Efficacy and safety of taxanes combined with chemotherapy drugs in advanced triple negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials

Background

Researchers have demonstrated that the combined use of taxanes and chemotherapy drugs, especially paclitaxel-based treatment, appeared to clinically benefit on advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). This meta-analysis aims to obtain the existent evidence on efficacy and safety for taxanes-based combination therapy to treat advanced TNBC.

Methods

From 1991 to June 2022, seven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase VIP, Wanfang, and CNKI databases) were comprehensively searched with no restricted language and region. The included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared taxanes-based combination therapy versus taxanes or other chemotherapy drugs. Statistical analysis was conducted using random-effect model, and the quality of RCTs was assessed using the tool of Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias.

Results

Twenty-six RCTs with a total of 8,236 advanced TNBC patients were included. Compared with taxanes monotherapy, taxanes-based combination therapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival (HR=0.79, 95%CI=0.74–0.83, I²= 0.0%, p=0.000) and overall survival (HR=0.88, 95%CI=0.82–0.94, I²= 9.3%, p=0.000) and increased the risk of vomiting (RR=1.26, 95%CI=1.07–1.48) and diarrhea (RR=1.82, 95%CI=1.22–2.70, I²= 90.3%, p=0.003). No statistical differences were observed in complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progressive disease (PD) indexes (CRR: RR=1.38, 95%CI=0.96–1.99; ORR: RR=1.20, 95%CI=0.73–1.98; DCR: RR=1.09, 95%CI=1.00–1.19; PD: RR=0.70, 95%CI=0.47–1.04). Compared with other chemotherapy drugs, taxanes plus other chemotherapy drugs significantly reduced the incidence of vomiting (RR=0.60, 95%CI=0.44–0.84, I²= 12.3%, p=0.002) and neutropenia (RR=0.58, 95%CI=0.35–0.96, I²= 73.0%, p=0.036) during the treatment period.

Conclusions

Taxanes-based combination therapy is evidently effective and well-tolerated in advanced TNBC, indicating that it might be a recommended option for treating advanced TNBC patients to some extent.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022337802.

Immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A molecular insight into the microenvironment, treatment, and resistance

Clinicians have very limited options to treat triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to the lack of effective targeted drugs. Recently, the findings of the mechanism underlying tumor-intrinsic immune escape have fueled a wave of studies into immunotherapy in breast cancer (BC). Compared with other BC subtypes, TNBC shows a better response to immunotherapy due to the higher level of tumor mutation burden and lymphocyte infiltration. Thereinto, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieved the first success of immunotherapy for TNBC and are widely utilized with conventional treatments in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant and advanced stages. However, a large number of TNBC patients fail to demonstrate a good response to ICIs, and the acquired resistance to ICI-based therapies is clinically emerging, which is a major challenge for immunotherapy in TNBC. Here we review the latest advances in TNBC immune microenvironment, immunotherapy, and immunotherapeutic resistance and discuss the challenges and potential approaches to improve the clinical benefit of immunotherapy against TNBC.

Atezolizumab (in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel): A Review in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Atezolizumab (Tecentriq^®), an immune checkpoint inhibitor against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), is the first immunotherapy agent to be approved (for use in combination with nab-paclitaxel) in the USA, the EU (as first-line) and Japan for the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Approval was based on the results of the phase III IMpassion130 trial in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC, in which atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to placebo plus nab-paclitaxel in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the PD-L1+ subgroup. Statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefits were not seen in two interim analyses and final OS data are awaited. The tolerability and safety profile of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel was consistent with those of each individual drug. The most common treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy and reduced neutrophil count. Adverse events of special interest occurred with higher frequency in patients who received atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel than placebo plus nab-paclitaxel, and were mostly immune-related (e.g. immune-related rash, hypothyroidism and hepatitis). Health-related quality of life was not significantly impacted by the addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel therapy. Thus, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel is a useful immunochemotherapy option for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic TNBC, including those whose tumours have PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%.