Analgesic effect of intrathecal desipramine on carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia in the rat

Contributions of peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal actions to analgesia

Pain signaling involves several main compartments that can be considered as potential sites for analgesic drug actions. When drugs are given systemically, they can act at spinal, supraspinal and peripheral sites, and several methods have been developed for identifying where they act. These include (1) localized delivery of drugs to specific sites (via intracerebral, intrathecal, and intraplantar injections), (2) systemic delivery of drugs with localized delivery of antagonists for the receptor on which the drug acts or for a system recruited by the drug, (3) use of peripherally restricted analogs, and (4) use of conditional knockout technology to selectively deplete receptors on nociceptors. Delivery of drugs simultaneously to several sites (spinal/supraspinal, peripheral/spinal, and peripheral/supraspinal) reveals "self-synergy" between sites for some agents. Knowledge of peripheral contributions to drug actions is important because of the potential to develop peripherally restricted analgesics (with a diminished side effect profile due to not entering the central nervous system), the potential to deliver drugs peripherally (e.g. topically) to act on sensory nerve endings and adjacent tissue (with a diminished side effect profile due to limited systemic absorption), and the potential to use combinations of topical and oral drug regimens to obtain improved pain relief (without increasing the side effect burden). This review considers methods used for compartmental analysis, and results of such site analysis for several major classes of analgesic drugs that are in current use.

Milnacipran inhibits glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity in spinal dorsal horn neurons

Background

Antidepressants, which are widely used for treatment of chronic pain, are thought to have antinociceptive effects by blockade of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake. However, these drugs also interact with various receptors such as excitatory glutamatergic receptors. Thermal hyperalgesia was induced by intrathecal injection of NMDA in rats. Paw withdrawal latency was measured after intrathecal injection of antidepressants. The effects of antidepressants on the NMDA and AMPA-induced responses were examined in lamina II neurons of rat spinal cord slices using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. The effects of milnacipran followed by application of NMDA on pERK activation were also investigated in the spinal cord.

Results

Intrathecal injection of milnacipran (0.1 μmol), but not citalopram (0.1 μmol) and desipramine (0.1 μmol), followed by intrathecal injection of NMDA (1 μg) suppressed thermal hyperalgesia. Milnacipran (100 μM) reduced the amplitude of NMDA (56 ± 3 %, 64 ± 5 % of control)-, but not AMPA (98 ± 5 %, 97 ± 5 % of control)-mediated currents induced by exogenous application and dorsal root stimulation, respectively. Citalopram (100 μM) and desipramine (30 μM) had no effect on the amplitude of exogenous NMDA-induced currents. The number of pERK-positive neurons in the group treated with milnacipran (100 μM), but not citalopram (100 μM) or desipramine (30 μM), followed by NMDA (100 μM) was significantly lower compared with the NMDA-alone group.

Conclusions

The antinociceptive effect of milnacipran may be dependent on the drug’s direct modulation of NMDA receptors in the superficial dorsal horn. Furthermore, in addition to inhibiting the reuptake of monoamines, glutamate NMDA receptors are also important for analgesia induced by milnacipran.

Effects of desipramine on the antioxidant status in rat tissues at carrageenan-induced paw inflammation

The pathogenesis of many diseases and different pathological conditions, including inflammation, is associated with excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The present study aimed to investigate the effects of the antidepressant desipramine (DES) on carrageenan (CG)-induced inflammation, as well as on the endogenous levels of cell enzyme and non-enzyme antioxidants in rat liver and spleen, 4 and 24 h after CG injection. The intra-plantar CG injection into the right hind paw resulted in a time-dependent increase in the paw volume; the maximum of CG-induced edema peak was in 2-4 h. A single DES dose of 20 mg · kg(-1) , administered 30 min before CG, had no effect on paw edema, whereas the higher drug dose used (50 mg · kg(-1) ) suppressed the edematous response to CG. The latter drug dose protected CG-induced decrease of glutathione (non-enzyme antioxidant) in the liver; it did not affect CG-unchanged activities of superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase (enzyme antioxidants) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (enzyme, important for the activity of glutathione-conjugated antioxidant enzymes) in both liver and spleen. The drug showed an efficient antioxidant capacity in ROS-generating chemical systems; it was higher than that of fluoxetine (another type of antidepressant). The present results suggest that the good antioxidant activity of DES might contribute to its beneficial effects in liver injuries.

Evaluation of the efficacy of intrathecal injection of amitriptyline and doxepin in spinal anesthesia in comparison with bupivacaine in rats

Background:

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are commonly used orally for treating chronic pain states, such as neuropathic pain. TCAs produce analgesia by various mechanisms, including sodium channels, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors, biogenic amines, opioids, inflammatory mediators, and substance P. Studies have shown that intrathecal tricyclic administration effectively attenuates pain and thermal hyperalgesia in inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two tertiary TCAs in sensory and motor block. We also used bupivacaine as a strong local anesthetic for the control group.

