Validation of a clinical prediction rule to reduce preoperative type and screen procedures

The Utility of ABO Testing in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients for elective operation often undergo routine ABO/Rh type and screening test for potential need of transfusion. Some institutions require double verification of ABO/Rh type. We evaluated the clinical practice pattern of performing ABO/Rh type and screening test in pediatric patients undergoing elective operation.

METHODS

Electronic medical records from pediatric patients who underwent elective surgery between June 2006 and June 2010 were retrieved. The frequency of ABO/Rh type and screening test and the incidence of packed red blood cell (pRBC) request and pRBC dispatch from the blood bank among those tested were analyzed by year and the surgical department.

RESULTS

Of the 23,631 patients, the incidence of ABO/Rh type and screening was 32.2%, and pRBC was dispatched in 37.9% of these patients. The incidence of ABO/Rh type and screening varied between 1.5% and 97.9% among surgical departments and also within the surgical departments depending on the type of surgery. The incidence of ABO/Rh type and screening showed a decreasing trend over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability among and within the surgical departments in the incidence of ABO/Rh type and screening in children undergoing elective surgery. A tailored approach may be beneficial to the patient in terms of comfort and cost.

Improved Cost-Effectiveness and Blood Product Utilization From Instituting a Blood Ordering Algorithm for Cardiac Surgical Cases

BACKGROUND

Results of a previous study revealed an over-ordering of blood products for cardiac surgery and led to the creation of a new blood ordering algorithm. This follow-up study has been conducted to evaluate improvement in ordering practices.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for 171 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery from March 2015 to March 2016 to determine the crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio (C:tx) and potential cost savings. Results were compared with pre-algorithm values and considered statistically significant if the 95% confidence interval did not include zero.

RESULTS

Prior to the algorithm, 100% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery were crossmatched. After instituting the algorithm, this decreased to 15%. The overall C:tx decreased from 7.97 to 2.14. Cost savings were calculated as $114.79 (coronary artery bypass grafting) and $129.05 (valve surgery) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a new algorithm to guide ordering practices has significantly improved the C:tx, reduced unnecessary crossmatching, and lowered costs.

Preoperative haemoglobin cut-off values for the prediction of post-operative transfusion in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine preoperative haemoglobin cut-off values that could accurately predict post-operative transfusion outcome in patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This will allow surgeons to provide selective preoperative type and screen to only patients at high risk of transfusion.

METHODS

A total of 1457 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis and underwent primary unilateral TKA between January 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify factors that could predict transfusion outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (2.5 %) were transfused postoperatively. Univariate analysis revealed preoperative haemoglobin (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), preoperative haematocrit (p < 0.001), and preoperative creatinine (p < 0.001) to be significant predictors. In the multivariate analysis with patients dichotomised at 70 years of age, preoperative haemoglobin remained significant with adjusted odds ratio of 0.33. Receiver operating characteristic curve identified the preoperative haemoglobin cut-off values to be 12.4 g/dL (AUC = 0.86, sensitivity = 87.5 %, specificity = 77.2 %) and 12.1 g/dL (AUC = 0.85, sensitivity = 69.2 %, specificity = 87.1 %) for age above and below 70, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend preoperative haemoglobin cut-off values of 12.4 g/dL for age above 70 and 12.1 g/dL for age below 70 to be used to predict post-operative transfusion requirements in TKA. To maximise the utilisation of blood resources, the authors recommend that only patients with haemoglobin level below the cut-off should receive routine preoperative type and screen before TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Perioperative blood ordering optimization process using information from an anesthesia information management system

BACKGROUND

As part of ongoing perioperative surgical home implantation process, we applied a previously published algorithm for creation of a maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) to our operating rooms. We hypothesized that using the MSBOS we could show a reduction in unnecessary preoperative blood testing and associated costs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data regarding all surgical cases done at UC Irvine Health's operating rooms from January 1, 2011, to January 1, 2014 were extracted from the anesthesia information management systems (AIMS). After the data were organized into surgical specialties and operative sites, blood order recommendations were generated based on five specific case characteristics of the group. Next, we assessed current ordering practices in comparison to actual blood utilization to identify potential areas of wastage and performed a cost analysis comparing the annual hospital costs from preoperative blood orders if the blood order schedule were to be followed to historical practices.

RESULTS

Of the 19,138 patients who were categorized by the MSBOS as needing no blood sample, 2694 (14.0%) had a type and screen (T/S) ordered and 1116 (5.8%) had a type and crossmatch ordered. Of the 6073 procedures where MSBOS recommended only a T/S, 2355 (38.8%) had blood crossmatched. The cost analysis demonstrated an annual reduction in actual hospital costs of $57,335 with the MSBOS compared to historical blood ordering practices.

CONCLUSION

We showed that the algorithm for development of a multispecialty blood order schedule is transferable and yielded reductions in preoperative blood product screening at our institution.

Pediatric preoperative blood ordering: when is a type and screen or crossmatch really needed?

