ModL: exploring and restoring regularity when testing for positive selection

A Phenotype-Genotype Codon Model for Detecting Adaptive Evolution

A central objective in biology is to link adaptive evolution in a gene to structural and/or functional phenotypic novelties. Yet most analytic methods make inferences mainly from either phenotypic data or genetic data alone. A small number of models have been developed to infer correlations between the rate of molecular evolution and changes in a discrete or continuous life history trait. But such correlations are not necessarily evidence of adaptation. Here, we present a novel approach called the phenotype-genotype branch-site model (PG-BSM) designed to detect evidence of adaptive codon evolution associated with discrete-state phenotype evolution. An episode of adaptation is inferred under standard codon substitution models when there is evidence of positive selection in the form of an elevation in the nonsynonymous-to-synonymous rate ratio $\omega$ to a value $\omega > 1$. As it is becoming increasingly clear that $\omega > 1$ can occur without adaptation, the PG-BSM was formulated to infer an instance of adaptive evolution without appealing to evidence of positive selection. The null model makes use of a covarion-like component to account for general heterotachy (i.e., random changes in the evolutionary rate at a site over time). The alternative model employs samples of the phenotypic evolutionary history to test for phenomenological patterns of heterotachy consistent with specific mechanisms of molecular adaptation. These include 1) a persistent increase/decrease in $\omega$ at a site following a change in phenotype (the pattern) consistent with an increase/decrease in the functional importance of the site (the mechanism); and 2) a transient increase in $\omega$ at a site along a branch over which the phenotype changed (the pattern) consistent with a change in the site's optimal amino acid (the mechanism). Rejection of the null is followed by post hoc analyses to identify sites with strongest evidence for adaptation in association with changes in the phenotype as well as the most likely evolutionary history of the phenotype. Simulation studies based on a novel method for generating mechanistically realistic signatures of molecular adaptation show that the PG-BSM has good statistical properties. Analyses of real alignments show that site patterns identified post hoc are consistent with the specific mechanisms of adaptation included in the alternate model. Further simulation studies show that the covarion-like component of the PG-BSM plays a crucial role in mitigating recently discovered statistical pathologies associated with confounding by accounting for heterotachy-by-any-cause. [Adaptive evolution; branch-site model; confounding; mutation-selection; phenotype-genotype.].

Looking for Darwin in Genomic Sequences: Validity and Success Depends on the Relationship Between Model and Data

Codon substitution models (CSMs) are commonly used to infer the history of natural section for a set of protein-coding sequences, often with the explicit goal of detecting the signature of positive Darwinian selection. However, the validity and success of CSMs used in conjunction with the maximum likelihood (ML) framework is sometimes challenged with claims that the approach might too often support false conclusions. In this chapter, we use a case study approach to identify four legitimate statistical difficulties associated with inference of evolutionary events using CSMs. These include: (1) model misspecification, (2) low information content, (3) the confounding of processes, and (4) phenomenological load, or PL. While past criticisms of CSMs can be connected to these issues, the historical critiques were often misdirected, or overstated, because they failed to recognize that the success of any model-based approach depends on the relationship between model and data. Here, we explore this relationship and provide a candid assessment of the limitations of CSMs to extract historical information from extant sequences. To aid in this assessment, we provide a brief overview of: (1) a more realistic way of thinking about the process of codon evolution framed in terms of population genetic parameters, and (2) a novel presentation of the ML statistical framework. We then divide the development of CSMs into two broad phases of scientific activity and show that the latter phase is characterized by increases in model complexity that can sometimes negatively impact inference of evolutionary mechanisms. Such problems are not yet widely appreciated by the users of CSMs. These problems can be avoided by using a model that is appropriate for the data; but, understanding the relationship between the data and a fitted model is a difficult task. We argue that the only way to properly understand that relationship is to perform in silico experiments using a generating process that can mimic the data as closely as possible. The mutation-selection modeling framework (MutSel) is presented as the basis of such a generating process. We contend that if complex CSMs continue to be developed for testing explicit mechanistic hypotheses, then additional analyses such as those described in here (e.g., penalized LRTs and estimation of PL) will need to be applied alongside the more traditional inferential methods.