1
|
Francis SD, Kang AW, Maheta BJ, Sangalang BR, Salingaros S, Wu RT, Nazerali RS. National trends in revision procedures in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: Autologous vs implant-based approaches. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 95:127-133. [PMID: 38905789 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction involves collaborative decision-making between patients and surgeons, but the need for multiple revisions after the initial reconstructive surgery process can burden patients and the healthcare system. This study explored how the type of breast reconstruction (autologous [ABR], immediate implant-based reconstruction [IBR], or two-stage IBR) impacts postreconstruction revision rates. METHOD Using MarketScan Databases, a retrospective database study (2007-2021) was conducted, identifying revision procedures through Current Procedural Terminology codes. Statistical analysis with linear models, adjusted for patient characteristics and surgical factors, used a significance threshold of p < 0.05. RESULTS Among 58,264 patients, 6.2% of ABR patients, 3.8% of immediate IBR patients, and 3.6% of two-stage IBR patients underwent future revisions. IBR had a 51% lower incidence rate of revision operations than ABR (incidence rate ratio = 0.49, p < 0.001). Within IBR, there was no significant difference in the number of operations between immediate IBR (0.06 ± 0.32) and two-stage IBR (0.05 ± 0.32, p = 0.95). Immediate IBR demonstrated 12% (OR = 0.88, p = 0.0022) and 70% (OR = 0.30, p < 0.001) lower odds of requiring breast revision and fat grafting compared to ABR, respectively. Two-stage reconstruction had 66 % lower odds of requiring only fat grafting than ABR (OR = 0.34, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION ABR necessitated a higher number of total revision procedures after completion of the initial reconstruction. These findings will better equip providers and patients to counsel patients in understanding their reconstructive journey, planning their reconstructions and timing, and provide more accurate estimates of the number of procedures that will be required to reach their aesthetic goals and final outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bhagvat J Maheta
- California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA
| | - Brian R Sangalang
- University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA
| | | | - Robin T Wu
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rahim S Nazerali
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGuire P, Glicksman C, Ferenz S, Haws M, Lawrence M, Black S, Faasse K. Symptom Improvement After Explantation With No Capsulectomy for Systemic Symptoms Associated With Breast Implants. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44:820-828. [PMID: 38339986 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjae034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic symptoms associated with breast implants (SSBI) is a term used to describe a group of patients who attribute a variety of symptoms to their implants. Previous studies have shown symptom improvement after implant removal in these patients irrespective of whether part or all the implant capsule has been removed. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate implant removal with no capsule removed in symptomatic and control subjects. METHODS Eligible study subjects were sequentially enrolled at 5 investigator sites. The SSBI Cohort included patients with systemic symptoms they attributed to their implants who requested explantation. The Non-SSBI Cohort included subjects without systemic symptoms attributed to their implants who requested explantation with or without replacement. All subjects agreed to undergo explantation without removal of any capsule. RESULTS Systemic symptom improvement was noted in SSBI subjects without removal of the implant capsule, comparable to the results of our previously published study. SSBI patients showed a 74% reduction in self-reported symptoms at 6 months with no capsulectomy which was not statistically different from partial or total capsulectomies (P = .23). CONCLUSIONS Explantation with or without capsulectomy provides symptom improvement in patients with systemic symptoms they associate with their implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
|
3
|
Dalli J, Nguyen C, Jindal A, Epperlein J, Hardy N, Pulitano C, Warrier S, Cahill R. A feasibility study assessing quantitative indocyanine green angiographic predictors of reconstructive complications following nipple-sparing mastectomy. JPRAS Open 2024; 40:32-47. [PMID: 38425697 PMCID: PMC10904167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction offers benefits; however, complications can compromise outcomes. Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) may mitigate perfusion-related complications (PRC); however, its interpretation remains subjective. Here, we examine and develop methods for ICGFA quantification, including machine learning (ML) algorithms for predicting complications. Methods ICGFA video recordings of flap perfusion from a previous study of patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with either immediate or staged immediate (delayed by a week due to perfusion insufficiency) reconstructions were analysed. Fluorescence intensity time series data were extracted, and perfusion parameters were interrogated for overall/regional associations with postoperative PRC. A naïve Bayes ML model was subsequently trained on a balanced data subset to predict PRC from the extracted meta-data. Results The analysable video dataset of 157 ICGFA featured females (average age 48 years) having oncological/risk-reducing