1
|
Nie L, Fang Y, Xia Z, Wei X, Wu Z, Yan Y, Wang F. Relationships within Bolbitis sinensis Species Complex Using RAD Sequencing. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 13:1987. [PMID: 39065514 PMCID: PMC11280518 DOI: 10.3390/plants13141987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Species identification and phylogenetic relationship clarification are fundamental goals in species delimitation. However, these tasks pose challenges when based on morphologies, geographic distribution, and genomic data. Previously, two species of the fern genus Bolbitis, B. × multipinna and B. longiaurita were described based on morphological traits; they are phylogenetically intertwined with B. sinensis and fail to form monophyletic groups. To address the unclear phylogenetic relationships within the B. sinensis species complex, RAD sequencing was performed on 65 individuals from five populations. Our integrated analysis of phylogenetic trees, neighbor nets, and genetic structures indicate that the B. sinensis species complex should not be considered as separate species. Moreover, our findings reveal differences in the degree of genetic differentiation among the five populations, ranging from low to moderate, which might be influenced by geographical distance and gene flow. The Fst values also confirmed that genetic differentiation intensifies with increasing geographic distance. Collectively, this study clarifies the complex phylogenetic relationships within the B. sinensis species complex, elucidates the genetic diversity and differentiation across the studied populations, and offers valuable genetic insights that contribute to the broader study of evolutionary relationships and population genetics within the Bolbitis species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liyun Nie
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; (L.N.); (Y.F.); (Z.X.); (X.W.)
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China;
- School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6149, Australia
| | - Yuhan Fang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; (L.N.); (Y.F.); (Z.X.); (X.W.)
| | - Zengqiang Xia
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; (L.N.); (Y.F.); (Z.X.); (X.W.)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xueying Wei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; (L.N.); (Y.F.); (Z.X.); (X.W.)
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and the Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China;
| | - Zhiqiang Wu
- Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China;
| | - Yuehong Yan
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and the Orchid Conservation & Research Center of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518114, China;
| | - Faguo Wang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; (L.N.); (Y.F.); (Z.X.); (X.W.)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu H, Wang Q, Hao G, Zhou R, Luo D, Cao K, Yan Z, Wang X. Insights into the phylogenetic relationships and species boundaries of the Myricaria squamosa complex (Tamaricaceae) based on the complete chloroplast genome. PeerJ 2023; 11:e16642. [PMID: 38099308 PMCID: PMC10720482 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Myricaria plants are widely distributed in Eurasia and are helpful for windbreak and embankment protection. Current molecular evidence has led to controversy regarding species boundaries within the Myricaria genus and interspecific phylogenetic relationships between three specific species-M. bracteata, M. paniculata and M. squamosa-which have remained unresolved. This study treated these three unresolved taxa as a species complex, named the M. squamosa complex. The genome skimming approach was used to determine 35 complete plastome sequences and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences for the said complex and other closely related species, followed by de novo assembly. Comparative analyses were conducted across Myricaria to identify the genome size, gene content, repeat type and number, SSR (simple sequence repeat) abundance, and codon usage bias of chloroplast genomes. Tree-based species delimitation results indicated that M. bracteata, M. paniculata and M. squamosa could not be distinguished and formed two monophyletic lineages (P1 and P2) that were clustered together. Compared to plastome-based species delimitation, the standard nuclear DNA barcode had the lowest species resolution, and the standard chloroplast DNA barcode and group-specific barcodes delimitated a maximum of four out of the five species. Plastid phylogenomics analyses indicated that the monophyletic M. squamosa complex is comprised of two evolutionarily significant units: one in the western Tarim Basin and the other in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. This finding contradicts previous species discrimination and promotes the urgent need for taxonomic revision of the threatened genus Myricaria. Dense sampling and plastid genomes will be essential in this effort. The super-barcodes and specific barcode candidates outlined in this study will aid in further studies of evolutionary history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Hu
