Prophylactic mirtazapine reduces intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus

Novel therapies for nausea and vomiting in advanced illness and supportive cancer care

Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics. Blonanserin, an atypical antipsychotic with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, has less of a risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Transdermal blonanserin, available in Korea, Japan, and China in a small number of trials, has improved nausea in patients not responding to standard antiemetics. Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant that has been used for multiple symptoms besides depression. There is little evidence that mirtazapine improves anorexia or nausea in advanced cancer but is as effective as olanzapine in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Isopropyl alcohol aromatherapy has been successfully used in the emergency department for nausea and vomiting with an onset to benefit more rapidly than standard antiemetics. Isopropyl alcohol prep pads can be used for home-going antiemetic therapy and as a bridge to treating acute nausea until standard antiemetics take effect.

Mirtazapine: A One-Stop Strategy for Treatment of Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms

Public health efforts to reduce the opioid overdose epidemic and treat opioid use disorder (OUD) have met with challenges associated with current non-standardized approaches to managing opioid withdrawal symptoms, such as itching, jitteriness, anxiety, depression, craving, vomiting, diarrhea, insomnia, and anorexia. These symptoms pose substantial obstacles to the safe initiation of medications for OUD, maintenance of long-term sobriety, and prevention of relapse. In clinical practice, multiple medications (polypharmacy) are prescribed to manage these withdrawal symptoms, including ondansetron and promethazine for vomiting and nausea, loperamide and Lomotil for diarrhea, hydroxyzine and doxepin for pruritus, benzodiazepines, the Z-drugs, and melatonin for insomnia, and benzos, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and various serotonergic agents for anxiety. This polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug-drug interactions and adverse drug events, increased medical costs, and increased odds of medication non-adherence and relapse. We propose an alternative single medication, mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic receptor antagonist, that can be used for myriad symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Case series, clinical studies, and clinical trials have shown mirtazapine to be effective for treating nausea and vomiting resulting from multiple etiologies, including hyperemesis gravidarum and chemotherapy-induced emesis. Other evidence supports the salutary effects of mirtazapine on itching and craving. Research findings support mirtazapine's beneficial effects on diarrhea and anxiety, a consequence of its modulating effects on serotonergic receptors mediating mood and gastrointestinal symptoms. There is also evidence supporting its efficacy as a potent and non-addictive sleep aid, which presents itself as a solution for insomnia associated with opioid withdrawal. The current review presents evidence from extant literature supporting mirtazapine as a one-drug strategy to treat the variety of symptoms of opioid withdrawal. This one-drug strategy has much potential to decrease polypharmacy, adverse drug events, relapse, and healthcare cost and increase the likelihood of prolonged sobriety and better quality of life for people living with OUD.

Prevention and Treatment of Neuraxial Morphine-Induced Pruritus: A Scoping Review

The addition of morphine to neuraxial anaesthesia leads to improved postoperative analgesia and lower opioid consumption, but is often accompanied by pruritus. Studies on preventing or treating pruritus show contradictory results. Our objective was to identify effective drugs for the prevention or treatment of pruritus by a scoping review of clinical trials. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. We identified clinical trials investigating the prevention or treatment of neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus in adults. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were screened for eligible studies. One-hundred-and-four articles were included covering 13 pharmacological groups. We conclude that dopamine antagonists, µ-opioid agonist/antagonists and neuraxial or orally administered µ-opioid antagonists prevent pruritus caused by neuraxial morphine regardless of the timing of administration. In the reviewed literature, 5HT3-antagonists prevent neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus when administered before morphine administration. For the treatment of neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus, only nalbuphine appears to be consistently effective. More research is needed to find the most effective doses and the optimal timing of the effective medication.

