Why Can't More Good Surgeons Learn Rhinoplasty?

Diagnosis and Management of Common Presentations of Posttraumatic Nasal Deformity: A Narrative Review

Posttraumatic nasal deformity (PTND) is a surgical challenge for the otolaryngologist and plastic surgeon. Various classifications and management algorithms have been proposed without reaching much consensus in terms of definition and management.

Methods

We present a narrative review aimed to define PTND and consolidate current knowledge regarding its diagnosis, subtypes, and treatment options.

Results

This report is a clinical overview of PTND. We also review recent studies that characterize different osteotomy approaches and techniques used for patients with PTND.

Conclusions

By providing a summary of the main challenges for PTND, we aim to add context to its variable presentation. We hope this broad overview will reinforce more effective communication between providers and promote patient understanding in order to ensure favorable long-term outcomes.

Functional Nasal Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) understand the functional significance of nasal anatomy as it relates to rhinoplasty and perform a comprehensive functional nasal assessment. (2) Identify the anatomical level of obstruction based on the authors' algorithmic approach and understand the current evidence supporting operative techniques for correcting nasal airway obstruction from septal deformity, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, internal nasal valve collapse, external nasal valve collapse. (3) Understand the current evidence supporting operative techniques for correcting nasal airway obstruction from septal deformity, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, internal nasal valve collapse, and external nasal valve collapse. (4) Appreciate the objective assessment tools for functional nasal surgery from a clinical and research perspective.

SUMMARY

The intent of functional rhinoplasty is to improve nasal airflow (and the perception thereof) by surgically correcting the anatomical sources of obstruction in the nasal airway. Cosmetic and functional rhinoplasty are not mutually exclusive entities, and the techniques that address one area, inevitably may affect the another. The rate of functional problems after cosmetic rhinoplasty range from 15 to 68 percent with nasal airway obstruction found to be the most common indication for secondary surgery. The objective of this CME article is to provide readers with an understanding of the (1) functional components of nasal anatomy, (2) clinical functional assessment, and (3) the current evidence supporting corrective maneuvers for each component.

The Principles and Practice of Endonasal Rhinoplasty: Special Topics for Clinics in Plastic Surgery Journal

Endonasal rhinoplasty is a minimally invasive approach in which esthetic and functional improvements are made solely through intranasal, without transcolumellar, incisions and with limited soft tissue and skeletal disruption. In addition to intentionally limiting surgical dissection, the rhinoplasty surgeon must preoperatively recognize and surgically correct 4 common anatomic variants which predictably create all 3 patterns of secondary deformity. In combination, respecting these principles gives the surgeon greater predictability in achieving esthetic and functional improvements, and the ability to limit the adverse effects of skin contractility and postoperative scar contracture, thus reducing the risk of secondary deformity, patient dissatisfaction, and reoperation.

Endonasal FLI Approach for Rhinoplasty with Modified Cottle Low Strip Septoplasty

To date, an endonasal approach has not been described that combines different incisions to provide exposure of all of the key anatomical structures, allowing for adequate, comprehensive visualization of the nasal architecture including the complete quadrangular cartilage and its extension with the upper lateral cartilages, including the caudal septal border from the ventral border and anterior nasal spine to the anterior septal angle, the scroll, and internal nasal valve.The endonasal approach that Fausto Lopez-Infante designed, the FLI technique, combines several basic known endonasal incisions that together allow excellent access and great visualization of the intranasal surgical field, enables extensive septal work, and preserves the natural anatomy of the dorsum as well as the tip support structures.This technique and approach to nasal surgery are based on an understanding of anatomy, allow standardization of the surgery, and make it reproducible. It is an outstanding option with excellent cosmetic and functional results.

Finesse in Caucasian Endonasal Rhinoplasty: The S.O.F.T. Concept

The nasal anatomy of Caucasian people includes thin skin, limited soft tissue volume, a high dorsum, strong cartilaginous framework, and narrow elliptical nasal inlets. A smooth dorsal contour, a well-defined tip, a naturally soft-feeling tip, and a functionally patent nasal valve constitute key objectives for Caucasian rhinoplasty. The author's focus on minimal-impact surgery has resulted in multiple novel techniques, embedded in a coherent algorithmic concept termed the S.O.F.T. (surgery and ongoing care free of trauma) concept. The foundation is the endonasal operation for the entire spectrum of primary and secondary deformities and maximal preservation of anatomic structures.

Remarks on Perfection in Plastic Surgery of the Face

An expectation of perfect and close to ideal outcomes is attributed not only to aesthetic, but also to reconstructive surgery. Contrary to quite common belief and despite great potential, the real chances for achieving attractive appearance are limited to relatively simple cases with moderately abnormal morphology, sufficient homogenous material, and hardly conspicuous scars potential. Therefore, the expectations for fully satisfactory outcomes should be limited to jaw surgery, cosmetic rhinoplasty, otoplasty, and some rejuvenation procedures, provided the best and uneventful surgery is secured. On the basis of over 40 years of clinical practice (KK) and survey of about 30,000 photos presenting both early and long term outcomes, the authors present their own subjective opinion on the value and potential of plastic surgery with regard to aesthetic evaluation. The paper is illustrated by numerous examples of plastic and esthetic procedures.

Satisfaction in rhinoplasty: the possible impact of anxiety and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is a complex but commonly applied surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction is the least discussed but one of the most important determinants of surgical success.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the patient satisfaction together with surgeon satisfaction were the main goals of this study. The roles of anxiety, gender, age and follow-up period were also studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

53 eligible patients operated by the first two authors within the previous 2 years were enrolled in the study. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as the details of the surgical procedure. Functional and esthetic satisfactions of the patients were evaluated by VAS and ROE respectively. Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by VAS in crosswise manner. Anxiety was measured by STAI_s and STAI_t scales.

RESULTS

The analysis concerning esthetic results as well as functional results did not reveal any significant difference between the two surgeons (p = 0.132, p = 0.43 respectively). ROE scores were significantly different among patients with "good" and "very good" functional results. The difference between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction was found to be insignificant (p = 0.273). Correlation analysis yielded a positive correlation between STAI_I and STAI_II (Pearson r = 0.335, p = 0.014) but not between STAI scores and ROE scores. Moreover, there was no relation between anxiety scores and the functional results. Likely, gender as well as age, follow-up, and surgical technique were not found to have any effect on patient satisfaction either.

CONCLUSION

Patient satisfaction is preferential in rhinoplasty. In our patient series, patient satisfaction was shown to be correlated with functional outcome but not with surgeon satisfaction. Anxiety was not found to have a significant impact on results of rhinoplasty. Our results should be interpreted cautiously keeping in mind that our patients' primary drive for rhinoplasty was functional.