Haemodynamic effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor antagonist during hypovolaemia in the anaesthetized pig

Prevention of hemorrhage-induced renal vasoconstriction and hypoxia by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism in pigs

Angiotensin II (ANG II) is a potent vasoconstrictor and may reduce renal blood flow (RBF), causing renal hypoxia. Hypotensive hemorrhage elevates plasma ANG II levels and is associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury. We hypothesized that ANG II antagonism prevents renal vasoconstriction and hypoxia caused by hemorrhage. Pigs were anaesthetized, surgically prepared, and randomized to intravenous losartan (1.5 mg·kg^-1·h^-1, n = 8) or an equal volume of intravenous Ringer acetate (vehicle-treated, n = 8). Hemorrhage was induced by continuous aspiration of blood to reach and sustain mean arterial pressure of <50 mmHg for 30 min. Plasma ANG II levels, hemodynamics and oxygenation were assessed 60 min prehemorrhage, 30-min after the start of hemorrhage, and 60 min posthemorrhage. Erythropoietin mRNA was analyzed in cortical and medullary tissue sampled at the end of the experiment. Hypotensive hemorrhage increased plasma ANG II levels and decreased RBF and oxygen delivery in both groups. Losartan-treated animals recovered in RBF and oxygen delivery, whereas vehicle-treated animals had persistently reduced RBF and oxygen delivery. In accordance, renal vascular resistance increased over time post hemorrhage in vehicle-treated animals but was unchanged in losartan-treated animals. Renal oxygen extraction rate and cortical erythropoietin mRNA levels increased in the vehicle group but not in the losartan group. In conclusion, ANG II antagonism alleviates prolonged renal vasoconstriction and renal hypoxia in a large animal model of hypotensive hemorrhage.

Pre-treatment with the angiotensin receptor 1 blocker losartan protects renal blood flow and oxygen delivery after propofol-induced hypotension in pigs

Hypotensive events are strongly correlated to the occurrence of perioperative acute kidney injury, but the underlying mechanisms for this are not completely elucidated. We hypothesised that anaesthesia-induced hypotension causes renal vasoconstriction and decreased oxygen delivery via angiotensin II-mediated renal vasoconstriction. Pigs were anaesthetised, surgically prepared and randomised to vehicle/losartan treatment (0.15 mg*kg⁻¹). A deliberate reduction in arterial blood pressure was caused by infusion of propofol (30 mg*kg⁻¹) for 10 min. Renal function and haemodynamics were recorded 60 min before and after hypotension. Propofol induced hypotension in all animals (p < 0.001). Renal blood flow (RBF) and renal oxygen delivery (RDO₂) decreased significantly regardless of treatment but more so in vehicle-treated compared to losartan-treated (p = 0.001, p = 0.02, respectively). During recovery RBF and RDO₂ improved to a greater extent in the losartan-treated compared to vehicle-treated (+ 28 ml*min⁻¹, 95%CI 8–50 ml*min⁻¹, p = 0.01 and + 3.1 ml*min⁻¹, 95%CI 0.3–5.8 ml*min⁻¹, p = 0.03, respectively). Sixty minutes after hypotension RBF and RDO₂ remained depressed in vehicle-treated, as renal vascular resistance was still increased (p < 0.001). In losartan-treated animals RBF and RDO₂ had normalised. Pre-treatment with losartan improved recovery of renal blood flow and renal oxygen delivery after propofol-induced hypotension, suggesting pronounced angiotensin II-mediated renal vasoconstriction during blood pressure reductions caused by anaesthesia.

