Spinal cord potential recordings from the extradural space during scoliosis surgery

Comparison of time-frequency distribution techniques for analysis of spinal somatosensory evoked potential

Spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) has been employed to monitor the integrity of the spinal cord during surgery. To detect both temporal and spectral changes in SSEP waveforms, an investigation of the application of time-frequency analysis (TFA) techniques was conducted. SSEP signals from 30 scoliosis patients were analysed using different techniques; short time Fourier transform (STFT), Wigner-Ville distribution (WVD), Choi-Williams distribution (CWD), cone-shaped distribution (CSD) and adaptive spectrogram (ADS). The time-frequency distributions (TFD) computed using these methods were assessed and compared with each other. WVD, ADS, CSD and CWD showed better resolution than STFT. Comparing normalised peak widths, CSD showed the sharpest peak width (0.13+/-0.1) in the frequency dimension, and a mean peak width of 0.70+/-0.12 in the time dimension. Both WVD and CWD produced cross-term interference, distorting the TFA distribution, but this was not seen with CSD and ADS. CSD appeared to give a lower mean peak power bias (10.3%+/-6.2%) than ADS (41.8%+/-19.6%). Application of the CSD algorithm showed both good resolution and accurate spectrograms, and is therefore recommended as the most appropriate TFA technique for the analysis of SSEP signals.

Acute respiratory and metabolic acidosis induced by excessive muscle contraction during spinal evoked stimulation

Spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) have been used to monitor spinal cord function during corrective scoliosis surgery. We report three cases in which direct epidural stimulation for measurement of SSEPs produced paraspinal muscle contraction, resulting in respiratory and metabolic acidosis. In two of the cases, SSEP-induced acidosis was observed even when only the first twitch of the train-of-four response was detectable after a second dose of muscle relaxant. In one of these two cases, the acidosis was abolished after a sufficient dose of vecuronium to ablate the twitch response. To prevent SSEP-induced respiratory and metabolic acidosis, we recommend that SSEPs should be measured only when profound neuromuscular blockade has been obtained.

Spinal cord monitoring

Over the past two decades, intraoperative spinal cord monitoring has matured into a widely used clinical tool. It is used when the spinal cord is at risk for damage during a surgical procedure. This includes orthopedic, neurosurgical, and certain cardiothoracic procedures. Both somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and direct motor pathway stimulation techniques are available. The SEP techniques are used most widely, are generally accepted, and have been shown to reduce surgical morbidity. A large multicenter study has shown that SEP monitoring reduces postoperative paraplegia by more than 50-60%. Techniques and literature on clinical applications are reviewed in this report.

Comparative study of propofol and midazolam effects on somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical treatment of scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

Studies of the effects on lower-limb cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) during total intravenous anesthesia are sparse for propofol and are lacking for midazolam. This study was designed to compare the effects of propofol and midazolam on CSEP under total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring for surgical treatment of scoliosis.

METHODS

CSEPs were recorded in two groups of 15 patients during posterior instrumentation for treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. The anesthesia used the combination of atracurium, alfentanil, and an hypnotic agent (propofol for Group I or midazolam for Group II). The main characteristics of the CSEPs (P40 latency and N34-P40 and P40-N50 amplitudes) were recorded using ankle posterior tibial nerve stimulation. The CSEPs were recorded before induction, 10, 70, 100, 130, and 160 minutes after induction, and before the wake-up test. The statistical analysis involved analysis of variance for repeated measures. Both groups were homogeneous before induction.

RESULTS

Neither CSEP deterioration during risk-associated surgical procedures nor postoperative clinical abnormalities were observed. Both propofol and midazolam induced increases in P40 latencies, with the increases being greater and more regular for the propofol-treated group. The amplitude values changed with time for both groups, decreasing mainly after induction; in the midazolam-treated group, the amplitudes were smaller but more stable. Propofol modified the morphological characteristics of the response by decreasing the late P60 component amplitude; the W-shaped CSEP morphological pattern was maintained with midazolam.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the appropriate use of either propofol or midazolam in scoliosis monitoring. Preoperative small-amplitude CSEPs might favor the use of propofol anesthesia.

