Supplementary oxygen for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: useful in prolonged uterine incision-to-delivery interval? †

Evaluation of oxygen administration in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia via lung ultrasound and the oxygen reserve index

BACKGROUND

Respiratory functions may be impaired in cesarean section (C/S) delivery performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) and oxygen supplementation may be required. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of different oxygen administrations in pregnant women on the lungs during C/S under SA using ultrasound and oxygen reserve index (ORI).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-center study from May 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. A total of 90 patients scheduled for C/S under SA were randomly divided into 3 groups. Following the SA, patients in group 0 were treated with room air, in Group 3 were administered 3 L/min O₂ with a nasal cannula (NC), in Group 6 were administered 6 L/min O₂ with a simple face mask. In addition to routine monitoring, ORI values were measured. Lung aeration was evaluated through the modified lung ultrasound score (LUS) before the procedure (T0), at minute 0 (T1), 20 (T2), and hour 6 (T3) after the procedure, and ∆LUS values were recorded.

RESULTS

After SA, the ORI values of Group 3 were higher than Group 0 at all times (p < 0.05), while the intraoperative 1st minute and the 10th, 25th and 40th minutes after delivery (p = 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.019) was higher than Group 6. When the LUS values of each group were compared with the T0 values a decrease was observed in Group 3 and Group 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.016). While ∆LUS values were always higher in Group 3 than in Group 0, they were higher only in T1 and T2 in Group 6.

CONCLUSION

We determined that it would be appropriate to prefer 3 L/min supplemental oxygen therapy with NC in C/S to be performed under SA.

Maternal Oxygen Supplementation Compared With Room Air for Intrauterine Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Supplemental oxygen is commonly administered to pregnant women at the time of delivery to prevent fetal hypoxia and acidemia. There is mixed evidence on the utility of this practice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the association of peripartum maternal oxygen administration with room air on umbilical artery (UA) gas measures and neonatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from February 18 to April 3, 2020. Search terms included labor or obstetric delivery and oxygen therapy and fetal blood or blood gas or acid-base imbalance.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials comparing oxygen with room air at the time of scheduled cesarean delivery or labor in patients with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies. Studies that did not collect paired umbilical cord gas samples or did not report either UA pH or UA Pao2 results were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. The analysis was stratified by the presence or absence of labor at the time of randomization. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome for this review was UA pH. Secondary outcomes included UA pH less than 7.2, UA Pao2, UA base excess, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 16 randomized clinical trials (n = 1078 oxygen group and n = 974 room air group). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 49.88%; P = .03). Overall, oxygen administration was associated with no significant difference in UA pH (weighted mean difference, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.01). Oxygen use was associated with an increase in UA Pao2 (weighted mean difference, 2.57 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.80-4.34 mm Hg) but no significant difference in UA base excess, UA pH less than 7.2, Apgar scores, or neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Umbilical artery pH values remained similar between groups after accounting for the risk of bias, type of oxygen delivery device, and fraction of inspired oxygen. After stratifying by the presence or absence of labor, oxygen administration in women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery was associated with increased UA Pao2 (weighted mean difference, 2.12 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.09-4.15 mm Hg) and a reduction in the incidence of UA pH less than 7.2 (relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90), but these changes were not noted among those in labor (Pao2: weighted mean difference, 3.60 mm Hg; 95% CI, -0.30 to 7.49 mm Hg; UA pH<7.2: relative risk, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.58-3.11).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that studies to date showed no association between maternal oxygen and a clinically relevant improvement in UA pH or other neonatal outcomes.

Analysis of Neonatal Outcome with Supplemental Oxygen to Mother during Elective Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:

Many questions have arisen on benefits of routine use of supplemental oxygen during elective cesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia.

Aims:

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate neonatal outcome in immediate postpartum period with or without supplemental oxygen to mother, undergoing elective CS under spinal anesthesia.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and thirty-four nonlaboring term pregnant women were allocated randomly into two groups to breathe room air (air group) or oxygen (oxygen group). Times from starting oxygen supplementation to delivery interval, skin incision to delivery (I-D) interval, and uterine incision to delivery (U-D) interval were recorded. APGAR scores were assessed at 1 min and 5 min after delivery. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis was done immediately to measure pH, oxygen partial pressure, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO₂), and bicarbonate.

