Divergent Allometric Trajectories in Gene Expression and Coexpression Produce Species Differences in Sympatrically Speciating Midas Cichlid Fish

The mechanisms of speciation without geographic isolation (i.e., sympatric speciation) remain debated. This is due in part to the fact that the genomic landscape that could promote or hinder species divergence in the presence of gene flow is still largely unknown. However, intensive research is now centered on understanding the genetic architecture of adaptive traits associated with this process as well as how gene expression might affect these traits. Here, using RNA-Seq data, we investigated gene expression of sympatrically speciating benthic and limnetic Neotropical cichlid fishes at two developmental stages. First, we identified groups of coexpressed genes (modules) at each stage. Although there are a few large and well-preserved modules, most of the other modules are not preserved across life stages. Second, we show that later in development more and larger coexpression modules are associated with divergence between benthic and limnetic fish compared with the earlier life stage. This divergence between benthic and limnetic fish in coexpression mirrors divergence in overall expression between benthic and limnetic fish, which is more pronounced later in life. Our results reveal that already at 1-day posthatch benthic and limnetic fish diverge in (co)expression, and that this divergence becomes more substantial when fish are free-swimming but still unlikely to have divergent swimming and feeding habits. More importantly, our study describes how the coexpression of several genes through development, as opposed to individual genes, is associated with benthic–limnetic species differences, and how two morphogenetic trajectories diverge as fish grow older.

Tissue preservation can affect geometric morphometric analyses: a case study using fish body shape

In geometric morphometrics, the extent of variation attributable to non-biological causes (i.e. measurement error) is sometimes overlooked. The effects of this variation on downstream statistical analyses are also largely unknown. In particular, it is unclear whether specimen preservation induces substantial variation in shape and whether such variation affects downstream statistical inference. Using a combination of empirical fish body shape data and realistic simulations, we show that preservation introduces substantial artefactual variation and significant non-random error (i.e. bias). Most changes in shape occur when fresh fish are frozen and thawed, whereas a smaller change in shape is observed when frozen and thawed fish are fixed in formalin and transferred to ethanol. Surprisingly, we also show that, in our case, preservation produces only minor effects on three downstream analyses of shape variation: classification using canonical variate analysis, permutation tests of differences in means and computations of differences in mean shape between groups. Even mixing of differently preserved specimens has a relatively small effect on downstream analyses. However, we suggest that mixing fish with different preservation should still be avoided and discuss the conditions in which this practice might be justified.