Effects of Abdominoplasty on Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Pulmonary Function

Perinatal outcomes following abdominoplasty: a retrospective study and review of current literature

BACKGROUND

Abdominoplasty surgery is a common body contouring surgery to remove excess fat and skin and restore weakened or separated abdominal muscles caused by aging, pregnancy, or weight fluctuations. There is limited literature regarding patient and pregnancy outcomes after abdominoplasty.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether there was a correlation between adverse pregnancy outcomes and history of abdominoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Our study used a large federated deidentified national health research network with data sourced from 68 healthcare organizations within the United States (TriNetX; data accessed on August 19, 2022). All patients with a record of pregnancy were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes and were grouped into those with a history of abdominoplasty and those without. This study evaluated the perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes mellitus, macrosomia, stillbirth, abnormal placentation, and wound disruption or infection occurring during a patient's pregnancy after abdominoplasty. Propensity matching was performed to account for potential confounders. An alpha level of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 44,737 patients meeting our criteria, 304 had a history of abdominoplasty, whereas 44,433 did not (control). Our study found that patients with a history of abdominoplasty had significantly higher gravidity, were largely located in the Southern and Midwest region, and had higher counts of vaginal deliveries and cesarean deliveries than the control cohort (Table 1). After propensity score matching, our study found a lower risk of preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes in patients with abdominoplasty (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.67; P<.0001) (Table 2). Furthermore, abdominoplasty was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.13; P=.0002) (Table 2). Lastly, this study did not find significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes (Table 2).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that abdominoplasty may be associated with a relative increase in the rates of preterm delivery and cesarean delivery and that other perinatal outcomes are not increased. This provides evidence that future desire for pregnancy need not be a relative contraindication to abdominoplasty.

Intra-abdominal pressure increases peri-operatively in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction: A prospective study linking high intra-abdominal pressure to non-fatal lung embolism within one patient

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. The procedure and peri-operative period are associated with the risk of severe post-operative complications, like venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and lung embolism. Whether the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) increases after the closure of the abdominal defect, thereby potentially affecting the venous backflow and the risk of VTE, is currently not known.

AIM

The primary aim is to test if the closure of the abdominal donor site increases the IAP in women undergoing secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

By using a Unometer, we measured the intravesical pressure as a surrogate marker for the IAP, at baseline, immediately after, and 24 h after abdominal skin closure, for 13 patients.

RESULTS

The mean IAP increased from 6.1 mmHg (95% CI 4.6-7.7) at baseline to 9.0 mmHg (95% CI 8.0-10.0) immediately after skin closure [mean diff. 2.9 (95% CI 1.0-4.8) (p = 0.007)] and further up to 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 9.0-14.5) 24 h after closure [mean diff. 5.3 (95% CI 1.4-9.1) (p = 0.012)]. We found that IAP varies among the patients, regardless of the tightness of abdominal closure or rectus plication (n = 3). Immediately after closure, none of the isolated patients showed abnormal levels of IAP (>12 mmHg), while eight out of 12 isolated patients (67%) showed IAP levels above the normal range after 24 h. One patient developed a non-fatal lung embolism.

CONCLUSION

The mean IAP increases significantly over the post-operative period after DIEP flap reconstruction, although abnormal IAP values are only seen 24 h after the closure of the skin.

Abdominal Hypertension after Abdominal Plication in Postbariatric Patients: The Consequence in the Postoperative Recovery

Background  Abdominoplasty with abdominal plication increases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and has been previously associated with limited diaphragmatic excursion and respiratory dysfunctions. Many factors found in abdominoplasties and among postbariatric patients predispose them to a higher occurrence. This study aims to evaluate the impact of abdominal plication among postbariatric patients, assess whether the plication increases their IAP, and analyze how these IAP correlate to their postoperative outcome. Methods  This prospective study was performed on all patients who underwent circumferential Fleur-De-Lis abdominoplasty. For this intended study, the IAP was measured by an intravesical minimally invasive approach in three stages: after the initiation of general anesthesia, after a 10-cm abdominal wall plication and skin closure, and 24 hours after the procedure. Results  We included 46 patients, of which 41 were female and 5 were male. Before the bariatric procedure, these patients had an average maximum weight of 121.4 kg and an average maximum body mass index of 45.78 kg/m 2 ; 7 were grade I obese patients, 10 were grade II, and 29 were grade III. Only three patients were operated on with a gastric sleeve and 43 with gastric bypass. We presented six patients with transitory intra-abdominal hypertension in the first 24 hours, all of them from the grade I obesity group, the highest presented was 14.3 mm Hg. We presented 15% (7/46) of complication rates, which were only four seroma and five dehiscence; two patients presented both seroma and wound dehiscence. Conclusion  Performing a 10-cm abdominal wall plication or greater represents a higher risk for intra-abdominal hypertension, slower general recovery, and possibly higher complication rate in patients who presented a lower degree of obesity (grade I) at the moment of the bariatric surgery.