[Neuromonitoring and anesthesia in surgery of the spine]

The authors report the main effects of anaesthetic drugs that are used alone or in association with anaesthetic protocols on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and on motor evoked potentials (MEP). In the first part of the article, the effects are analysed on SEPs and MEPs that are obtained from non-invasive methods; in the second part, the effects of anaesthesia are analysed with respect to invasive methods of EP recordings. The current increase of invasive techniques of neuromonitoring by SEPs and MEPs is in relation with the weak effect of anaesthetics on evoked responses. Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) provides stable anaesthesia for non-invasive SEP neuromonitoring only if bolus is avoided. With TIVA and other anaesthetic techniques, the introduction of repetitive stimulation provides new possibilities for non-invasive MEP neuromonitoring.

Surgical monitoring of motor pathways

Intraoperative monitoring of corticospinal function is no longer an experimental technique, having been introduced into routine practice in a number of centers, each of which has now accumulated large series of some hundreds of cases. Different techniques have been developed by these centers; each has advantages and disadvantages, and it is clear that no one technique in particular is optimal for all surgical procedures. The corticospinal system can be activated by transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or by direct stimulation of the spinal cord with electrical or magnetic stimuli delivered singly or as double or multiple pulses. The evoked activity may be recorded directly from the spinal cord using epidural electrode, or as a postsynaptic volley in motor axons ("neurogenic motor evoked potentials," MEP), or as a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from innervated muscles. For scoliosis surgery, we use transcranial electrical stimulation, recording the evoked volley from the spinal cord using epidural electrodes at two spinal levels. By simultaneously stimulating the tibial nerves in the popliteal fossae, descending corticospinal volleys and ascending somatosensory volleys can be recorded in the same sweep. Accordingly, this technique allows monitoring of two different modalities of function at two separate levels of the nervous system, a goal that is most desirable because it helps identify the earliest evidence of dysfunction and at the same time minimizes false-positive reports to the surgeon. Our technique has the advantage of being relatively immune to the depressant effects of anesthesia, and full muscle relaxation is possible--even desirable. More peripheral recordings of neurogenic MEP or CMAP, are sensitive to the choice of anesthetic, and the latter requires incomplete curarization. However, these techniques may be appropriate when the pathology is in the low spinal cord or nerve roots.

Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the posterior pharynx to stimulation of the median nerve and cauda equina

Somatosensory evoked potentials (ppSEPs) in response to stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist and the cauda equina at the epidural space (the L4 level) were recorded from the posterior wall of the pharynx in 15 patients who underwent spinal surgery under general anesthesia, using disc electrodes attached to the endotracheal tube, and compared with segmental spinal cord potentials (seg-SCPs) that were recorded simultaneously from the posterior epidural space (PES). ppSEPs consisted of the initially positive spike (P9) followed by slow positive (P13) and negative (N22) waves. The P13 and N22 of ppSEPs had phase reversal relationship with the P2 and N2 recorded from the PES, respectively. The peak latencies of P9 (9.40 +/- 0.7 ms) (mean +/- SD), P13 (13.1 +/- 0.9 ms), and N22 (22.0 +/- 2.1 ms) of ppSEPs coincided with those of P1, N1 and P2 of seg-SCPs, respectively, ppSEPs were recorded more clearly with a reference electrode on the dorsal surface of the neck than with the reference electrode at the earlobe or back of the hand. The threshold and maximal stimulus intensities were also similar between the ppSEPs and seg-SCPs. Thus, the P9, P13, and N22 components of ppSEPs were thought to have the same origin as the P1, N1 and P2 of seg-SCPs, respectively. Therefore, the P9, P13 and N22 of ppSEPs may reflect incoming volleys through the root, synchronized activities of the interneurons and primary afferent depolarizations (PAD), respectively. ppSEPs in response to cauda equina stimulation showed that the latencies of the two initial components (4.6 +/- 0.4 and 6.4 +/- 0.6 ms) corresponded to those of the SCPs recorded from the PES (4.6 +/- 0.3 and 6.3 +/- 0.5 ms), suggesting that these potentials reflect impulses conducting through the spinal cord, similar to epidurally recorded SCPs.