Perioperative Glycemic Control in Plastic Surgery: Review and Discussion of an Institutional Protocol

Outcomes and Perioperative Risk Factors after Oncologic Free-Flap Scalp Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Little is known about the risk factors associated with complications after free flap scalp reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify patient, scalp defect, and flap characteristics associated with increased risk of surgical complications.

METHODS

 A retrospective study was performed of free-flap scalp reconstruction in oncologic patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2002 to 2017. Data collection included patient, defect, flap, and complication characteristics. Complications were classified into major, defined as complications requiring surgical intervention, and minor, defined as complications requiring conservative treatment. Risk factors and outcome variables were compared using chi-square with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

 A total of 63 free flaps to the scalp in 58 patients were performed; average follow-up was 3.5 years. Most flaps were muscle-only or musculocutaneous. One-third of patients with free flaps experienced complications (n = 21, 15 major and 6 minor). Examining risk factors for complications, patients with cardiovascular disease were nearly three times more likely to have suffered a major complication than patients without cardiovascular disease (36.7 vs. 12.1%, p = 0.04). This was the only significant risk factor noted. Perioperative radiotherapy, prior scalp surgery, flap type, and recipient vessel selection were found to be nonsignificant risk factors.

CONCLUSION

 Cardiovascular disease may be a significant marker of risk for major complications in patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction of the scalp. This information should be used to help guide perioperative counseling and decision making in this challenging patient population.

Establishing a recommended duration of blood glucose monitoring in nondiabetic patients following orthopaedic surgery

Previous studies have demonstrated that blood glucose (BG) levels should be monitored for at least 1 week after orthopaedic surgery in diabetic patients, but no study has determined how long nondiabetic patients should be monitored. As postoperative elevations in BG have deleterious effects, determining a duration for monitoring the BG of nondiabetic patients after major orthopaedic surgery is needed to detect hyperglycemic events, create comprehensive protocols for nondiabetic orthopaedic patients, and reduce adverse outcomes. A retrospective study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent a major orthopaedic surgery at a community hospital. A BG level of 150 mg/dl was the cutoff used to define hyperglycemia according to our institutional guidelines. A χ² , analysis of variance, and subgroup analysis were performed separately. Greater than 67% of nondiabetic patients experienced a high BG level (>150 mg/dl) after surgery. We found that nondiabetic patients reached their postoperative maximum BG level at 20 h, which was sooner compared to diabetic patients. We discovered more than 92% of nondiabetic patients reached a maximum BG levels within the first 72 h of hospitalization, while the BG levels after this period were found to be within normal limits in greater than 87% of cases. We propose that BG management be instituted in nondiabetics from the preoperative period to 72 h after surgery, including patients who are same-day discharges. There may not be a need to continue inpatient BG monitoring beyond the first 72 h for nondiabetic hospitalized patients with extended hospitalizations.

Strategies to Minimize Surgical Scarring: Translation of Lessons Learned from Bedside to Bench and Back

Significance: An understanding of the physiology of wound healing and scarring is necessary to minimize surgical scar formation. By reducing tension across the healing wound, eliminating excess inflammation and infection, and encouraging perfusion to healing areas, surgeons can support healing and minimize scarring. Recent Advances: Preoperatively, newer techniques focused on incision placement to minimize tension, skin sterilization to minimize infection and inflammation, and control of comorbid factors to promote a healing process with minimal scarring are constantly evolving. Intraoperatively, measures like layered closure, undermining, and tissue expansion can be taken to relieve tension across the healing wound. Appropriate suture technique and selection should be considered, and finally, there are new surgical technologies available to reduce tension across the closure. Postoperatively, the healing process can be supported as proliferation and remodeling take place within the wound. A balance of moisture control, tension reduction, and infection prevention can be achieved with dressings, ointments, and silicone. Vitamins and corticosteroids can also affect the scarring process by modulating the cellular factors involved in healing. Critical Issues: Healing with no or minimal scarring is the ultimate goal of wound healing research. Understanding how mechanical tension, inflammation and infection, and perfusion and hypoxia impact profibrotic pathways allows for the development of therapies that can modulate cytokine response and the wound extracellular microenvironment to reduce fibrosis and scarring. Future Directions: New tension-off loading topical treatments, laser, and dermabrasion devices are under development, and small molecule therapeutics have demonstrated scarless wound healing in animal models, providing a promising new direction for future research aimed to minimize surgical scarring.

Updates in Diabetic Wound Healing, Inflammation, and Scarring

Diabetic patients can sustain wounds either as a sequelae of their disease process or postoperatively. Wound healing is a complex process that proceeds through phases of inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Diabetes results in several pathological changes that impair almost all of these healing processes. Diabetic wounds are often characterized by excessive inflammation and reduced angiogenesis. Due to these changes, diabetic patients are at a higher risk for postoperative wound healing complications. There is significant evidence in the literature that diabetic patients are at a higher risk for increased wound infections, wound dehiscence, and pathological scarring. Factors such as nutritional status and glycemic control also significantly influence diabetic wound outcomes. There are a variety of treatments available for addressing diabetic wounds.