Alternative Abdominal Wall Plication Techniques: A Review of Current Literature

Abdominoplasty is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. By removing redundant skin and fat tissue, body contouring narrows the waist and achieves a naturally flattened appearance. To achieve this, one technique frequently utilized is plication of the abdominal rectus sheath. Although abdominal wall plication is commonly performed during abdominoplasty, there is a lack of consensus regarding which plication method provides the best outcomes. Each variation addresses some of the common intraoperative and postoperative complications of abdominoplasty. These include extended operating time, rupture of the plication, epigastric bulging, and patient postoperative dissatisfaction. Many plication techniques have been described in the literature, but no single technique has been adopted by plastic surgeons as the gold standard. Here we present a narrative comparison of current published literature reporting novel or modified abdominoplasty plication techniques. This includes diagrams of each procedure, sutures utilized, and key concepts of each plication technique. Discussion regarding how these modifications change operating time, alter epigastric bulging, and improve the ability to narrow the waist is provided. The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise source document for plastic surgeons to reference when choosing a plication method to use during abdominoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Back Pain According to Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Scale After Abdominoplasty With Plication: A Prospective Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Chronic back pain is a physically debilitating condition that affects more than 80% of adults in the United States. A recent case series highlighted how abdominoplasty with plication can offer an alternative surgical approach for treating chronic back pain. These results have been corroborated by a large prospective series. However, this study excluded male and nulliparous subjects, who may also benefit from this surgery. Our group aims to investigate the effect of abdominoplasty on back pain in a more diverse patient population.

METHODS

Subjects older than 18 years undergoing abdominoplasty with plication were recruited. An initial survey called the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) was administered at the preoperative visit. This questionnaire inquiries about and grades the patient's history of back pain and surgery. Demographic, medical, and social history was also obtained. A follow-up survey and RMQ was then given 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects were enrolled. Subjects had a mean age of 43.4 ± 14.3 years. Twenty-eight subjects were female and 26 were postpartum. Twenty-one subjects reported initial back pain on the RMQ scale. Of these, 19 reported a decrease in RMQ score after surgery, including male and nulliparous subjects. A significant decrease in mean RMQ score was demonstrated 6 months after surgery (2.94-0.44, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis of female subjects demonstrated significantly decreased final RMQ score in parous women, vaginal or cesarean section delivery, and absence of twin gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominoplasty with plication significantly decreases self-reported back pain 6 months after surgery. These results support that abdominoplasty is not purely a cosmetic procedure but can also be applied therapeutically to improve functional symptoms of back pain.

EFFECTS OF DIEP FLAP-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION ON RESPIRATORY FUNCTION

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction (BR) is an essential part of breast cancer treatment, and the DIEP flap is considered the gold standard reconstruction technique, which uses a free abdominal flap. Concerns have been raised regarding the effects of abdominoplasty on respiratory functions. This topic has not been addressed regarding donor-site closure of DIEP flaps. Our aim is to prospectively compare preoperative and postoperative spirometry in patients undergoing DIEP flap-based BR, investigating its impact on respiratory function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 21 patients who received BR with DIEP flap in our institution, who underwent pulmonary function assessment by spirometry 1 month preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. We assessed Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF). Statistical analysis was performed using the paired samples test.

RESULTS

An improvement in the mean values of all 4 variables was found at 1 year from surgery. Namely, FEV1 improved by 0.1 L with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.39 L, FVC by 0.04 L with SD of 0.627, FEV1/FVC by 2.11 L with SD of 7.85 L, and PEF by 1.2 L with SD of 1.45 L. Only PEF was statistically significant [P = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that DIEP flap BR does not negatively impact respiratory function. Although further knowledge is required, we confirm the possibility of considering the indication for abdominoplasty and DIEP flap reconstruction in patients with altered and reduced pulmonary function.

A case of severe acute respiratory failure after elective abdominoplasty

Surgical correction of abdominal muscle diastasis may decrease intra-abdominal volume and increase intra-abdominal pressure. The induced changes may ultimately lead to respiratory compromise. In abdominoplasty, one of the most frequently performed esthetic procedures, those changes are believed to be transient and clinically insignificant. We describe a case where acute change in respiratory physiology after abdominoplasty led to severe respiratory failure with significantly decreased pulmonary compliance in a young and otherwise healthy patient. In this case mechanical ventilation failed to improve compliance, and reversal of abdominoplasty was required to restitute pulmonary function.

