1
|
Windhoffer ED, Carruthers TJB, Henkel J, Gleason JS, Wiebe JJ. Leveraging co-production within ecosystem restoration to maximize benefits to coastal birds. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 360:121093. [PMID: 38735069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Coastal Louisiana's ecosystems are threatened by anthropogenic factors exacerbated by climate change induced sea-level rise. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill resulted in injuries and deaths to coastal birds in Louisiana, and the ongoing loss of habitat has limited the potential for successful nesting of resident birds throughout the coast. Habitat loss is being addressed through increased large-scale ecosystem restoration as a result of settlement funds from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. To further inform bird restoration in Louisiana, an avian restoration guidance document (Guidance for Coastal Ecosystem Restoration and Monitoring to Create or Improve Bird-NestingHabitat, 2023) was developed to maximize restoration benefits for coastal breeding birds while also achieving broader habitat restoration objectives. The developed restoration guidance was co-produced by subject-matter experts and professionals, including avian experts, engineers, and coastal restoration project managers. The result of this cross-disciplinary effort was specific and targeted guidance that presents designable habitat features that are in the control of project engineers and are also important high-value bird nesting habitats (e.g., shoreline access, elevation heterogeneity and edge habitat). For the first time in Louisiana, defined nest-site characteristics and monitoring approaches are readily available to inform ecosystem restoration project implementation. The restoration document specifically emphasizes bird species that breed and nest in coastal habitats in Louisiana, and restoration managers can use these guidelines to explicitly incorporate bird nesting habitat features into coastal restoration planning, design, and implementation. In developing this guidance, many knowledge gaps and data needs were identified specific to engineering and project design, enabling the research community to frame research questions around specific coastal restoration questions. The co-production of science model applied here for avian resources is applicable to a wide range of other living marine resources that may benefit from large-scale ecosystem restoration and is an example of the benefits of working relationships, communications, and common goal setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva D Windhoffer
- The Water Institute, 1110 River Road S. Suite 200, Baton Rouge, LA, 70802, USA.
| | - Tim J B Carruthers
- The Water Institute, 1110 River Road S. Suite 200, Baton Rouge, LA, 70802, USA.
| | - Jessica Henkel
- The Water Institute, 1110 River Road S. Suite 200, Baton Rouge, LA, 70802, USA.
| | - Jeffrey S Gleason
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower Suwannee National Wildlife Refuge, 16450 NW 31 Place, Chiefland, FL, 32626, USA.
| | - Jon J Wiebe
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 200 Dulles Drive, Lafayette, LA, 70506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts CP, Naugle DE, Allred BW, Donovan VM, Fogarty DT, Jones MO, Maestas JD, Olsen AC, Twidwell D. Next-generation technologies unlock new possibilities to track rangeland productivity and quantify multi-scale conservation outcomes. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 324:116359. [PMID: 36206652 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Historically, relying on plot-level inventories impeded our ability to quantify large-scale change in plant biomass, a key indicator of conservation practice outcomes in rangeland systems. Recent technological advances enable assessment at scales appropriate to inform management by providing spatially comprehensive estimates of productivity that are partitioned by plant functional group across all contiguous US rangelands. We partnered with the Sage Grouse and Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiatives and the Nebraska Natural Legacy Project to demonstrate the ability of these new datasets to quantify multi-scale changes and heterogeneity in plant biomass following mechanical tree removal, prescribed fire, and prescribed grazing. In Oregon's sagebrush steppe, for example, juniper tree removal resulted in a 21% increase in one pasture's productivity and an 18% decline in another. In Nebraska's Loess Canyons, perennial grass productivity initially declined 80% at sites invaded by trees that were prescriptively burned, but then fully recovered post-fire, representing a 492% increase from nadir. In Kansas' Shortgrass Prairie, plant biomass increased 4-fold (966,809 kg/ha) in pastures that were prescriptively grazed, with gains highly dependent upon precipitation as evidenced by sensitivity of remotely sensed estimates (SD ± 951,308 kg/ha). Our results emphasize that next-generation remote sensing datasets empower land managers to move beyond simplistic control versus treatment study designs to explore nuances in plant biomass in unprecedented ways. The products of new remote sensing technologies also accelerate adaptive management and help communicate wildlife and livestock forage benefits from management to diverse stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb P Roberts
- U.S. Geological Survey, Arkansas Fish and Wildlife Cooperative Research Unit, University of Arkansas, SCEN 522, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
| | - David E Naugle
- WA Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, USA
| | - Brady W Allred
- WA Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, USA
| | | | - Dillon T Fogarty
- Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Matthew O Jones
- WA Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, USA
| | | | | | - Dirac Twidwell
- Agronomy & Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hollmann S, Regierer B, Bechis J, Tobin L, D’Elia D. Ten simple rules on how to develop a stakeholder engagement plan. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010520. [PMID: 36227852 PMCID: PMC9560496 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