NSM with either immediate (n=90) or staged immediate (n=26) reconstruction. For those delayed, peak brightness at initial ICGFA was lower (p<0.001) and significantly improved (both quicker-onset and brighter p=0.001) one week later. The overall PRC rate in reconstructed patients (n=116) was 11.2%, with such patients demonstrating significantly dimmer (overall, p=0.018, centrally, p=0.03, and medially, p=0.04) and slower-onset (p=0.039) fluorescent peaks with shallower slopes (p=0.012) than uncomplicated patients with ICGFA. Importantly, such relevant parameters were converted into a whole field of view heatmap potentially suitable for intraoperative display. ML predicted PRC with 84.6% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity. Conclusion Whole breast quantitative ICGFA assessment reveals statistical associations with PRC that are potentially exploitable via ML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Dalli
- UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, UCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C.L. Nguyen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - A. Jindal
- UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, UCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - N.P. Hardy
- UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, UCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C. Pulitano
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - S. Warrier
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - R.A. Cahill
- UCD Centre for Precision Surgery, School of Medicine, UCD, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marra C, Cuomo R, Ceccaroni A, Pentangelo P, Alfano C. Acellular dermal matrix in breast augmentation surgery: A systematic review. JPRAS Open 2024; 40:111-117. [PMID: 38854623 PMCID: PMC11156703 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in breast reconstruction was described for the first time in 2000s. Recently, ADMs have been used not only in reconstructive surgery but also in cosmetic breast surgery for both primary and revision indications. Therefore, the matrices represent an important support to recent surgical techniques for breast augmentation in treatment or prevention of complications. Conversely, ADMs can affect operative times, costs, and additional complications related to their placement. A review of the literature was carried out to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and indication for the use of these matrices in cosmetic breast surgery. Methods A literature review was conducted including manuscripts published up to April 2023 on breast augmentation using ADM. PubMed and MEDLINE were the databases used for research. The keywords used were "Breast augmentation" and "Acellular Dermal Matrix." Non-English language articles have been excluded. Results The initial search for "breast augmentation" yielded 7900 results, which were further reviewed for "Acellular Dermal Matrices" in breast augmentation, selecting 74 articles. Following further screening, 12 articles were included in the review. A total of 787 patients were treated with breast augmentation and ADM placement. The main indication was capsular contracture (60%). Conclusions The current evidence from the published scientific literature, albeit limited, suggests the indication for the use of ADM in revision surgery, to support the prosthetic pocket, to minimize the risk of capsular contracture and its recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Marra
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy
| | - Roberto Cuomo
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Alessandra Ceccaroni
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy
| | - Paola Pentangelo
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy
| | - Carmine Alfano
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bai J, Ferenz S, Fracol M, Kim JY. Revision Breast Reconstruction With Biologic or Synthetic Mesh: An Analysis of Postoperative Capsular Contracture Rates. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2024; 6:ojae035. [PMID: 38854738 PMCID: PMC11160324 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Both biologic and synthetic mesh have been found to reduce the risk of capsular contracture, yet there is limited data assessing the use of these scaffold materials in revision breast reconstruction. Objectives This investigation sought to assess the ability of either biologic or synthetic mesh to prevent capsular contracture in the revision breast reconstruction population. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of implant-based revision reconstructions performed by the senior author between 2008 and 2023. Patient demographics and outcomes were assessed, including the incidence of Baker Grade III or IV capsular contractures. Results were compared between biologic and synthetic mesh groups using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Ninety-five breasts underwent revision reconstruction with 90 (94.7%) for correction of malposition, 4 (4.2%) for size change, and 1 (1.1%) for revision after additional oncologic breast surgery. Of these breasts, 26 (27.4%) used biologic mesh and 69 (72.6%) used synthetic mesh. Capsular contracture occurred in 1 (3.8%) biologic mesh breast and 4 (5.8%) synthetic mesh breasts. There was no significant difference in the incidence of capsular contracture between the 2 groups (P = 1.000). None of the recorded demographics were risk factors for capsular contracture, including the use of biologic or synthetic mesh (P = .801). Conclusions Both biologic and synthetic mesh are successful at preventing capsular contracture in patients undergoing implant-based revision reconstruction. This adds to the growing evidence that both scaffold materials can be used in complex revision breast reconstruction to aid in preventing capsular contracture. Level of Evidence 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John Y Kim