Statistical Analysis:

Statistical comparisons were performed using either Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results:

For oxygen group versus air group, In Oxygen group, proportion of fetal acidosis was significantly less; umbilical arterial (UA) blood pH (7.22 ± 0.05 vs. 7.19 ± 0.05, P = 0.001) as well as umbilical venous (UV) blood pH (7.26 ± 0.05 vs. 7.22 ± 0.06, P < 0.001) were significantly higher and UA PCO2 (55.4 ± 9.9 vs. 62.9 ± 6.9, P = 0.001) and UV PCO2 (51.4 ± 8.2 vs. 54.3 ± 7.2, P = 0.036) were significantly lower compared to air group. APGAR scores were similar between the groups.

Conclusions:

Supplemental oxygen has potential benefits as demonstrated by less proportion of FA in mothers receiving supplemental oxygen.

Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Supplementary oxygen is routinely administered to low-risk pregnant women during an elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia; however, maternal and foetal outcomes have not been well established. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine whether supplementary oxygen given to low-risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia can prevent maternal and neonatal desaturation. The secondary objective was to compare the mean values of maternal and neonatal blood gas levels between mothers who received supplementary oxygen and those who did not (control group).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, issue 11), MEDLINE (1948 to November 2014) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2014). The original search was first performed in February 2012. We reran the search in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE in February 2016. One potential new study of interest was added to the list of 'Studies awaiting Classification' and will be incorporated into the formal review findings during the next review update.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of low-risk pregnant women undergoing an elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia and compared outcomes with, and without, oxygen supplementation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed methodological quality and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We found one new included study in this updated version. In total, our updated review includes 11 trials (with 753 participants). The low quality of evidence showed no significant differences in average Apgar scores at one minute (N = six trials, 519 participants; 95% confidence (CI) -0.16 to 0.31, P = 0.53) and at five minutes (N = six trials, 519 participants; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.06, P = 0.98). None of the 11 trials reported maternal desaturation. The very low quality of evidence showed that in comparison to room air, women in labour receiving supplementary oxygen had higher maternal oxygen saturation (N = three trials, 209 participants), maternal PaO2 (oxygen pressure in the blood; N = six trials, 241 participants), UaPO2 (foetal umbilical arterial blood; N = eight trials, 504 participants; 95% CI 1.8 to 4.9, P < 0.0001) and UvPO2 (foetal umbilical venous blood; N = 10 trials, 683 participants). There was high heterogeneity among these outcomes. A subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in UaPO2 between the two intervention groups in low-risk studies, whereas the high-risk studies showed a benefit for the neonatal oxygen group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found no convincing evidence that giving supplementary oxygen to healthy term pregnant women during elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia is either beneficial or harmful for either the mother or the foetus' short-term clinical outcome as assessed by Apgar scores. Although, there were significant higher maternal and neonatal blood gas values and markers of free radicals when extra oxygen was given, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the low grade quality of the evidence.

Assessment of fetal antioxidant and oxidant status during different anesthesia techniques for elective cesarean sections

Background:

We aimed to investigate the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on fetal total antioxidant status (TAS) and total oxidant status (TOS), and oxidative stress index (OSI) during elective cesarean section in this study.

Materials and Methods:

Forty-seven parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly allocated into three groups: Group spinal (n = 15), group epidural (n = 17), and group general (n = 15), This prospective randomized study was performed in Faculty of Medicine, Turgut Ozal University, Turkey. After the baby was delivered; TAS, TOS levels, and arterial blood gases parameters were analyzed in an umbilical arterial blood sample. OSI values are calculated by a ratio of TOS to the TAS.