To make research responsible and research outcomes meaningful, it is necessary to communicate our research and to involve as many relevant stakeholders as possible, especially in application-oriented-including information and communications technology (ICT)-research. Nowadays, stakeholder engagement is of fundamental importance to project success and achieving the expected impact and is often mandatory in a third-party funding context. Ultimately, research and development can only be successful if people react positively to the results and benefits generated by a project. For the wider acceptance of research outcomes, it is therefore essential that the public is made aware of and has an opportunity to discuss the results of research undertaken through two-way communication (interpersonal communication) with researchers. Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), an approach that anticipates and assesses potential implications and societal expectations regarding research and innovation, aims to foster inclusive and sustainable research and innovation. Research and innovation processes need to become more responsive and adaptive to these grand challenges. This implies, among other things, the introduction of broader foresight and impact assessments for new technologies beyond their anticipated market benefits and risks. Therefore, this article provides a structured workflow that explains "how to develop a stakeholder engagement plan" step by step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Hollmann
- SB Science Management UG (haftungsbeschränkt), Berlin, Germany
- University of Potsdam, Faculty of Science, Potsdam, Germany
- * E-mail: (SH); (BR)
| | - Babette Regierer
- University of Potsdam, Faculty of Science, Potsdam, Germany
- Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ) e.V., Großbeeren, Germany
- * E-mail: (SH); (BR)
| | - Jaele Bechis
- Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, BETA, Nancy, France
| | - Lesley Tobin
- Rete Europea dell’Innovazione—REDINN, Pomezia, Italy
| | - Domenica D’Elia
- Institute for Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hyde M, Breck SW, Few A, Beaver J, Schrecengost J, Stone J, Krebs C, Talmo R, Eneas K, Nickerson R, Kunkel KE, Young JK. Multidisciplinary engagement for fencing research informs efficacy and rancher-to-researcher knowledge exchange. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2022.938054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Across much of the Western United States, recovery of large carnivore populations is creating new challenges for livestock producers. Reducing the risks of sharing the landscape with recovering wildlife populations is critical to private working lands, which play an vital role in securing future energy, water, food, and fiber for an ever-expanding human population. Fencing is an important mitigation practice that many ranchers, land managers, and conservationists implement to reduce carnivore-livestock conflict. While fencing strategies have been reviewed in the literature, research seldom incorporates knowledge from the people who utilize fencing the most (i.e., livestock producers). Incorporating producers and practitioners early in the process of producing scientific knowledge is proving to be a critical endeavor for enhancing knowledge exchange, better evaluation of the practice, and more realistic understanding of the costs and benefits. Here, we describe how our multidisciplinary effort of co-producing knowledge informs understanding of the effectiveness of various fencing designs and more importantly provides a better mechanism for transferring this knowledge between producers, researchers, and land managers. We explain the process underway and demonstrate that incorporating producers and practitioners from the onset allows research priorities and expected outcomes to be set collaboratively, gives transparency to the agricultural community of the research process, provides a critical lens to evaluate efficacy and functionality, and will inform the practicality of fencing as a conflict prevention tool. We discuss opportunities and challenges of this co-production process and how it can be applied to other realms of fencing and conflict prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bennett NJ, Dodge M, Akre TS, Canty SWJ, Chiaravalloti R, Dayer AA, Deichmann JL, Gill D, McField M, McNamara J, Murphy SE, Nowakowski AJ, Songer M. Social science for conservation in working landscapes and seascapes. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2022.954930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biodiversity is in precipitous decline globally across both terrestrial and marine environments. Therefore, conservation actions are needed everywhere on Earth, including in the biodiversity rich landscapes and seascapes where people live and work that cover much of the planet. Integrative landscape and seascape approaches to conservation fill this niche. Making evidence-informed conservation decisions within these populated and working landscapes and seascapes requires an in-depth and nuanced understanding of the human dimensions through application of the conservation social sciences. Yet, there has been no comprehensive exploration of potential conservation social science contributions to working landscape and seascape initiatives. We use the Smithsonian Working Land and Seascapes initiative – an established program with a network of 14 sites around the world – as a case study to examine what human dimensions topics are key to improving our understanding and how this knowledge can inform conservation in working landscapes and seascapes. This exploratory study identifies 38 topics and linked questions related to how insights from place-based and problem-focused social science might inform the planning, doing, and learning phases of conservation decision-making and adaptive management. Results also show how conservation social science might yield synthetic and theoretical insights that are more broadly applicable. We contend that incorporating insights regarding the human dimensions into integrated conservation initiatives across working landscapes and seascapes will produce more effective, equitable, appropriate and robust conservation actions. Thus, we encourage governments and organizations working on conservation initiatives in working landscapes and seascapes to increase engagement with and funding of conservation social science.
