1
|
Conklin JP, Wallace T, McCauley KL, Breitenstein J, Gore RK. Level of Evidence of Telehealth Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health Services for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2024; 31:379-402. [PMID: 37903966 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-023-09981-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in significant impairments in functioning associated with partial or permanent disabilities. Examining the evidence for domain-specific telehealth interventions is necessary to guide the development of effective clinical and research programs for this population. The present scoping review characterizes the level of evidence across a range of TBI-related disabilities and impairments. A literature search was performed across comprehensive databases using search terms related to TBI, rehabilitation, telehealth, and outcome. A total of 19 publications from 17 studies met inclusion criteria. Articles focused on telehealth interventions to improve global, cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning post-TBI. Levels of evidence ranged from 1 to 4 across domains, with predominantly experimental designs (level 1). Outcomes demonstrating improvement or benefit from telehealth treatments were reported across all functional domains (50-80% of studies). Results highlight the potential of telehealth interventions across the span of comprehensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation care. Expanded research is needed on remote treatment options for physical symptoms, for subgroups within TBI populations (i.e., mild TBI, military populations), as well as on remote and hybrid comprehensive rehabilitation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica P Conklin
- SHARE Military Initiative, Shepherd Center, 80 Peachtree Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA
| | - Tracey Wallace
- SHARE Military Initiative, Shepherd Center, 80 Peachtree Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
| | - Katherine L McCauley
- SHARE Military Initiative, Shepherd Center, 80 Peachtree Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA
| | - Jackie Breitenstein
- SHARE Military Initiative, Shepherd Center, 80 Peachtree Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA
| | - Russell K Gore
- SHARE Military Initiative, Shepherd Center, 80 Peachtree Park Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwertfeger JL, Beyer C, Hung P, Ung N, Madigan C, Cortes AR, Swaminathan B, Madhavan S. A map of evidence using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve cognition in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). FRONTIERS IN NEUROERGONOMICS 2023; 4:1170473. [PMID: 38234478 PMCID: PMC10790940 DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1170473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Cognition impairments often occur after a traumatic brain injury and occur at higher rates in military members. Cognitive symptoms impair daily function, including balance and life quality, years after the TBI. Current treatments to regain cognitive function after TBI, including medications and cognitive rehabilitation, have shown limited effectiveness. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a low-cost, non-invasive brain stimulation intervention that improves cognitive function in healthy adults and people with neuropsychologic diagnoses beyond current interventions. Despite the available evidence of the effectiveness of tDCS in improving cognition generally, only two small TBI trials have been conducted based on the most recent systematic review of tDCS effectiveness for cognition following neurological impairment. We found no tDCS studies that addressed TBI-related balance impairments. Methods A scoping review using a peer-reviewed search of eight databases was completed in July 2022. Two assessors completed a multi-step review and completed data extraction on included studies using a priori items recommended in tDCS and TBI research guidelines. Results A total of 399 results were reviewed for inclusion and 12 met the criteria and had data extracted from them by two assessors using Google Forms. Consensus on combined data results included a third assessor when needed. No studies using tDCS for cognition-related balance were found. Discussion Guidelines and technology measures increase the identification of brain differences that alter tDCS effects on cognition. People with mild-severe and acute-chronic TBI tolerated and benefited from tDCS. TBI-related cognition is understudied, and systematic research that incorporates recommended data elements is needed to advance tDCS interventions to improve cognition after TBI weeks to years after injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Lynn Schwertfeger
- Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, United States Department of Veteran Affairs, North Chicago, IL, United States
- Clinical Medicine, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Charlotte Beyer
- Department of Foundational Sciences and Humanities, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Paul Hung
- Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, United States Department of Veteran Affairs, North Chicago, IL, United States
- Psychiatry Residency Program, Clinical Medicine, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Nathaniel Ung
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Caroline Madigan
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Alvi Renzyl Cortes
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Bharathi Swaminathan
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Captain James A. Lovell Federal health Care Center, North Chicago, IL, United States
- PM&R Residency Program, Clinical Medicine, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Sangeetha Madhavan
- Rehabilitation Sciences Program, and Physical Therapy Program, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avramovic P, Rietdijk R, Attard M, Kenny B, Power E, Togher L. Cognitive and Behavioral Digital Health Interventions for People with Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:159-194. [PMID: 35819294 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to cognitive linguistic deficits that significantly impact on quality of life and well-being. Digital health offers timely access to specialized services; however, there are few synthesized reviews in this field. This review evaluates and synthesizes reports of digital health interventions in TBI rehabilitation and caregiver education. Systematic searches of nine databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, speechBITE, and PsycBITE) were conducted from database inception to February 2022. Studies were included of interventions where the primary treatment focus (> 50%) was on improving communication, social, psychological or cognitive skills of people with TBI and/or communication partners. Data on participants, characteristics of the interventions, outcome measures and findings were collected. Risk of bias was accounted for through methodological quality assessments (PEDro-P and PEDro+, Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials) and intervention description. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic synthesis. Forty-four articles met eligibility criteria: 20 randomized controlled trials, three single-case experimental designs, six non-randomized controlled trials, nine case series studies, and two case studies. Studies comprised 3666 people with TBI and 213 carers. Methodological quality was varied and intervention description was poor. Most interventions were delivered via a single digital modality (e.g., telephone), with few using a combination of modalities. Five interventions used co-design with key stakeholders. Digital health interventions for people with TBI and their caregivers are feasible and all studies reported positive outcomes; however, few included blind assessors. Improved methodological rigor, clearly described intervention characteristics and consistent outcome measurement is recommended. Further research is needed regarding multi-modal digital health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Avramovic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Center of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, Australia
