Building Transcription Factor Binding Site Models to Understand Gene Regulation in Plants

Transcription factors (TFs) are key cellular components that control gene expression. They recognize specific DNA sequences, the TF binding sites (TFBSs), and thus are targeted to specific regions of the genome where they can recruit transcriptional co-factors and/or chromatin regulators to fine-tune spatiotemporal gene regulation. Therefore, the identification of TFBSs in genomic sequences and their subsequent quantitative modeling is of crucial importance for understanding and predicting gene expression. Here, we review how TFBSs can be determined experimentally, how the TFBS models can be constructed in silico, and how they can be optimized by taking into account features such as position interdependence within TFBSs, DNA shape, and/or by introducing state-of-the-art computational algorithms such as deep learning methods. In addition, we discuss the integration of context variables into the TFBS modeling, including nucleosome positioning, chromatin states, methylation patterns, 3D genome architectures, and TF cooperative binding, in order to better predict TF binding under cellular contexts. Finally, we explore the possibilities of combining the optimized TFBS model with technological advances, such as targeted TFBS perturbation by CRISPR, to better understand gene regulation, evolution, and plant diversity.

An SVM-based method for assessment of transcription factor-DNA complex models

Background

Atomic details of protein-DNA complexes can provide insightful information for better understanding of the function and binding specificity of DNA binding proteins. In addition to experimental methods for solving protein-DNA complex structures, protein-DNA docking can be used to predict native or near-native complex models. A docking program typically generates a large number of complex conformations and predicts the complex model(s) based on interaction energies between protein and DNA. However, the prediction accuracy is hampered by current approaches to model assessment, especially when docking simulations fail to produce any near-native models.

Results

We present here a Support Vector Machine (SVM)-based approach for quality assessment of the predicted transcription factor (TF)-DNA complex models. Besides a knowledge-based protein-DNA interaction potential DDNA3, we applied several structural features that have been shown to play important roles in binding specificity between transcription factors and DNA molecules to quality assessment of complex models. To address the issue of unbalanced positive and negative cases in the training dataset, we applied hard-negative mining, an iterative training process that selects an initial training dataset by combining all of the positive cases and a random sample from the negative cases. Results show that the SVM model greatly improves prediction accuracy (84.2%) over two knowledge-based protein-DNA interaction potentials, orientation potential (60.8%) and DDNA3 (68.4%). The improvement is achieved through reducing the number of false positive predictions, especially for the hard docking cases, in which a docking algorithm fails to produce any near-native complex models.

Conclusions

A learning-based SVM scoring model with structural features for specific protein-DNA binding and an atomic-level protein-DNA interaction potential DDNA3 significantly improves prediction accuracy of complex models by successfully identifying cases without near-native structural models.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2538-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding specificity using an integrative energy function

Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression through binding to specific target DNA sites. Accurate annotation of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) at genome scale represents an essential step toward our understanding of gene regulation networks. In this article, we present a structure-based method for computational prediction of TFBSs using a novel, integrative energy (IE) function. The new energy function combines a multibody (MB) knowledge-based potential and two atomic energy terms (hydrogen bond and π interaction) that might not be accurately captured by the knowledge-based potential owing to the mean force nature and low count problem. We applied the new energy function to the TFBS prediction using a non-redundant dataset that consists of TFs from 12 different families. Our results show that the new IE function improves the prediction accuracy over the knowledge-based, statistical potentials, especially for homeodomain TFs, the second largest TF family in mammals.

CONTACT

jguo4@uncc.edu

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

An efficient algorithm for improving structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites

Background

Gene expression is regulated by transcription factors binding to specific target DNA sites. Understanding how and where transcription factors bind at genome scale represents an essential step toward our understanding of gene regulation networks. Previously we developed a structure-based method for prediction of transcription factor binding sites using an integrative energy function that combines a knowledge-based multibody potential and two atomic energy terms. While the method performs well, it is not computationally efficient due to the exponential increase in the number of binding sequences to be evaluated for longer binding sites. In this paper, we present an efficient pentamer algorithm by splitting DNA binding sequences into overlapping fragments along with a simplified integrative energy function for transcription factor binding site prediction.