- Corresponding Author: Dr John Y. Kim, 259 E Erie St Suite 2060, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. E-mail: ; Instagram: drjohnkimplastics
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ng TP, Loo BYK, Yong N, Chia CLK, Lohsiriwat V. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3366-3376. [PMID: 38285304 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14943-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the world's most prevalent cancer, and many breast cancer patients undergo mastectomy as the choice of treatment, often with post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) use has become a method to improve outcomes of reconstruction for these patients. We aimed to compare postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes, which are still poorly characterized, between groups utilizing acellular dermal matrix during reconstruction and those without. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched electronic databases from inception to 16 June 2022 for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies comparing the outcomes of patients who have and have not received acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction. The results were quantitatively combined and analyzed using random-effects models. RESULTS A total of nine studies were included, representing 3161 breasts. There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes, such as seroma formation (p = 0.51), hematomas (p = 0.20), infections (p = 0.21), wound dehiscence (p = 0.09), reoperations (p = 0.70), implant loss (p = 0.27), or skin necrosis (p = 0.21). Only two of the studies included evaluated patient-reported outcomes between the use and non-use of ADM in implant-based breast reconstruction using BREAST-Q questionnaire, as well as self-reported pain. There was no reported significant difference in BREAST-Q or pain scores. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows comparable short- and long-term outcomes between ADM and non-ADM breast reconstruction, suggesting that the use of ADM may not be necessary in all cases given their additional cost. However, there is a paucity of data for patient-reported outcomes, and further research is required to determine whether ADM use affects patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trina Priscilla Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brandon Yong Kiat Loo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicole Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clement Luck Khng Chia
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
- Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Visnu Lohsiriwat
- Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boyd CJ, Chiodo MV, Lisiecki JL, Wagner RD, Rohrich RJ. Systematic Review of Capsular Contracture Management following Breast Augmentation: An Update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:303e-321e. [PMID: 36877620 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular contracture is one of the most frequent indications for revision following breast augmentation. Management goals focus on restoring breast aesthetics and minimizing subsequent recurrence of capsular contracture. As new data emerge, close review of the data are merited to build evidence-based clinical guidelines to inform surgical practice and management of capsular contracture. METHODS A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases was conducted to characterize the surgical management of capsular contracture in revision breast augmentations. The primary endpoint was capsular contracture recurrence rate. RESULTS The review was conducted in November of 2021. Primary search revealed 14,163 results. Initial screening by title left 1223 articles. Abstract review left 90 articles for full-text review, of which 34 were ultimately included and were all observational in nature. CONCLUSIONS Capsular contracture management remains an important topic, with limited high-level evidence for establishing clear evidence-based treatment guidelines. Although more evidence is required to assess the effects of capsulectomy, implant exchange, and plane change, these appear to be useful mechanisms for reducing recurrent capsular contracture. There is more evidence regarding the use of acellular dermal matrix, although this still requires long-term follow-up studies. New developments regarding textured implants limit the revision breast augmentation surgeon to smooth devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carter J Boyd
- From the Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone
| | | | | | - Ryan D Wagner
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Rod J Rohrich
- Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Samuels K, Millet E, Wong L. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 44:26-35. [PMID: 37595294 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capsular contracture is a known complication of breast augmentation and is among the top reasons for revisional breast augmentation procedures. The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been shown to reduce the rate of capsular contracture in breast reconstruction and augmentation, theorizing that it acts as a protective barrier between the implant capsule and inflammatory process responsible for capsular contracture. The role of ADM in treatment of capsular contracture has been investigated in numerous studies, with a variety of ADMs. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of existing literature on the use of ADM for treatment of capsular contracture in aesthetic breast augmentation patients to investigate differences in efficacy of ADM types. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were systematically reviewed for articles pertaining to capsular contracture, acellular dermal matrices, and breast augmentation. Number of patients, type of ADM, Baker grade, follow-up time, complication rate, and capsular contracture rate were recorded from identified articles. Data was pooled from studies to calculate a capsular contracture rate for each ADM type, with a chi-squared test performed for analysis. Identified studies with a comparative group were included in a meta-analysis utilizing risk ratio (RR) to assess the efficacy of ADM. RESULTS Nine articles including ADM for treatment of capsular contracture in breast augmentation met criteria for inclusion, with a total of 481 breasts. Strattice was the most commonly utilized ADM (n = 391), followed by AlloDerm (n = 57). There was a statistically significant difference in efficacy of ADM among the studied ADM types (P < .001). AlloDerm, FlexHD, and DermaMatrix had the lowest capsular contracture rates (0%). NeoForm and SurgiMend had the highest capsular contracture rates (each 25%, but with n = 4 and n = 8, respectively). Strattice had a capsular contracture rate of 1.53% in the pooled data, and meta-analysis showed that Strattice reduced the risk of capsular contracture (RR 0.14 [95% CI 0.06, 0.31]) compared with conventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS Acellular dermal matrices appear to be effective at treating capsular contracture after breast augmentation while maintaining a low complication rate. Overall capsular contracture rates are low with the use of ADM. There is a statistically significant difference in efficacy among ADM types. Meta-analysis shows that Strattice is effective at reducing the risk of capsular contracture in breast augmentation patients when compared to conventional treatment. Future research, especially in the form of randomized controlled trials, is needed to further investigate the efficacy of various ADMs in the treatment of capsular contracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
9
|
Susini P, Nisi G, Pierazzi DM, Giardino FR, Pozzi M, Grimaldi L, Cuomo R. Advances on Capsular Contracture-Prevention and Management Strategies: A Narrative Review of the Literature. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5034. [PMID: 37305202 PMCID: PMC10256414 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Capsular contracture (CC) is the most relevant complication of both aesthetic and reconstructive breast implant surgery. For many years, experimental and clinical trials have attempted to analyze CC risk factors, clinical features, and appropriate management strategies. It is commonly accepted that a multifactorial etiology promotes CC development. However, the heterogeneity in patients, implants and surgical techniques make it difficult to suitably compare or analyze specific factors. As a consequence, discordant data are present in literature, and a true systematic review is often limited in its conclusions. Hence, we decided to present a comprehensive review of current theories on prevention and management strategies, rather than a specific "solution" to this complication. Methods The PubMed database was searched for literature regarding CC prevention and management strategies. Pertinent articles in English, published before December 1, 2022, were compared with selection criteria and eventually included in this review. Results Through the initial search, 97 articles were identified, of which 38 were included in the final study. Several articles explored different medical and surgical preventive and therapeutic strategies, showing numerous controversies on appropriate CC management. Conclusions This review provides a clear overview of the complexity of CC. The wide variety of clinical situations in term of patients, implants, and surgical techniques prevent the standardization of CC management strategies. By contrast, a patient-customized approach should be preferred, and different strategies should be considered depending on the specific case. Further research is desirable to better ascertain evidence-based protocols with regard to CC prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Susini
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Nisi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Diletta Maria Pierazzi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Francesco Ruben Giardino
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Mirco Pozzi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Grimaldi
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| | - Roberto Cuomo
