Spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric amethocaine in adolescents

The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in children: a dose-finding study

PURPOSE

To determine the 50% minimum effective concentration (MEC50) and the 95% effective concentration (MEC95) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block during hypospadias repair surgery of pediatric patients.

METHODS

Children were enrolled with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery. Children were grouped into two age groups: toddlerhood (1-3 years old) and preschool (3-6 years old). We measured The MEC50 using Dixon's up-and-down method. The first children received the caudal block with 1.0 mL/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine. We determined each subsequent patient's concentration based on the previous patient's response and adjusted the concentration in intervals of 0.015%. Meanwhile, the probit regression analysis obtains 95% effective concentration (MEC95). In addition, we recorded the general condition, adverse events, and postoperative pain of each child.

RESULTS

46 children undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery were included in this study, 22 in the toddlerhood group and 24 in the preschool group. Of the total number of patients, the caudal block was successful in 25 (54%) and failed in 21 (46%). The MEC50 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.102% (95% CI 0.099%, 0.138%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.129% (95% CI 0.124%, 0.138%) in the preschool group. The MEC95 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.148% (95% CI 0.131%, 0.149%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.162% (95% CI 0.134%, 0.164%) in the preschool group. Our results showed that ropivacaine concentration was statistically different between preschool children and toddlers (P < 0.001). None of the adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that children in the preschool group required higher concentrations of ropivacaine than children in the toddler group during ultrasound-guided sacral block combined with non-intubated general anesthesia. At the same time, this method of anesthesia is safe and effective for children undergoing surgery for hypospadias.

Spinal anesthesia in children: A review

Even after a vast safety record, the role of spinal anesthesia (SA) as a primary anesthetic technique in children remains contentious and is mainly limited to specialized pediatric centers. It is usually practiced on moribund former preterm infants (<60 weeks post-conception) to reduce the incidence of post-operative apnea when compared to general anesthesia (GA). However, there is ample literature to suggest its safety and efficacy for suitable procedures in older children as well. SA in children has many advantages as in adults with an added advantage of minimal cardio-respiratory disturbance. Recently, several reports from animal studies have raised serious concerns regarding the harmful effects of GA on young developing brain. This may further increase the utility of SA in children as it provides all components of balanced anesthesia technique. Also, SA can be an economical option for countries with finite resources. Limited duration of surgical anesthesia in children is one of the major deterrents for its widespread use in them. To overcome this, several additives like epinephrine, clonidine, fentanyl, morphine, neostigmine etc. have been used and found to be effective even in neonates. But, the developing spinal cord may also be vulnerable to drug-related toxicity, though this has not been systematically evaluated in children. So, adjuvants and drugs with widest therapeutic index should be preferred in children. Despite its widespread use, incidence of side-effects is low and permanent neurological sequalae have not been reported with SA. Literature yields encouraging results regarding its safety and efficacy. Technical skills and constant vigilance of experienced anesthesia providers is indispensable to achieve good results with this technique.

Recent developments in paediatric neuraxial blocks

Paediatric anaesthesia and paediatric regional anaesthesia are intertwined. Almost all surgeries unless contradicted could be and should be supplemented with a regional block. The main objective of this review is to elaborate on the recent advances of the central neuraxial blocks, such as application of ultrasound guidance and electrical stimulation in the pursuit of safety and an objective end point. This review also takes account of the traditional technique and understand the benefits as well the risk of each as compared with the recent technique. The recent trends in choosing the most appropriate peripheral block for a given surgery thereby sparing the central neuroaxis is considered. A penile block for circumcision or a sciatic block for unilateral foot surgery, rather than caudal epidural would have a better risk benefit equation. Readers will find a special mention on the recent thoughts on continuous epidural analgesia in paediatrics, especially its rise and fall, yet its unique importance. Lastly, the issue of block placements under sedation or general anaesthesia with its implication in this special population is dealt with. We conducted searches in MEDLINE (PubMed) and assessed the relevance of the abstracts of citations identified from literature searches. The search was carried out in English, for last 10 years, with the following key words: Recent advances in paediatric regional anaesthesia; ultrasound guidance for central neuraxial blocks in children; role of electrical stimulation in neuraxial blocks in children; complications in neuraxial block. Full-text articles of potentially relevant abstracts were retrieved for further review.