Results:

The levels of TAS and TOS in umbilical arterial blood sample were not statistically different among three. However, OSI values were significantly different among the three groups (P = 0.042). Median OSI values is 24 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-37) in group spinal, 19 (IQR, 4-44) in group epidural, and 8 (IQR, 4-36) in group general. There was no significant difference in OSI values in the comparison of group spinal with group general and group epidural, but it was significantly lower in group general when compared with group epidural with Bonferroni correction (P = 0.017). Umbilical cord arterial blood gas values (pH, PaCO₂, PaO₂, SaO₂, HCO₃, and CtO₂), glucose, lactate, and hemoglobin levels were similar in three groups.

Conclusion:

General anesthesia may be more favorable than epidural in those undergoing cesarean section when fetal oxidative status gains importance.

Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia is associated with decreases in cerebral oxygen saturation as assessed by NIRS: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of spinal anesthesia on cerebral rSO2 during elective cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

Thirty-four women scheduled for elective CD under spinal anesthesia were recruited. In the operating room rSO2 of the left and right frontal area and right thigh was recorded using three disposable sensors. A combination of 1.8-2.0 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine plus 10 μg of fentanyl were injected intrathecally. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2 as well as rSO2 of the left and right forehead areas and right thigh were recorded before, 5, 10, and 25 to 50 minutes after spinal injection, after uterine incision and placenta delivery, and analyzed with ANOVA repeated measures. The study was approved by the Aretaieio Hospital Institutional Review Board and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT01669135).

RESULTS

The rSO2 left and right frontal area values decreased significantly from baseline (p=0.0001 and p=0.0001 respectively), with most remarkable decreases 5 and 10 minutes after spinal injection, from 65 (SD 8.7)% to 56 (SD 9.3)% and 56 (SD 9.5)% (p=0.0001 and p=0.0001) for the left and from 63 (SD 7.7)% to 55 (SD 9.3)% and 56 (SD 8.9)% (p=0,0001 and p=0.0001) for the right frontal area respectively. The rSO2 right thigh values increased significantly during the study period (p=0.0001).

KEY LIMITATIONS

Contribution of extracranial circulation to the rSO2, lack of PaCO2 and cardiac output measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Women undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia may present decreases in cerebral rSO2. The clinical impact of these results remains to be determined.

Effects of supplemental oxygen on maternal and neonatal oxygenation in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

The use of supplemental oxygen in uncomplicated cesarean deliveries under spinal anesthesia has been thoroughly investigated during recent decades. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits for both mother and infant of administering supplemental, low-dose oxygen via a nasal cannula versus having no supplement (i.e., room air only). Healthy parturients at term undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups: an oxygen group (n = 170), who received 3 LPM oxygen via a nasal cannula; and a room-air group (n = 170), who were assigned to breathe room air. Maternal oxygen saturation was measured continuously by using pulse oximeter. The desaturation was determined by oxygen saturation <94% over 30 seconds. Umbilical cord gases and Apgar scores were collected followed delivery of the infant. All maternal desaturation events occurred in 12 parturients assigned to the room-air group. Most events were concurrent with hypotension. The umbilical venous partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher in the oxygen group. The other blood gas measurements and Apgar scores were not significantly different between the two groups. Based on our findings, the use of supplemental oxygen could prevent maternal desaturation resulting from receiving sedation and intraoperative hypotension.

Supplemental oxygen in elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: Handle the sword with care

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the effect of 21% and 40% oxygen supplementation on maternal and neonatal oxidative stress in elective cesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty term parturients undergoing elective CS under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in the study. We allocated patients randomly to breathe 21% (air group) or 40% (oxygen group) oxygen from the time of skin incision until the end of the operation. We collected maternal pre- and post-operative and umbilical artery (UA) blood samples. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS) and the oxidative stress index (OSI) were measured.