Materials and Methods:

In a double-blind randomized controlled trial in an animal lab, intrathecal injection of drugs was performed in 30 Wistar male rats. We divided the subjects into 3 groups: group 1: 90 µL Doxepine (50 mM), group 2: 90 µl amitriptyline (60 mM). and group 3: 90 µL bupivacaine (23 mM). Then sensory, motor, and proprioceptive changes were measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12 hours by one examiner.

Results:

In Groups 1 and 2, a total of 3 rats died. After adjusting the concentrations, amitriptyline had a similar potency but a longer duration of spinal blockade of motor, proprioception, and nociception than did bupivacaine (p < 0.05), whereas doxepin had a reasonable but lower efficacy and shorter duration of spinal blockade than did bupivacaine (p < 0.05). The full recovery time for Group 2 was significantly longer.

Conclusions:

It seems that tertiary amine drugs such as amitriptyline and doxepin had reasonable potencies of spinal blockade when compared to bupivacaine. However, amitriptyline had a more potent and long-acting spinal anesthetic effect. Amitriptyline may turn out to be a clinically valuable local anesthetic.

Monoaminergic Antidepressants in the Relief of Pain: Potential Therapeutic Utility of Triple Reuptake Inhibitors (TRIs)

Over 75% of depressed patients suffer from painful symptoms predicting a greater severity and a less favorable outcome of depression. Imaging, anatomical and functional studies have demonstrated the existence of common brain structures, neuronal pathways and neurotransmitters in depression and pain. In particular, the ascending serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways originating from the raphe nuclei and the locus coeruleus; respectively, send projections to the limbic system. Such pathways control many of the psychological functions that are disturbed in depression and in the perception of pain. On the other hand, the descending pathways, from monoaminergic nuclei to the spinal cord, are specifically implicated in the inhibition of nociception providing rationale for the use of serotonin (5-HT) and/or norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, NRIs, SNRIs), in the relief of pain. Compelling evidence suggests that dopamine (DA) is also involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. Indeed, recent insights have demonstrated a central role for DA in analgesia through an action at both the spinal and suprasinal levels including brain regions such as the periaqueductal grey (PAG), the thalamus, the basal ganglia and the limbic system. In this context, dopaminergic antidepressants (i.e., containing dopaminergic activity), such as bupropion, nomifensine and more recently triple reuptake inhibitors (TRIs), might represent new promising therapeutic tools in the treatment of painful symptoms with depression. Nevertheless, whether the addition of the dopaminergic component produces more robust effects than single- or dual-acting agents, has yet to be demonstrated. This article reviews the main pathways regulating pain transmission in relation with the monoaminergic systems. It then focuses on the current knowledge regarding the in vivo pharmacological properties and mechanism of action of monoaminergic antidepressants including SSRIs, NRIs, SNRIs and TRIs. Finally, a synthesis of the preclinical studies supporting the efficacy of these antidepressants in analgesia is also addressed in order to highlight the relative contribution of 5-HT, NE and DA to nociception.

Serotoninergic and non-serotoninergic effects of two tricyclic antidepressants on visceral nociception in a rat model

OBJECTIVE

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are well established in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The effects are believed to be linked to serotoninergic antinociceptive properties, but data on the antinociceptive effects of various TCAs with variable serotoninergic and non-serotoninergic properties have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the antinociceptive effects of different TCAs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Colorectal distension (CRD) using a barostat device was carried out in rats and the visceromotor response (VMR) to CRD was quantified by abdominal wall electromyography. Prior to CRD, saline (control), amitriptyline (AM), desipramine (DES), reserpine (RES) or a combination of TCAs and RES (AM + RES or DES + RES) was applied intraperitoneally. Serum 5-HT levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RES was used to antagonize the serotoninergic actions of TCAs in order to discriminate between these effects and others.

RESULTS

Both TCAs decreased the VMR compared to placebo. After RES application without TCAs, the VMR was increased compared to controls (6403 microV+/-1772 microV). Co-administration of AM and RES resulted in a modest decrease in VMR (5774 microV+/-1953 microV), while in rats treated with RES and DES the VMR again was significantly lower (3446 microV (+/-1347 microV; p <0.05)). 5-HT levels were higher in TCA pretreated rats than those in controls and significantly lower 5-HT levels were found in all rats pretreated with RES.

CONCLUSIONS

AM and DES have antinociceptive properties while RES is pro-nociceptive. The antinociceptive effects of DES are not abolished by RES pretreatment, while AM only attenuates the pro-nociceptive effects of RES. The non-serotoninergic properties of TCAs substantially contribute to the differences in the antinococeptive effects of various TCAs.

