Commonality in Abnormality: "Abnormal" Neuropsychological Scores Are Common in Baseline Testing of Youth Athletes

Assessing cognitive changes in multiple sclerosis: criteria for a reliable decision

INTRODUCTION

Quantifying a significant cognitive change on a neuropsychological battery is essential to assess patients' decline or recovery and offer appropriate care. The reliability of change indices is particularly important in multiple sclerosis (MS), as the course of cognitive impairment is quite unpredictable, due at least in part to substantial interindividual variability. The main objective of this study was to compare six different methods for assessing cognitive change in an MS sample: the SD method, two reliable change indices, two standardized regression-based methods (SRB), and the generalized regression-based method (GSRB).

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-three patients with clinically definite MS and 89 healthy controls underwent a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests assessing cognitive functions that are frequently affected in this disease (i.e., verbal episodic memory, working memory, processing speed and verbal fluency).

RESULTS

We observed fairly similar proportions of improvement, decline or stability in the control group whatever the method. By contrast, in the MS sample, regression-based methods with one predictor (i.e., score at T1) and four predictors (i.e., score at T1 and demographic factors: age, sex, education level) detected a significant worsening more often than the reliable change indices while the GSRB method was more consistent with the RCI methods in tasks associated with ceiling effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The interpretation of a patient's cognitive changes depends on which method is used. The (G)SRB methods appear to be relevant indicators for assessing cognitive change in MS. The addition of demographic factors does not seem to play an important role in the prediction of significant worsening in the MS sample, regardless of cognitive domain. For clinicians, an easy-to-use free shiny app is provided.

Back from the sideline, but back to baseline? A pediatric case study examining neuropsychological functioning after sustaining multiple sport-related concussions

Most individuals recover quickly from a concussion; however, youth who sustain multiple concussions may be at risk for long-term cognitive impairments. This case study examines the neuropsychological performance of a 13-year-old malewith five head injuries. After his first concussion during study participation (fourth injury overall), several improvements were observed, likely due to practice effects, yet after sustaining another concussion <2 years later,declines were observed in visuoconstruction, verbal memory, and intellectual functioning. Across serial re-evaluation, his vocabulary knowledge declined, and fewer improvements were observed than anticipated when accounting for serial practice effects, highlighting the possible cumulative impact of multiple concussions.

OculoMotor Assessment Tool Test Procedure and Normative Data

SIGNIFICANCE

This study establishes normative data and a testing procedure for the oculomotor assessment tool. The oculomotor assessment tool standardizes visual targets for the Vestibular/OculoMotor Screening assessment and provides additional metrics that may aid in the differentiation between those with normal and those with abnormal oculomotor function potentially caused by a concussion.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the oculomotor endurance of healthy participants with no self-reported history of concussions using the oculomotor assessment tool.

METHODS

Healthy participants (n = 376, average age of 20.4 years, range of 11 to 34 years, with no self-reported history of concussions) were recruited to perform the following three tasks for 60 seconds each: (1) horizontal saccades, (2) vertical saccades, and (3) vergence jumps. The participants were instructed to alternate visual fixation between two targets for each of the tasks as fast as they could without overshooting or undershooting the visual target. The differences in the number of eye movements between the initial and latter 30 seconds of the 1-minute test were analyzed.

RESULTS

A statistical difference (P < .001) was observed in the number of eye movements for all three tasks (horizontal saccades [70 ± 15 for initial 30 seconds, 63 ± 13 for latter 30 seconds], vertical saccades [68 ± 14, 63 ± 13], and vergence jumps [43 ± 11, 39 ± 10]) between the initial and latter 30 seconds. No significant differences were identified in the number of eye movements or the change in eye movements between the initial and latter 30 seconds based on sex.

CONCLUSIONS

These results establish a normative database for various eye movements. These data could potentially be used to compare different patient populations who have binocular endurance dysfunctions potentially due to traumatic brain injury, such as patients with concussion(s).