Platelet-Rich Plasma, Adipose Tissue, and Scar Modulation

Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Chronic Respiratory Disease

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in chronic respiratory disease patients will cause lung regeneration, thereby slowing the progression of the disease. We performed a search to obtain pertinent articles on the following electronic databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, NCBI, Medscape, and clinicaltrials.gov. Keywords used during in search included "Platelet Rich Plasma" AND "Chronic Respiratory Disease" AND/OR "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease". A total of 15 articles were chosen for this paper, published from 2011 to 2021, and included case series, lab studies, animal studies, cohort studies, and clinical trials. All statistical data were considered significant if the p-value was less than 5%, or 0.05. Our findings confirmed that PRP therapy successfully caused anti-inflammatory effects and acceleration of tissue regeneration, resulting in improved lung function. This, in turn, slowed the progression of the disease and led to an improved quality of life. Not all chronic respiratory disease patients present in the same manner, but the connecting link is the damaged tissue of the lungs, causing issues with the functionality of the lungs. By adjunctively treating patients with PRP, the high concentration of platelets and their secreted growth factors can help induce an acceleration of healing and regeneration of pulmonary tissue. This, in turn, can slow the progression of the disease, which could lower the overall mortality rate in chronic respiratory disease patients. More studies should be conducted on this topic, specifically large, double-blinded, randomized human trials with controls, to further assess the efficacy and beneficial effects of PRP treatment on the lungs.

Intraovarian PRP Injection Improved Hot Flashes in a Woman With Very Low Ovarian Reserve

PRP, rich in growth factors and cytokines, has been gaining considerable attention as an adjunct therapy to fertility treatment for women with very low ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency. To date, most prior studies have focused on the effect of PRP on ovarian response pertaining to oocyte production and pregnancy outcome following assisted reproductive technology. This report presents a patient with very low ovarian reserve, with medical problems that preclude her from taking hormone replacement therapy, who presented for fertility treatment with PRP and then accidentally reported significant improvement of menopausal symptoms including her hot flashes for 14 weeks following PRP intra-ovarian injection. The purpose of this case report is to increase awareness of clinicians about the use of PRP as a potential alternative therapy for hot flashes in women who have contraindications for hormone replacement therapy.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Modulates Gap Junction Functionality and Connexin 43 and 26 Expression During TGF-β1-Induced Fibroblast to Myofibroblast Transition: Clues for Counteracting Fibrosis

Skeletal muscle repair/regeneration may benefit by Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) treatment owing to PRP pro-myogenic and anti-fibrotic effects. However, PRP anti-fibrotic action remains controversial. Here, we extended our previous researches on the inhibitory effects of PRP on in vitro transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, the effector cells of fibrosis, focusing on gap junction (GJ) intercellular communication. The myofibroblastic phenotype was evaluated by cell shape analysis, confocal fluorescence microscopy and Western blotting analyses of α-smooth muscle actin and type-1 collagen expression, and electrophysiological recordings of resting membrane potential, resistance, and capacitance. PRP negatively regulated myofibroblast differentiation by modifying all the assessed parameters. Notably, myofibroblast pairs showed an increase of voltage-dependent GJ functionality paralleled by connexin (Cx) 43 expression increase. TGF-β1-treated cells, when exposed to a GJ blocker, or silenced for Cx43 expression, failed to differentiate towards myofibroblasts. Although a minority, myofibroblast pairs also showed not-voltage-dependent GJ currents and coherently Cx26 expression. PRP abolished the TGF-β1-induced voltage-dependent GJ current appearance while preventing Cx43 increase and promoting Cx26 expression. This study adds insights into molecular and functional mechanisms regulating fibroblast-myofibroblast transition and supports the anti-fibrotic potential of PRP, demonstrating the ability of this product to hamper myofibroblast generation targeting GJs.

In vitro characterization and clinical use of platelet-rich plasma-derived Endoret-Gel as an autologous treatment for atrophic scars

BACKGROUND

Normal healing process becomes severely dysregulated in pathophysiological conditions such as inflammation, infection or underlaying diseases. These scenarios hamper the standard healing pattern and dermal fibrotic tissue develops.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study a novel three-dimensional formulation (Endoret-Gel) based on plasma rich in growth factors technology (Endoret-PRGF) has been assessed for atrophic scar management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microstructure analysis, growth factor content, and projection capacity of both formulations (Endoret-Gel and Endoret-PRGF) was assessed. Additionally, a clinical evaluation of Endoret-Gel treatment was also performed in a case of an extense atrophic scar.

