Novel approach to management of a posterior tracheal tear complicating percutaneous tracheostomy

Managing complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy

Percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy are some of the most commonly performed procedures at bedside in the intensive care unit. While they are generally considered safe, they can be associated with numerous short and long-term complications, many of which can occur long after their placement and cause significant morbidity. Performers of these procedures should possess a comprehensive understanding of procedural indications and contraindications, and know how to recognize and manage complications that may arise. In this review, we highlight complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and describe strategies for their prevention and management, with a special focus on post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis. Other complications reviewed include bleeding, pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema, posterior wall injury, tube displacement, tracheomalacia, tracheoinominate artery fistula, tracheo-esophageal fistula, and stomal cellulitis. Gastrostomy complications and their management are also discussed including bleeding, internal organ injury, necrotizing fasciitis, aspiration pneumonia, buried bumper syndrome, tumor seeding, wound infection, tube displacement, peristomal leakage, and gastric outlet obstruction. In light of the potentially serious outcomes associated with complications of percutaneous tracheostomy and gastrostomy, the emphasis should be placed on risk-reduction strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. We therefore present detailed pragmatic and comprehensive checklists to serve as a reference for clinicians involved in performing these procedures.

Bronchoscopic management of iatrogenic tracheal laceration using polyurethane-covered nitinol tracheal stents

Iatrogenic tracheal laceration is a known complication of emergent endotracheal intubation. Patients with tracheal laceration present a therapeutic challenge. There is no established standard treatment approach in this patient population. Interventions reported include conservative management, stent placement, or surgery. We present our experience of tracheal tears in patients with respiratory failure successfully managed with polyurethane-covered nitinol stent, including three cases of postintubation and one case of postsurgical tracheostomy tracheal injury.

Evolutional trends in the management of tracheal and bronchial injuries

Tracheal and Bronchial injuries are potentially life threatening complications which require urgent diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. They typically occur in association with blunt and penetrating chest trauma although they are increasingly being encountered in patients following endobronchial intervention and percutaneous tracheostomy insertion. Their precise incidence is unknown. Presenting features include dyspnoea, stridor, respiratory and haemodynamic compromise, haemoptysis, surgical emphysema, pneumothorax and persistent significant airleak. There may be other additional injuries to consider in trauma patients with large airway injury. Familiarity with the diagnosis and management of large airway injuries is important for medical teams engaged in emergency medicine, thoracic surgery and medicine, anaesthesia and intensive care. Although early surgical intervention is the mainstay of treatment, endobronchial manoeuvres to seal defects are receiving increasing attention particularly for patients with medical co-morbidities which may contraindicate formal surgery or transfer or where local surgical expertise is not available.

Tracheostomy Tube Placement: Early and Late Complications

Tracheostomy tube placement is a therapeutic procedure that has gained increased favor over the past decade. Upper airway obstructions, failure to liberate from the ventilator, and debilitating neurological conditions are only a few indications for tracheostomy tube placement. Tracheostomy tubes can be placed either surgically or percutaneously. A percutaneous approach offers fewer surgical site infections and postsurgical bleeding than a surgical approach. A surgical placement posses a lower risk of injury to the posterior tracheal wall and spontaneous decannulation is less common. Late complications of both approaches include stenosis, malacia, along with tracheoesophageal, tracheoinnominate, and tracheocutaneous fistulas. This review describes the indications and methods of placement of tracheostomy tubes along with early and late complications that may occur following placement.

Conservative management of post-intubation tracheal tears-report of three cases

Iatrogenic tracheal rupture is a rare complication after intubation. We present three patients with tracheal tears. In all of these patients, a common finding was a lesion of the posterior tracheal wall with postoperative subcutaneous and emphysema as the first clinical sign of the rupture. Diagnosis and follow-up were based on clinical and endoscopic findings and chest computed tomography (CT) scans. In our cases with progressive subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema or dyspnea, we performed a tracheotomy and bypassed the lesion with a tracheostomy tube to avoid an increase in air leakage into the mediastinum. Under broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, no mediastinitis occurred and all patients survived without sequelae. Closure of tracheostomy was scheduled for 1-2 months after tracheal injury. Analysis of surgical and anesthesiological procedures revealed no abnormalities and the accumulation of tracheal injuries was considered as accidental. We found that in clinically stable patients with spontaneous breathing and with no mediastinitis, a conservative management of tracheal tears is a safe procedure.