Angiotensin II during Experimentally Simulated Central Hypovolemia

Central hypovolemia, defined as diminished blood volume in the heart and pulmonary vascular bed, is still an unresolved problem from a therapeutic point of view. The development of pharmaceutical agents targeted at specific angiotensin II receptors, such as the non-peptidergic AT₂-receptor agonist compound 21, is yielding many opportunities to uncover more knowledge about angiotensin II receptor profiles and possible therapeutic use. Cardiovascular, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective therapeutic use of compound 21 have been suggested. However, there has not yet been a focus on the use of these agents in a hypovolemic setting. We argue that the latest debates on the effect of angiotensin II during hypovolemia might guide for future studies, investigating the effect of such agents during experimentally simulated central hypovolemia. The purpose of this review is to examine the role of angiotensin II during episodes of central hypovolemia. To examine this, we reviewed results from studies with three experimental models of simulated hypovolemia: head up tilt table test, lower body negative pressure, and hemorrhage of animals. A systemic literature search was made with the use of PubMed/MEDLINE for studies that measured variables of the renin–angiotensin system or its effect during simulated hypovolemia. Twelve articles, using one of the three models, were included and showed a possible organ-protective effect and an effect on the sympathetic system of angiotensin II during hypovolemia. The results support the possible organ-protective vasodilatory role for the AT₂-receptor during hypovolemia on both the kidney and the splanchnic tissue.

Refractory hypotension during general anesthesia despite preoperative discontinuation of an angiotensin receptor blocker

Due to their beneficial reduction in morbidity and mortality angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have become increasingly popular to treat hypertension. However, similar to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, they can lead to severe hypotension in conjunction with general anesthesia and thus have been recommended to be withheld in the morning of surgery. Here, we present a 51 year old female who developed severe refractory hypotension after induction of general anesthesia, although she had discontinued her medication 24 hours preoperatively as instructed. Therefore, halting ARBs for more than 24 hours before surgery may be necessary. Heightened awareness of this potential interaction and recognizing the need to treat with vasopressin is required when ARB-induced hypotension occurs.

ETA-receptor blockade impairs vasoconstriction after hemorrhage in xenon-anesthetized dogs treated with an AT1-receptor antagonist

The effects of endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) blockade on hemodynamics and hormonal adaptation during hemorrhage were studied in xenon/remifentanil-anesthetized dogs (n=6) pretreated with an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor blocker.

CONTROLS

after a baseline awake period, anesthesia was induced in the dogs with propofol and maintained with xenon/remifentanil (baseline anesthesia). Sixty minutes later, 20 mL x kg(-1) of blood was withdrawn within 5 min and the dogs observed for another hour (hemorrhage). AT1 group followed the same protocol as controls except the AT1-receptor blocker losartan (i.v. 100 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started at the beginning of the experiment. AT1+ETA group was the same as AT1 group but with the addition of the ETA-receptor blocker atrasentan (i.v. 1 mg x kg(-1), then 0.01 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). In controls, mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained unchanged during baseline anesthesia, whereas systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased from 3282+/-281 to 7321+/-803 dyn.s.cm-5, heart rate (HR) decreased from 86+/-4 to 40+/-3 beats x min(-1), and cardiac output (CO) decreased from 2.3+/-0.2 to 0.9+/-0.1 L x min(-1) (p<0.05), with no further changes after hemorrhage. In AT1-inhibited dogs, MAP (71+/-6 mm Hg) and SVR (5939+/-611 dyn x s x cm(-5)) were lower during baseline anesthesia and after hemorrhage, but greater than those in AT1+ETA (66+/-7 mm Hg, 5034+/-658 dyn x s x cm(-5)) (p<0.05). HR and CO were not different between groups. Plasma concentration of vasopressin was highest with AT1+ETA inhibition after hemorrhage. Combined AT1+ETA-receptor blockade impaired vasoconstriction more than did AT1-receptor blockade alone, both during baseline xenon anesthesia and after hemorrhage. Even a large increase in vasoconstrictor hormones could not prevent the decrease in blood pressure and the smaller increase in SVR. Thus, endothelin is an important vasoconstrictor during hemorrhage, and both endothelin and angiotensin II are essential hormones for cardiovascular stabilization after hemorrhage.