A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study

Background

This study presents a classification system and treatment method to correct Rectus diastasis (RD) during abdominoplasty.

Materials and methods

One hundred and sixty seven patients undergoing abdominoplasty were enrolled between April 2014 and January 2018. Forty-three patients did not present with RD and were excluded from the analysis. Mean age was 40.32 years, mean BMI was 23.84, and minimum follow-up was 24 months. A four-type (A: mild 2–3cm, B: moderate 3–5cm, C: severe 5–7cm, and D: very severe 7–9cm) classification system is described. A different treatment method is performed in each category using continuous and interrupted absorbable sutures. Postoperatively patients filled up a questionnaire that involved the level of pain, the postoperative day they performed specific indoor/outdoor activities, and the evaluation of the aesthetic result.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed between the four RD types regarding pain, complications, and return to specific activities. All types of RD had the same low rate complication profile. The seroma rate was 0.81%. The infection rate was 0.81%, and the thromboembolism and the pneumonic embolism rate was 0%. After 2–6 years of follow-up no clinical recurrence of rectus diastasis was observed. All reoperations (14.52%) were performed due to scar deformities. Mean pain score levels were very low (<1.5) and within a week most patients returned to specific indoor and outdoor activities. Most patients were extremely satisfied with the results.

Conclusions

In this article, we present an updated classification system and treatment protocol to provide surgeons a safe and standardized method that produces high-quality aesthetic results.

Level of evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02739-w.

Evaluation of functional outcomes following rectus diastasis repair-an up-to-date literature review

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade rectus diastasis has gained attention as a condition that may benefit from surgery. Numerous surgical techniques have been presented but scientifically proper studies reporting functional outcome are few and evidence is incomplete. The aim of this up-to-date review is to analyse the outcomes of rectus diastasis repair in recently published papers, focusing on functional changes following surgery.

METHOD

A comprehensive search in PubMed and Web of Science was performed. Suitable papers were selected using titles and abstracts with terms suggesting surgical treatment of rectus diastasis. All abstracts were scrutinised, and irrelevant studies excluded in four stages. Reports providing original data, including outcome assessment following surgery, were included.

RESULT

Ten papers with a total of 780 patients were found to fulfil the search criteria. Study design, surgical procedure, follow-up time, functional outcome and assessment instruments were compiled. All included studies reported improvements in a variety of functional aspects regardless of surgical method. The outcomes assessed include core stability, back pain, abdominal pain, posture, urinary incontinence, abdominal muscle strength and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review show that surgical repair of rectus diastasis is a safe and effective treatment that improves functional disability. However, the absence of standardized instruments for assessing outcome makes it impossible to compare studies. Since indications for surgery are relative and related to core function, valid instruments for assessing indication and outcome are needed to ensure benefit of the procedure.

Pregnancy after transverse plication lipoabdominoplasty, undermining halted at umbilicus, liposuction without restrictions, umbilicoplasty with a skin graft, and low transverse scar localization (TULUA). Literature review and case report

OBJECTIVE

To report the case of a pregnant woman with a history of transverse plication abdominoplasty (TULUA) and to conduct a review of the available literature on the impact of this intervention on the course of gestation and vice versa.

METHODS

Case report of a 23-year-old pregnant woman with a history of TULUA abdominoplasty performed eight months before pregnancy. A literature search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library, SciELO, LILACS, BVS and Google Scholar, with no restriction by language or date of publication. Studies of any design were included, including case reports. Book chapters and clinical practice guidelines were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,158 studies were identified, of which 13 case reports or case series met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, for a total of 111 patients. No reports of TULUA before pregnancy were found. Age at the time of delivery ranged between 19 and 37 years and all births were at term, with newborns of adequate birth weight. Eleven studies described the route of delivery, including 7 cases of cesarean section and 4 vaginal deliveries. Two studies described the development of cervical prolapse, one at 15 weeks of gestation and the second at the time of labor. Three patients experienced impaired abdominal wall nerve block during the cesarean section. Regarding cosmetic results after delivery, there is a paucity of data about potential relapse in the form of skin laxity or diastasis. However, satisfactory cosmetic results were reported in two cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of literature on the topic of pregnancy following abdominoplasty, and it is limited to case reports. The literature suggests that abdominoplasty could increase the frequency of cervical prolapse and cesarean section, although the impact on perinatal outcome is not clear. It appears that abdominal wall repair is maintained. Additional studies focusing on perinatal outcomes in women with abdominoplasty and the impact of gestation on the results of the intervention are required.