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary testing for and ordering of blood products adds to overall healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES

Determine intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) product utilization for pediatric procedures and costs associated with perioperative testing and ordering.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review captured perioperative blood testing and intraoperative transfusion data for patients <19 years of age who underwent noncardiac surgery over a 13-month period at one tertiary care hospital. The main outcome measure was cost associated with testing for blood products in patients undergoing procedures that had a zero rate of transfusion.

RESULTS

The intraoperative transfusion rate for 8620 noncardiac pediatric procedures was 2.78%. Of 8380 nontransfused patients, 707 (8.4%) had type and screen, and of those, 420 (5%) were crossmatched for RBC products in preparation for surgery. The 10 surgical procedures that had the highest perioperative blood testing but no instances of transfusion were as follows: colostomy or ileostomy takedown, spinal cord untethering, tunneled catheter placement, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, elbow reduction and fixation, lumbar puncture, suboccipital craniectomy, hip arthrogram, percutaneous intravascular central line, and tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Procedures with low transfusion probability and high crossmatch testing were ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision and growing rod distraction. For all nontransfused patients, the cost of obtaining type and screen was $31,815, and the cost for crossmatch was $25,200.

CONCLUSION

Patients may undergo preoperative type and screen or crossmatch for procedures rarely associated with transfusion. Historic transfusion probability may be used to predict need for transfusion for specific surgical procedures and reduce unnecessary perioperative testing and associated costs.

Optimizing Preoperative Blood Ordering with Data Acquired from an Anesthesia Information Management System

Background:

The maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) is used to determine preoperative blood orders for specific surgical procedures. Because the list was developed in the late 1970s, many new surgical procedures have been introduced and others improved upon, making the original MSBOS obsolete. The authors describe methods to create an updated, institution-specific MSBOS to guide preoperative blood ordering.

Methods:

Blood utilization data for 53,526 patients undergoing 1,632 different surgical procedures were gathered from an anesthesia information management system. A novel algorithm based on previously defined criteria was used to create an MSBOS for each surgical specialty. The economic implications were calculated based on the number of blood orders placed, but not indicated, according to the MSBOS.

Results:

Among 27,825 surgical cases that did not require preoperative blood orders as determined by the MSBOS, 9,099 (32.7%) had a type and screen, and 2,643 (9.5%) had a crossmatch ordered. Of 4,644 cases determined to require only a type and screen, 1,509 (32.5%) had a type and crossmatch ordered. By using the MSBOS to eliminate unnecessary blood orders, the authors calculated a potential reduction in hospital charges and actual costs of $211,448 and $43,135 per year, respectively, or $8.89 and $1.81 per surgical patient, respectively.

Conclusions:

An institution-specific MSBOS can be created, using blood utilization data extracted from an anesthesia information management system along with our proposed algorithm. Using these methods to optimize the process of preoperative blood ordering can potentially improve operating room efficiency, increase patient safety, and decrease costs.

Perioperative blood transfusion practices in oncologic thoracic surgery: when, why, and how

INTRODUCTION

Available information on perioperative blood transfusion practices in oncologic thoracic surgery is scant and outdated. The purpose of this study was to investigate transfusion requirements in patients undergoing curative resection for lung cancer and to identify possible factors predictive of perioperative blood transfusion in our cohort of patients.

METHODS

From 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2009, 317 patients underwent anatomic pulmonary resection. Patients who received at least 1 unit of red blood cells comprised the "transfused" group. Each case in this group was matched for surgical procedure with a control subject who did not require blood transfusion and was operated on during the same year; these patients comprised the "not transfused" group.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients (23.6%) received at least 1 unit of red blood cells during the perioperative period. Factors conditioning perioperative blood transfusion were: preoperative hemoglobin level (p < 0.0001); procedure duration (p = 0.017); body mass index (p < 0.001); induction therapies (p = 0.017); redo procedure (p = 0.021). Age, sex, histology, stage, ASA score, side, intraoperative blood loss, and fluid infusion did not affect perioperative blood transfusion practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative hemoglobin level is the major risk factor for perioperative blood transfusion practices in oncologic thoracic surgery; procedure duration, body mass index, induction therapies, and redo procedure may condition transfusional needs, although they were actually not predictive on multivariate analysis.

Analysis of blood transfusion predictors in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophagectomy for cancers is a major operation with significant blood loss and usage. Concerns exist about the side effects of blood transfusion, cost and availability of donated blood. We are not aware of any previous study that has evaluated predictive factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing elective oesophagectomy for cancer. This study aimed to audit the pattern of blood crossmatch and to evaluate factors predictive of transfusion requirements in oesophagectomy patients.

