Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after orthopaedic surgery with sufentanil and ropivacaine 0.165% or levobupivacaine 0.125%

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus conventional epidural analgesia after total hip replacement - a randomized trial

AIMS

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is usually considered a better option for pain management compared to conventional analgesia. The beneficial effect of PCA has been assessed in a number of studies; however, the results are inconsistent. The goal of this study was to compare of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) to conventional epidural analgesia after total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

This prospective study was performed at the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine at a tertiary university hospital. After THR, patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and randomized to one of two groups (PCEA and non-PCEA). Postoperative pain in the PCEA group was treated using a standardized protocol, while the analgesia in the non-PCEA group was based on physician prescription according to the patient's clinical condition. The total consumption of analgesics, patients' satisfaction, pain intensity, and analgesia-related complications were recorded for 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 111 patients (PCEA group, n=55 and non-PCEA group, n=56). The PCEA group had significantly lower total consumption of analgesic mixtures (0.9±0.3 and 1.3±0.4 mL/kg per day, P<0.001).There was greater patient satisfaction (P<0.001) in the PCEA group. The mean pain intensity over 24 hours postoperatively was similar for both groups (P=0.14). There was no significant difference in rate of analgesia-related complications between the groups (hypotension, P=0.14; bradypnea, P=0.11).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional epidural analgesia based on physician prescription, PCEA led to less total analgesic consumption and greater patient satisfaction after THR.

Dose determination of sufentanil for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with background infusion in abdominal surgeries: A random study

Objectives

Sufentanil has been widely used in epidural PCA, while its use in intravenous PCA has rarely been reported. Based on its use in target controlled infusion, we reckoned that the effect-site concentration of sufentanil would be steady if background infusion is given in intravenous PCA. This prospective, single center, randomized study with a three arm parallel group design aims to find out the appropriate dose of sufentanil when used in intravenous PCA with background infusion in abdominal surgeries.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer and consented to the study were recruited. The analgesia pump with one of three different doses of sufentanil (1.5, 2.0 or 2.5 μg/kg) was attached to the patient through peripheral venous line right after surgery. The primary endpoint was pain scale VAS up to 48 hours postoperatively.

Results

In our study 90 patients were analyzed. In group B (SF 2.0) and C (SF2.5), patients had better pain relief than in group A (SF 1.5). There was no difference between group B and C in pain intensity at rest. While in group C more patients got pain relived at activity than in group B. All three groups had low and similar incidence of adverse effects of sufentanil.

Conclusion

The dose 2.5 μg/kg of sufentanil with background infusion is preferred because of better pain alleviation at activity without increase of adverse effects up to 48 hours after surgery.

A multicenter study of the analgesic effects of epidural chloroprocaine after lower limb orthopedic surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects and optimal concentration of chloroprocaine for epidural analgesia after lower limb orthopedic surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, observational, multicenter clinical study.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery area, university hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred and twenty patients from 4 hospitals were enrolled and randomized into 5 groups after lower limb orthopedic surgery under epidural anesthesia with lidocaine.

INTERVENTIONS

Epidural chloroprocaine mixed with 0.4μg/mL fentanyl was administered via a patient-controlled analgesia pump at the concentration of 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, 1.2%, or 1.4% after the surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

Systolic blood pressure, heart rate, visual analog score at rest and during activity, as well as the Bromage score at 0 minute, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after the surgery were recorded and compared. Use of morphine and incidence of adverse effects were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients given 1.2% chloroprocaine showed the lowest visual analog score compared with other groups. There was no significant difference in the Bromage score among 5 groups. The Bromage score returned to 0 in 89.7% of the patients 48 hours after surgery. No difference in postoperative morphine usage, blood pressure, or heart rate was found among 5 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural 1.2% chloroprocaine with 0.4μg/mL fentanyl could generate proper analgesic effects with little influence on mobility in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery. In addition, it could generate a good sense and movement separation, facilitating the early functional training.

[Levobupivacaine vs. ropivacaine for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

BACKGROUND

Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine are both used for continuous femoral analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; however it is unknown whether both drugs are equally effective regarding pain control, preservation of mobility and patient satisfaction.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial 84 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadruple hamstring tendons were studied. For postoperative pain therapy levobupivacaine 0.125%, ropivacaine 0.2% or placebo control with NaCl 0.9% at a rate of 6 ml/h were used for 48 h using a femoral nerve catheter. All patients also received an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) pump with piritramide.