Psychopharmacology in the Pediatric Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant Units: Antidepressant Treatment

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical profiles, tolerability, and efficacy of two groups of antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and the atypical antidepressant, mirtazapine, in children and adolescents treated in a large pediatric Hematology-Oncology center. Methods: A review of computerized medical charts of 32 pediatric patients with cancer, from December 2011 to April 2020, was conducted. Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressant medications were retrospectively analyzed. The Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scales were used to evaluate psychiatric symptoms severity before and following treatment, while the data on adverse events and drug-drug interactions were retrieved from the computerized medical records. Results: Thirty-two children and adolescents with cancer, 2-21 years of age (mean 14.1 ± 4.6 years), were treated with antidepressants. Fourteen patients (44%) received mirtazapine, whereas 18 patients (56%) received SSRIs: sertraline (25%), escitalopram (25%), or fluoxetine (6%). Treatment choice was dictated either by physician preference or informed by potential drug-drug interactions. The most common psychiatric diagnoses were major depressive disorders (47%), anxiety disorders (19%), and medication-induced psychiatric disorders (19%). The most common psychiatric-medical symptoms were depressed mood (94%) and anxiety (62%). CGI-S improved significantly (p < 0.05) between pretreatment and on-treatment assessments, with no statistically significant difference between SSRI and mirtazapine-treated patients. CGI-I scores at reassessment indicated improvement in most patients (84%). Adverse events of treatment were mild in all patients. Conclusions: The antidepressants used in this study, SSRIs and mirtazapine, were effective and well tolerated in children and adolescents with cancer and psychiatric comorbidities. Given the high rates of depression and anxiety in children with cancer, large-scale, multisite, prospective clinical trials of antidepressants are warranted.

Itching as the onset of pain (part 3)

Itchy skin is an extremely unpleasant symptom that can provoke insomnia, depression, irritability, loss of appetite. There are several theories of itching. According to one of them, itching is a modified pain caused by a slight irritation of the nerve endings in the skin. According to the second, itching is an independent symptom, in the formation of which nervous, humoral and vascular mechanisms are involved. Other theories consider itching as a reaction of the autonomic nervous system or a hereditary pathological condition. According to recent studies, itchy skin is characterized by the absence of a universal peripheral mediator of itching. The trigger for itching is the action of pruritogen – a mechanical, chemical, thermal or electrical stimulant directly or indirectly through mediators. Free ends of type A delta fibers and type C fibers play a crucial role in itching and pain. If this was previously confirmed only by clinical observations, now there are neurophysiological studies that support the theory that itching and pain fibers are one with different activity thresholds. Today, it is unacceptable that there are separate specific receptors for different sensations. It is now assumed that there are mixed receptors for heat, cold, pain, itching and touch [95]. Systematic use of substances included in the list of drugs and manifested by mental and physical dependence on them – drug addiction, one of the diseases of society. But drug addiction is sometimes forced, according to medical indications, in cases of palliative conditions. Depending on the stage of the person after taking the drug or in the interval between drug use, one of the signs of use may be severe itching of the skin. And after excluding both the main diseases that cause itching and other secondary causes of itching, it can be assumed that a person has idiopathic generalized pruritus (itching) of unknown origin (GPOU). The itching of the elderly, which is quite common in the elderly, as a manifestation of concomitant, often combined, somatic pathology, but may also be due to physiological changes, both on the skin and on the physiological aging of nerve endings.

Serotonin and noradrenaline modulate chronic itch processing in mice

The roles of serotonin and noradrenaline in the modulation of chronic pruriceptive processing currently remain unclear. To clarify the contribution of serotonin and noradrenaline to chronic itch, the effects of the administration of antidepressants or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors were evaluated in the present study. A pretreatment with milnacipran, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and mirtazapine, a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant, attenuated the induction of spontaneous scratching behavior in mice with chronic itch. The administration of a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, such as fluvoxamine and paroxetine, but not escitalopram, or a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, such as atomoxetine and nisoxetine, ameliorated the induction of spontaneous scratching behavior in mice with chronic itch. Furthermore, this attenuation was reversed by the administration of yohimbine, a selective α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist, or methysergide, a non-selective serotonin receptor antagonist. These results suggest that elevated serotonin and noradrenaline levels are involved in the attenuation of scratching behavior induced by chronic itch, and serotonin receptors and an α₂-adrenoceptor play a crucial role in chronic pruriceptive processing.

Current and emerging systemic treatments targeting the neural system for chronic pruritus

INTRODUCTION

Pruritus is a debilitating symptom that significantly affects the quality of life of patients who suffer from it. Many current and emerging systemic treatments targeting the neural system have been successful in treating itch of various underlying etiologies.