Sub-Scarpa's Lipectomy in Abdominoplasty: An Analysis of Risks and Rewards in 723 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

During the course of performing abdominoplasties, a plastic surgeon will encounter a certain body habitus characterized by a thick, tethered, and excessively redundant upper skin flap. Often these patients also demonstrate diffuse and substantial fascial laxity. One approach to this problem involves direct thinning and release of the flap by resection of the sub-Scarpa's fat pad. In theory, this resection should be safe from a flap perfusion standpoint. However, the safety of the sub-Scarpa's resection has not been completely documented.

OBJECTIVES

The author sought to assess the safety and efficacy of sub-Scarpa's lipectomy in abdominoplasty.

METHODS

A total 723 patients were retrospectively examined and divided into 2 groups: those with (Group B) and those without (Group A) a sub-Scarpa's lipectomy component to the abdominoplasty. Because of differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, data analysis was performed with a logistic regression model and with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The sub-Scarpa's lipectomy technique allowed for substantial thinning of the flap: the average weight of the resected fat pad was 411 g. Wide undermining allowed for substantial fascial correction, and excellent results were obtainable even in challenging cases. The sub-Scarpa's lipectomy group did not demonstrate an increase in either minor (<5 cm2) or major (>5 cm2) flap necrosis. However, there was a statistically significant increase in fat necrosis and seroma formation in Group B compared with Group A. In both groups, an increasing body mass index was a risk factor for fat necrosis and major flap necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a sub-Scarpa's lipectomy during abdominoplasty is a useful technique to consider for selected abdominoplasty candidates. The risks of minor and major flap loss do not seem to be increased compared to the standard abdominoplasty, but the risks of fat necrosis and seroma formation may be greater.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

DIEAP Flap Patients Equally as Satisfied with the Abdomen as Abdominoplasty Patients

Background:

The dermolipectomy of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap procedure is designed to give an end result as seen with abdominoplasty (AP). Several steps of an AP are, however, not routinely performed. This study compared the patient-reported outcomes between these 2 procedures with an emphasis on the abdomen.

Methods:

Thirty-four patients reconstructed with a DIEAP flap (DIEAP group), and 30 patients with an AP (AP group) were asked to complete 2 study-specific questionnaires. The first questionnaire covered abdominal outcomes, whereas the second was concerned with general outcomes.

Results:

The DIEAP group was significantly older compared with the AP group. Eighty-five percentage of the DIEAP group and 66 % of the AP group answered the questionnaires. Postoperatively, the DIEAP group was significantly more satisfied with their bodies when dressed (P = 0.009), and there was a trend of DIEAP patients being more satisfied with the appearance of the abdomen (P = 0.085). No significant difference was found comparing outcomes concerning umbilicus, muscle function, pain, scarring, and contour. The DIEAP group was more worried about their health than the AP group postoperatively (P = 0.044). AP patients had a significantly more altered body image (P = 0.016) and increased sexual desire (P = 0.003) than DIEAP patients. There was no significant difference regarding changes in self-image, social relationships, being naked with partner, and overall satisfaction.

Conclusion:

DIEAP flap patients were equally as satisfied with the abdomen as AP patients.

Abdominoplasty Improves Low Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence

BACKGROUND

The authors studied the incidence of low back pain and urinary incontinence in the postpartum population presenting for abdominoplasty, and the extent of improvement following the operation.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective study used validated questionnaires: the Oswestry Disability Index for back pain and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form for urinary incontinence. Questionnaires were administered preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Results cover 214 patients from nine centers. The mean age was 42.1 years, the mean parity was 2.5, and the mean body mass index was 26.3 kg/m. The mean surgical statistics were as follows: weight removed, 1222 g; liposuction volume, 795 ml; and diastasis, 4.5 cm. Eighty-seven percent of the abdominoplasties were either radical, high lateral tension, or high oblique tension. The mean Oswestry Disability Index score preoperatively was 21.6 percent, and 8.8 percent had no back pain. The mean score was 8 percent at 6 weeks and 3.2 percent at 6 months. These results are statistically significant. The mean International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire score preoperatively was 6.5; of the patients assessed, 27.5 percent had no incontinence. This score fell to 1.6 at 6 weeks, and the same, 1.6, at 6 months. These results are also statistically significant. Preoperative predictors of back pain were body mass index greater than 25 kg/m and umbilical hernia; predictors of incontinence were age older than 40 years and vaginal deliveries. There were no significant predictors of postoperative back pain or urinary incontinence improvement at 6 months. All methods of abdominoplasty produced similar improvement.

CONCLUSION

Abdominoplasty with rectus repair creates a significant improvement in the functional symptoms of low back pain and urinary incontinence.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.