Co-phosphorylation networks reveal subtype-specific signaling modules in breast cancer

A framework for considering prior information in network-based approaches to omics data analysis

For decades, molecular biologists have been uncovering the mechanics of biological systems. Efforts to bring their findings together have led to the development of multiple databases and information systems that capture and present pathway information in a computable network format. Concurrently, the advent of modern omics technologies has empowered researchers to systematically profile cellular processes across different modalities. Numerous algorithms, methodologies, and tools have been developed to use prior knowledge networks (PKNs) in the analysis of omics datasets. Interestingly, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the source of prior knowledge can greatly impact the results of a given analysis. For these methods to be successful it is paramount that their selection of PKNs is amenable to the data type and the computational task they aim to accomplish. Here we present a five-level framework that broadly describes network models in terms of their scope, level of detail, and ability to inform causal predictions. To contextualize this framework, we review a handful of network-based omics analysis methods at each level, while also describing the computational tasks they aim to accomplish.

Computational systems approach towards phosphoproteomics and their downstream regulation

Protein phosphorylation plays an essential role in modulating cell signalling and its downstream transcriptional and translational regulations. Until recently, protein phosphorylation has been studied mostly using low-throughput biochemical assays. The advancement of mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics transformed the field by enabling measurement of proteome-wide phosphorylation events, where tens of thousands of phosphosites are routinely identified and quantified in an experiment. This has brought a significant challenge in analysing large-scale phosphoproteomic data, making computational methods and systems approaches integral parts of phosphoproteomics. Previous works have primarily focused on reviewing the experimental techniques in MS-based phosphoproteomics, yet a systematic survey of the computational landscape in this field is still missing. Here, we review computational methods and tools, and systems approaches that have been developed for phosphoproteomics data analysis. We categorise them into four aspects including data processing, functional analysis, phosphoproteome annotation and their integration with other omics, and in each aspect, we discuss the key methods and example studies. Lastly, we highlight some of the potential research directions on which future work would make a significant contribution to this fast-growing field. We hope this review provides a useful snapshot of the field of computational systems phosphoproteomics and stimulates new research that drives future development.

Protein Biomarkers in Monocytes and CD4+ Lymphocytes for Predicting Lithium Treatment Response of Bipolar Disorder: a Feasibility Study with Tyramine-Based Signal-Amplified Flow Cytometry

Purpose

To determine if enhanced flow cytometry (CellPrint™) can identify intracellular proteins of lithium responsiveness in monocytes and CD4⁺ lymphocytes from patients with bipolar disorder.

Methods

Eligible bipolar I or II patients were openly treated with lithium for 16-weeks. Baseline levels of Bcl2, BDNF, calmodulin, Fyn, phospho-Fyn/phospho-Yes, GSK3β, phospho-GSK3αβ, HMGB1, iNOS, IRS2, mTor, NLPR3, PGM1, PKA C-α, PPAR-γ, phospho-RelA, and TPH1 in monocytes and CD4⁺ lymphocytes of lithium responders and non-responders were measured with CellPrint™. Their utility of discriminating responders from non-responders was explored. Protein-protein network and pathway enrichment analyses were conducted.

Results

Of the 24 intent-to-treat patients, 12 patients completed the 16-week study. Eleven of 13 responders and 8 of 11 non-responders were available for this analysis. The levels of the majority of analytes in lithium responders were lower than non-responders in both cell types, but only the level of GSK3β in monocytes was significantly different (p = 0.034). The combination of GSK3β and phospho-GSK3αβ levels in monocytes correctly classified 11/11 responders and 5/8 non-responders. Combination of GSK3β, phospho-RelA, TPH1 and PGM1 correctly classified 10/11 responders and 6/7 non-responders, both with a likelihood of ≥ 85%. Prolactin, leptin, BDNF, neurotrophin, and epidermal growth factor/epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways are involved in the lithium treatment response. GSK3β and RelA genes are involved in 4 of 5 these pathways.

Conclusion

CellPrint™ flow cytometry was able to detect differences in multiple proteins in monocytes and CD4⁺ lymphocytes between lithium responders and non-responders. A large study is warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

PhosR enables processing and functional analysis of phosphoproteomic data

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics has revolutionized our ability to profile phosphorylation-based signaling in cells and tissues on a global scale. To infer the action of kinases and signaling pathways in phosphoproteomic experiments, we present PhosR, a set of tools and methodologies implemented in a suite of R packages facilitating comprehensive analysis of phosphoproteomic data. By applying PhosR to both published and new phosphoproteomic datasets, we demonstrate capabilities in data imputation and normalization by using a set of "stably phosphorylated sites" and in functional analysis for inferring active kinases and signaling pathways. In particular, we introduce a "signalome" construction method for identifying a collection of signaling modules to summarize and visualize the interaction of kinases and their collective actions on signal transduction. Together, our data and findings demonstrate the utility of PhosR in processing and generating biological knowledge from MS-based phosphoproteomic data.