Augmentation Mammaplasty After Breast Enhancement With Hyaluronic Acid

Complications after breast augmentation with hyaluronic acid: a case report

Breast augmentation is a very requested procedure in aesthetic surgery. Over time, various techniques of breast augmentation have been described, both through the use of alloplastic materials and autologous tissues: implants, fat grafting, flap surgery, and injectable fillers. According to the international current trend to perform minimally invasive procedure, injectable fillers have progressively increased their uses and notoriety in aesthetic medicine. Among the various available products, hyaluronic acid is likely to be the most popular synthetic filler all over the world. Nowadays many brands are on the market and this paper focuses on Macrolane which is a NASHA-based (stabilized hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin) filler. However, although highly biocompatible, as any material, foreign to our body, also hyaluronic acid fillers undergo a process of degradation and disposal. In our work, we report the first case in literature of migration of Macrolane in an axillary lymph node in a 45-year-old woman three years after injection for breast augmentation and its related management. The aim of the paper is to discuss and underline further complications and their treatment besides the ones already described in literature in order to provide a deeper knowledge concerning the use and the side effects of injectable fillers in aesthetic medicine.

[Cosmetic Breast Augmentation without Silicone Implants]

Cosmetic Breast Augmentation without Silicone Implants Abstract. Cosmetic breast augmentation procedures without silicone implants are becoming increasingly popular. Mastopexy can be adapted to the needs of the patient and usually result in an at least optical augmentation. Lipofilling is a safe procedure in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery and can help to restore natural appearance, compensate volume deficiencies, and correct asymmetries, that may be congenital or a consequence of prior surgeries. Cosmetic breast augmentation of very small breasts or when aiming at higher breast volumes using lipofilling only are usually combined with procedures for tissue expansion in order to increase the take rate of the injected fat. Hyaluronic acid injections is no valid alternative and are not recommended for cosmetic breast augmentation.

Sub-muscular Breast Augmentation Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) consists of infiltration of saline solution with lidocaine and epinephrine into the tissues to obtain regional anesthesia and vasoconstriction. The use of TLA in augmentation mammoplasty has been described for sub-glandular positioning. We describe a modified TLA technique for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation reporting our experience during the past 7 years.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, 300 patients underwent bilateral primary sub-muscular breast augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution was prepared with 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Firstly, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, secondarily, during surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle.

RESULTS

The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated while performing TLA was 740 mL per breast. No signs of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity were reported and conversion to general anesthesia was never required. In all patients, no pain nor discomfort was reported during the pre-operating infiltration and surgical procedure. We reported a major complication rate of 3.3% (4 hematomas and 6 seromas) and a minor complication rate of 6.0% (8 implant dislocation and 10 dystrophic scars formation).

CONCLUSIONS

TLA represents a safe and efficacious technique for performing breast augmentation surgery with sub-muscular implant positioning. This technique guarantees good pain control during and after surgery and has low incidence of postoperative side effects. Patients subjected to sub-muscular breast augmentation with TLA were satisfied.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Application on the Perisilicon Capsule Structure

BACKGROUND

Silicon implants constitute a major part of plastic surgery practice. Although materials with high biocompatibility have been used around the implants, capsule formation still develops and progressive nature of this process results in capsule contraction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of hyaluronic acid injected around the silicon block on the capsule structure.

METHODS

Twenty Wistar albino rats were used in the study. Rats were divided into two main groups (group 1 and group 2) and two subgroups. Rats in group 1 were sacrificed in week 4 and rats in group 2 were sacrificed in week 8. A subcutaneous pouch was created in the dorsum of the rats and a silicon block was placed into the pouch in groups 1A and 2A. 0.2 ml of hyaluronic acid was injected around the silicon block in group 1B and group 2B. Rats were sacrificed and capsule structure and thickness were analyzed following macroscopic evaluation. Concentrations of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and heat shock protein-47 (HSP-47) were evaluated immunohistochemically, and statistical comparisons were made.

RESULT

Capsule structure consisted of three layers in all the groups. A more intense collagen structure was observed in the middle layer. The capsule was thinnest in group 1A and thickest in group 2B; the difference between the groups was statistically significant. TGF-β1 was most intense in group 2B and it was correlated with the amount of collagen. Involvement of HSP-47 was observed mainly in collagen and also in fibroblasts and vascular structures, and its concentration was found to be lower in groups 2A and 2B.

CONCLUSION

Exogenously added cross-linked hyaluronic acid increased the capsular thickness and may increase the risk of developing capsular contracture around silicone implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Evidence was obtained from the well-designed controlled trials without randomization.

[Body contouring]

In our contemporary postmodern society, a modified perception of the human body is accompanied by an increasing demand for body shaping procedures. The treatment needs to be effective but it is just as important that they are safe and can be easily integrated into the daily working and routine schedule. While the options for minimally invasive volume addition are largely limited to injectable implants based on hyaluronic acid or autologous fat, a multitude of options are available for volume reduction. Before deciding on the method of choice, the following needs to be considered: which indications need to be treated, the extent of the reduction in volume and how much pain and possible undesired reactions the patient is prepared to accept.