1
|
Kiselica AM, Karr JE, Mikula CM, Ranum RM, Benge JF, Medina LD, Woods SP. Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice. Neuropsychol Rev 2024; 34:637-667. [PMID: 37594687 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09596-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Much attention in the field of clinical neuropsychology has focused on adapting to the modern healthcare environment by advancing telehealth and promoting technological innovation in assessment. Perhaps as important (but less discussed) are advances in the development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data. These techniques can yield improvement in diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning with little additional cost. Brooks and colleagues (Can Psychol 50: 196-209, 2009) eloquently summarized best practices in normative data creation and interpretation, providing a practical overview of norm development, measurement error, the base rates of low scores, and methods for assessing change. Since the publication of this seminal work, there have been several important advances in research on development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data, which may be less familiar to the practicing clinician. Specifically, we provide a review of the literature on regression-based normed scores, item response theory, multivariate base rates, summary/factor scores, cognitive intraindividual variability, and measuring change over time. For each topic, we include (1) an overview of the method, (2) a rapid review of the recent literature, (3) a relevant case example, and (4) a discussion of limitations and controversies. Our goal was to provide a primer for use of normative neuropsychological test data in neuropsychological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Kiselica
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, 115 Business Loop 70 W, Columbia, MO, 65203, USA.
| | - Justin E Karr
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Cynthia M Mikula
- Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rylea M Ranum
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, 115 Business Loop 70 W, Columbia, MO, 65203, USA
| | - Jared F Benge
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Austin, TX, Austin, USA
| | - Luis D Medina
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shaikh KT, Bolton K, Shaikh U, Troyer AK, Rich JB, Vandermorris S. Evaluating functional abilities within the context of memory assessment: A practice survey of neuropsychologists. Clin Neuropsychol 2024; 38:557-587. [PMID: 37649186 DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2249178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Functioning in daily life is an important consideration when differentiating between individuals with normal cognition, mild neurocognitive disorder, and major neurocognitive disorder. Despite this, there is no gold standard measurement approach for assessing functional abilities and few guidelines on how to do so. The objective of this study was to examine neuropsychologists' practices regarding the assessment of functional abilities across the spectrum of memory ability. Method: A total of 278 psychologists who routinely conduct neuropsychological assessments completed an online survey (estimated 15% response rate) querying their practices and perspectives with respect to the assessment of functional abilities. Results: Respondents identified that changes to several components of daily functioning, including activities of daily living, were important when evaluating functional abilities. Respondents reported utilizing a variety of instruments to assess functioning, with an overwhelming majority indicating the use of semi-structured interviews. Although most respondents are satisfied with existing tools, a quarter of respondents felt strongly that there was a need for more instruments of everyday functioning. Respondents further indicated that their recommendations to patients, particularly regarding compensatory strategies and follow-up with other professionals, were informed by results of their functional assessment. Conclusions: Overall, our survey results indicate that neuropsychologists perceive multiple factors of daily life to be important considerations when evaluating functioning, use a variety of techniques to assess functioning, and perceive a need for more measures of functional abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komal T Shaikh
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kathryn Bolton
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Toronto Metropolitan University
| | - Umar Shaikh
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Angela K Troyer
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jill B Rich
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susan Vandermorris
- Neuropsychology and Cognitive Health Program, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shi Y, Pu S, Peng H, Luo Y. Development and validation of the patient-reported outcome scale for chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:653-665. [PMID: 37452989 PMCID: PMC10808283 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03702-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measuring patient's experience and perception of disease are important components of approach to care. However, no tools are available to assess the PROs of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aims to develop and verify a PROs scale to evaluate clinical outcomes in CKD patients. METHODS The theoretical structure model and original item pool were formed through a literature review, patient interviews and references to relevant scales. The Delphi method, classical test theory methods and item response theory method were used to select items and adjust dimensions to form the final scale. Altogether 360 CKD patients were recruited through convenience sampling. CKD-PROs could be evaluated from four aspects, namely reliability, content validity, construct validity, responsibility, and feasibility. RESULTS The CKD-PROs scale covers 4 domains, including the physiological, psychological, social, and therapeutic domain, and 12 dimensions, 54 items. The Cronbach's α is 0.939, the split reliability coefficient is 0.945, and the correlation of the scores each item and domain's coefficients range from 0.413 to 0.669. The results of structure validity, content validity and reactivity showed that the multidimensional measurement of the scale met professional expectations. The recovery rate and effective rate of the scale were over 99%. CONCLUSION The CKD-PROs scale has great reliability, validity, reactivity, acceptability and is capable of being used as one of the evaluation tools for the clinical outcomes of CKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shi