VASOPRESSIN MAY BE USEFUL IN THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC ANAPHYLAXIS IN RABBITS

Recent studies demonstrate that vasopressin is useful when treating hemorrhagic and septic shock. The effect of vasopressin on systemic anaphylaxis has not been investigated except in clinical case reports. Vasopressin increases blood pressure because of vasoconstriction through the V1 receptor. Thus, we evaluated the effect of vasopressin on circulatory depression and bronchoconstriction provoked by systemic anaphylaxis and survival rates in rabbits. In the first set of experiments, 15 nonsensitized rabbits received normal saline (control) and vasopressin at 0.8 or 0.08 U/kg. In the second set, 40 sensitized rabbits received horse serum to induce anaphylaxis, and then received the same drugs as in the first set. In the first set, mean arterial pressure (MAP) in vasopressin groups increased by 18% to 24% compared with the control. Vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg decreased MAP insignificantly before the increases of MAP occurred. In the second set, vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg improved the survival rate. At 45 min after antigen challenge, 69% of the rabbits that received vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg were alive, whereas 29% of the control rabbits and 23% of the rabbits that received vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg were alive. Vasopressin increased MAP by 36% to 109% compared with the control within 5 min, however, at 2 min, vasopressin at 0.8 U/kg had no effect on MAP. Pulmonary dynamics were similar. In conclusion, vasopressin at 0.08 U/kg improved survival rates and severe hypotension provoked by systemic anaphylaxis, suggesting that this agent may be useful in the treatment of systemic anaphylaxis.

Hypovolaemia-induced vasodilatation during angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade: role of the AT2 receptor

AT(1) receptor antagonists may interfere with the haemodynamic determinants of arterial pressure either directly or indirectly through the stimulation of AT(2) receptor provided Ang II is available to interact with them. In order to evaluate the counteracting haemodynamic effect of AT(2) receptor, a prospective, randomized, controlled experimental study was carried out in anaesthetised juvenile pigs. Pigs were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 6), valsartan, an AT(1) receptor antagonist (a-AT(1) group; n = 6), or valsartan and PD 123319, an AT(2) receptor antagonist (a-AT(1-2) group; n = 6) after anaesthesia and before hypovolaemia by 20% of the total estimated blood volume. Thirty minutes after bleeding, the mean arterial pressure decreased significantly and similarly in the three groups (25-30%). The placebo group had a significant decrease in cardiac output (CO) without significant change in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Conversely, in the a-AT(1) group, SVR decreased significantly with a moderate change in CO and addition of the AT(2) antagonist to the AT(1) antagonist (a-AT(1-2) group) did not abolish the lowering in SVR. The results suggest that AT(2) receptor has only a small if any contribution in the vasodilatation observed in the AT(1)-blockade group.

Effect of angiotensin II and endothelin-1 receptor blockade on the haemodynamic and hormonal changes after acute blood loss and after retransfusion in conscious dogs

AIM

This study investigates angiotensin II and endothelin-1 mediated mechanisms involved in the haemodynamic, hormonal, and renal response towards acute hypotensive haemorrhage.

METHODS

Conscious dogs were pre-treated with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) and/or endothelin-A (ETA) receptor blockers or not. Protocol 1: After a 60-min baseline period, 25% of the dog's blood was rapidly withdrawn. The blood was retransfused 60 min later and data recorded for another hour. Protocol 2: Likewise, but preceded by AT1 blockade with i.v. Losartan. Protocol 3: Likewise, but preceded by ETA blockade with i.v. ABT-627. Protocol 4: Likewise, but with combined AT1 plus ETA blockade.

RESULTS

In controls, haemorrhage decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) by approximately 25%, cardiac output by approximately 40%, and urine volume by approximately 60%, increased angiotensin II (3.1-fold), endothelin-1 (1.13-fold), vasopressin (116-fold), and adrenaline concentrations (3.2-fold). Glomerular filtration rate and noradrenaline concentrations remained unchanged. During AT1 blockade, the MAP decrease was exaggerated (-40%) and glomerular filtration rate fell. During ETA blockade, noradrenaline increased after haemorrhage instead of adrenaline, and the MAP recovery after retransfusion was blunted. The decrease in cardiac output was similar in all protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II is more important than endothelin-1 for the short-term regulation of MAP and glomerular filtration rate after haemorrhage, whereas endothelin-1 seems necessary for complete MAP recovery after retransfusion. After haemorrhage, endothelin-1 seems to facilitate adrenaline release and to blunt noradrenaline release. Haemorrhage-induced compensatory mechanisms maintain blood flow more effectively than blood pressure, as the decrease in cardiac output--but not MAP--was similar in all protocols.