CImbinator: a web-based tool for drug synergy analysis in small- and large-scale datasets

Computational models, databases and tools for antibiotic combinations

Antibiotic combination is a promising strategy to extend the lifetime of antibiotics and thereby combat antimicrobial resistance. However, screening for new antibiotic combinations is both time-consuming and labor-intensive. In recent years, an increasing number of researchers have used computational models to predict effective antibiotic combinations. In this review, we summarized existing computational models for antibiotic combinations and discussed the limitations and challenges of these models in detail. In addition, we also collected and summarized available data resources and tools for antibiotic combinations. This study aims to help computational biologists design more accurate and interpretable computational models.

CDCDB: A large and continuously updated drug combination database

In recent years, due to the complementary action of drug combinations over mono-therapy, the multiple-drugs for multiple-targets paradigm has received increased attention to treat bacterial infections and complex diseases. Although new drug combinations screening has benefited from experimental tests like automated high throughput screening, it is limited due to the large number of possible drug combinations. The task of drug combination screening can be streamlined through computational methods and models. Such models require up-to-date databases; however, existing databases are static and consist of the data collected at the time of their creation. This paper introduces the Continuous Drug Combination Database (CDCDB), a continuously updated drug combination database. The CDCDB includes over 40,795 drug combinations, of which 17,107 are unique combinations consisting of more than 4,129 individual drugs, curated from ClinicalTrials.gov, the FDA Orange Book^®, and patents. To create CDCDB, we use various methods, including natural language processing techniques, to improve the process of drug combination discovery, ensuring that our database can be used for drug synergy prediction. Website: https://icc.ise.bgu.ac.il/medical_ai/CDCDB/.

Measurement(s)	drug combination effect modeling • drug combination effect modeling
Technology Type(s)	Text mining • Clinical Trials Informatics System
Factor Type(s)	Medicine
Sample Characteristic - Organism	Homo sapiens

SynergyFinder 3.0: an interactive analysis and consensus interpretation of multi-drug synergies across multiple samples

SynergyFinder (https://synergyfinder.fimm.fi) is a free web-application for interactive analysis and visualization of multi-drug combination response data. Since its first release in 2017, SynergyFinder has become a popular tool for multi-dose combination data analytics, partly because the development of its functionality and graphical interface has been driven by a diverse user community, including both chemical biologists and computational scientists. Here, we describe the latest upgrade of this community-effort, SynergyFinder release 3.0, introducing a number of novel features that support interactive multi-sample analysis of combination synergy, a novel consensus synergy score that combines multiple synergy scoring models, and an improved outlier detection functionality that eliminates false positive results, along with many other post-analysis options such as weighting of synergy by drug concentrations and distinguishing between different modes of synergy (potency and efficacy). Based on user requests, several additional improvements were also implemented, including new data visualizations and export options for multi-drug combinations. With these improvements, SynergyFinder 3.0 supports robust identification of consistent combinatorial synergies for multi-drug combinatorial discovery and clinical translation.

Computational Pipeline for Rational Drug Combination Screening in Patient-Derived Cells

In many complex diseases, such as cancers, resistance to monotherapies easily occurs, and longer-term treatment responses often require combinatorial therapies as next-line regimens. However, due to a massive number of possible drug combinations to test, there is a need for systematic and rational approaches to finding safe and effective drug combinations for each individual patient. This protocol describes an ecosystem of computational methods to guide high-throughput combinatorial screening that help experimental researchers to identify optimal drug combinations in terms of synergy, efficacy, and/or selectivity for further preclinical and clinical investigation. The methods are demonstrated in the context of combinatorial screening in primary cells of leukemia patients, where the translational aim is to identify drug combinations that show not only high synergy but also maximal cancer-selectivity. The mechanism-agnostic and cost-effective computational methods are widely applicable to various cancer types, which are amenable to drug testing, as the computational methods take as input only the phenotypic measurements of a subset of drug combinations, without requiring target information or genomic profiles of the patient samples.

MuSyC is a consensus framework that unifies multi-drug synergy metrics for combinatorial drug discovery

Drug combination discovery depends on reliable synergy metrics but no consensus exists on the correct synergy criterion to characterize combined interactions. The fragmented state of the field confounds analysis, impedes reproducibility, and delays clinical translation of potential combination treatments. Here we present a mass-action based formalism to quantify synergy. With this formalism, we clarify the relationship between the dominant drug synergy principles, and present a mapping of commonly used frameworks onto a unified synergy landscape. From this, we show how biases emerge due to intrinsic assumptions which hinder their broad applicability and impact the interpretation of synergy in discovery efforts. Specifically, we describe how traditional metrics mask consequential synergistic interactions, and contain biases dependent on the Hill-slope and maximal effect of single-drugs. We show how these biases systematically impact synergy classification in large combination screens, potentially misleading discovery efforts. Thus the proposed formalism can provide a consistent, unbiased interpretation of drug synergy, and accelerate the translatability of synergy studies.

The lack of a unifying metric characterizing combinatorial drug interactions has impeded the development of combinatorial therapies. Here, the authors present MuSyC, a consensus synergy metric that overcomes several caveats associated with other, popular metrics.

