1
|
Wang HS, Liu CY, Hsu SC, Huang SC, Hung TH, Ng KF, Chen TC. A Single-Institute Experience with C-ros Oncogene 1 Translocation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers in Taiwan. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:5789. [PMID: 35628598 PMCID: PMC9145855 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23105789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The C-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene translocation is an important biomarker for selecting patients for crizotinib-targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to understand the incidence, diagnostic algorithm, clinical course and objective response to crizotinib in ROS1 translocated lung non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) in Taiwan. (2) Methods: First, we retrospectively studied the ROS1 status in 100 NSCLC samples using break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining to establish a diagnostic algorithm. Then, we performed routine ROS1 IHC tests in 479 NSCLCs, as crizotinib was available from 2018 in Taiwan. We analyzed the objective response rate and the survival impact of crizotinib. (3) Results: Four ROS1 translocations were clustered in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type adenocarcinomas but not in cases with EGFR mutations. Strong ROS1 expression was positively correlated with ROS1 translocation (p < 0.001). NSCLCs with ROS1 translocation had a poor prognosis compared to those without ROS1 translocation (p = 0.004) in the pre-crizotinib stage. Twenty NSCLCs were detected with ROS1 translocation in 479 wild-type EGFR specimens from 2018. Therefore, the incidence of ROS1 translocation is approximately 4.18% in EGFR wild-type NSCLCs. In these 20 ROS1 translocation cases, 19 patients received crizotinib treatment, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 78.95% (confidence interval = 69.34% to 88.56%), including 1 complete response, 14 partial responses, 3 stable cases and 1 progressive case. Overall survival and progression-free survival were better in the 19 ROS1-translocated NSCLCs of the prospective group with crizotinib treatment than the four ROS1-translocated NSCLCs of the retrospective group without crizotinib treatment. (4) Conclusions: ROS1-translocated NSCLCs had a poor prognosis and could have a beneficial outcome with crizotinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Sheng Wang
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (H.-S.W.); (S.-C.H.); (S.-C.H.); (K.-F.N.)
| | - Chien-Ying Liu
- Department & Centers of Lung Cancer and Interventional Bronchoscopy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan;
| | - Sheng-Chi Hsu
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (H.-S.W.); (S.-C.H.); (S.-C.H.); (K.-F.N.)
| | - Shih-Chiang Huang
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (H.-S.W.); (S.-C.H.); (S.-C.H.); (K.-F.N.)
| | - Tsai-Hsien Hung
- Institute of Stem Cell & Translational Cancer Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan;
| | - Kwai-Fong Ng
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (H.-S.W.); (S.-C.H.); (S.-C.H.); (K.-F.N.)
| | - Tse-Ching Chen
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University School of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (H.-S.W.); (S.-C.H.); (S.-C.H.); (K.-F.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loeser H, Kraemer M, Gebauer F, Bruns C, Schröder W, Zander T, Alakus H, Hoelscher A, Buettner R, Lohneis P, Quaas A. Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO) Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Immunol Res 2020; 2020:2862647. [PMID: 33029538 PMCID: PMC7527882 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2862647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an interferon-inducible immune checkpoint expressed on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). IDO is known as a poor prognostic marker in esophageal squamous cell cancer, while a positive effect was shown for breast cancer. A comprehensive analysis of IDO expression in a well-defined cohort of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is missing. METHODS We analyzed 551 patients with EAC using single-protein and multiplex immunohistochemistry as well as mRNA in situ technology for the expression and distribution of IDO on subtypes of TILs (INF-γ mRNA and CD4- and CD8-positive T lymphocytes). RESULTS IDO expression on TILs was seen in up to 59.6% of tumors, and expression on tumor cells was seen in 9.2%. We found a strong positive correlation of IDO-positive TILs, CD3-positive T lymphocytes, and INF-γ mRNA-producing TILs in the tumor microenvironment of EACs showing significantly better overall survival (47.7 vs. 22.7 months, p < 0.001) with emphasis on early tumor stages (pT1/2: 142.1 vs. 37.1 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, IDO is identified as an independent prognostic marker. CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasizes the importance of immunomodulation in EAC marking IDO as a potential biomarker. Beyond this, IDO might indicate a subgroup of EAC with an explicit survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Loeser
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Max Kraemer
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Gebauer
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schröder
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Hakan Alakus
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
| | - Arnulf Hoelscher
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Lohneis
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Germany
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|