Healing Adjuncts in Craniofacial Surgery: A Practical Review of Dietary Vitamins and Supplements

BACKGROUND

In the United States, the use of herbal supplements on a regular basis ranges from 32% to 97%. Prevalence of supplement use is particularly elevated after facial surgery. It has been reported as high as 50%. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of literature on the dietary use of supplements. They are not regulated by the FDA. Often, they are not reported by patients. This study examines the role of dietary supplements as adjuncts to healing in craniofacial and facial aesthetic surgeries.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE. Databases were screened for papers describing the use of supplements in craniofacial procedures in adult patients using relevant search terms. Data on criteria, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 19 articles were selected from the 806 identified. Fifteen different supplements or combinations of supplements have been studied for use in facial surgeries. Of these 15 supplements, the following demonstrated potential healing benefits: dry ivy leaf extract, Nazalzem ointment (vitamin A and dexpanthenol), combination nasal sprays (phospholipids, fatty acids, vitamin A, and vitamin E), Saireito pills, topical olive oil, yunnan baiyao, melilotus extract, arnica, and combination arnica and ledum. Arnica is the most commonly studied supplement in a variety of facial operations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is ample evidence to support a role for the use of certain dietary supplements to optimize wound healing in craniofacial and facial aesthetic surgery. Controlled diet and use of appropriate supplements may have a synergistic beneficial effect on wound healing following craniofacial surgery. However, there is a need for additional reporting to allow for the creation of stronger guidelines and increased patient screening, reporting, and compliance.

An Update on Measures of Preoperative Glycemic Control

Glycemic control represents a modifiable preoperative risk factor in surgery. Traditionally, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and plasma glucose are utilized as measures of glycemic control. However, studies show mixed results regarding the ability of these conventional measures to predict adverse surgical outcomes. This may be explained by the time window captured by HbA1c and serum glucose: long-term and immediate glycemic control, respectively. Fructosamine, glycosylated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol constitute alternative metrics of glycemic control that are of growing interest but are underutilized in the field of surgery. These nontraditional measures reflect the temporal variations in glycemia over the preceding days to weeks. Therefore, they may more accurately reflect glycemic control within the time window that most significantly affects surgical outcomes. Additionally, these alternative measures are predictive of negative outcomes, even in the nondiabetic population and in patients with chronic renal disease and anemia, for whom HbA1c performs poorly. Adopting these newer metrics of glycemia may enhance the value of preoperative evaluation, such that the effectiveness of any preoperative glycemic control interventions can be assessed, and adverse outcomes associated with hyperglycemia better predicted. The goal of this review is to provide an update on the preoperative management of glycemia and to describe alternative metrics that may improve our ability to predict and control for the negative outcomes associated with poor glycemic control.

PROACTIVE PROTOCOL-BASED MANAGEMENT OF HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETES IN COLORECTAL SURGERY PATIENTS

OBJECTIVE

The management of diabetic patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery continues to be unsystematic, despite evidence that standardized perioperative glycemic control is associated with fewer postoperative surgical complications. We examined the efficacy of a pre-operative diabetes optimization protocol implemented at a single institution in improving perioperative glycemic control with a target blood glucose of 80 to 180 mg/dL.

METHODS

Patients with established and newly diagnosed diabetes who underwent elective colorectal surgery were included. The control group comprised 103 patients from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2013, before protocol implementation. The glycemic-optimized group included 96 patients following protocol implementation from January 1, 2014, through July 31, 2016. Data included demographic information, blood glucose levels, insulin doses, hypoglycemic events, and clinical outcomes (length of stay, re-admissions, complications, and mortality).

RESULTS

Patients enrolled in the glycemic optimization protocol had significantly lower glucose levels intra-operatively (145.0 mg/dL vs. 158.1 mg/dL; P = .03) and postoperatively (135.6 mg/dL vs. 145.2 mg/dL; P = .005). A higher proportion of patients enrolled in the protocol received insulin than patients in the control group (0.63 vs. 0.48; P = .01), but the insulin was administered less frequently (median [interquartile range] number of times, 6.0 [2.0 to 11.0] vs. 7.0 [5.0 to 11.0]; P = .04). Two episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred in the control group. There was no difference in clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Improved peri-operative glycemic control was observed following implementation of a standardized institutional protocol for managing diabetic patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

ABBREVIATIONS

HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin A1c; IQR = interquartile range.

Defining the Association between Diabetes and Plastic Surgery Outcomes: An Analysis of Nearly 40,000 Patients

Background:

Diabetes is an increasingly prevalent comorbidity in patients presenting for surgery, impacting nearly 14% of adults in the United States. Although it is known that diabetic patients are at an increased risk for postoperative complications, there is a paucity of literature on the specific ramifications of diabetes on different surgical procedures.

Methods:

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset, demographics, outcomes, and length of in-patient hospitalization were examined for patients who underwent plastic surgery between 2007 and 2012. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between diabetes status and a spectrum of medical and surgical postoperative outcomes.

Results:

Thirty-nine thousand four hundred seventy-five plastic surgery patients were identified, including 1,222 (3.10%) with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 1,915 (4.75%) with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), who had undergone breast, hand/upper and lower extremity, abdominal, or craniofacial procedures. Logistic regression analyses showed that only insulin-dependent diabetics had a higher likelihood of surgical complications (IDDM: P value < 0.0001; NIDDM: P value < 0.103), whereas patients with both IDDM and NIDDM had increased likelihoods of medical complications (IDDM: P value < 0.001; NIDDM: P value = 0.0093) compared with nondiabetics. Average hospital stay for diabetics was also longer than for nondiabetics.

Conclusions:

Diabetes is associated with an increase in a multitude of postoperative complications and in hospital length of stay, in patients undergoing plastic surgery. Diabetes status should thus be evaluated and addressed when counseling patients preoperatively. Risks may be further stratified based on IDDM versus NIDDM status.