Autologous Fat Transplantation for Aesthetic Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hybrid Breast Augmentation: Double Benefit or Double Risk? A Comparative Study of 932 Cases

BACKGROUND

The authors propose a hybrid breast augmentation (HBA) method combining implants and fat grafting and explore the outcome and safety through a retrospective, single-center, propensity score-matched, comparative study.

METHODS

Outcome, satisfaction, and complications were compared between the HBA group (302 cases) and the implant-based breast augmentation (IBA) group (353 cases), and between the HBA group and the autologous fat grafting (AFG) group (277 cases).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 31.7 months. After propensity score matching (PSM), 270 cases were matched between the HBA and IBA groups, and 156 cases were matched between the HBA and AFG groups. Compared with the IBA group, HBA achieved higher scores of implant visibility/palpability and upper pole contour with the specialists' evaluations (before and after PSM; P < 0.05). Regarding patient satisfaction, the scores of softness (before and after PSM), smoothness of the upper pole (before PSM), and overall satisfaction (after PSM) of the HBA group were better ( P < 0.05). Implant-related complications occurred at a similar rate. Compared with the AFG group, HBA achieved higher scores of shape (before and after PSM) and symmetry (after PSM) with evaluations by specialists ( P < 0.05). The scores of shape, symmetry, and overall satisfaction in the HBA group were better (before and after PSM; P < 0.05). The HBA group showed a lower incidence of palpable cysts, fat necrosis, oil cysts, and fat calcification (before PSM; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When the three techniques were compared objectively, HBA presented better indices of aesthetic outcomes, satisfaction, and acceptable complications rates when compared with IBA and AFG.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

The Optimal Layer for Breast Augmentation in an Autologous Fat Grafting Murine Model

BACKGROUND

Fat grafting is an effective procedure for breast augmentation, but the variations in this technique result in unpredictable fat retention. Therefore, animal models are needed to simulate the operation and the optimal layer for fat retention.

OBJECTIVES

An autologous fat grafting murine model for breast augmentation was built to detect a new layer for fat grafting in the chest.

METHODS

The left side of the female rat inguinal fat flap was harvested, dissected into small pieces, and autotransplanted into 3 different layers of the breast. Retention rate and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were measured at 1, 4, 8 12, and 16 weeks. Immunofluorescence staining was utilized to detect adipocytes and endothelial cells, and immunohistochemistry was conducted to evaluate the expression of integrins β1 and α6.

RESULTS

The volume of fat grafts slightly grew in the intramuscular and submuscular layers at Week 4. Retention rates in the subcutaneous layer and submuscular layer were significantly higher than the intramuscular layer at Week 16. H&E staining showed that oil cysts existed in the subcutaneous layer throughout the 16 weeks. At the terminal time point, well-vascularized mature adipose structures were observed in intramuscular and submuscular layers, with smaller adipocytes in intramuscular layers. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that integrin β1 was identically expressed in every adipocyte in all the layers, whereas integrin α6 selectively expressed in bigger adipocytes in the intramuscular layer. The expression intensities of integrin β1 and α6 were significantly higher in the intramuscular layer than in the subcutaneous and submuscular layers.

CONCLUSIONS

The angiogenic and moderate mechanical environment makes the submuscular layer the optimal layer for fat retention.

Mechanical Stress Improves Fat Graft Survival by Promoting Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Proliferation

Cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL), defined as co-transplantation of aspirated fat with enrichment of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), is a novel technique for cosmetic and reconstructive surgery to overcome the low survival rate of traditional fat grafting. However, clinically approved techniques for increasing the potency of ASCs in CAL have not been developed yet. As a more clinically applicable method, we used mechanical stress to reinforce the potency of ASCs. Mechanical stress was applied to the inguinal fat pad by needling. Morphological and cellular changes in adipose tissues were examined by flow cytometric analysis 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after the procedure. The proliferation and adipogenesis potencies of ASCs were evaluated. CAL with ASCs treated with mechanical stress or sham control were performed, and engraftment was determined at 4 weeks post-operation. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that mechanical stress significantly increased the number as well as the frequency of ASC proliferation in fat. Proliferation assays and adipocyte-specific marker gene analysis revealed that mechanical stress promoted proliferation potential but did not affect the differentiation capacity of ASCs. Moreover, CAL with cells derived from mechanical stress-treated fat increased the engraftment. Our results indicate that mechanical stress may be a simple method for improving the efficacy of CAL by enhancing the proliferation potency of ASCs.

Preoperative Risk Factors and Complication Rates of Breast Augmentation With Fat Grafting

BACKGROUND

The current literature on the complications and risk factors of autologous fat grafting (AFG) for breast augmentation is scant and inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to use a large, multicenter database to determine the major complications and risk factors of patients undergoing breast augmentation with AFG in comparison to breast augmentation with implants.

METHODS

Patients undergoing breast augmentation with AFG as well as with implants between January 2, 2017 and July 31, 2019 were identified from the CosmetAssure database (Birmingham, AL). The primary outcome was the occurrence of major complication(s) requiring emergency department visit, hospital admission, or reoperation within 45 days postoperatively. Age, gender, BMI, smoking, diabetes, facility, ASA class, and anesthetic type were evaluated as risk factors.

RESULTS

Among the 76,128 patients enrolled in CosmetAssure, 789 (1.0%) underwent breast augmentation with AFG, in comparison to 18,544 (24.3%) patients with implants. The incidence of any major complication in the AFG cohort and implant cohort was 3.2% and 2.3%, respectively. Infection was significantly higher in the AFG cohort (1.1% vs 0.5%). Tobacco users were more likely to have any complication, infection, and pulmonary dysfunction/hypoxia on univariate analysis. ASA Class III/IV was more likely to have any complication and infection. On multivariate analysis, smoking was an independent risk factor for any complication (relative risk = 17.1) and infection (relative risk = 20.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection and hematoma are the most common major complications in breast augmentation with AFG. Tobacco use is the only independent risk factor for overall complications and infection. Breast augmentation with AFG has a higher infection rate than augmentation with implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

The Application and Efficacy Evaluation of Autologous Fat Transplantation in Antiaging of the Face: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the therapy of autologous fat fine-grain transplantation in the application of antiaging facial by metaelaboration method.

Methods

In Chinese and English databases, such as Wanfang, Weipu, CNKI, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, the literature on the use of autologous fat fines graft in antiaging facial was collected, covering randomized comparative trials, nonrandomized comparative studies, comparative case studies, cohort studies, case reports, and so forth. Meta-analyses were also conducted on complication rates, beauty seeker satisfaction, and one-shot success rates.

Results

This study included 23 studies that held metaelaborations, including a total of 2852 beauty seekers. According to metaelaboration, the complication rate was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.04), the satisfaction rate of beauty seekers was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), and the success rate of one injection is 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.84).

Conclusion

Autologous fat fine-grain transplantation is obvious and stable in the use of antiaging facial, and it is necessary to popularize the use in clinical practice.