- Microbial Resources and Drug Development Key Laboratory of Guizhou Tertiary Institution, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Microbial Resources and Drug Development Key Laboratory of Guizhou Tertiary Institution, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Guoqian Hao
- School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin, China
| | - Ruitao Zhou
- School of Preclinical Medicine, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Dousheng Luo
- School of Preclinical Medicine, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Kejun Cao
- School of Preclinical Medicine, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Zhimeng Yan
- School of Medical Information Engineering, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Xinyu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Medical Electrophysiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
- Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Führding‐Potschkat P, Kreft H, Ickert‐Bond SM. Influence of different data cleaning solutions of point-occurrence records on downstream macroecological diversity models. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e9168. [PMID: 35949539 PMCID: PMC9351331 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital point-occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and other data providers enable a wide range of research in macroecology and biogeography. However, data errors may hamper immediate use. Manual data cleaning is time-consuming and often unfeasible, given that the databases may contain thousands or millions of records. Automated data cleaning pipelines are therefore of high importance. Taking North American Ephedra as a model, we examined how different data cleaning pipelines (using, e.g., the GBIF web application, and four different R packages) affect downstream species distribution models (SDMs). We also assessed how data differed from expert data. From 13,889 North American Ephedra observations in GBIF, the pipelines removed 31.7% to 62.7% false positives, invalid coordinates, and duplicates, leading to datasets between 9484 (GBIF application) and 5196 records (manual-guided filtering). The expert data consisted of 704 records, comparable to data from field studies. Although differences in the absolute numbers of records were relatively large, species richness models based on stacked SDMs (S-SDM) from pipeline and expert data were strongly correlated (mean Pearson's r across the pipelines: .9986, vs. the expert data: .9173). Our results suggest that all R package-based pipelines reliably identified invalid coordinates. In contrast, the GBIF-filtered data still contained both spatial and taxonomic errors. Major drawbacks emerge from the fact that no pipeline fully discovered misidentified specimens without the assistance of taxonomic expert knowledge. We conclude that application-filtered GBIF data will still need additional review to achieve higher spatial data quality. Achieving high-quality taxonomic data will require extra effort, probably by thoroughly analyzing the data for misidentified taxa, supported by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Führding‐Potschkat
- Biodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography, Faculty of Forest SciencesUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Holger Kreft
- Biodiversity, Macroecology and Conservation Biogeography, Faculty of Forest SciencesUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Stefanie M. Ickert‐Bond
- Department of Biology and Wildlife & UA Museum of the NorthUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksAlaskaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Warps and Wefts of a Polyploidy Complex: Integrative Species Delimitation of the Diploid Leucanthemum (Compositae, Anthemideae) Representatives. PLANTS 2022; 11:plants11141878. [PMID: 35890512 PMCID: PMC9319895 DOI: 10.3390/plants11141878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Species delimitation—owing to the paramount role of the species rank in evolutionary, ecological, and nature conservation studies—is an essential contribution of taxonomy to biodiversity research. In an ‘integrative taxonomy’ approach to species delimitation on the diploid level, we searched for evolutionary significant units (the warps and wefts) that gave rise to the polyploid complex of European ox-eye daisies (Leucanthemum; Compositae-Anthemideae). Species discovery and validation methods based on genetic, ecological, geographical, and morphometric datasets were applied to test the currently accepted diploid morpho-species, i.e., morphologically delimited species, in Leucanthemum. Novel approaches were taken in the analyses of RADseq data (consensus clustering), morphometrics of reconstructed leaf silhouettes from digitized herbarium specimens, and quantification of species-distribution overlaps. We show that 17 of the 20 Leucanthemum morpho-species are supported by genetic evidence. The taxonomic rank of the remaining three morpho-species was resolved by combining genealogic, ecologic, geographic, and morphologic data in the framework of von Wettstein’s morpho-geographical species concept. We herewith provide a methodological pipeline for the species delimitation in an ‘integrative taxonomy’ fashion using sources of evidence from genealogical, morphological, ecological, and geographical data in the philosophy of De Queiroz’s “Unified Species Concept”.