Results

A DNA binding sequence is split into overlapping pentamers (5 base pairs) for calculating transcription factor-pentamer interaction energy. To combine the results from overlapping pentamer scores, we developed two methods, Kmer-Sum and PWM (Position Weight Matrix) stacking, for full-length binding motif prediction. Our results show that both Kmer-Sum and PWM stacking in the new pentamer approach along with a simplified integrative energy function improved transcription factor binding site prediction accuracy and dramatically reduced computation time, especially for longer binding sites.

Conclusion

Our new fragment-based pentamer algorithm and simplified energy function improve both efficiency and accuracy. To our knowledge, this is the first fragment-based method for structure-based transcription factor binding sites prediction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1755-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Different Types of Molecular Docking Based on Variations of Interacting Molecules

Molecular docking plays an important role in drug discovery research by facilitating target identification, target validation, virtual screening for lead identification and lead optimization. Depending upon the nature of the disease of interest, targets can be either protein or DNA while drugs are mostly organic small molecules. Different types of molecular docking techniques like protein-protein or protein-DNA or protein-small molecule or DNA-small molecule are employed for achieving the above mentioned objectives. This chapter provides a clear idea of the position of molecular docking in drug discovery with detailed discussion on different types of molecular docking based on the varieties of interacting partners. Subsequently the authors provide a detailed list of tools that can be used for docking in drug discovery and discus some examples of molecular docking in drug discovery before concluding with a remark on future areas of improvement in molecular docking related to drug discovery.

Statistical analysis of structural determinants for protein-DNA-binding specificity

DNA-binding proteins play critical roles in biological processes including gene expression, DNA packaging and DNA repair. They bind to DNA target sequences with different degrees of binding specificity, ranging from highly specific (HS) to nonspecific (NS). Alterations of DNA-binding specificity, due to either genetic variation or somatic mutations, can lead to various diseases. In this study, a comparative analysis of protein-DNA complex structures was carried out to investigate the structural features that contribute to binding specificity. Protein-DNA complexes were grouped into three general classes based on degrees of binding specificity: HS, multispecific (MS), and NS. Our results show a clear trend of structural features among the three classes, including amino acid binding propensities, simple and complex hydrogen bonds, major/minor groove and base contacts, and DNA shape. We found that aspartate is enriched in HS DNA binding proteins and predominately binds to a cytosine through a single hydrogen bond or two consecutive cytosines through bidentate hydrogen bonds. Aromatic residues, histidine and tyrosine, are highly enriched in the HS and MS groups and may contribute to specific binding through different mechanisms. To further investigate the role of protein flexibility in specific protein-DNA recognition, we analyzed the conformational changes between the bound and unbound states of DNA-binding proteins and structural variations. The results indicate that HS and MS DNA-binding domains have larger conformational changes upon DNA-binding and larger degree of flexibility in both bound and unbound states. Proteins 2016; 84:1147-1161. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Knowledge-based three-body potential for transcription factor binding site prediction

A structure-based statistical potential is developed for transcription factor binding site (TFBS) prediction. Besides the direct contact between amino acids from TFs and DNA bases, the authors also considered the influence of the neighbouring base. This three-body potential showed better discriminate powers than the two-body potential. They validate the performance of the potential in TFBS identification, binding energy prediction and binding mutation prediction.

Different Types of Molecular Docking Based on Variations of Interacting Molecules

Molecular docking plays an important role in drug discovery research by facilitating target identification, target validation, virtual screening for lead identification and lead optimization. Depending upon the nature of the disease of interest, targets can be either protein or DNA while drugs are mostly organic small molecules. Different types of molecular docking techniques like protein-protein or protein-DNA or protein-small molecule or DNA-small molecule are employed for achieving the above mentioned objectives. This chapter provides a clear idea of the position of molecular docking in drug discovery with detailed discussion on different types of molecular docking based on the varieties of interacting partners. Subsequently the authors provide a detailed list of tools that can be used for docking in drug discovery and discus some examples of molecular docking in drug discovery before concluding with a remark on future areas of improvement in molecular docking related to drug discovery.

