MAMnet: detecting and genotyping deletions and insertions based on long reads and a deep learning approach

VolcanoSV enables accurate and robust structural variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing

Structural variants (SVs) significantly contribute to human genome diversity and play a crucial role in precision medicine. Although advancements in single-molecule long-read sequencing offer a groundbreaking resource for SV detection, identifying SV breakpoints and sequences accurately and robustly remains challenging. We introduce VolcanoSV, an innovative hybrid SV detection pipeline that utilizes both a reference genome and local de novo assembly to generate a phased diploid assembly. VolcanoSV uses phased SNPs and unique k-mer similarity analysis, enabling precise haplotype-resolved SV discovery. VolcanoSV is adept at constructing comprehensive genetic maps encompassing SNPs, small indels, and all types of SVs, making it well-suited for human genomics studies. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that VolcanoSV surpasses state-of-the-art assembly-based tools in the detection of insertion and deletion SVs, exhibiting superior recall, precision, F1 scores, and genotype accuracy across a diverse range of datasets, including low-coverage (10x) datasets. VolcanoSV outperforms assembly-based tools in the identification of complex SVs, including translocations, duplications, and inversions, in both simulated and real cancer data. Moreover, VolcanoSV is robust to various evaluation parameters and accurately identifies breakpoints and SV sequences.

A comprehensive review of deep learning-based variant calling methods

Genome sequencing data have become increasingly important in the field of personalized medicine and diagnosis. However, accurately detecting genomic variations remains a challenging task. Traditional variation detection methods rely on manual inspection or predefined rules, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors. Consequently, deep learning-based approaches for variation detection have gained attention due to their ability to automatically learn genomic features that distinguish between variants. In our review, we discuss the recent advancements in deep learning-based algorithms for detecting small variations and structural variations in genomic data, as well as their advantages and limitations.

SVDF: enhancing structural variation detect from long-read sequencing via automatic filtering strategies

Structural variation (SV) is an important form of genomic variation that influences gene function and expression by altering the structure of the genome. Although long-read data have been proven to better characterize SVs, SVs detected from noisy long-read data still include a considerable portion of false-positive calls. To accurately detect SVs in long-read data, we present SVDF, a method that employs a learning-based noise filtering strategy and an SV signature-adaptive clustering algorithm, for effectively reducing the likelihood of false-positive events. Benchmarking results from multiple orthogonal experiments demonstrate that, across different sequencing platforms and depths, SVDF achieves higher calling accuracy for each sample compared to several existing general SV calling tools. We believe that, with its meticulous and sensitive SV detection capability, SVDF can bring new opportunities and advancements to cutting-edge genomic research.

LcDel: deletion variation detection based on clustering and long reads

Motivation: Genomic structural variation refers to chromosomal level variations such as genome rearrangement or insertion/deletion, which typically involve larger DNA fragments compared to single nucleotide variations. Deletion is a common type of structural variants in the genome, which may lead to mangy diseases, so the detection of deletions can help to gain insights into the pathogenesis of diseases and provide accurate information for disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Many tools exist for deletion variant detection, but they are still inadequate in some aspects, and most of them ignore the presence of chimeric variants in clustering, resulting in less precise clustering results. Results: In this paper, we present LcDel, which can detect deletion variation based on clustering and long reads. LcDel first finds the candidate deletion sites and then performs the first clustering step using two clustering methods (sliding window-based and coverage-based, respectively) based on the length of the deletion. After that, LcDel immediately uses the second clustering by hierarchical clustering to determine the location and length of the deletion. LcDel is benchmarked against some other structural variation detection tools on multiple datasets, and the results show that LcDel has better detection performance for deletion. The source code is available in https://github.com/cyq1314woaini/LcDel.

Tradeoffs in alignment and assembly-based methods for structural variant detection with long-read sequencing data

Long-read sequencing offers long contiguous DNA fragments, facilitating diploid genome assembly and structural variant (SV) detection. Efficient and robust algorithms for SV identification are crucial with increasing data availability. Alignment-based methods, favored for their computational efficiency and lower coverage requirements, are prominent. Alternative approaches, relying solely on available reads for de novo genome assembly and employing assembly-based tools for SV detection via comparison to a reference genome, demand significantly more computational resources. However, the lack of comprehensive benchmarking constrains our comprehension and hampers further algorithm development. Here we systematically compare 14 read alignment-based SV calling methods (including 4 deep learning-based methods and 1 hybrid method), and 4 assembly-based SV calling methods, alongside 4 upstream aligners and 7 assemblers. Assembly-based tools excel in detecting large SVs, especially insertions, and exhibit robustness to evaluation parameter changes and coverage fluctuations. Conversely, alignment-based tools demonstrate superior genotyping accuracy at low sequencing coverage (5-10×) and excel in detecting complex SVs, like translocations, inversions, and duplications. Our evaluation provides performance insights, highlighting the absence of a universally superior tool. We furnish guidelines across 31 criteria combinations, aiding users in selecting the most suitable tools for diverse scenarios and offering directions for further method development.

A survey of algorithms for the detection of genomic structural variants from long-read sequencing data

As long-read sequencing technologies are becoming increasingly popular, a number of methods have been developed for the discovery and analysis of structural variants (SVs) from long reads. Long reads enable detection of SVs that could not be previously detected from short-read sequencing, but computational methods must adapt to the unique challenges and opportunities presented by long-read sequencing. Here, we summarize over 50 long-read-based methods for SV detection, genotyping and visualization, and discuss how new telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies and pangenome efforts can improve the accuracy and drive the development of SV callers in the future.

Benchmarking datasets for assembly-based variant calling using high-fidelity long reads

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in long-read sequencing technologies have enabled accurate identification of all genetic variants in individuals or cells; this procedure is known as variant calling. However, benchmarking studies on variant calling using different long-read sequencing technologies are still lacking.

RESULTS

We used two Caenorhabditis elegans strains to measure several variant calling metrics. These two strains shared true-positive genetic variants that were introduced during strain generation. In addition, both strains contained common and distinguishable variants induced by DNA damage, possibly leading to false-positive estimation. We obtained accurate and noisy long reads from both strains using high-fidelity (HiFi) and continuous long-read (CLR) sequencing platforms, and compared the variant calling performance of the two platforms. HiFi identified a 1.65-fold higher number of true-positive variants on average, with 60% fewer false-positive variants, than CLR did. We also compared read-based and assembly-based variant calling methods in combination with subsampling of various sequencing depths and demonstrated that variant calling after genome assembly was particularly effective for detection of large insertions, even with 10 × sequencing depth of accurate long-read sequencing data.

CONCLUSIONS

By directly comparing the two long-read sequencing technologies, we demonstrated that variant calling after genome assembly with 10 × or more depth of accurate long-read sequencing data allowed reliable detection of true-positive variants. Considering the high cost of HiFi sequencing, we herein propose appropriate methodologies for performing cost-effective and high-quality variant calling: 10 × assembly-based variant calling. The results of the present study may facilitate the development of methods for identifying all genetic variants at the population level.