Predicting and Quantifying Antagonistic Effects of Natural Compounds Given with Chemotherapeutic Agents: Applications for High-Throughput Screening

Natural products have been used for centuries to treat various human ailments. In recent decades, multi-drug combinations that utilize natural products to synergistically enhance the therapeutic effects of cancer drugs have been identified and have shown success in improving treatment outcomes. While drug synergy research is a burgeoning field, there are disagreements on the definitions and mathematical parameters that prevent the standardization and proper usage of the terms synergy, antagonism, and additivity. This contributes to the relatively small amount of data on the antagonistic effects of natural products on cancer drugs that can diminish their therapeutic efficacy and prevent cancer regression. The ability of natural products to potentially degrade or reverse the molecular activity of cancer therapeutics represents an important but highly under-emphasized area of research that is often overlooked in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review aims to evaluate the body of work surrounding the antagonistic interactions between natural products and cancer therapeutics and highlight applications for high-throughput screening (HTS) and deep learning techniques for the identification of natural products that antagonize cancer drug efficacy.

A foundation for reference models for drug combinations with an application to Loewe's reference model

Background

Treating patients with combinations of drugs that have synergistic effects has become widespread practice in the clinic. Drugs work synergistically when the observed effect of a drug combination is larger than the effect predicted by the reference model. The reference model is a theoretical null model that returns the combined effect of given doses of drugs under the assumption that these drugs do not interact. There is ongoing debate on what it means for drugs to not interact. The controversy transcends mathematical punctuality, as different non-interaction principles result in different reference models. A famous reference model that has been in existence for already a long time is Loewe’s reference model. Loewe’s vision on non-interaction was purely intuitive: two drugs do not interact if all combinations of doses that result in a certain given effect lie on a straight line.

Results

We show that Loewe’s reference model can be obtained from much more fundamental principles. First, we introduce the new notion of complementary dose. Secondly, we reformulate the existing concept of equivalent dose, whereby our formulation is more general than existing ones. Finally, a very general non-interaction principle is put forward. The proposed non-interaction principle represents a certain interplay between complementary and equivalent doses: drugs are non-interacting if complementarity is preserved under equivalence. It is then shown that Loewe’s reference model naturally follows from these principles by an appropriate choice of complementarity.

Conclusions

The presented work increases insight into Loewe’s reference model for drug combinations, which is realized by the introduction of a very general non-interaction principle that does not refer to any specific dose-response curve, nor to any property of applicable dose-response curves.

PTEN and DNA-PK determine sensitivity and recovery in response to WEE1 inhibition in human breast cancer

Inhibition of WEE1 kinase by AZD1775 has shown promising results in clinical cancer trials, but markers predicting AZD1775 response are lacking. Here we analysed AZD1775 response in a panel of human breast cancer (BC) cell lines by global proteome/transcriptome profiling and identified two groups of basal-like BC (BLBCs): ‘PTEN low’ BLBCs were highly sensitive to AZD1775 and failed to recover following removal of AZD1775, while ‘PTEN high’ BLBCs recovered. AZD1775 induced phosphorylation of DNA-PK, protecting cells from replication-associated DNA damage and promoting cellular recovery. Deletion of DNA-PK or PTEN, or inhibition of DNA-PK sensitized recovering BLBCs to AZD1775 by abrogating replication arrest, allowing replication despite DNA damage. This was linked to reduced CHK1 activation, increased cyclin E levels and apoptosis. In conclusion, we identified PTEN and DNA-PK as essential regulators of replication checkpoint arrest in response to AZD1775 and defined PTEN as a promising biomarker for efficient WEE1 cancer therapy.

Charting the Fragmented Landscape of Drug Synergy

Even as the clinical impact of drug combinations continues to accelerate, no consensus on how to quantify drug synergy has emerged. Rather, surveying the landscape of drug synergy reveals the persistence of historical fissures regarding the appropriate domains of conflicting synergy models - fissures impacting all aspects of combination therapy discovery and deployment. Herein we chronicle the impact of these divisions on: (i) the design, interpretation, and reproducibility of high-throughput combination screens; (ii) the performance of algorithms to predict synergistic mixtures; and (iii) the search for higher-order synergistic interactions. Further progress in each of these subfields hinges on reaching a consensus regarding the long-standing rifts in the field.

Statistical determination of synergy based on Bliss definition of drugs independence

Although synergy is a pillar of modern pharmacology, toxicology, and medicine, there is no consensus on its definition despite its nearly one hundred-year history. Moreover, methods for statistical determination of synergy that account for variation of response to treatment are underdeveloped and if exist are reduced to the traditional t-test, but do not comply with the normal distribution assumption. We offer statistical models for estimation of synergy using an established definition of Bliss drugs’ independence. Although Bliss definition is well-known, it remains a theoretical concept and has never been applied for statistical determination of synergy with various forms of treatment outcome. We rigorously and consistently extend the Bliss definition to detect statistically significant synergy under various designs: (1) in vitro, when the outcome of a cell culture experiment with replicates is the proportion of surviving cells for a single dose or multiple doses, (2) dose-response methodology, (3) in vivo studies in organisms, when the outcome is a longitudinal measurement such as tumor volume, and (4) clinical studies, when the outcome of treatment is measured by survival. For each design, we developed a specific statistical model and demonstrated how to test for independence, synergy, and antagonism, and compute the associated p-value.

A high-throughput drug combination screen of targeted small molecule inhibitors in cancer cell lines

While there is a high interest in drug combinations in cancer therapy, openly accessible datasets for drug combination responses are sparse. Here we present a dataset comprising 171 pairwise combinations of 19 individual drugs targeting signal transduction mechanisms across eight cancer cell lines, where the effect of each drug and drug combination is reported as cell viability assessed by metabolic activity. Drugs are chosen by their capacity to specifically interfere with well-known signal transduction mechanisms. Signalling processes targeted by the drugs include PI3K/AKT, NFkB, JAK/STAT, CTNNB1/TCF, and MAPK pathways. Drug combinations are classified as synergistic based on the Bliss independence synergy metrics. The data identifies combinations that synergistically reduce cancer cell viability and that can be of interest for further pre-clinical investigations.