Spread of subarachnoid block, intraoperative local anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic requirements in Caesarean section and total abdominal hysterectomy

Evaluation of Therapies for Peripheral and Neuraxial Opioid-induced Pruritus based on Molecular and Cellular Discoveries

Opioids are a mainstay of treatment for pain worldwide. Pruritus, a common side effect of opioids, is a patient dissatisfier that limits their use in many clinical settings. Both parenteral and neuraxial administration of opioids frequently evoke pruritus. The ability of opioids to suppress pain while causing itch continues to perplex clinicians and researchers alike. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how opioids can give rise to pruritus, but specific knowledge gaps perpetuate debate. This review summarizes the clinical burden of opioid-induced pruritus and emphasizes recent discoveries of peripheral and central mechanisms for opioid-induced pruritus, particularly with respect to scientific and conceptual advances in spinal cord circuitry and mast cell biology. The mechanisms and effectiveness of existing medications used for clinical management of pruritus will be evaluated, and we will highlight the emerging preclinical utility of selective κ-opioid receptor agonists, such as nalfurafine, for the management of opioid-induced pruritus.

Patient choice compared with no choice of intrathecal morphine dose for caesarean analgesia: a randomized clinical trial

Background

The study aimed to determine whether a patient's choice for their intrathecal morphine (ITM) dose reflects their opioid requirements and pain after caesarean delivery and if giving women a choice of ITM dose would reduce opioid use and improve pain scores compared with women who did not have a choice.

Methods

A total of 120 women undergoing caesarean delivery with spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to a choice of 100 or 200 μg ITM or no choice. The study involved deception, such that all participants were still randomly assigned 100 or 200 μg ITM regardless of choice. Rescue opioid use over the 48-h study period was the primary outcome measure. Pain at rest and movement and side effect (pruritus, nausea, and vomiting) data were collected 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h postoperatively. Data are presented as median [95% confidence interval (CI)].

Results

Women who requested the larger ITM dose required more supplemental opioid [median 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1.3)] mg morphine equivalents at each assessment interval; P  < 0.001] and reported more pain with movement [median 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-1.9)] verbal numerical rating score of 0-10 points] than patients who requested the smaller ITM dose ( P  = 0.0008), regardless of the ITM dose given. There was no difference in opioid use whether the patient was offered a perceived choice or not.

Conclusions

Women who were given a choice and chose the larger ITM dose correctly anticipated a greater postoperative opioid requirement and more pain compared with women who chose the smaller dose. Simply being offered a choice did not impact opioid use or pain scores after caesarean delivery.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01425762).

An assessment of subarachnoid block: a survey of 175 articles and recommendations for improvement

BACKGROUND

Assessment of subarachnoid block, particularly the sensory component, may be incomplete and influence the conclusions of studies involving subarachnoid anesthesia, as well as their application in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We manually searched 175 articles concerning subarachnoid block published from 2006 to 2009 in 8 anesthesia journals to determine the components of the subarachnoid anesthetic procedure recorded as well as the extent of sympathetic and motor block.

RESULTS

The level of subarachnoid injection was reported in 86% of the articles, baricity in 84%, concentration of local anesthetic in 77%, patient's position in 75%, needle size in 77%, and needle type in 71%. The stimulus used for assessing sensory block was reported in 69% of the articles; 17% described the block as unilateral or bilateral, and 11% described the lines along which the stimulus was applied. Motor and sympathetic block were assessed in 40% and 18% of studies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest incomplete description of tools and assessment of sensory block in studies involving subarachnoid anesthesia. We propose a checklist to facilitate a more standardized evaluation of the extent of subarachnoid anesthesia.

Influence of injection rate of hyperbaric bupivacaine on spinal block in parturients: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether a tenfold difference in the rate of intrathecal injection of bupivacaine would affect sensory block level in parturients. Secondary outcomes included onset of block and the incidence of hypotension and nausea.

METHODS

Following Research Ethics Board approval, 90 ASA I and II term parturients scheduled for Cesarean delivery were randomized to receive either fast injection (over four seconds, Group F) or slow injection (over 40 sec, Group S) of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg plus morphine 200 microg. Sensory block, motor block, and blood pressure were assessed every minute for the first 15 min, then every five minutes for the next 20 min. All occurrences of nausea, hypotension (decrease in systolic blood pressure > 30%) and ephedrine requirements were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients in Group F and 42 patients in Group S completed the study. No differences in maximum sensory block height (Group F = median T2, interquartile range [T2-T4], Group S = T3 [T2-T4], P = 0.077) or time to achieve block height (F = 9.3 +/- 4.3 min, S = 9.7 +/- 4.7, P = 0.64) were observed. The frequencies of hypotension (Group F = 35/43, Group S = 32/42, P = 0.56), ephedrine utilization (Group F = 32/43, Group S = 26/42, P = 0.21) and nausea (Group F = 15/43, Group S = 16/42, P = 0.76) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Rapid intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine does not affect spread of spinal anesthesia or the incidence of hypotension and nausea in parturients.

Dose-response study of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine may produce more predictable and reliable anesthesia than plain ropivacaine for cesarean section. The dose-response relation for spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine is undetermined. This double-blind, randomized, dose-response study determined the ED50 (50% effective dose) and ED95 (95% effective dose) of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty parturients undergoing elective cesarean section delivery with use of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this study. An epidural catheter was placed at the L1 approximately L2 vertebral interspace, then lumbar puncture was performed at the L3 approximately L4 vertebral interspace, and parturients were randomized to receive spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine in doses of 10.5 mg, 12 mg, 13.5 mg, or 15 mg in equal volumes of 3 ml. Sensory levels (pinprick) were assessed every 2.5 min until a T7 level was achieved and motor changes were assessed by modified Bromage Score. A dose was considered effective if an upper sensory level to pin prick of T7 or above was achieved and no intraoperative epidural supplement was required. ED50 and ED95 were determined with use of a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

ED50 (95% confidence interval) of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine was determined to be 10.37 (5.23 approximately 11.59) mg and ED95 (95% confidence interval) to be 15.39 (13.81approximately 23.59) mg. The maximum sensory block levels and the duration of motor block and the rate of hypotension, but not onset of anesthesia, were significantly related to the ropivacaine dose.

CONCLUSION

The ED50 and ED95 of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery under the conditions of this study were 10.37 mg and 15.39 mg, respectively. Ropivacaine is suitable for spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2004

This paper is the 27th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2004 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.