Structure-based modeling of protein: DNA specificity

Protein:DNA interactions are essential to a range of processes that maintain and express the information encoded in the genome. Structural modeling is an approach that aims to understand these interactions at the physicochemical level. It has been proposed that structural modeling can lead to deeper understanding of the mechanisms of protein:DNA interactions, and that progress in this field can not only help to rationalize the observed specificities of DNA-binding proteins but also to allow researchers to engineer novel DNA site specificities. In this review we discuss recent developments in the structural description of protein:DNA interactions and specificity, as well as the challenges facing the field in the future.

On the use of knowledge-based potentials for the evaluation of models of protein-protein, protein-DNA, and protein-RNA interactions

Proteins are the bricks and mortar of cells, playing structural and functional roles. In order to perform their function, they interact with each other as well as with other biomolecules such as DNA or RNA. Therefore, to fathom the function of a protein, we require knowing its partners and the atomic details of its interactions (i.e., the structure of the complex). However, the amount of protein interactions with an experimentally determined three-dimensional structure is scarce. Therefore, computational techniques such as homology modeling are foremost to fill this gap. Protein interactions can be modeled using as templates the interactions of homologous proteins, if the structure of the complex is known, or using docking methods. In both approaches, the estimation of the quality of models is essential. There are several ways to address this problem. In this review, we focus on the use of knowledge-based potentials for the analysis of protein interactions. We describe the procedure to derive statistical potentials and split them into different energetic terms that can be used for different purposes. We extensively discuss the fields where knowledge-based potentials have been successfully applied to (1) model protein-protein, protein-DNA, and protein-RNA interactions and (2) predict binding sites (in the protein and in the DNA). Moreover, we provide ready-to-use resources for docking and benchmarking protein interactions.

PiDNA: Predicting protein-DNA interactions with structural models

Predicting binding sites of a transcription factor in the genome is an important, but challenging, issue in studying gene regulation. In the past decade, a large number of protein–DNA co-crystallized structures available in the Protein Data Bank have facilitated the understanding of interacting mechanisms between transcription factors and their binding sites. Recent studies have shown that both physics-based and knowledge-based potential functions can be applied to protein–DNA complex structures to deliver position weight matrices (PWMs) that are consistent with the experimental data. To further use the available structural models, the proposed Web server, PiDNA, aims at first constructing reliable PWMs by applying an atomic-level knowledge-based scoring function on numerous in silico mutated complex structures, and then using the PWM constructed by the structure models with small energy changes to predict the interaction between proteins and DNA sequences. With PiDNA, the users can easily predict the relative preference of all the DNA sequences with limited mutations from the native sequence co-crystallized in the model in a single run. More predictions on sequences with unlimited mutations can be realized by additional requests or file uploading. Three types of information can be downloaded after prediction: (i) the ranked list of mutated sequences, (ii) the PWM constructed by the favourable mutated structures, and (iii) any mutated protein–DNA complex structure models specified by the user. This study first shows that the constructed PWMs are similar to the annotated PWMs collected from databases or literature. Second, the prediction accuracy of PiDNA in detecting relatively high-specificity sites is evaluated by comparing the ranked lists against in vitro experiments from protein-binding microarrays. Finally, PiDNA is shown to be able to select the experimentally validated binding sites from 10 000 random sites with high accuracy. With PiDNA, the users can design biological experiments based on the predicted sequence specificity and/or request mutated structure models for further protein design. As well, it is expected that PiDNA can be incorporated with chromatin immunoprecipitation data to refine large-scale inference of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. PiDNA is available at: http://dna.bime.ntu.edu.tw/pidna.