- From the Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Swanson E. Peer Review: How to Review a Plastic Surgery Manuscript. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90:281-287. [PMID: 37093767 PMCID: PMC10090308 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Little information is available regarding how to review a plastic surgery manuscript. This vital responsibility ensures that publications meet an acceptable scientific standard. Thoughtful and thorough reviews are essential to protect patients and surgeons from unscientific practices and products. This discussion provides information for the reviewer, gained from the author's experience, including examples of a thorough review, likely to be useful to the editor, and a cursory one that is unhelpful.The first consideration is relevance. Prerequisites for publication include institutional review board approval, disclosure of financial conflicts, and discussion of the regulatory status of devices. Particular attention is needed to check for conflicts of interest, which are endemic in plastic surgery today. In view of the common practice of using computer-generated imaging, reviewers need to be especially vigilant for inauthentic "photoshopped" photographs. Examples of published images that have been digitally altered are provided.If data are available, it may be possible to check the statistical tests. Reviewers need to be aware of the practice of p-hacking. A quick literature search can identify relevant but unreferenced publications. The manuscript needs to be properly organized into sections. Minor points may be made regarding style. The study design and methodology need to be evaluated to be sure that the conclusions are well supported by data. Randomized studies are rarely feasible. Fortunately, well-done prospective observational studies in consecutive patients can be just as useful. Realistic complication rates are expected. Meta-analyses in plastic surgery are often subject to confounding variables. Comments should be available to the authors; confidential comments hidden from authors are discouraged. Like honesty, transparency is the best policy. Manuscripts should be evaluated solely for merit, not the identity of the author or institution. Timeliness of submission of the review is appreciated by authors.Evidence-based medicine is concerned solely with the facts. The 2 basic criteria are a solid scientific basis and reliable evidence of efficacy. Reviewers need to keep an open mind. Studies that challenge the status quo are often the most valuable ones and are needed for the advancement of the specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Swanson
- Dr Swanson is in private practice in Leawood, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Swanson E. Does Acellular Dermal Matrix Really Reduce the Risk of Recurrent Ptosis after Mastopexy? PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e4491. [PMID: 36032371 PMCID: PMC9400928 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
|
12
|
Abi-Rafeh J, Safran T, Winocour S, Dionisopoulos T, Davison P, Vorstenbosch J. Complications of Capsulectomies: An Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM 2022; 4:ojac025. [PMID: 35747463 PMCID: PMC9212085 DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojac025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although plastic surgeons commonly perform capsulectomies for a variety of peri-prosthetic capsular conditions, the safety of capsulectomy remains unknown, and the literature lacks evidence describing its morbidity and complication rates for patients inquiring about its associated risks. Objectives The present study aims to identify and define the complication rates associated with capsulectomies. Methods An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was performed between the years 2015 and 2018. All information pertaining to demographics, patient-related information, surgical indications, procedure-related information, outcomes, and complications were assessed. Results The study identified 2231 cases of surgeon-reported capsulectomies; indications most commonly reported included capsular contracture (n = 638, 28.6%) and breast implant rupture (n = 403, 18.1%). In total, 141 patients (6.32%) were hospitalized for longer than 1 postoperative day (range, 2-28 days), while the overall complication rate was 3.0% (n = 67/2231 patients). Incidence of minor complications, representing superficial surgical site infections, was 0.8%, while the major complication rate was 2.24%. These included 7 cases of deep surgical site infections (0.3%), 19 organ space infections (0.9%), and 8 cases of wound dehiscence (0.4%). Eight patients developed sepsis (0.4%); 6 patients required transfusions (0.3%); 1 case of postoperative pneumonia and 1 myocardial infarction were also identified (n = 1 each, 0.0%). The overall reoperation and readmission rates were 2.0%, representing a readmission rate of 66% among patients with complications. Conclusions The present study provides the first estimate of the incidence of complications associated with capsulectomies. Although the NSQIP database contains significant limitations, the data presented herein describe a complication profile that plastic surgeons can share with their patients during informed consent. Level of Evidence: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad Abi-Rafeh
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tyler Safran
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sebastian Winocour
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tassos Dionisopoulos
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter Davison
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Joshua Vorstenbosch