Collapse
|
6
|
Seed choice in ground beetles is driven by surface-derived hydrocarbons. Commun Biol 2022; 5:724. [PMID: 35864204 PMCID: PMC9304415 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03678-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) are among the most prevalent biological agents in temperate agroecosystems. Numerous species function as omnivorous predators, feeding on both pests and weed seeds, yet the sensory ecology of seed perception in omnivorous carabids remains poorly understood. Here, we explore the sensory mechanisms of seed detection and discrimination in four species of omnivorous carabids: Poecilus corvus, Pterostichus melanarius, Harpalus amputatus, and Amara littoralis. Sensory manipulations and multiple-choice seed feeding bioassays showed olfactory perception of seed volatiles as the primary mechanism used by omnivorous carabids to detect and distinguish among seeds of Brassica napus, Sinapis arvensis, and Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae). Seed preferences differed among carabid species tested, but the choice of desirable seed species was generally guided by the olfactory perception of long chain hydrocarbons derived from the seed coat surface. These olfactory seed cues were essential for seed detection and discrimination processes to unfold. Disabling the olfactory appendages (antennae and palps) of carabid beetles by ablation left them unable to make accurate seed choices compared to intact beetles. Ground beetles are generalist predators of various arable weed seeds. Sensory manipulations and multiple-choice feeding bioassays show that seed choice is stimulated by volatile chemicals derived from the epicuticular lipids on the seed coat.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pavlacky DC, Hagen CA, Bartuszevige AM, Iovanna R, George TL, Naugle DE. Scaling up private land conservation to meet recovery goals for grassland birds. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2021; 35:1564-1574. [PMID: 33728682 PMCID: PMC8518544 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Long-term population declines have elevated recovery of grassland avifauna to among the highest conservation priorities in North America. Because most of the Great Plains is privately owned, recovery of grassland bird populations depends on voluntary conservation with strong partnerships between private landowners and resource professionals. Despite large areas enrolled in voluntary practices through U.S. Department of Agriculture's Lesser Prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) Initiative (LPCI), the effectiveness of Farm Bill investments for meeting wildlife conservation goals remains an open question. Our objectives were to evaluate extents to which Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and LPCI-grazing practices influence population densities of grassland birds; estimate relative contributions of practices to regional bird populations; and evaluate percentages of populations conserved relative to vulnerability of species. We designed a large-scale impact-reference study and used the Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions program to evaluate bird population targets of the Playa Lakes Joint Venture. We used point transect distance sampling to estimate density and population size for 35 species of grassland birds on private lands enrolled in native or introduced CRP plantings and LPCI-prescribed grazing. Treatment effects indicated CRP plantings increased densities of three grassland obligates vulnerable to habitat loss, and LPCI grazing increased densities of four species requiring heterogeneity in dense, tall-grass structure (α = 0.1). Population estimates in 2016 indicated the practices conserved breeding habitat for 4.5 million birds (90% CI: 4.0-5.1), and increased population sizes of 16 species , totaling 1.8 million birds (CI: 1.4-2.4). Conservation practices on private land benefited the most vulnerable grassland obligate species (AICc weight = 0.53). By addressing habitat loss and degradation in agricultural landscapes, conservation on private land provides a solution to declining avifauna of North America and scales up to meet population recovery goals for the most imperiled grassland birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Pavlacky
- Bird Conservancy of the RockiesBrightonColoradoUSA
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - Christian A. Hagen
- Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisOregonUSA
| | | | - Rich Iovanna
- Economic and Policy Analysis, Farm Service AgencyUnited States Department of AgricultureWashingtonD.C.USA
| | - Thomas Luke George
- Bird Conservancy of the RockiesBrightonColoradoUSA
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsColoradoUSA
| | - David E. Naugle
- W.A. Franke College of Forestry and ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaMontanaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malhotra R, Jiménez JE, Harris NC. Patch characteristics and domestic dogs differentially affect carnivore space use in fragmented landscapes in southern Chile. DIVERS DISTRIB 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rumaan Malhotra
