Integrative eQTL-weighted hierarchical Cox models for SNP-set based time-to-event association studies

BACKGROUND

Integrating functional annotations into SNP-set association studies has been proven a powerful analysis strategy. Statistical methods for such integration have been developed for continuous and binary phenotypes; however, the SNP-set integrative approaches for time-to-event or survival outcomes are lacking.

METHODS

We here propose IEHC, an integrative eQTL (expression quantitative trait loci) hierarchical Cox regression, for SNP-set based survival association analysis by modeling effect sizes of genetic variants as a function of eQTL via a hierarchical manner. Three p-values combination tests are developed to examine the joint effects of eQTL and genetic variants after a novel decorrelated modification of statistics for the two components. An omnibus test (IEHC-ACAT) is further adapted to aggregate the strengths of all available tests.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrated that the IEHC joint tests were more powerful if both eQTL and genetic variants contributed to association signal, while IEHC-ACAT was robust and often outperformed other approaches across various simulation scenarios. When applying IEHC to ten TCGA cancers by incorporating eQTL from relevant tissues of GTEx, we revealed that substantial correlations existed between the two types of effect sizes of genetic variants from TCGA and GTEx, and identified 21 (9 unique) cancer-associated genes which would otherwise be missed by approaches not incorporating eQTL.

CONCLUSION

IEHC represents a flexible, robust, and powerful approach to integrate functional omics information to enhance the power of identifying association signals for the survival risk of complex human cancers.

IUSMMT: Survival mediation analysis of gene expression with multiple DNA methylation exposures and its application to cancers of TCGA

Effective and powerful survival mediation models are currently lacking. To partly fill such knowledge gap, we particularly focus on the mediation analysis that includes multiple DNA methylations acting as exposures, one gene expression as the mediator and one survival time as the outcome. We proposed IUSMMT (intersection-union survival mixture-adjusted mediation test) to effectively examine the existence of mediation effect by fitting an empirical three-component mixture null distribution. With extensive simulation studies, we demonstrated the advantage of IUSMMT over existing methods. We applied IUSMMT to ten TCGA cancers and identified multiple genes that exhibited mediating effects. We further revealed that most of the identified regions, in which genes behaved as active mediators, were cancer type-specific and exhibited a full mediation from DNA methylation CpG sites to the survival risk of various types of cancers. Overall, IUSMMT represents an effective and powerful alternative for survival mediation analysis; our results also provide new insights into the functional role of DNA methylation and gene expression in cancer progression/prognosis and demonstrate potential therapeutic targets for future clinical practice.

Gene-based mediation analysis in epigenetic studies

Mediation analysis has been a useful tool for investigating the effect of mediators that lie in the path from the independent variable to the outcome. With the increasing dimensionality of mediators such as in (epi)genomics studies, high-dimensional mediation model is needed. In this work, we focus on epigenetic studies with the goal to identify important DNA methylations that act as mediators between an exposure disease outcome. Specifically, we focus on gene-based high-dimensional mediation analysis implemented with kernel principal component analysis to capture potential nonlinear mediation effect. We first review the current high-dimensional mediation models and then propose two gene-based analytical approaches: gene-based high-dimensional mediation analysis based on linearity assumption between mediators and outcome (gHMA-L) and gene-based high-dimensional mediation analysis based on nonlinearity assumption (gHMA-NL). Since the underlying true mediation relationship is unknown in practice, we further propose an omnibus test of gene-based high-dimensional mediation analysis (gHMA-O) by combing gHMA-L and gHMA-NL. Extensive simulation studies show that gHMA-L performs better under the model linear assumption and gHMA-NL does better under the model nonlinear assumption, while gHMA-O is a more powerful and robust method by combining the two. We apply the proposed methods to two datasets to investigate genes whose methylation levels act as important mediators in the relationship: (1) between alcohol consumption and epithelial ovarian cancer risk using data from the Mayo Clinic Ovarian Cancer Case-Control Study and (2) between childhood maltreatment and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in adulthood using data from the Gray Trauma Project.

How Can Gene-Expression Information Improve Prognostic Prediction in TCGA Cancers: An Empirical Comparison Study on Regularization and Mixed Cox Models

Background

Previous cancer prognostic prediction models often consider only the most important transcriptomic expressions, and their power is limited. It is unknown whether prediction power can be further improved when additional transcriptomic information is incorporated.

Methods

To integrate transcriptomes, four models are compared based on 32 types of cancer in the Cancer Genome Atlas, including the general Cox model with only clinical covariates, the Cox model with a lasso penalty (coxlasso), the Cox model with an elastic net penalty (coxenet), and the mixed-effects Cox model (coxlmm). Furthermore, we partition the survival variance into the relative contribution of clinical and transcriptomic components within the framework of coxlmm. Finally, the influence of different numbers of genes was evaluated in the context of coxlmm.

Results

Compared with the clinical covariates–only Cox model, the average prediction gain was 2.4% for coxlasso, 4.2% for coxenet, and 7.2% for coxlmm across 16 low-censored cancers; a significant elevation of prediction power was observed for SARC, SKCM, LGG, PAAD, and HNSC. Similar findings were observed for all 32 cancers with the average prediction gain of 2.7, 3.8, and 5.8% for coxlasso, coxenet, and coxlmm. Coxlmm always had comparable or better prediction performance relative to coxlasso and coxenet with an average of 2.8% prediction improvement across the 16 low-censored cancers. In addition, it is shown that the predictive accuracy of coxlmm generally increases with the number of genes included. The survival variance partition analysis demonstrates that the transcriptomic contribution was higher for some cancers (e.g., LGG, CESC, PAAD, SKCM, and SARC) and lower for others (e.g., BRCA, COAD, KIRC, and STAD).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the integration of transcriptomic information can substantially improve prognostic prediction accuracy, but the prediction performance is cancer-specific and varies across cancer types. It further reveals that gene expression exhibits distinct contributions to survival variation across cancers.