Moderate hypothermia for 359 operations to clip cerebral aneurysms

2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

AIM

The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Temperature management for deliberate mild hypothermia during neurosurgical procedures

Deliberate mild hypothermia is safer from the point of view of adverse events and does not require a specific technique, unlike deep or moderate hypothermia. Therefore, mild hypothermia was widely used for neurosurgical procedures. Unfortunately, the neuroprotective efficacy of intraoperative mild hypothermia has not yet been proven; however, temperature management for intraoperative deliberate mild hypothermia has been improved over the past two decades. It is very important to achieve mild hypothermia before the commencement of the main surgery, and to maintain the patient's body temperature until the procedure is completed. In addition, it is also important to complete rewarming by the end of the surgery so that an accurate neurological evaluation can be made. Regarding the effects of mild hypothermia on outcomes, a large randomized controlled study reported that unfavorable outcomes did not differ between participants with or without hypothermia. Apart from these unfavorable outcomes, it is known that temperature management during deliberate intraoperative mild hypothermia has contributed to improvement of anesthesia practice. The accumulation of experience in this field is important. Clinical interest in deliberate mild hypothermia is currently low; however, anesthesiologists should be prepared for the time when it is required again in the future.

Recent antiepileptic and neuroprotective applications of brain cooling

Hypothermia is a widely used clinical practice for neuroprotection and is a well-established method to mitigate the adverse effects of some clinical conditions such as reperfusion injury after cardiac arrest and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in newborns. The discovery, that lowering the core temperature has a therapeutic potential dates back to the early 20th century, but the underlying mechanisms are actively researched, even today. Especially, in the area of neural disorders such as epilepsy and traumatic brain injury, cooling has promising prospects. It is well documented in animal models, that the application of focal brain cooling can effectively terminate epileptic discharges. There is, however, limited data regarding human clinical trials. In this review article, we will discuss the main aspects of therapeutic hypothermia focusing on its use in treating epilepsy. The various experimental approaches and device concepts for focal brain cooling are presented and their potential for controlling and suppressing seizure activity are compared.

Management of raised intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: time for a consensus?

Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a well-recognized phenomenon in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) that has been demonstrated to lead to poor outcomes. Despite significant advances in clinical research into aSAH, there are no consensus guidelines devoted specifically to the management of elevated ICP in the setting of aSAH. To treat high ICP in aSAH, most centers extrapolate their treatment algorithms from studies and published guidelines for traumatic brain injury. Herein, the authors review the current management strategies for treating raised ICP within the aSAH population, emphasize key differences from the traumatic brain injury population, and highlight potential directions for future research in this controversial topic.

Cooling for cerebral protection during brain surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing neurosurgery are at risk of cerebral ischaemia with resultant cerebral hypoxia and neuronal cell death. This can increase both the risk of mortality and long term neurological disability. Induced hypothermia has been shown to reduce the risk of cerebral ischaemic damage in both animal studies and in humans who have been resuscitated following cardiac arrest. This had lead to an increasing interest in its neuroprotective potential in neurosurgical patients. This review was originally published in 2011 and did not find any evidence of either effectiveness or harm in these patients. This updated review was designed to capture current evidence to readdress these issues.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of induced hypothermia versus normothermia for neuroprotection in patients undergoing brain surgery. Effectiveness was to be measured in terms of short and long term mortality and functional neurological outcomes. Safety was to be assessed in terms of the rate of the adverse events infection, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, congestive cardiac failure and any other adverse events reported by the authors of the included studies.

SEARCH METHODS

For the original review, the authors searched the databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP) and LILACS to November 2010. For the updated review all these databases were re-searched from November 2010 to May 2014.For both the original and updated versions, grey literature was sought by searching reference lists of identified studies and relevant review articles, and conference proceedings. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