- School of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
- Department of Nephrology, the Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi Pu
- School of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
- Department of Nephrology, the Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Peng
- School of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
- Department of Nephrology, the Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Luo
- School of Nursing, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kehl-Floberg KE, Marks TS, Edwards DF, Giles GM. Conventional clock drawing tests have low to moderate reliability and validity for detecting subtle cognitive impairments in community-dwelling older adults. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15:1210585. [PMID: 37705561 PMCID: PMC10495769 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1210585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early identification of subtle cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults is critical, as mild cognitive impairment contributes to disability and can be a precursor to dementia. The clock drawing test (CDT) is a widely adopted cognitive screening measure for dementia, however, the reliability and validity of paper-and-pencil CDT scoring scales for mild cognitive impairment in community samples of older adults is less well established. We examined the reliability, sensitivity and specificity, and construct validity of two free-drawn clock drawing test scales-the Rouleau System and the Clock Drawing Interpretation Scale (CDIS)-for subtle cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. Methods We analyzed Rouleau and CDIS scores of 310 community-dwelling older adults who had MoCA scores of 20 or above. For each scale we computed Cronbach's alpha, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for sensitivity and specificity using the MoCA as the index measure, and item response theory models for difficulty level. Results Our sample was 75% female and 85% Caucasian with a mean education of 16 years. The Rouleau scale had excellent interrater reliability (94%), poor internal consistency [0.37 (0.48)], low sensitivity (0.59) and moderate specificity (0.71) at a score of 9. The CDIS scale had good interrater reliability (88%), moderate internal consistency [0.66 (0.09)], moderate sensitivity (0.78) and low specificity (0.45) at a score of 19. In the item response models, both scales' total scores gave the most information at lower cognitive levels. Conclusion In our community-dwelling sample, the CDIS's psychometric properties were better in most respects than the Rouleau for use as a screening instrument. Both scales provide valuable information to clinicians screening older adults for cognitive change, but should be interpreted in the setting of a global cognitive battery and not as stand-alone instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E. Kehl-Floberg
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Timothy S. Marks
- Department of Kinesiology-Occupational Therapy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Dorothy F. Edwards
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Kinesiology-Occupational Therapy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Gordon M. Giles
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Samuel Merritt University, Oakland, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cai T, Wu F, Huang Q, Yu C, Yang Y, Ni F, Yuan C. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:95. [PMID: 35706033 PMCID: PMC9202169 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01997-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The PROMIS-57 is a commonly used self-reported instrument to solve the lack of generalizable and universal measures required to evaluate common symptoms and functions from patients’ perspectives. This study aimed to translate the PROMIS-57 into Chinese and psychometrically test the translated instrument on patients with breast cancer. Methods Translation, cross‑cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the instrument were performed from June 2020 to June 2021. Eligible patients were recruited and completed the PROMIS-57, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Results Data from 602 patients with a mean age of 48.83 years were analyzed. Most domains in the PROMIS-57 showed an absence of floor and ceiling effects. Multi-trait scaling analysis demonstrated acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The correlations between the PROMIS-57 scores and the selected FACT-B scores supported the criterion validity via the Pearson correlation test. Measurement invariance was supported by the absence of differential item functioning for most items. Cronbach’s α of the domains ranged from 0.85–0.95. The unidimensional factor structure of all domains was supported using confirmatory factor analyses. Additionally, most items showed acceptable item information curves and item characteristics curve matrices. Conclusion The Chinese version of the PROMIS-57 was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing common symptoms and functions among patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Cai
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fulei Wu
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qingmei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Chunfang Yu
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Feixia Ni
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changrong Yuan
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|