New developments in the use of tricyclic antidepressants for the management of pain

In recent years, tricyclic antidepressant drugs have experienced a resurgence in their use as valuable pharmacological tools in the treatment of pain. Along with the evolution in our understanding of their analgesic mechanisms of action, there have been concurrent breakthroughs regarding their indications for use and modes of administration. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of how antidepressant drugs exert their antinociceptive effects, and new developments regarding their clinical application.

Differential blockade of nerve injury-induced shift in weight bearing and thermal and tactile hypersensitivity by milnacipran

Antidepressants such as tricyclic antidepressants have become used to treat a variety of chronic pain conditions. However, the side effects are dose-limiting in the treatment of chronic pain. Milnacipran is a norepinephrine/serotonin reuptake inhibitor that does not have the severe side effects associated with traditional tricyclic antidepressants. The effects of intrathecal and systemic administration of milnacipran on spinal nerve ligation (SNL)-induced thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity and shift in weight bearing were determined. Intrathecal administration of milnacipran was found to reverse both SNL-induced thermal and tactile (to von Frey filaments) hypersensitivity, as well as shift in weight bearing. Acute systemic administration of milnacipran also reversed nerve injury-induced thermal hypersensitivity for up to 5 hours but failed to reverse tactile hypersensitivity or shift in weight bearing. Of note, both intrathecal and subcutaneous administration of milnacipran induced thermal antinociception in both SNL and sham rats. Chronic (daily) systemic administration of milnacipran alleviated both thermal hypersensitivity and shift in weight bearing, with both acute and chronic effects observed on thermal hypersensitivity. However, chronic systemic milnacipran administration failed to alleviate tactile hypersensitivity to von Frey filaments. These results indicate that different mechanisms underlie shift in weight bearing, thermal hypersensitivity, and tactile hypersensitivity.

PERSPECTIVE

These results indicate that the ability of milnacipran to relieve nerve injury-induced allodynia, hyperalgesia, and shift in weight bearing depends on the route of administration and the duration of treatment, with alleviation of SNL-induced tactile hypersensitivity and shift in weight bearing as a result of activity within the central-rather than the peripheral-nervous system.

The influence of the time course of inflammation and spinalization on the antinociceptive activity of the α2-adrenoceptor agonist medetomidine

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of the time course of inflammation and the implication of spinal and supraspinal sites on the antihyperalgesic effects of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist medetomidine. Behavioral experiments showed a more intense antihyperalgesia in the phase of maintenance of inflammation than in the early or resolution stages. Maximum effect, without sedation, was observed with a dose of 40 microg/kg (66+/-12% and 76+/-15% reduction of mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia). No change was observed in the paw swelling, indicating that its effects were not secondary to a reduction of inflammation. In electrophysiological experiments, the effect was more pronounced in animals with an intact spinal cord than in spinalized animals (max. effects of 2+/-0.7% vs. 48+/-11% of control, noxious mechanical stimulation). We conclude that the antihyperalgesic effect of medetomidine depends on the time course of inflammation and that it is mainly located supraspinally.

The monoamine-mediated antiallodynic effects of intrathecally administered milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Antidepressants are often used to treat neuropathic pain. In the present study, we determined the antiallodynic effects of selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors in the spinal cord in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Mechanical allodynia was produced by tight ligation of the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves and determined by applying von Frey filaments to the left hindpaw. A serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, milnacipran, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, or a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, maprotiline, was administered intrathecally via a chronically implanted catheter. Milnacipran produced dose-dependent antiallodynic effects at doses between 3 microg and 100 microg. The effect lasted for 7 h after injection of 100 microg (P < 0.05). The antiallodynic effect of 30 microg of milnacipran was attenuated by intrathecal coadministration of 30 microg of yohimbine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, 30 microg of methysergide, a serotonin receptor antagonist, or 30 microg of atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist (P < 0.01, respectively). Intraperitoneal administration of milnacipran had no antiallodynic effects at doses of 3 to 30 mg/kg. Antiallodynic effects were not produced by intrathecal administration of paroxetine (10 to 100 microg) or maprotiline (10 to 100 microg). These findings suggest that simultaneous inhibition of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake in the spinal cord is essential to mediate antiallodynic effects. Milnacipran might be effective for suppression of neuropathic pain.