As in the original review, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of induced hypothermia versus normothermia for neuroprotection in patients of any age and gender undergoing brain surgery, which addressed mortality, neurological morbidity or adverse event outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently extracted data and two independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion between authors.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, one new ongoing study was found but no new eligible completed studies were identified. This update was therefore conducted using the same four studies included in the original review. These studies included a total of 1219 participants, mean age 40 to 54 years. All included studies were reported as RCTs. Two were multicentred, together including a total of 1114 patients who underwent cerebral aneurysm clipping, and were judged to have an overall low risk of bias. The other two studies were single centred. One included 80 patients who had a craniotomy following severe traumatic brain injury and was judged to have an unclear or low risk of bias. The other study included 25 patients who underwent hemicranicectomy to relieve oedema following cerebral infarction and was judged to have an unclear or high risk of bias. All studies assessed hypothermia versus normothermia. Overall 608 participants received hypothermia with target temperatures ranging from 32.5 °C to 35 °C, and 611 were assigned to normothermia with the actual temperatures recorded in this group ranging form 36.5 °C to 38 °C. For those who were cooled, 556 had cooling commenced immediately after induction of anaesthesia that was continued until the surgical objective of aneurysm clipping was achieved, and 52 had cooling commenced immediately after surgery and continued for 48 to 96 hours.Pooled estimates of effect were calculated for the outcomes mortality during treatment or follow-up (ranging from in-hospital to one year); neurological outcome measured in terms of the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) of 3 or less; and adverse events of infections, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and congestive cardiac failure. With regards to mortality, the risk of dying if allocated to hypothermia compared to normothermia was not statistically significantly different (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 1.27, P = 0.47). There was no indication that the time at which cooling was started affected the risk of dying (RR with intraoperative cooling 0.95, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.51, P = 0.83; RR for cooling postoperatively 0.67, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35, P = 0.26). For the neurological outcome, the risk of having a poor outcome with a GOS of 3 or less was not statistically different in those who received hypothermia versus normothermia (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.04, P = 0.09). Again there was no indication that the time at which cooling was started affected this result. Regarding adverse events, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence in those allocated to hypothermia versus normothermia for risk of surgical infection (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.97, P = 0.48), myocardial infarction (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 4.98, P = 0.22), ischaemic stroke (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.05, P = 0.24) or congestive heart failure (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.21, P = 0.38). In contrast to other outcomes, where time of application of cooling did not change the statistical significance of the effect estimates, there was a weak statistically significant increased risk of infection in those who were cooled postoperatively versus those who were not cooled (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.98, P = 0.03). Overall, as in the original review, no evidence was found that the use of induced hypothermia was either beneficial or harmful in patients undergoing neurosurgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that the use of induced hypothermia was associated with a significant reduction in mortality or severe neurological disability, or an increase in harm in patients undergoing neurosurgery.

Cooling for cerebral protection during brain surgery

BACKGROUND

The brain is at risk of ischaemia during a variety of neurosurgical procedures, and this can lead to devastating results. Induced hypothermia is the controlled lowering of core body temperature for therapeutic purposes. This remains the current practice during neurosurgery for the prevention or minimization of ischaemic brain injury. Brain surgery may lead to severe complications due to factors such as requirement for brain retraction, vessel occlusion, and intraoperative haemorrhage. Many anaesthesiologists believe that induced hypothermia is indicated to protect the central nervous system during surgery. Although hypothermia is often used during brain surgery, clinical efficacy has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of induced hypothermia versus normothermia for neuroprotection in patients undergoing brain surgery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10), MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE and Current Controlled Trials (from inception to November 2010), reference lists of identified trials, and bibliographies of published reviews. We also contacted researchers in the field. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials of induced hypothermia versus normothermia for neuroprotection in patients undergoing brain surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials of cooling for cerebral protection during brain surgery, involving a total of 1219 patients. We did not find any evidence that hypothermia for neuroprotection in patients undergoing brain surgery is either effective or unsafe when compared to normothermia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there is some evidence that mild hypothermia is safe, its effectiveness is not clear when compared with normothermia. We need to perform more clinical trials in order to establish the benefit, if any, of hypothermia for cerebral protection during brain surgery before making firm recommendations for the routine use of this intervention.

Thermal management of the patient: where does the patient lose and/or gain temperature?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anesthesia inhibits normal thermoregulatory control, leading to perioperative hypothermia or allowing therapeutic hypothermia. During the last decade many studies have shown the effects of anesthesia on thermoregulation. As a consequence many active warming and cooling devices are available to manipulate patients' core temperature. This review focuses on new findings in the field of temperature management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thermal management of patients has improved tremendously in recent years. Many outcome studies have shown adverse effects of perioperative hypothermia, as well as beneficial effects of therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and brain trauma. However, inducing hypothermia is limited by physiologic thermoregulatory responses. Small reductions in core temperature lead to vasoconstriction and shivering, effectively hindering hypothermia. Thus prevention of vasoconstriction and shivering have become major goals during induction of therapeutic hypothermia. All anesthetics, opioids and sedatives lower the vasoconstriction and shivering threshold, thus allowing hypothermia. However, these drugs have side effects, such as respiratory depression, sedation and nausea. Several drugs, alone or in combination, lower the shivering threshold while causing minimal or no side effects.

SUMMARY

Anesthesia affects thermoregulatory control and leads to perioperative hypothermia. The prevention of perioperative hypothermia improves patient's outcome. Therapeutic hypothermia can be induced and also improves outcome in certain conditions.