Doescher J, Emmanuel B, Greve J, Schuler PJ, Sommer F, Laban S, Veit J, Hoffmann TK. Barbed suture in neck dissection: a randomized clinical study on efficacy, safety and aesthetic outcome.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024;
281:6613-6620. [PMID:
39095537 PMCID:
PMC11564391 DOI:
10.1007/s00405-024-08869-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The resection of lymph nodes/neck dissection is a typical part of the surgical treatment of head and neck malignancies. The aim of this study was to compare subcutaneous closure using single knotted, braided suture (VicrylTM, standard arm) with continuous self-locking, monofilament barbed suture (V-LocTM, experimental arm).
METHODS
Neck Lock was a randomized clinical trial at a single tertiary referral center. It was conducted from 2016 till 2022 with a follow-up period of 3 months. Assessment of safety and aesthetic outcome was double-blinded. 68 patients were randomized after application of exclusion criteria. Subcutaneous wound closure was performed in an intrapatient randomized fashion for suture technique. The primary endpoint was the duration of subcutaneous sutures. Wound healing and scar formation were recorded at multiple postoperative intervals as secondary endpoints.
RESULTS
The median age was 61 years, 89.7% were male. 92.6% suffered from a squamous cell carcinoma. There was a significant difference in median subcutaneous suture time (p = 0.024) between the experimental (6:11 ± 2:30 min) and standard (7:01 ± 2.42 min) arms. There was no significant difference in safety when assessing adverse events (AEs). At least one AE occurred in 14.7% vs. 5.9%, for barbed and smooth sutures respectively (p = 0.16).
CONCLUSION
For neck dissection of head and neck malignancies, subcutaneous wound closure with self-locking sutures offers significant time savings over the single knot technique with similar safety and aesthetic results.
TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION
The trial was registered with WHO acknowledged primary registry "German Clinical Trials Register" under the ID DRKS00025831 ( https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00025831 ).
Collapse