Collapse
|
5
|
Reydon TAC, Kunz W. Classification below the species level: when are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful? Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blab067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Infraspecific taxa (subspecies, races and varieties) are often seen as real entities in nature and recognized as biologically meaningful groups. But because infraspecific taxa by definition are subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of ‘their’ species. This makes the status of infraspecific taxa crucially dependent on the way species are considered and thus on the various species concepts that have been advanced as answers to the ‘species problem’. Accordingly, there is a profound lack of clarity regarding the following questions. What are infraspecific taxa? What is their biological meaning? Are they real entities or merely instrumental units? When should an infraspecific group be ranked and named as an infraspecific taxon? In this paper, we aim to contribute to greater clarity about these issues by examining which types of infraspecific groups are biologically meaningful in light of the main results from the species debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A C Reydon
- Institute of Philosophy & Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS), Leibniz University Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167 Hannover, Germany
| | - Werner Kunz
- Institute for Genetics, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ivanov V, Marusik Y, Pétillon J, Mutanen M. Relevance of ddRADseq method for species and population delimitation of closely related and widely distributed wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Sci Rep 2021; 11:2177. [PMID: 33500478 PMCID: PMC7838170 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81788-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Although species delimitation is often controversial, emerging DNA-based and classical morphology-based methods are rarely compared using large-scale samplings, even less in the case of widely distributed species that have distant, allopatric populations. In the current study, we examined species boundaries within two wolf spider species of the genus Pardosa (Araneae, Lycosidae), P. riparia and P. palustris. Wolf spiders constitute an excellent model for testing the relevance of traditional vs. modern methods in species and population delimitation because several closely related species are distributed over cross-continental geographic ranges. Allopatric populations of the two Pardosa species were sampled across Europe to Far East Russia (latitudinal range > 150°) and several dozen individuals were studied using morphological characters (morphometry of three measures for both sexes, plus five in males only and two in females only), DNA barcoding (COI sequencing) and double-digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq). The results obtained allow for changing the taxonomic status of two Far East Russian populations to subspecies and ddRADseq proved to be a powerful tool for taxonomic research despite scarce sampling and inherent subjectivity of species delimitation in allopatry. Overall, this study pleads for both multi-criteria and more population-based studies in taxonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislav Ivanov
- grid.10858.340000 0001 0941 4873Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Yuri Marusik
- grid.493323.c0000 0004 0399 5314Institute for Biological Problems of the North, RAS, Magadan, Russia ,grid.412219.d0000 0001 2284 638XDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa
| | - Julien Pétillon
- grid.410368.80000 0001 2191 9284UMR CNRS ECOBIO, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Marko Mutanen
- grid.10858.340000 0001 0941 4873Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lohse S, Wasmer MS, Reydon TAC. Integrating Philosophy of Science into Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in the Life Sciences. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1162/posc_a_00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
This paper argues that research on normative issues in the life sciences will benefit from a tighter integration of philosophy of science. We examine research on ethical, legal and social issues in the life sciences (“ELSI”) and discuss three illustrative examples of normative issues that arise in different areas of the life sciences. These examples show that important normative questions are highly dependent on epistemic issues which so far have not been addressed sufficiently in ELSI, RRI and related areas of research. Accordingly, we argue for the integration of research on the epistemic aspects of the relevant areas of science into ELSI research to provide a better basis for addressing normative questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lohse
- Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS) and the Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin S. Wasmer
- Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS) and the Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas A. C. Reydon
- Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS) and the Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Derry JF, Dagg JL. The Origin of Specious: misunderstandings about Patrick Matthew’s evolutionary thinking. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blaa115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Many ambiguities in Patrick Matthew’s evolutionary ideas can be resolved upon rejecting the presumption that his mechanism was identical to Darwin’s. This presumption has led to two ingrained interpretations which we show are false. First, competitive natural selection plays no role in Matthew’s lineage splitting. On the contrary, it is absent during his comparably short phases of adaptive radiation occurring after catastrophes. Catastrophes eliminate competition, and the competitive vacuum pulls the surviving species apart and unleashes their indwelling variational force. Separate populations adapt to new circumstances through variation and non-competitive survival. Second, competitive natural selection does not drive Matthew’s lineage adaptation either. When it is active, during the comparably long phases of conformity that follow adaptive radiation, the environment directly leads the system towards adaptation. Lineages adapt to changing circumstances but do not split. Interpreting Matthew’s statements accordingly makes sense of his evolutionary thinking that seemed obscure for over a century, especially his statements about the fixity of species and the species problem.