RESULTS

Endoret-Gel presented high molecular weight plasmatic proteins that formed solid thermal aggregates enclosed by a stable fibrin network. This formulation has a higher cutaneous projection capacity compared with Endoret-PRGF. Both formulations presented a high load of bioactive proteins such as EGF, PDGF-AB, and IGF-I being higher in liquid Endoret-PRGF. Clinical results evidenced that infiltrations of Endoret-Gel derived in an early volumetric disposal that was maintained for several months. The treatment provided and immediate soft tissue augmentation and scar amelioration effect that was translated into a noticeable clinical improvement of the injury. No side effects or adverse events were reported during ten-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary findings suggest that Endoret-Gel may act not only as a temporary volumizer but also as soft tissue stimulator that might be used as a monotherapy for scar management.

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Prevent TGF-β1-Induced Myofibroblast Generation but Are Not Synergistic when Combined: Morphological in vitro Analysis

The persistence of activated myofibroblasts is a hallmark of fibrosis of many organs. Thus, the modulation of the generation/functionality of these cells may represent a strategical anti-fibrotic therapeutic option. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based therapy has shown promising clues, but some criticisms still limit the clinical use of these cells, including the need to avoid xenogeneic compound contamination for ex vivo cell amplification and the identification of appropriate growth factors acting as a pre-conditioning agent and/or cell delivery vehicle during transplantation, thus enabling the improvement of cell survival in the host tissue microenvironment. Many studies have demonstrated the ability of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a source of many biologically active molecules, to positively influence MSC proliferation, survival, and functionality, as well as its anti-fibrotic potential. Here we investigated the effects of PRP, murine and human bone marrow-derived MSCs, and of the combined treatment PRP/MSCs on in vitro differentiation of murine NIH/3T3 and human HDFα fibroblasts to myofibroblasts induced by transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, a well-known pro-fibrotic agent. The myofibroblastic phenotype was evaluated morphologically (cell shape and actin cytoskeleton assembly) and immunocytochemically (vinculin-rich focal adhesion clustering, α-smooth muscle actin and type-1 collagen expression). We found that PRP and MSCs, both as single treatments and in combination, were able to prevent the TGF-β1-induced fibroblast-myofibroblast transition. Unexpectedly, the combination PRP/MSCs had no synergistic effects. In conclusion, within the limitations related to an in vitro experimentation, our study may contribute to providing an experimental background for supporting the anti-fibrotic potential of the combination PRP/MSCs which, once translated "from bench to bedside," could potentially offer advantages over the single treatments.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Prevents In Vitro Transforming Growth Factor-β1-Induced Fibroblast to Myofibroblast Transition: Involvement of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A/VEGF Receptor-1-Mediated Signaling †

The antifibrotic potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is controversial. This study examined the effects of PRP on in vitro transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-induced differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, the main drivers of fibrosis, and the involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A in mediating PRP-induced responses. The impact of PRP alone on fibroblast differentiation was also assessed. Myofibroblastic phenotype was evaluated by confocal fluorescence microscopy and western blotting analyses of α-smooth muscle actin (sma) and type-1 collagen expression, vinculin-rich focal adhesion clustering, and stress fiber assembly. Notch-1, connexin 43, and VEGF-A expression were also analyzed by RT-PCR. PRP negatively regulated fibroblast-myofibroblast transition via VEGF-A/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1-mediated inhibition of TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling. Indeed TGF-β1/PRP co-treated fibroblasts showed a robust attenuation of the myofibroblastic phenotype concomitant with a decrease of Smad3 expression levels. The VEGFR-1 inhibition by KRN633 or blocking antibodies, or VEGF-A neutralization in these cells prevented the PRP-promoted effects. Moreover PRP abrogated the TGF-β1-induced reduction of VEGF-A and VEGFR-1 cell expression. The role of VEGF-A signaling in counteracting myofibroblast generation was confirmed by cell treatment with soluble VEGF-A. PRP as single treatment did not induce fibroblast myodifferentiation. This study provides new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms underpinning PRP antifibrotic action.