Effect of biliary excretion on ketamine anaesthesia in the rat

Ketamine applications beyond anesthesia - A literature review

Ketamine's clinical use began in the 1970s. Physicians benefited from its safety and ability to induce short-term anesthesia and analgesia. The psychodysleptic effects caused by the drug called its further clinical use into question. Despite these unpleasant effects, ketamine is still applied in veterinary medicine, field medicine, and specialist anesthesia. Recent intensive research brought into light new possible applications of this drug. It began to be used in acute, chronic and cancer pain management. Most interesting reports come from research on the antidepressive and antisuicidal properties of ketamine giving hope for the creation of an effective treatment for major depressive disorder. Other reports highlight the possible use of ketamine in treating addiction, asthma and preventing cancer growth. Besides clinical use, the drug is also applied to in animal model of schizophrenia. It seems that nowadays, with numerous possible applications, the use of ketamine has returned; to its former glory. Nevertheless, the drug must be used with caution because still the mechanisms by which it executes its functions and long-term effects of its use are not fully known. This review aims to discuss the well-known and new promising applications of ketamine.

Modulation of NMDA receptor function by ketamine and magnesium: Part I

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are important components of pain processing. Ketamine and Mg2+ block NMDA receptors and might therefore be useful analgesics, and combinations of Mg2+ and ketamine provide more effective analgesia. We investigated their interactions at NMDA receptors. Xenopus oocytes, expressing NR1/NR2A or NR1/NR2B glutamate receptors, were studied. The effects of Mg2+, racemic ketamine and its isomers, and the combination of Mg2+ and S(+)-ketamine on NMDA signaling were determined. Mg2+ and ketamine alone inhibited NMDA receptors noncompetitively (half-maximal inhibitory effect concentration: Mg2+ 4.2 +/- 1.2 x 10(-)(4) M at NR1/NR2A and 6.3 +/- 2.4 x 10(-)(4) M at NR1/NR2B; racemic ketamine 13.6 +/- 8.5 x 10(-)(6) M at NR1/NR2A and 17.6 +/- 7.2 x 10(-)(6) M at NR1/NR2B; S(+)-ketamine 4.1 +/- 2.5 x 10(-)(6) at NR1/NR2A and 3.0 +/- 0.3 at NR1/NR2B; R(-)-ketamine 24.4 +/- 4.1 x 10(-)(6) M at NR1/NR2A and 26.0 +/- 2.4 x 10(-)(6) M at NR1/NR2B). The combined application of Mg2+ and ketamine decreased the half-maximal inhibitory effect concentration >90% at both receptors. Isobolographic analysis demonstrated super-additive interactions. Ketamine and Mg2+ inhibit responses of recombinantly expressed NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B glutamate receptors, and combinations of the compounds act in a super-additive manner. These findings may explain, in part, why combinations of ketamine and Mg2+ are more effective analgesics than either compound alone.

IMPLICATIONS

Ketamine and Mg2+ inhibit functioning of recombinantly expressed NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B glutamate receptors, and combinations of the compounds act in a super-additive manner. These findings may explain, in part, why combinations of ketamine and Mg2+ are more effective analgesics than either compound alone.

Methods in testing interrelationships between excretion of drugs via urine and bile

The liver and kidney are largely responsible for inactivating and eliminating drugs and other chemicals. As the excretory capabilities of the two organs overlap, a damage of one system might be compensated by the other. Because of the specificity of both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms such an alternative excretion route is not possible generally. Several interferences are possible to characterize the relation between hepatic and renal excretion of drugs and xenobiotics. Firstly, the simultaneous assay of excreted drug amounts in urine and bile can give some information concerning the main transport routes of this drug. Thereafter the total interruption of liver or kidney function elucidates the general possibility of alternative excretion routes. But it is important for clinical practice to distinguish between different localizations of organ damages. Today some experimental possibilities exist to exclude partial functions of both kidney and liver separately. Thus it can be clarified why a compound might be excreted via liver or kidney. Moreover it can be characterized whether or not a compensation for the loss of one main excretion organ is possible or not. Such investigations are of some practical importance. Dosing guidelines for drug therapy must be completed for cases of renal or hepatic failure. Moreover the developmental pattern of both elimination routes has consequences for drug use in paediatrics as well as geriatrics. Beside this point of view such investigations are necessary for the prediction of changes in the toxicity of drugs after renal or hepatic insufficiency.