RESULTS

Age, weight, height, parity, gestation week, spinal-skin incision time, skin incision-delivery time, delivery time, operation time, 1(st) and 5(th) minutes Apgar scores, and birth weight were similar between the groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no differences in preoperative TAC, TOS, or OSI levels between the groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Postoperative maternal TAC, TOS and OSI levels significantly increased in the oxygen group (p = 0.047, < 0.001 and 0.038, respectively); umbilical artery TAC levels significantly increased in the oxygen group (p = 0.003); and umbilical artery TOS and OSI levels significantly increased in the air group (p = 0.02 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in impact on maternal and fetal oxidative stress of supplemental 40% compared to 21% oxygen mandates further large-scale studies that investigate the role of oxygen supplementation during elective CS under spinal anesthesia.

Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Supplementary oxygen is routinely administered to low-risk pregnant women during an elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia; however, maternal and foetal outcomes have not been well established.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine whether supplementary oxygen given to low-risk term pregnant women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia can prevent maternal and neonatal desaturation. The secondary objective was to compare the mean values of maternal and neonatal blood gas levels between mothers who received supplementary oxygen and those who did not (control group).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (1948 to February 2012) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2012). We did not apply language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials of low-risk pregnant women undergoing an elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia and compared outcomes with, and without, oxygen supplementation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed methodological quality and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials with a total of 683 participants. Supplementary oxygen administration varied widely in dose and duration between trials. No cases of maternal desaturation were reported, although none of the 10 trials focused on maternal desaturation. Significant differences were noted in maternal oxygen saturation (higher with oxygen, N = three trials; mean difference (MD) 1.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8 to 2.3, P < 0.0001), maternal PaO2 (oxygen pressure in the blood; higher with oxygen, N = six trials; MD 141.8 mm Hg, 95% CI 109.3 to 174.3, P < 0.00001), neonatal UaPO2 (foetal umbilical arterial blood; higher with oxygen, N = eight trials; MD 3.3 mm Hg, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.9, P < 0.0001) and UvPO2 (foetal umbilical venous blood; higher with oxygen, N = 10 trials; MD 5.9 mm Hg, 95% CI 3.2 to 8.5, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were reported in neonatal UapH (N = eight trials; MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00, P = 0.26) and in average Apgar scores at one minute (N = five trials; MD 0.07, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.34, P = 0.6) and at five minutes (N = five trials; MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.05, P = 0.91).Only two out of 10 trials had a low risk of bias in all categories. When we separated the studies into low risk and high risk for bias, we found substantial statistical heterogeneity. None of the low-risk studies showed a significant difference in neonatal UaPO2 between the two intervention groups, whereas the high-risk studies showed a benefit for the neonatal oxygen group.The level of oxygen free radicals (malondialdehyde (MDA) and 8-isoprostane) was higher in participants who received supplementary oxygen (N = two trials; MD 0.2 µmol/L, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4, P = 0.0002; MD 64.3 pg/mL, 95% CI 51.7 to 76.8, P < 0.00001, respectively).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that supplementary oxygen given to healthy term pregnant women during elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia is associated with higher maternal and neonatal oxygen levels (maternal SpO2, PaO2, UaPO2 and UvPO2) and higher levels of oxygen free radicals. However, the intervention was neither beneficial nor harmful to the neonate's short-term clinical outcome as assessed by Apgar scores.

[Caesarean sections under regional anesthesia: pros and cons of supplementary oxygen]

The routine administration of supplemental oxygen to women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anesthesia in order to optimize oxygen supply to the fetus is common anesthetic practice in many German hospitals. However, this practice has been controversially discussed in the non-German literature for many years. This review presents and discusses the pros and cons of routinely providing supplemental oxygen to a parturient during caesarean section on the basis of the literature published over the last 30 years. Proponents of routine oxygen administration point to potential and unforeseeable risks of caesarean sections and consider the prophylactic administration of oxygen based on physiological considerations to be advantageous in terms of patient safety. Interestingly, data regarding the effects of an increased maternal FIO2 on improvement of fetal oxygenation are inconsistent, therefore, no unambiguous recommendation concerning which FIO2 to choose can be given. Opponents of routine oxygen supplementation allude above all to an increase in free radical activity in both mother and fetus; however, data in this respect are not consistent either. As supplemental oxygen to patients undergoing elective caesarean section without any risk factors under regional anesthesia is associated with potential risks while no advantage has so far been demonstrated, routine administration of oxygen has to be challenged and is no longer considered to be indicated by many. On the contrary, in cases of emergency with a concomitant risk of hypoxia for mother and fetus, administration of oxygen is indispensable in the light of present data.