Spinal blocks

Every anesthetist should have the expertise to perform lumbar puncture that is the prerequisite to induce spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia is easy and effective technique: small amount of local anesthetic injected in the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid provides highly effective anesthesia, analgesia, and sympathetic and motor block in the lower part of the body. The main limitation of spinal anesthesia is a variable and relatively short duration of the block with a single-injection of local anesthetic. With appropriate use of adjuvant or combining spinal anesthesia with epidural anesthesia, the analgesic action can be controlled in case of early recovery of initial block or in patients with prolonged procedures. Contraindications are rare. Bleeding disorders and any major dysfunction in coagulation system are rare in children, but spinal anesthesia should not be used in children with local infection or increased intracranial pressure. Children with spinal anesthesia may develop the same adverse effects as has been reported in adults, but in contrast to adults, cardiovascular deterioration is uncommon in children even with high blocks. Most children having surgery with spinal anesthesia need sedation, and in these cases, close monitoring of sufficient respiratory function and protective airway reflexes is necessary. Postdural puncture headache and transient neurological symptoms have been reported also in pediatric patients, and thus, guardians should be provided instructions for follow-up and contact information if symptoms appear or persist after discharge. Epidural blood patch is effective treatment for prolonged, severe headache, and nonopioid analgesic is often sufficient for transient neurological symptoms.

Spinal anesthesia in neonates and infants - a single-center experience of 505 cases

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of spinal anesthesia (SA) in newborns and infants undergoing surgery appropriate for this technique.

METHODS

The files of 505 patients who underwent surgery under spinal anesthesia since 1998 at a major tertiary hospital in Israel were analyzed retrospectively. SA was performed with bupivacaine 5 mgxml(-1) by attending pediatric anesthesiologists or an anesthesia resident. Demographic data, prematurity history, comorbidities, technical data, cardiovascular stability, complications and supplementary drugs were documented. The surgeon assessed the quality of anesthesia at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Appropriate SA was achieved in 95.3% of cases; in 69.9% at the first attempt. The mean number of attempts per patient was 1.41 and mean dose of bupivacaine was 0.66 +/- 0.16 mgxkg(-1). Intravenous sedation, usually with midazolam (dose 0.1-0.2 mgxkg(-1)) was required in 28.1% of children because of crying/restlessness. Intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia was necessary in five patients (1.04%). The main side effect was bradycardia (<100 bxmin(-1)) without desaturation which occurred in nine patients (1.8%). In three patients (0.62%), high spinal block occurred without bradycardia and hypotension. None of the patients had postoperative meningitis.

CONCLUSIONS

SA is safe and effective in newborns and infants undergoing low abdominal, perineal and orthopedic surgery. In order to save time, our advice is to attempt SA after the surgeon is scrubbed, and minimize surgical teaching activity. The need to deal with a small and sometimes sick patient independent of the type of anesthesia requires the presence of an experienced pediatric anesthesiologist.

Spinal anaesthesia in paediatric patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Spinal anaesthesia has seldom been employed in paediatric patients. Its use has been suggested mainly in former preterm newborns and infants who are known to be exposed to high perioperative apnoea risk. There is currently some evidence that spinal anaesthesia could be considered as an equal alternative to general anaesthesia as it is in adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

New drugs and adjuvants recently introduced in clinical practice, more-detailed knowledge of spread anaesthetic modalities and larger databases, now available, could today make paediatric spinal anaesthesia a more suitable technique for many anaesthetists.

SUMMARY

We will review recent literature focusing the latest techniques, drugs, dosages, and complications in order to define the limits and advantages of employing spinal anaesthesia in all paediatric ages, in routine and emergency surgery.

Spinal anesthesia with tetracaine in 7.5% or 0.75% glucose in adolescents and adults

To examine whether adolescents and adults might develop different anesthetic distribution and hemodynamic consequences after spinal injection of 0.5% tetracaine in 7.5% or 0.75% glucose, we studied 100 ASA I or II patients who were scheduled for elective surgery to the lower limb and fulfilled the following criteria: age between 13 and 16 yr (Adolescent group, n = 40) or between 25 and 74 yr (Adult group, n = 60); height between 155 and 180 cm; and body mass index between 18 and 32 kg/m(2). Patients in each group were then randomly divided into two equal subgroups to receive spinal anesthesia with 0.5% tetracaine in either 7.5% or 0.75% glucose with 0.125% phenylephrine at the L3-4 interspace. With patients in the supine horizontal position, neural block was assessed by cold, pinprick, and touch sensation and a modified Bromage scale after the injection of the study drug. The 7.5% glucose solution produced a significantly higher and faster spread of blockade in adolescents than in adults. In contrast, there were no differences in the levels of three sensory modalities between the two age groups after the 0.75% glucose solution, which produced a lower spread of blockade than the 7.5% glucose solution in either age group. Adolescents given the 0.75% glucose solution developed a smaller maximum decrease in systolic pressure than those given the heavier solution. We conclude that adolescents may develop an extensive level of blockade more easily and quickly than adults after intrathecal hyperbaric tetracaine, but that the difference may be reduced by using a less heavy solution.

IMPLICATIONS

The influence of age on the characteristics of spinal anesthesia is still controversial. Our results show that adolescents develop blockade more extensively and quickly than adults after spinal anesthesia with 0.5%tetracaine in 7.5% glucose but not after the 0.75% glucose solution.