The Effect of Obesity, Bariatric Surgery, and Operative Time on Abdominal Body Contouring Outcomes

The Impact of Diabetes on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Abdominoplasty is increasingly sought after by patients for aesthetic rejuvenation or functional improvement. However, no previous study has comprehensively evaluated the impact of diabetes on post-abdominoplasty complications. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of diabetes on outcomes following abdominoplasty.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted systematically on MEDLINE Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to January 2023. The primary outcomes of interest were overall complications. The secondary outcomes included major complications and minor complications. A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to examine the impact of diabetes on post-abdominoplasty complications.

RESULTS

A total of fifteen studies involving 79724 patients, 5483 of whom had diabetes, met our inclusion criteria. Patients with diabetes were more likely to suffer from overall complications (OR = 1.63, 95% CI, 1.12-2.14; P < 0.05), major complications (OR = 1.44, 95% CI, 1.24-1.64; P < 0.05) and minor complications (OR = 1.84, 95% CI, 1.34-2.34; P < 0.05) than non-diabetic patients after abdominoplasty. Furthermore, patients with diabetes had a higher risk of wound-related complications (OR = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.80-3.27; P < 0.05) than non-diabetic patients after abdominoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how diabetes affects abdominoplasty outcomes. It finds that diabetes significantly increases the risk of overall, major, minor, and wound-related complications compared to non-diabetic patients. However, it does not elevate the risk of ischemic complications. Surgeons should inform patients about these risks, and future research should investigate how glycemic control might reduce these complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Obesity as a Risk Factor in Cosmetic Abdominal Body Contouring: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of obesity is on the rise around the globe. Outside of the massive weight loss (MWL) patient population, knowledge of risk factors associated with abdominal body contouring (BC) is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of obesity has on cosmetic abdominal BC outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 was done. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and COCHRANE databases were reviewed under search syntax "obesity," "abdominoplasty," "panniculectomy," and "body contouring" for articles. Cosmetic was defined as abdominoplasty or panniculectomy outside the context of MWL. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Studies reporting postoperative outcomes with less than 50% of their population involving MWL patients were included. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by pooled analysis and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 3088 initial studies, 16 met inclusion criteria, and nine were used for pooled and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that obesity was associated with more seromas (OR 1.45, 1.06-1.98, p = 0.02), hematomas (OR 2.21, 1.07-4.57, p = 0.03), and total surgical site occurrences (OR 1.99, 1.30-3.04, p = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in odds of any other complications. Analysis by obesity class showed no significant increase in odds in seromas or wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates obesity increased odds of postoperative complications following cosmetic abdominal BC. However, risk of complications does not continue to increase with higher obesity class. A BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 should not be a strict contraindication to cosmetic abdominal BC. Instead, plastic surgeons should evaluate patients on a case-by-case basis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Flowchart in Post-Bariatric Surgery: A Research for the Appropriate Type and Timing of Plasties Reshaping the Body

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a chronic disease with significant health implications. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity-related conditions. However, the timing of post-bariatric body contouring surgery remains uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1336 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. We analyzed weight trends and variations after different types of bariatric procedures. The Pittsburgh Index was used to evaluate body contouring outcomes.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were women, and sleeve gastrectomy was the most common procedure. Weight loss varied depending on the surgery type, with different outcomes for male and female patients. The Pittsburgh Index remained stable in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the timing of body contouring surgery should be tailored to the type of bariatric procedure performed. Abdominoplasty is recommended as a last procedure for sleeve gastrectomy patients, while gastric bypass patients are suitable candidates for early abdominoplasty. Biliopancreatic diversion patients should stabilize their weight before abdominoplasty. The Pittsburgh Index is a valuable tool for assessing the timing of post-bariatric plastic surgery. Further research is needed to optimize surgical planning and outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Effect of Drains and Compressive Garments Versus Progressive Tensioning Sutures on Seroma Formation in Abdominoplasty

Seroma is a common problem following abdominoplasty surgery. Both compressive garments with drains and progressive tension sutures have their advocates to minimise seroma formation. This is a retrospective study in which patients underwent an identical surgical procedure, except for use of drains and garments in comparison to progressive tension sutures between 2005 and 2020. Two hundred thirty-two patients were included in the study 61 in the drains and garment group (DG group), and 171 with progressive tension sutures (PTS group) alone. There was a lower incidence of seroma formation in the PTS group (X2 (1, N = 232) = 6.35, P = .012). The weight of tissue excised in the PTS group was greater than the DG group (P < .001). There was there a significantly higher tissue excision weights for patients who developed a seroma, compared with those who did not (P=.02). Patients, who developed a seroma in the PTS group, had significantly greater excision weights than the DG group. Liposuction did not change the incidence of seroma in each group (X2 (4, N = 232) = 6.701, P = .08 n/s). This study demonstrates the effectiveness of progressive tension sutures in reducing the incidence of seroma formation following abdominoplasty, particularly when large excision weights are involved. The addition of small volume liposuction distant to the abdominal flap does not increase the incidence of seroma formation.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Post-Bariatric Plastic Surgery: Abdominoplasty, the State of the Art in Body Contouring

Due to the increased prevalence of obesity in the last decades, bariatric surgery has been on the rise in recent years. Bariatric surgery is a compelling option for weight loss in obese patients with severe obesity-related comorbidities or for whom lifestyle modifications have proven ineffective. Redundant skin following significant weight loss is a common occurrence affecting up to 96% of patients who undergo bariatric surgery, negatively impacting physical and psychosocial health and detracting from activities of daily living. Statistics of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons show that 46,577 body contouring procedures were performed after massive weight loss in the USA in a 2020 report. Abdominoplasty, a well-established cosmetic surgery procedure for improving body contour, is performed by removing excess skin and fat from the abdominal wall and thereby restoring musculofascial integrity and skin elasticity, resulting in a more ideal body shape and increasing quality of life. Although abdominoplasty is a safe procedure, it has been associated with a higher complication rate compared with other body-contouring procedures. Technologic advances over the past decade have been developed as non-invasive alternatives or adjunctive tools to surgery to enhance cosmetic results and minimize complications. New energy-based technologies may supplant invasive surgery for mild to moderate skin laxity and/or diminish the extent of surgery and resulting scars. Plastic surgeons play a significant role in improving the quality of life of patients who suffer from obesity and underwent bariatric surgery. We are deeply convinced, however, that the advancement of knowledge and research in this field will determine the introduction of new technologies and custom-made techniques. This advancement will reduce the complication rate with a rapid reintegration of the patient into the world of work and resumption of daily activities.