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bassetto F, Pandis L, Azzena GP, De Antoni E, Crema A, Scortecci L, Brambullo T, Pavan C, Marini M, Facchin F, Vindigni V. Complete Implant Wrapping with Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:1575-1584. [PMID: 35352159 PMCID: PMC9512749 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-02826-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Capsular contracture (CC) represents one of the most common complications in breast reconstruction surgery, impairing final result and patients’ well-being. The role of acellular dermal matrixes (ADM) has been widely described for the treatment and prevention of contracture. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complete implant coverage with porcine-derived ADM in preventing CC limiting complications. In addition, patients’ reported outcomes were evaluated in order to define the role of ADM in improving sexual, physical and psychosocial well-being and satisfaction. Methods 42 patients who underwent surgical treatment of 46 contracted reconstructed breasts from May 2018th to May 2019th were collected in the two groups (ADM group vs. Control group). Results The ADM group showed lower rate of CC recurrence and a higher rate of implant losses and minor complications. A significant difference was observed in red breast syndrome (27.3% in the ADM group vs. absent in control the group) and skin ulceration rates (18.2% in the ADM group vs. 4.18% in the control group). As for patients’ perceived outcomes, the ADM group showed a statistically significant higher postoperative Satisfaction of Breast Scale score compared to the control group. In addition, a significant difference was observed in the improvement of Physical Well-Being of the Chest Scale and the Satisfaction of Breast Scale after surgery, in favor to the ADM group. Conclusion Complete implant coverage with ADM may reduce the risk of CC recurrence in breast reconstruction. An accurate patient selection allows minimizing complications improving patient well-being and satisfaction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franco Bassetto
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Pandis
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Azzena
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Eleonora De Antoni
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Crema
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Leonardo Scortecci
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Tito Brambullo
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Pavan
- Psychiatric Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Marini
- Psychiatric Clinic, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Federico Facchin
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
- Plastic Surgery Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Viale Rodolfi 37, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Vindigni
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Neuroscience Department, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Trends in Breast Augmentation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:2691-2711. [PMID: 35654858 PMCID: PMC9729143 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-02904-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast augmentation is one of the most demanded procedures in plastic surgery and one of the most commonly performed by plastic surgeons. However, a bibliometric analysis of breast augmentation has not been published in recent years. The current study aimed to use a bibliometric analysis to conduct a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of breast augmentation research and provide the research trends and hotspots in this field. METHODS Publications on breast augmentation research were extracted from the Web of Science core collection database. VOSviewer 1.6.18 was used to assess co-authorship, co-occurrence, citation of countries, institutions, authors, and journals, as well as hotspot keywords. RESULTS On February 8, 2022, 4637 records of breast augmentation research published from 1985 to 2021 were collected. The bulk of the retrieved studies were original research articles (n = 2235, 48.20%). A total of 1053 (22.71%) papers were open access. The annual publication output increased annually. The USA was the driving force in this field and had a strong academic reputation. The top-contributing institution was the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (2.37%, with 110 publications). Plastic and reconstructive surgery (998 publications, 21.52%) published the most research in this field and was also the most frequently co-cited journal (22,351 citations, total link strength (TLS): 409,301). Clemens MW (68 publications, 1.47%) was the most prolific author, and Spear SL (1456 citations, TLS: 27,231) was the most frequently co-cited author. The research hotspots included the following four aspects: safety and effectiveness of breast implants, implant-based breast reconstruction, breast cancer incidence after breast implantation, and breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). The research trends were BIA-ALCL, implant-based breast reconstruction, BREAST-Q, acellular dermal matrix, capsular contracture, and autologous fat grafting. CONCLUSION The present study provides a panoramic view of breast augmentation research in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This novel comprehensive bibliometric analysis can help researchers and nonresearchers alike to rapidly identify the potential partners, research hotspots, and research trends within their areas of interest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|
15
|