Collapse
|
9
|
Inderbitzin P, Robbertse B, Schoch CL. Species Identification in Plant-Associated Prokaryotes and Fungi Using DNA. PHYTOBIOMES JOURNAL 2020; 4:103-114. [PMID: 35265781 PMCID: PMC8903201 DOI: 10.1094/pbiomes-12-19-0067-rvw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Species names are fundamental to managing biological information. The surge of interest in microbial diversity has resulted in an increase in the number of microbes that need to be identified and assigned a species name. This article provides an introduction to the principles of DNA-based identification of Archaea and Bacteria traditionally known as prokaryotes, and Fungi, the Oomycetes and other protists, collectively referred to as fungi. The prokaryotes and fungi are the most commonly studied microbes from plants, and we introduce the most relevant concepts of prokaryote and fungal taxonomy and nomenclature. We first explain how prokaryote and fungal species are defined, delimited, and named, and then summarize the criteria and methods used to identify prokaryote and fungal organisms to species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Robbertse
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Conrad L. Schoch
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reydon TAC. Taxa hold little information about organisms: Some inferential problems in biological systematics. HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE LIFE SCIENCES 2019; 41:40. [PMID: 31591647 DOI: 10.1007/s40656-019-0281-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The taxa that appear in biological classifications are commonly seen as representing information about the traits of their member organisms. This paper examines in what way taxa feature in the storage and retrieval of such information. I will argue that taxa do not actually store much information about the traits of their member organisms. Rather, I want to suggest, taxa should be understood as functioning to localize organisms in the genealogical network of life on Earth. Taxa store information about where organisms are localized in the network, which is important background information when it comes to establishing knowledge about organismal traits, but it is not itself information about these traits. The view of species and higher taxa that is proposed here follows from examining three problems that occur in contemporary biological systematics and are discussed here: the problem of generalization over taxa, the problem of phylogenetic inference, and the problematic nature of the Tree of Life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A C Reydon
- Institute of Philosophy & Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS), Leibniz University Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jirapatrasilp P, Backeljau T, Prasankok P, Chanabun R, Panha S. Untangling a mess of worms: Species delimitations reveal morphological crypsis and variability in Southeast Asian semi-aquatic earthworms (Almidae, Glyphidrilus). Mol Phylogenet Evol 2019; 139:106531. [PMID: 31185298 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Semi-aquatic freshwater earthworms in the genus Glyphidrilus from Southeast Asia are characterized by both an extreme morphological crypsis among divergent phylogenetic lineages and a high morphological variability within the same phylogenetic lineages. The present study provides a new taxonomic framework for this problematic genus in SE Asia by integrating DNA sequence and morphological data. When single-locus and multilocus multispecies coalescent-based (MSC) species delimitation methods were applied to DNA sequence data, they usually yielded highly incongruent results compared to morphology-based species identifications. This suggested the presence of several cryptic species and high levels of intraspecific morphological variation. Applying reciprocal monophyly to the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene tree allowed us to propose the existence of 33 monophyletic species. Yet, often substantially more molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) were obtained when species delimitation was based on COI and 16S rRNA sequences. In contrast, the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences suggested fewer MOTUs and did not recover most of the monophyletic species from the Mekong basin. However, several of these latter taxa were better supported when MSC species delimitation methods were applied to the combined mtDNA and ITS datasets. The ITS2 secondary structure retrieved one unnamed Mekong basin species that was not uncovered by the other methods when applied to ITS2 sequences. In conclusion, based on an integrative taxonomic workflow, 26 Glyphidrilus candidate species were retained and two remained to be confirmed. As such, this study provides evidence to suggest nine species new to science and to synonymize 12 nominal morphospecies. It also illustrates that the uncritical use of COI as a universal DNA barcode may overestimate species diversity because COI may be unable to distinguish between divergent conspecific lineages and different candidate species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parin Jirapatrasilp
- Biological Sciences Program, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Thierry Backeljau
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pongpun Prasankok
- School of Biology, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Ratmanee Chanabun
- Program in Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture Technology, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon 47000, Thailand
| | - Somsak Panha
- Animal Systematics Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|