Gluteal Implants Versus Autologous Flaps in Patients with Postbariatric Surgery Weight Loss: A Prospective Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Gluteal Projection After Lower Body Lift

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Papers on Gluteal Augmentation

Background

Gluteoplasty or gluteal augmentation is a popular cosmetic procedure that is used to improve the volume, shape, and contour of the buttocks.

Objectives

This bibliometric analysis aims to characterize emerging research trends and to assess the methodological quality of the highest impact gluteoplasty research.

Methods

The 100 most-cited publications in gluteoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journal years (from Inception to August 2023). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine level of evidence (LOE) of each study was assessed.

Results

The 100 most-cited publications regarding gluteoplasty were cited by a total of 2375 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 5 to 176 (mean 23.75 ± 25.86), with the highest-cited study being authored by Simonacci, discussing autologous fat grafting (n = 176). Most publications were LOE 5 (n = 55), representative of the large number of case series and reports. The number of publications for LOE 1, 2, 3, and 4 was 1, 9, 13, and 22, respectively. The main content focus was "surgical technique" in 38 publications, followed by "outcomes" (n = 34) and "risk factors/prognosis" (n = 10). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used in 20 publications, and 33 publications reported aesthetic outcome measures.

Conclusions

This analysis demonstrates a need for improvement in research methodologies regarding gluteoplasty research. This advancement would be facilitated by robust, high-quality research through randomized control trials and multicenter studies, as well as the further development of validated PROMs for gluteoplasty.

Level of Evidence 2

A Dynamic Anatomic Study of Parasacral Perforators: Mapping, Perforasome, and Applications for Buttock Enhancement

BACKGROUND

Due to the lack of knowledge about parasacral artery perforators, flaps from this region cannot be used with complete confidence in their security and effectiveness. Knowledge of the clusters and perforasome of these perforators could help in the design of more reliable flaps and extend the range of applications.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the location, number, and density of perforators, and to subsequently analyze the perfusion flow and linking vessel distribution.

METHODS

Five fresh cadavers were harvested and dissected. For the mapping, after injecting lateral sacral arteries with colored latex, perforators with a diameter of >0.5 cm were examined in 5 sacral regions. All data were collected on the suprafascial plane, with an orthonormal coordinate system placed on iliac crests and median lines. For perforasome analysis, 5 perforators and 3 three sacral flaps were injected with radiopaque dye. A dynamic (4-dimensional) computed tomographic angiography completed the analysis.

RESULTS

A mean [standard deviation] of 8.4 [1.36] perforators per corpse, with a mean diameter of 0.72 [0.14] mm, were identified. There was a higher density of parasacral perforators close to the median line and 7.6 cm above the iliac crests. This pattern was not a random distribution (P < 0.05). The perfusion area was preferentially in the superior gluteal region. Perfusion flow was permitted by the dominant direct-linking vessels towards adjacent lumbar perforators, oriented diagonally upward and outward to the midline.

CONCLUSIONS

Parasacral perforator flaps appear to be a useful procedure in reconstruction and in aesthetic surgery, especially in gluteal augmentation. Their reliability depends on sound anatomic knowledge, with accurate preoperative perforator mapping.

Gluteal Region Reshaping of Massive Weight Loss Patients—A Decision-Making Strategy

Background  Massive weight loss (MWL) is a very common presentation that you may face as a plastic surgeon. Each patient has his own individual criteria, so, you should work according to a well-organized plan, especially when such cases have concerns about their gluteal area contour that were neglected before by many surgeons. A decision-making strategy was used to give a personalized treatment for targeting gluteal region reshaping of MWL patients.

Methods  This study considered all patients with MWL subjected to buttock reshaping. There was no randomization in treatment; there was a case-by-case assessment. We analyzed the features of the buttocks, the type of surgery performed, the outcomes, and the complications.

Results  Fifty two patients were included (41 females and 11 males), ages ranged between 21 and 66 years. Demographic data, preoperative body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were collected. Statistically significant improvements were observed in gluteal ptosis and patient satisfaction grades.

Conclusion  Aesthetic improvement of the buttocks involves either augmentation or contouring that may be obtained by liposculpture, surgical lifting, or combination. Patients with MWL have high expectations and are often treated with multiple procedures. Thus, an easy strategic approach personalized on each patient to treat multiple adjacent areas in one operation is necessary. Adipose tissue distribution, gluteal skin status, and BMI were the main factors that can forcefully affect our plan to guarantee reduction of unpleasant results and complications and improve patient satisfaction.

Fragmented Fat Transfer for Massive Weight Loss Gluteal Contouring

SUMMARY

A recently introduced novel fragmentation technique has made it possible to convert fat tissue from apronectomy into large-scale viable lipograft, providing a glimpse of an alternative to traditional liposuction and its harvesting limitations. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial clinical evidence on fragmented fat transfer to restore volume and enhance deflated gluteal contours in a sample of massive weight loss patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of 20 women who received autologous buttock fat grafts that were harvested and fragmented following belt lipectomies and/or fleur-de-lis abdominoplasties. The average total volume subcutaneously grafted into the buttocks was 720 ml (bilateral), ranging from 500 ml to 960 ml. No local gluteal complications, such as seroma, infection, fat necrosis, or subcutaneous nodulations, were reported. Photographic observation of postoperative results over a 6- to 14-month follow-up period showed clear enhancement of body contouring in all patients, especially in those in whom fat transfer was combined with circumferential lifts. Fat fragmentation has proved useful and effective in providing great amounts of viable fat graft in a safe, simple, and reproducible technique without noticeable complications. The method eliminates the organic response to the insult of liposuction while using the entirety of formerly discarded apronectomy tissue to provide fine, transferable, autologous fat without increasing operative time. Although preliminary, the authors' clinical findings with this new technique support further studies of fragmented fat as an alternative to liposuction in gluteal fat grafting. Additional potential applications, including in wound healing and regenerative medicine, are worth exploring. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Are We Measuring What Really Counts?

Most published clinical research is faulty because of many reasons, one being faulty design. A remedy to this problem is the correct utilization of the PICOT (population, intervention, comparative intervention, outcome and time horizon) format in the design of a clinical research question. One element of the PICOT format, "outcome," has not been assessed adequately in aesthetic surgery. In this review, we found that in the last decade of all randomized controlled trials and comparative studies published in Aesthetic Surgery Journal, only about half specified a primary outcome. Regrettably, only 40% reported both a primary outcome and justification for choosing this outcome. This poses a credibility issue with the conclusions of the majority of published studies. There is an urgent need to develop critical outcome sets for aesthetic procedures to be utilized by future investigators. With such a critical outcome set, we will be able to pool the results of multiple studies on the same subject and reach conclusive results.