AREAS COVERED

A complete search of the PUBMED and Google Scholar databases was completed and literature pertinent to current and emerging systemic anti-pruritic drugs which target the neural system was compiled. The purpose of this review is to give the reader with an overview of the current and emerging systemic therapeutic options which target the neural system for chronic pruritus. The authors then provide the reader with their expert perspectives on the future of these therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Exciting new anti-pruritic therapies targeting the neural system which show promise include NK-1 inhibitors, opioid receptor modulators, and drugs targeting specific itch receptors such as Mrgpr, Na_v1.7, and PAR2, as well as selective GABA modulators. Future studies should be conducted in order to fully understand these exciting therapeutic options.

Effect of mirtazapine on pruritus in patients on hemodialysis: a cross-over pilot study

BACKGROUND

Uremic pruritus (UP) is a highly prevalent and disturbing problem in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, treatment of UP is largely unsatisfactory. The present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of mirtazapine, an atypical antidepressant agent with potent antagonistic activity against serotonin (5HT2, 5HT3) and histamine (H1) receptors, in the treatment of pruritus in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

An 8-week long, prospective, open-label, and cross-over randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 77 HD patients with chronic pruritus. After a 2-week washout period, eligible patients were randomly assigned either to the mirtazapine (15 mg per day) or gabapentin (100 per day) for 2 weeks. Following 2 weeks washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment arm for 2 more weeks. The severity of pruritus was measured seven times during each treatment period using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Furthermore, at the end of the study, patients also were blindly asked which treatment (first or last in the sequential course of the study) they preferred.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients completed two treatment periods of the study. Although, compared to baseline, both gabapentin and mirtazapine treatment resulting in significant improvement in VAS scores, decreasing in pruritus severity was significantly greater in the mirtazapine treatment period compared with the gabapentin treatment period (P < 0.001). Furthermore, although side effects such as drowsiness and dry mouth more reported in the mirtazapine treatment period, overall higher percentage of the study patients preferred mirtazapine over gabapentin for the treatment of their pruritus symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, our study provides evidence that mirtazapine can be an effective therapy for UP in patients who are on maintenance HD. However, further studies would be necessary to confirm effectiveness as well as the safety of mirtazapine in the long-term management of chronic pruritus.

Defining the role of mirtazapine in the treatment of refractory pruritus

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Mirtazapine has traditionally been used for the treatment of major depressive disorder, with an added benefit in patients who have comorbid insomnia or anxiety. Recent studies describe its usefulness in treating refractory pruritus of various causes as well. Our goal is to better define the use of mirtazapine in the treatment of refractory pruritus.

METHOD

Through a thorough literature review of PubMed, we identified all reports of the use of mirtazapine for pruritus.

RESULTS

Upon examination of 8 supporting articles, we found mirtazapine has quality evidence for the treatment of intra-thecal morphine-induced pruritus. Mirtazapine may also be effective in treating pruritus related to various other conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, cutaneous malignancies (primary or metastatic), hematologic malignancies (lymphomas and leukemias), liver failure, renal failure, cholestasis, as well as pruritus of unknown origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine plays a role in treatment for intra-thecel morphine-induced pruritis yet high-quality trials are needed to confirm its efficacy in other dermatologic conditions.

Can we use psychoactive drugs to treat pruritus?

Pruritus is a frequent complaint both in dermatology and general medicine. This burdensome symptom has a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis, with the key involvement of central nervous system in its development. Psychoactive drugs (psychopharmaceuticals) encompass several therapeutic groups utilized mainly in psychiatry. However, these drugs are occasionally used in dermatological practice and may contribute to alleviation of pruritus in a variety of cutaneous and extracutaneous disorders. This review article summarizes the role of H1-antihistamines, antidepressants, antipsychotics and antiepileptics in managing pruritus.