| | - Rachael Rietdijk
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Center of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, Australia
| | - Michelle Attard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Center of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, Australia
| | - Belinda Kenny
- School of Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emma Power
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Center of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, Australia
| | - Leanne Togher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Center of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Update on the Efficacy of Cognitive Rehabilitation After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 104:315-330. [PMID: 35921874 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify, categorize, and analyze the methodological issues of cognitive rehabilitation of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and its efficacy. DATA SOURCES Pubmed and PsycINFO were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2021 using keywords for cognitive intervention and traumatic brain injury. STUDY SELECTION Two independent reviewers selected articles concerning cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury. Of 458 studies, 97 full-text articles were assessed and 46 met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION Data were analyzed by 1 reviewer according to criteria concerning the methodological quality of studies. DATA SYNTHESIS Results showed a large scope of 7 cognitive domains targeted by interventions, delivered mostly in individual sessions (83%) with an integrative cognitive approach (48%). Neuroimaging tools as a measure of outcome remained scarce, featuring in only 20% of studies. Forty-three studies reported significant effects of cognitive rehabilitation, among which 7 fulfilled a high methodological level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Advances and shortcomings in cognitive rehabilitation have both been highlighted and led us to develop methodological key points for future studies. The choice of outcome measures, the selection of control interventions, and the use of combined rehabilitation should be investigated in further studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Charvet L, Harrison AT, Mangold K, Moore RD, Guo S, Zhang J, Datta A, Androulakis XM. Remotely supervised at-home tDCS for veterans with persistent post-traumatic headache: a double-blind, sham-controlled randomized pilot clinical trial. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1184056. [PMID: 37213913 PMCID: PMC10196360 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1184056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Currently, there are no FDA approved therapies for persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH) secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI). As such neither headache nor TBI specialists have an effective means to manage PPTH. Thus, the objective of the present pilot trial was to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a four-week at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) intervention for veterans with PPTH. Methods Twenty-five (m = 46.6 ± 8.7 years) veterans with PPTH were randomized into two groups and received either active (n = 12) or sham (n = 13) RS-tDCS, with anodal stimulation over left dlPFC and cathodal over occipital pole. Following a four-week baseline, participants completed 20-sessions of active or sham RS-tDCS with real-time video monitoring over a period of four-weeks. Participants were assessed again at the end of the intervention and at four-weeks post-intervention. Primary outcomes were overall adherence rate (feasibility) and change in moderate-to-severe headache days per month (efficacy). Secondary outcomes were changes in total number of headache days, and PPTH-related functional outcomes. Results Adherence rate was high with 88% of participants (active = 10/12; sham = 12/13) fully completing tDCS interventions. Importantly, there was no significant difference in adherence between active and sham groups (p = 0.59). Moderate-to-severe headache days were significantly reduced within the active RS-tDCS group (p = 0.004), compared to sham during treatment (-2.5 ± 3.5 vs. 2.3 ± 3.4), and 4-week follow-up (-3.9 ± 6.4 vs. 1.2 ± 6.5). Total number of headache days was significantly reduced within the active RS-tDCS (p = 0.03), compared to sham during-treatment (-4.0 ± 5.2 vs. 1.5 ± 3.8), and 4-week follow-up (-2.1 ± 7.2 vs. -0.2 ± 4.4). Conclusion The current results indicate our RS-tDCS paradigm provides a safe and effective means for reducing the severity and number of headache days in veterans with PPTH. High treatment adherence rate and the remote nature of our paradigm indicate RS-tDCS may be a feasible means to reduce PPTH, especially for veterans with limited access to medical facilities.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT04012853].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Charvet
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Adam T. Harrison
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
- Department of Neurology, Columbia VA Healthcare System, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Kiersten Mangold
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
- Department of Neurology, Columbia VA Healthcare System, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Robert Davis Moore
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Siyuan Guo
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jiajia Zhang
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Abhishek Datta
- Research and Development, Soterix Medical, Inc., Woodbridge, NJ, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Michelle Androulakis
- Department of Neurology, Columbia VA Healthcare System, Columbia, SC, United States
- Headache Centers of Excellence Program, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Columbia, SC, United States
- *Correspondence: X. Michelle Androulakis,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pilloni G, Charvet LE, Bikson M, Palekar N, Kim MJ. Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use. J Clin Neurol 2022; 18:391-400. [PMID: 35796264 PMCID: PMC9262447 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe and well-tolerated noninvasive method for stimulating the brain that is rapidly developing into a treatment method for various neurological and psychiatric conditions. In particular, there is growing evidence of a therapeutic role for tDCS in ameliorating or delaying the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We provide a brief overview of the current development and application status of tDCS as a nonpharmacological therapeutic method for AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), summarize the levels of evidence, and identify the improvements needed for clinical applications. We also suggest future directions for large-scale controlled clinical trials of tDCS in AD and MCI, and emphasize the necessity of identifying the mechanistic targets to facilitate clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppina Pilloni
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leigh E Charvet
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, City University of New York, NY, USA
| | - Nikhil Palekar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Min-Jeong Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tolerability and feasibility of at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS): Single-center evidence from 6,779 sessions. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:707-716. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|