What's new in obstetric anesthesia?

The current article covers some of the major themes that emerged in 2009 in the fields of obstetric anesthesiology, obstetrics, and perinatology, with a special emphasis on the implications for the obstetric anesthesiologist.

Intrauterine resuscitation during labor: should maternal oxygen administration be a first-line measure?

Intrauterine resuscitation techniques are often used during labor when the fetal heart rate pattern is nonreassuring. These techniques have not been well studied; common practices are based on classic studies many years old. Models of intrauterine resuscitation using one (or more) technique as a first-line intervention and adding others in a specific series or clinical algorithm based on fetal response have not been tested. Maternal oxygen therapy is often used; however, recent evidence suggests potential risks to the mother and fetus or newborn. Even small increases in maternal and fetal pO(2) as a result of maternal oxygen administration can produce oxygen free radical activity in mothers and fetuses. The potential long-term effects are unknown. Caution should be exercised when considering maternal oxygen administration as a first-line intrauterine resuscitation measure until more data are available, reserving its use after other measures have been unsuccessful in resolving the nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern.

[Is oxygen therapy truly useful and necessary during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze maternal and fetal well-being with and without the application of oxygen therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Randomized trial of full-term parturients who had received prenatal care during pregnancy. The women were healthy and classified as ASA 1. They were scheduled for delivery by cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and randomized to 2 groups to breathe room air or air providing an inspired oxygen fraction of 40% through a face mask. We assessed the well-being of the neonate immediately after birth with the Apgar test and by measuring umbilical cord blood gases.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty women were enrolled. Both groups were similar, with no differences in demographic or hemodynamic variables, time from uterine incision to fetal extraction, neonatal birth weight, presence of umbilical cord abnormalities, type of resuscitation required by the neonate, or Apgar score in the first or fifth minute. Oxygen saturation in maternal blood by pulse oximetry was higher after 10 minutes in the group of women who received supplemental oxygen through face masks. We also observed significant differences in umbilical cord arterial blood between the room air and supplemental oxygen groups, respectively, as follows: PaCO2, 51.14 mm Hg vs 54.33 mm Hg (P=.016); bicarbonate, 22.19 mEq L(-1) vs 23.23 mEq L(-1) (P=.012); lactate, 1.85 mmol L(-1) vs 1.64 mmol L(-1) (P=.038). The PO2 in venous blood also differed significantly: 25.53 mm Hg vs 28.13 mm Hg, respectively (P=033).

CONCLUSIONS

Breathing supplemental oxygen or not during elective cesarean delivery of healthy parturients under spinal anesthesia does not have a significant effect on neonatal well-being.

Supplementary oxygen for emergency Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists if the administration of supplementary oxygen to patients having emergency Caesarean section (CS) under regional anaesthesia is beneficial or potentially harmful. Therefore, in a prospective double-blinded study, we randomized patients having emergency CS under regional anaesthesia to receive either air or 60% oxygen until delivery and compared the effects on fetal oxygenation and lipid-peroxidation in the mother and baby.

METHODS

We recruited 131 women having emergency CS under regional anaesthesia. Either 21% (air group) or 60% oxygen (oxygen group) was administered using a Venturi-type facemask until delivery. We compared the oxygen exposure duration, umbilical arterial (UA) and venous (UV) blood gases and oxygen content, and plasma concentration of 8-isoprostane. Subanalysis was performed according to whether or not fetal compromise was considered present.