METHODS

Data was collected from the database of all patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer over a 2-year period. Clinico-pathological data collected included patients demographics, clinical factors, tumour histopathological data, preoperative and discharge haemoglobin levels, total blood loss, number of units of blood crossmatched pre-, intra- and postoperatively, number of blood units transfused, crossmatched units reused for another patient and number of blood units wasted.Clinico-pathological variables were evaluated and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which factors were predictive of blood transfusion.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients with a male to female ratio of 2.5:1 and median age of 68 (40-85) years were audited. The mean preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) was 13.0 g/dl. 37% of males (Hb < 13.0 g/dl) and 29% of females (Hb < 11.5 g/dl) were anaemic preoperatively. A total of 1241 blood units were crossmatched and 316 units were transfused to 71 patients. Seventy four patients (51%) did not require blood transfusion during their hospital episode. 846 blood units not used for oesophagectomy patients were reused for other patients and 79 units were wasted. The overall crossmatch to transfusion ratio was 4:1 and reuse and wastage rates were 65.2% and 6.3% respectively. The independent predictors of blood transfusion include age >70 years, Hb level <11.0 g/dl, T-stage, presence of postoperative complications and anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

The cohort of patients audited was over-crossmatched. The identified independent predictors of blood transfusion should be considered in preoperative blood ordering for oesophagectomy patients. This study has directly led to a reduction in the maximum surgical blood-ordering schedule for oesophagectomy to 2 units and a reaudit is underway.

The effect of national guidelines on the implementation of outpatient preoperative evaluation clinics in Dutch hospitals

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative evaluation performed by anaesthesiologists primarily aims to estimate the risk of perioperative complications and to create opportunities to optimize the patients' condition before surgery. In this study an inventory was made of the current practice of preoperative evaluation in Dutch hospitals. It was estimated how many hospitals had implemented an outpatient preoperative evaluation clinic in 2004. Subsequently, current practice was compared with the results of a previous inventory (2000). It was also evaluated to what extent the guidelines of the Dutch Health Council and the Netherlands Society of Anaesthesiology were followed.

METHODS

The study consisted of two phases. First, a literature research was performed and pilot interviews were constructed. The interviews were conducted face-to-face with anaesthesiologists in a sample of Dutch hospitals. Based on the results, written questionnaires were constructed. In the second phase these questionnaires were sent to all general and academic hospitals in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

In 2004, 74% of the hospitals had an outpatient preoperative evaluation clinic, compared with 50% in 2000. The percentage of hospitals with an outpatient preoperative evaluation clinic available for all elective patients increased from 20% to 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Dutch guidelines on preoperative evaluation seem to have influenced current practice. An increase in the number of outpatient preoperative evaluation clinics was seen after the guidelines were published. The implementation of an outpatient preoperative clinic seems to warrant that anaesthesiologists are carrying out the activities prescribed by the guidelines. Most hospitals without a clinic aim to implement one in the future.

The health economics of blood use in cerebrovascular aneurysm surgery: the experience of a UK centre

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage secondary to a leaking cerebrovascular aneurysm involves coiling or clipping. Traditionally all patients undergoing this procedure are cross-matched routinely. With ever-increasing strains on the health budget and transfusion services in particular, as well as the real, albeit low risk of transfusion transmitted disease, we propose that a simple 'group and save', coupled with a reliable 'fast-issue' blood transfusion service should replace this outdated concept.

METHOD

To assess this assumption, we carried out a retrospective analysis of 103 patients who underwent clipping or coiling during January to December 2001 in our Neurosurgical Unit.

RESULTS

All patients but one had been cross-matched (99%). However, only 33 patients (32%) eventually required a blood transfusion. In real terms, this meant a total of 294 units of blood that had been cross-matched routinely, in our series of 103 patients, were not used. Had these patients only been 'group and saved' and a system of 'fast-issue' been adopted, assuming that none of the patients had abnormal antibodies, the blood transfusion department would have made a saving of 4815.72 pounds sterling for this group of patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that advances in surgical technique have made routine cross-matching of blood in cerebral aneurysm surgery unnecessary.

Role of history and physical examination in preoperative evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Since reports have shown that outpatient preoperative evaluation increases the quality of care and cost-effectiveness, an increasing number of patients are being evaluated purely on an outpatient basis. To improve cost-effectiveness, it would be appealing if those patients who are healthy and ready for surgery without additional testing could be easily distinguished from those who require more extensive evaluation. This paper examines whether published studies provide sufficient data to determine how detailed preoperative history taking and physical examination need to be in order to assess the health of surgical patients and to meet the objective of easy and early distinction.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted from 1991 to 2000 with respect to preoperative patient history and physical examination. Altogether, 213 articles were found, of which 29 were selected. Additionally, 38 cross-references, 7 articles on additional testing and 4 recently published papers were used.

RESULTS

It is questionable to what extent an extensive history is relevant for anaesthesia and long-term prognosis. With respect to physical examination, it seems unreasonable to diagnose valvular heart disease based on cardiac auscultation only, and it is unclear which method should be used to predict the difficulty of endotracheal intubation. The benefits of routine testing for all surgical patients before operation are extremely limited and are not advocated.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of detail of preoperative patient history and the value of physical examination to obtain a reasonable estimate of perioperative risk remains unclear. Although not evidence based, a thorough history taking and physical examination of all patients before surgery seems important until more evidence-based guidelines become available. Diagnostic and prognostic prediction studies may provide this necessary evidence.