Spinal noradrenaline transporter inhibition by reboxetine and Xen2174 reduces tactile hypersensitivity after surgery in rats

Spinal noradrenaline (NA) released in response to noxious stimuli may play an important role in suppression of nociceptive transmission. Here, we investigated the efficacy of a competitive NA transporter inhibitor (reboxetine) and a noncompetitive NA transporter inhibitor peptide, Xen2174, isolated from the Pacific cone snail, to treat tactile hypersensitivity following paw incisional surgery. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, an incision of the plantar aspect of the hind paw was performed, and withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments near the surgical site determined. Reboxetine (0.5-5 microg) and Xen2174 (0.3-100 microg) increased withdrawal threshold when injected 24h after paw incision, with a peak effect at 15-60 min, for Xen2174, an ED50 value of 0.64 microg. Administration of Xen2174 (3-30 microg) 15 min before incision also reduced hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner. Withdrawal threshold after the single 30 microg dose was greater than vehicle control even at 2, 3, and 5 days after incision. Doses <or=30 microg did not alter spontaneous behavior. The anti-hypersensitivity effect of 10 microg of Xen2174 was totally blocked by the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan, and partially blocked by the muscarinic antagonist, atropine. These data suggest that selective NA transporter inhibition suppresses post-incisional hypersensitivity through a different mechanism from that of neuropathic pain, since we previously reported that reversal of hypersensitivity by intrathecal clonidine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, following spinal nerve ligation is completely blocked by intrathecal atropine. Finally, these data suggest that intrathecal administration of Xen2174 at the time of spinal anesthesia might produce postoperative analgesia in humans.

Participation of brainstem nuclei in the pronociceptive effect of lesion or neural block of the anterior pretectal nucleus in a rat model of incisional pain

The anterior pretectal nucleus (APtN) participates in nociceptive process and controls spinal nociceptive inputs, and its integrity reduces the severity of the responses to persistent injury. In this study we examined whether the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) or the gigantocellularis nucleus pars alpha (GiA), stations that relay APtN inputs to the spinal cord, can control the persistent pain induced by a hind paw incision in rats with disrupted APtN. The withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation of the incised paw measured with von Frey filaments was significantly reduced in rats with contralateral APtN lesion or neural block of this nucleus with 2% lidocaine. Intrathecal xylamine, an inhibitor of noradrenaline uptake, inhibited the neural block of the APtN-induced increase in the incisional pain. Injection of glutamate into the contralateral PPTg or ipsilateral GiA reduced the incisional pain. Neural block of the PPTg or GiA reduced the threshold, mainly in APtN-disrupted rats. We conclude that persistent noxious stimulation activates descending pathways involving the contralateral APtN and PPTg, and ipsilateral GiA. Disruption of the APtN allows the activation of alternative circuitry involving at least the PPTg and GiA as intermediary stations that might maintain the control of nociceptive inputs in the spinal cord, probably involving noradrenergic mechanisms.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Lesion of the bulbospinal noradrenergic pathways blocks desipramine-induced inhibition of the C-fiber evoked nociceptive reflex in rats

Desipramine-induced inhibition of spinal cord nociceptive transmission was studied in rats with or without lesion of the bulbospinal noradrenergic system by recording the C-fiber evoked nociceptive reflex from a hind limb. Bulbospinal noradrenergic projections were lesioned by injecting intrathecally 20 microg of 6-hydroxydopamine 2 weeks before the electrophysiological experiments. Results show that desipramine (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg intraperitoneally) produced dose-dependent inhibition of the C reflex response duration in rats having intact noradrenergic bulbospinal systems. The inhibitory effect of desipramine was reduced or even abolished in rats pre-treated with 6-hydroxydopamine. In addition, [3H]-noradrenaline uptake was significantly lower in spinal cord slices arising from 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned animals, as compared to that from intact rats. These observations support the notion that the antinociceptive activity of antidepressants with noradrenergic selectivity depends on a normal rate of endogenous noradrenaline released by bulbospinal neurons.

Antinociceptive effect of clomipramine in monoarthritic rats as revealed by the paw pressure test and the C-fiber-evoked reflex

The antinociceptive effect of clomipramine was studied in monoarthritic rats by using the paw pressure test and the C-fiber-evoked reflex. Monoarthritis was produced by intra-articular injection of complete Freund's adjuvant into the tibio-tarsal joint. Joint circumference as well as vocalization threshold to graded paw pressure were evaluated weekly during a 14-week period after the intra-articular injection. At week 8, monoarthritic and vehicle-injected control rats were given either clomipramine or saline and both the paw pressure threshold and inhibition of the C-fiber-evoked reflex response were evaluated. Results showed that (i) 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg/kg, i.v. of clomipramine induced significantly greater dose-dependent antinociception to paw pressure testing in the monoarthritic group, as compared to the control one; and (ii) 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg/kg, i.v. of clomipramine exerted significantly higher dose-dependent inhibition of the C-reflex activity in monoarthritic rats than in controls. Results suggest that the higher sensitivity to clomipramine in monoarthritic rats could be related to adaptive changes occurring in monoamine metabolism or in other neurotransmitter systems during chronic pain.