Successful silicon stent for life-threatening tracheal wall laceration

We report an 86-year-old woman with a large tracheal laceration caused by tracheal intubation at cardiopulmonary arrest who underwent a successful stent procedure. Tracheal laceration developed in the membranous portion longitudinally 6 cm in length to 2 cm above the carina. Following 9 days' tracheal intubation, a Y-shaped silicon stent was inserted over the lacerated trachea. Four months after the stenting procedure, we removed the Y-shaped silicon stent from the healed membranous wall. The patient returned to daily life without requiring thoracotomy.

Traumatic perforation of the trachea in two horses caused by orotracheal intubation

Two of 348 horses that underwent gastrointestinal surgery under general anaesthesia developed perforations in their tracheas caused by the endotracheal tube. In one case the damage was probably caused when the horse was being moved from the induction room for surgery and excessive traction was exerted on the tube when the anaesthetic machine was moved too far ahead of the horse. The trachea of the other horse may have been damaged when it was intubated.

Iatrogene Trachealverletzung bei intraoperativer Bauchlagerung

Two patients 16 and 21 years old developed tracheal rupture during elective surgery following trouble-free orotracheal intubation and intraoperative ventral positioning. The injuries remained undetected in both patients for more than 12 h. Diagnostic investigation after the onset of first symptoms indicated in each a tear in the posterior tracheal wall. Early operation prevented the development of serious complications in both patients. The casuistics indicate that tracheal injuries can emerge in minor elective surgery that may be carried out on an outpatient basis, and ventral positioning for surgery may represent a risk factor for their occurrence. Clinical symptoms, diagnostic procedure, findings, and therapy are discussed.

Postoperative tracheal rupture in a patient with a difficult airway

PURPOSE

Tracheal rupture is an uncommon and potentially life-threatening event. This report presents a case of postoperative tracheal rupture in a patient with a known difficult airway presenting to a rural hospital.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 29-yr-old man presented to a rural hospital with sudden onset neck pain and progressive dyspnea. Five days earlier the patient had undergone tracheal resection for tracheal stenosis related to prolonged intubation. The patient informed the emergency room staff that the attending anesthesiologist had made note of a "difficult airway". The community hospital had neither a portable storage unit for difficult airway management nor a bronchoscope available. In the presence of a general surgeon, an initial attempt at an awake intubation was unsuccessful. During this time the patient developed massive subcutaneous emphysema obliterating surgical landmarks and causing stridor. A modified rapid sequence intubation was performed. Intubation was successful using a Jackson-Wisconsin #3 straight blade and styletted endotracheal tube. The patient was transferred to a tertiary care centre where he underwent a primary repair of the trachea.

CONCLUSION

Management of tracheal rupture in the patient with a difficult airway is a challenging problem, especially, in a rural hospital. This case highlights the need for skilled staff and resources to manage a difficult airway in the emergency room.

[Tracheobronchial ruptures: classification and management]

BACKGROUND

Tracheobronchial ruptures are rare surgical emergencies with significant mortality. We present management and outcome of such ruptures treated at the University of Leipzig in Germany and propose a novel therapeutic algorithm-a new classification system for stratifying treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 24 patients 19 to 88 years old who were treated in our institution for tracheobronchial injury.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven percent of the injuries were caused iatrogenically. Fifty-four percent were type I injuries (isolated tracheal lesions), 38% type II (involvement of carina or main stem bronchi), and 8% type III (distal lesions of lobar or segmental bronchi). Seventy-five percent of the patients were operated via right-sided dorsolateral thoracotomy. In four (22%), insufficiency of the tracheal closure occurred, with mediastinitis possibly being a significant risk factor for this event (P<0.001). In surgically treated patients, rupture-related and overall mortality were 5.5% and 28%, respectively, whereas in medically treated patients, mortality was 33%.

CONCLUSION

The proposed classification of tracheobronchial injuries enables stratifying the treatment of patients with tracheobronchial ruptures. Type I lesions can be surgically closed either by a right-sided thoracotomy or transcervical-transtracheal approach. In contrast, surgical management of type II and III injuries always requires thoracotomy.