For OS, Osi (HR 0.52, 0.10-2.00 vs placebo), cetuximab (Cet)+Bev+Plat (HR 0.51, 0.06-3.38 vs placebo), and cilengitide (Cil)+Cet+Plat were top-ranking individual treatments, while ET+aVEGFR+Plat, ET+Plat, and third-generation EGFR-TKI (3^rd ET) were top-ranking medication classes. For PFS regarding the EGFR genomic aberration status, Erlo+Bev, Osi, and Afa were superior for exon 19 deletion status, whereas ET+Bev, Osi, and gefitinib (Gef)+pemetrexed (Peme) were excellent for exon 21 L858Arg mutation status. The results were consistent in terms of the ORR and DoR and remained robust across sensitivity analyses. However, Erlo + Bev had the most grade 3 or higher adverse events. Osi, Erlo+Bev, and Erlo+Bev+Plat are reasonably recommended to balance PFS and OS, but adverse events should be considered. IT+aVEGFR+Plat shows potential superiority, but more clinical evidence is needed.

Four generations of EGFR TKIs associated with different pathogenic mutations in non-small cell lung carcinoma

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a malignant tumour with poor prognosis and high mortality. Platinum-based dual-agent chemotherapy is the main therapeutic regimen for this disease. In recent years, because of the introduction of molecular targeted therapy, various targeted therapeutic agents against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have been rapidly developed, which has become a research hotspot for NSCLC treatment. Here, we review the latest studies describing the features and types of EGFR pathogenic mutations, currently established EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors from the first to fourth generation, including their action mechanisms, acquired resistance, and clinical applications, and potential challenges and perspectives that current researchers should address.