Open Capsulotomy for Capsular Contracture after Breast Augmentation: An Alternative Treatment Algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:663e-665e. [PMID: 34468478 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Zingaretti N, Vittorini P, Savino V, Vittorini JC, De Francesco F, Riccio M, Parodi PC. Surgical Treatment of Capsular Contracture (CC): Literature Review and Outcomes Utilizing Implants in Revisionary Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:2036-2047. [PMID: 33543344 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02148-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this clinical review is to provide an overview of the use of breast implants after capsular contracture (CC) surgical treatment, with a focus on type of implants used. Furthermore, our experience in this field is also reviewed. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases were reviewed to identify literature related to surgical treatment of capsular contracture and implant replacement. Each article was reviewed by two independent reviewers to ensure all relevant publications were identified. The literature search identified 54 applicable articles. Of these, 26 were found to have a therapeutic level of evidence. The reference lists in each relevant paper were screened manually to include relevant papers not found through the initial search. RESULTS Only four articles report the replacement of implants after surgical treatment of capsular contracture. Six articles reported an implant exchange with only smooth silicone gel filled implants. Two reviews advice to use smooth implants in implant replacement. CONCLUSION With our expertise in the field and the results of this up-to-date literature review, it can be concluded that implant exchange is recommended in case of breast revision for capsular contracture, and the use of subpectoral smooth silicone gel breast implants is a good option after surgical treatment in patients with primary or recurrence Baker III-IV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
|
17
|
Swanson E. Is Acellular Dermal Matrix Really an Essential Part of the Management of Capsular Contracture of the Breast? Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:NP1255-NP1258. [PMID: 33623994 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
18
|
Abstract
Breast augmentation is consistently one of the most commonly performed aesthetic operations every year. Unfortunately, revision rates following primary augmentation remain as high as 36%. There are several causes for revision breast augmentation; however, the most common and challenging of these include capsular contracture, implant malposition, and ptosis of the aging breast following augmentation. Successful management of these problems requires knowledge on how to best treat the implant and capsule with the corresponding soft tissue simultaneously. While surgical management is important, understanding the pathological causes of these entities during the primary operation can reduce the need for revision. This article utilizes the most up-to-date literature to review the appropriate clinical evaluation and surgical management of these complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad D Denney
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Mountain Brook Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Alvin B Cohn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Grotting and Cohn Plastic Surgery, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jeremy W Bosworth
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Pallavi A Kumbla
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ganon S, Morinet S, Serror K, Mimoun M, Chaouat M, Boccara D. Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Prosthesis Capsular Contracture Recurrence. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:15-23. [PMID: 32696162 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01876-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Baker grade III and IV breast prosthesis capsular contractures represent a major problem for patients undergoing mammoplasties. The risk factors involved in recurrence are debated, and the best surgical approach for their prevention is not established. The objective was to identify these. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a retrospective study of patients operated on for capsular contracture at the Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris from 2012 to 2014. The characteristics at inclusion were compared so as to determine the risk factors of recurrence. The surgical approaches were compared between the patients with recurrence and those without at 5 years. RESULTS Of the 100 patients included, 24 had a recurrence. The minimal follow-up was 5 years. No risk factors of recurrence of capsular contracture were identified. The surgical approach associated with the lowest rate of recurrence was anterior capsulectomy [OR total capsulectomy = 2.36 (0.73; 8.037) OR capsulotomy = 4.33 (1.37; 14.81)] (p < 0.040) with alteration of the volume of the implant, whether greater or less than initially [OR greater volume = 0.30 (0.096; 0.83); OR smaller volume = 0.14 (0.008; 0.85)] (p < 0.018). CONCLUSION The occurrence of capsular contracture is a major problem with prosthetic breast surgery. The main risk factors identified to date are essentially in regard to the occurrence of a first episode. No significant risk factors for recurrence were identified. The best prevention appears to be an anterior capsulectomy with reducing the volume of the implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . IV.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kornstein AN. The Benefit of Acellular Dermal Matrix Placement in Primary Breast Surgery May Outweigh the Cost in Patients at High Risk of Capsular Contracture. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40:NP434-NP435. [PMID: 32304320 PMCID: PMC7294990 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N Kornstein
- Corresponding Author: Dr Andrew N. Kornstein, 539 Danbury Road, Wilton, CT 06897, USA. E-mail: ; Twitter: @andrewkornstei1
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mirhaidari S, Wagner DS. Response to "The Benefit of Acellular Dermal Matrix Placement in Primary Breast Surgery May Outweigh the Cost in Patients at High Risk of Capsular Contracture". Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40:NP436-NP437. [PMID: 32328621 PMCID: PMC7294991 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|