RESULTS

Data from 125 patients were analysed. For the oxygen group vs the air group, there were greater values for UA PO(2) [mean 2.2 (SD 0.5) vs 1.9 (0.6) kPa, P=0.01], UA O(2) content [6.6 (2.5) vs 4.9 (2.8) ml dl(-1), P=0.006], UV PO(2) [3.8 (0.8) vs 3.2 (0.8) kPa, P<0.0001], and UV O(2) content [12.9 (3.5) vs 10.4 (3.8) ml dl(-1), P=0.001]. There was no difference between the groups in maternal, UA, or UV 8-isoprostane concentration. Apgar scores and UA pH were similar between the groups. Similar changes were observed regardless of whether fetal compromise was considered present (n=37) or not (n=88).

CONCLUSIONS

Breathing 60% oxygen during emergency CS under regional anaesthesia increased fetal oxygenation with no associated increase in lipid-peroxidation in the mother or fetus.

Fetal effects of maternal supplementary oxygen during Caesarean section

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarises the current issues, knowledge and research on the effects of maternal supplementary oxygen therapy on the fetus during Caesarean section. This is a controversial subject since supplementary oxygen has the potential to confer both benefits and also harm to the fetus, depending on the circumstances.

RECENT FINDINGS

For elective Caesarean section, breathing room air under regional anaesthesia or 30% oxygen under general anaesthesia is not associated with either maternal or fetal hypoxia. A prolonged uterine-incision-to-delivery (U-D) interval of up to 310 s is not a major factor per se for development of fetal hypoxia or acidosis, and no benefits could be derived from breathing supplementary oxygen in this situation. Although it appears rational to provide supplementary oxygen in the presence of a hypoxic or compromised fetus, to achieve meaningful increases in fetal oxygenation, a very high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) is required. However, it still remains unclear whether this is beneficial for the fetus. The process of damage to the hypoxic fetus is one of oxidative stress mediated by free radicals generated during reperfusion (ischaemia-reperfusion injury). Independently, hyperoxia from breathing supplementary oxygen also induces formation of free radicals by direct mitochondrial electron transfer. Although hyperoxia could lessen the severity of fetal hypoxia, there is also a theoretical risk of an enhanced reperfusion injury. This issue has not been resolved in a clinical study, but an animal study reported enhanced formation of free radicals after an episode of fetal hypoxia in the group receiving supplementary oxygen.

SUMMARY

For elective Caesarean section, current evidence suggests that supplementary oxygen is unnecessary. For emergency Caesarean section, further data are required before a conclusion can be made for its beneficial and adverse effects. Improvement of fetal oxygenation should be the primary objective, and this is achievable in the short term by using a very high FiO2. Although there is also a possibility of an enhanced reperfusion injury, particularly in the preterm and non-labouring patients, further data are necessary before a conclusion can be made.

Nitrous oxide anxiolysis for elective cesarean section

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if inhaled 40% nitrous oxide (N(2)O) via facemask is an effective anxiolytic in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care women's hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 2 groups to receive either 100% O2 via facemask or 40% N2O in O2 via facemask.

MEASUREMENTS

Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) and measured variables (visual analog scale [VAS] anxiety, VAS pain, and sedation scores) were obtained at specific periods during the procedure (preoperatively, entering the operating room, spinal injection, skin incision, uterine incision, delivery, and at the conclusion of the surgical procedure). In addition, surgical time and delivery time, mean dose and percentage of patients requiring ephedrine or phenylephrine boluses, the emesis rate, and Apgar scores were measured.

MAIN RESULTS

No differences were noted with respect to maternal mean blood pressure, heart rate, pulse-oximeter oxygen saturation, and sedation or VAS pain scores during the measured periods. No differences were noted in surgical and delivery times, mean dose, or percentage of patients who required ephedrine or phenylephrine to maintain maternal blood pressure, the emesis rate, or 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores. Mean anxiety scores for the N2O group were significantly lower at the time of spinal injection, skin incision, and uterine incision. Multivariate analysis of variance for high-anxiety patients (> or =50 VAS) revealed significantly lower VAS scores in the N2O group, compared with the O2 group again at spinal injection, skin incision, and uterine incision.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled 40% N2O via facemask provides effective anxiolysis in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in patients with high anxiety (> or =50 VAS) at the time of spinal injection, skin incision, and uterine incision.