RESULTS

Patient satisfaction was significantly higher and night rest was better in both treatment groups compared to the placebo group but there appeared to be no major differences between the two local anesthetics. Opioid consumption was significantly higher in the placebo group compared to the levobupivacaine group but not the ropivacaine group. The pain scores showed a trend towards higher scores in the placebo group throughout but the difference only reached statistical significance on postoperative day 1. No statistical significant differences in motor block were found between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative analgesia for ACL reconstruction during the first 48 h using femoral block with a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125% or ropivacaine 0.2% in combination with an IVPCA is similarly effective and better than a placebo. Both studied drugs seem to be equally appropriate for this purpose.

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after Caesarean section: levobupivacaine 0.15% versus ropivacaine 0.15% alone or combined with fentanyl 2 µg/ml: a comparative study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of epidural ropivacaine 0.15%, levobupivacaine 0.15% and ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml, used with a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device after Caesarean section.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty women undergoing elective Caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia were enrolled. Postoperatively, patients received PCEA with either ropivacaine or levobupivacaine 0.15% (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 5 ml/20 min), or ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl 2 µg/ml (basal rate 6 ml/h, bolus 4 ml/20 min). Sympathetic and sensory level of analgesia, motor ability (Bromage 0-3), and pain scores at rest, movement and cough (VAS 0-10), haemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, side effects and total doses of local anaesthetic were documented every 6 h for 24 h. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a descriptive scale.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in pain scores at all time intervals. A significantly higher sympathetic and sensory blockade occurred with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.15% compared to ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl, with no significant difference in total local analgesic consumption at 24 h (p = 0.08). Rescue analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups (p = 0.8) while patients' satisfaction was significantly higher in the ropivacaine 0.15% plus fentanyl group (p = 0.02). Haemodynamics, oxygenation, nausea, pruritus and numbness did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilute local anaesthetic solutions provided satisfactory postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section when used with a PCEA device. The combination of ropivacaine 0.15% with fentanyl 2 µg/ml appeared superior, since it provided higher patient satisfaction with statistically equal pain scores and local anaesthetic consumption.

Effect of combined single-injection femoral nerve block and patient-controlled epidural analgesia in patients undergoing total knee replacement

PURPOSE

Total knee replacement is one of the most painful orthopedic procedures, and effective pain relief is essential for early mobility and discharge from hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether addition of single-injection femoral nerve block to epidural analgesia would provide better postoperative pain control, compared to epidural analgesia alone, after total knee replacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients received a single-injection femoral nerve block with 0.25% levobupivacaine (30 mL) combined with epidural analgesia (femoral nerve block group) and 40 patients received epidural analgesia alone (control group). Pain intensity and volume of patient-controlled epidural analgesia medication and rescue analgesic requirements were measured in the first 48 hours after surgery at three time periods; 0-6 hours, 6-24 hours, and 24-48 hours. Also, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median visual analog scale at rest and movement was significantly lower until 48 hours in the femoral nerve block group. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia volume was significantly lower throughout the study period, however, rescue analgesia requirements were significantly lower only up to 6 hours in the femoral nerve block group. The incidences of nausea and vomiting and rescue antiemetic requirement were significantly lower in the femoral nerve block group up to 6 hours.

CONCLUSION

The combination of femoral nerve block with epidural analgesia is an effective pain management regimen in patients undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.

Comparison of the prophylactic anti-emetic efficacy of ramosetron and ondansetron in patients at high-risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting after total knee replacement

We compared the prophylactic anti-emetic efficacy of ramosetron, a newly developed 5-HT(3) antagonist, and ondansetron in patients at high-risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting after total knee replacement. Eighty-four patients with three risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (female, non-smoking and use of postoperative opioid use (ropivacaine and hydromorphone patient controlled epidural analgesia)) undergoing unilateral total knee replacement were randomly allocated to ramosetron 0.3 mg (n = 42) or ondansetron 4 mg (n = 42) groups. A complete response (no postoperative nausea and vomiting and no rescue anti-emetic) and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed for 48 h after surgery at 0-2 h, 2-6 h, 6-24 h, and 24-48 h. More patients in the ramosetron group had a complete response between 2 and 48 h. The incidence of nausea between 2 and 24 h and the severity of nausea between 2 and 48 h were also less in the ramosetron group. Ramosetron was more effective than ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients at high risk undergoing unilateral total knee replacement.