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
| | - Jaime E. Jiménez
- Advanced Environmental Research Institute Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas Denton Texas USA
| | - Nyeema C. Harris
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA
- Applied Wildlife Ecology Lab School of the Environment Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Woody Plant Encroachment and the Sustainability of Priority Conservation Areas. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12208321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Woody encroachment is a global driver of grassland loss and management to counteract encroachment represents one of the most expensive conservation practices implemented in grasslands. Yet, outcomes of these practices are often unknown at large scales and this constrains practitioner’s ability to advance conservation. Here, we use new monitoring data to evaluate outcomes of grassland conservation on woody encroachment for Nebraska’s State Wildlife Action Plan, a statewide effort that targets management in Biologically Unique Landscapes (BULs) to conserve the state’s natural communities. We tracked woody cover trajectories for BULs and compared BUL trajectories with those in non-priority landscapes (non-BULs) to evaluate statewide and BUL-scale conservation outcomes more than a decade after BUL establishment. Statewide, woody cover increased by 256,653 ha (2.3%) from 2000–2017. Most BULs (71%) experienced unsustainable trends of grassland loss to woody encroachment; however, management appeared to significantly reduce BUL encroachment rates compared to non-BULs. Most BULs with early signs of encroachment lacked control strategies, while only one BUL with moderate levels of encroachment (Loess Canyons) showed evidence of a management-driven stabilization of encroachment. These results identify strategic opportunities for proactive management in grassland conservation and demonstrate how new monitoring technology can support large-scale adaptive management pursuits.
Collapse
|
10
|
Garmestani A, Twidwell D, Angeler DG, Sundstrom S, Barichievy C, Chaffin BC, Eason T, Graham N, Granholm D, Gunderson L, Knutson M, Nash KL, Nelson RJ, Nystrom M, Spanbauer TL, Stow CA, Allen CR. Panarchy: opportunities and challenges for ecosystem management. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 2020; 18:576-583. [PMID: 33408590 PMCID: PMC7784709 DOI: 10.1002/fee.2264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Addressing unexpected events and uncertainty represents one of the grand challenges of the Anthropocene, yet ecosystem management is constrained by existing policy and laws that were not formulated to deal with today's accelerating rates of environmental change. In many cases, managing for simple regulatory standards has resulted in adverse outcomes, necessitating innovative approaches for dealing with complex social-ecological problems. We highlight a project in the US Great Plains where panarchy - a conceptual framework that emerged from resilience - was implemented at project onset to address the continued inability to halt large-scale transition from grass-to-tree dominance in central North America. We review how panarchy was applied, the initial outcomes and evidence for policy reform, and the opportunities and challenges for which it could serve as a useful model to contrast with traditional ecosystem management approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahjond Garmestani
- Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL
- Utrecht Centre for Water, Oceans and Sustainability Law, Utrecht University School of Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Dirac Twidwell
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
- Center for Resilience in Agricultural Working Lands, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
| | - David G Angeler
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Shana Sundstrom
- School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
| | - Chris Barichievy
- Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Brian C Chaffin
- Department of Society and Conservation, College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
| | - Tarsha Eason
- Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL
| | - Nick Graham
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Dean Granholm
- US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Bloomington, MN
| | - Lance Gunderson
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Kirsty L Nash
- Centre for Marine Socioecology and Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - R John Nelson
- Department of Biology, Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Magnus Nystrom
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Craig A Stow
- NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Craig R Allen
- Center for Resilience in Agricultural Working Lands, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
- School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
| |
Collapse
|