Use of thermal and non thermal techniques for assessing compatibility between mirtazapine and solid lipids

The present investigation was aimed at the evaluation of possible interactions between mirtazapine and selected solid lipids that are commonly used to develop solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipidic carriers (NLCs). The solids lipids explored were palmitic acid, stearic acid, glycerylmonostearate, cutina CPPH, sterotex NF, gelucire 50/13, hydrogenated castor oil and compritol 888 ATO. The techniques used were Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), Hot Stage Microscopy (HSM) and Isothermal Stress Testing (IST) studies. In some cases, the DSC results indicated the possibility of drug-solid lipid interactions which was further ruled out by performing HSM studies. Moreover, IST studies were also used to further confirm the compatibility between the drug and selected solid lipids. And the findings from these studies indicated compatibility between mirtazapine and solid lipids that can further be used to develop SLNs or NLCs.

Antidepressants as antipruritic agents: A review

Pruritus is a concomitant symptom of various underlying disorders viz. dermatological, systemic and psychiatric disorders that provoke the person to scratch the skin. Many natural as well as, antipruritic therapies are usually practiced in the treatment of pruritus including general preventive measures, topical therapies such as cooling agents, antihistamines, anesthetics, capsaicin, corticosteroids, immunomodulators and; systemic therapies including administration of antihistamines, opioid antagonists/agonists, antiepileptic drugs/neuroleptics (e.g., gabapentin and pregabalin), antidepressants (e.g., doxepin, amitriptyline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, escitalopram and mirtazapine) (Patel and Yosipovitch, 2010; Reich et al., 2011; Martín and Padilla, 2015; Eskeland et al., 2016). Topical therapies are the mainstay of treatment of delicate and localized pruritus while other systemic drug therapies are used to treat stern and generalized pruritus. The reported antipruritic activity of some antidepressant drugs has intrigued this review to focus on the types of pruritus, pruritus mechanism, the antipruritic mechanism of antidepressants and to comprehend the role of antidepressants in the management of pruritus.

The vicious cycle of itch and anxiety

Chronic itch is associated with increased stress, anxiety, and other mood disorders. In turn, stress and anxiety exacerbate itch, leading to a vicious cycle that affects patient behavior (scratching) and worsens disease prognosis and quality of life. This cycle persists across chronic itch conditions of different etiologies and even to some extent in healthy individuals, suggesting that the final common pathway for itch processing (the central nervous system) plays a major role in the relationship between itch and anxiety. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments that reduce anxiety have shown promising anti-itch effects. Further research is needed to establish specific central mechanisms of the itch-anxiety cycle and provide new targets for treatment.

Comparison of mirtazapine, gabapentin and ondansetron to prevent intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus

OBJECTIVE:

Antagonism of the central nervous system inhibitor neurotransmitter gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) or serotonergic system activation is an important factor in the pathogenesis of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. This study tested the hypothesis that preoperative use of ondansetron, gabapentin or mirtazapine can prevent morphine-induced pruritus.

METHODS:

We randomly allocated 80 patients of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I and II physical status who were to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia or pilonidal sinus operations under spinal anesthesia into 4 equal groups. The first 3 groups received oral doses of 30 mg mirtazapine, 8 mg ondansetron, and 1200 mg gabapentin at 2 hours, 10 minutes, and 1 hour before surgery, respectively, and the fourth group was given a placebo. All patients received intrathecal injection of 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2 mg morphine. Pruritus was evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine administration, and details of presence, onset time, duration, localization, and severity of pruritus were recorded.

RESULTS:

Incidence of pruritus was significantly more frequent in the placebo group compared to ondansetron, gabapentin, and mirtazapine groups (70%, 55%, 35%, and 35%, respectively). In general, onset of pruritus was between 2 and 6 hours after intrathecal morphine injection; however, onset in the gabapentin group (mean±SD: 4.75±2.7 hours; p=0.019) was delayed compared to other groups. It was observed that pruritus persisted relatively longer in the ondansetron and placebo groups (mean±SD: 6±3.08; 5.82±2.96 hours, respectively; p=0.047). No statistical determination was made regarding location of pruritus. Severity of pruritus was greater in the placebo group (p=0.0001). Necessity for antipruritic treatment was not statistically significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION:

Incidence and severity of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus decreased with use of each of all 3 drugs compared to placebo.

Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia: Current trends

The practice of anesthesiology has always been governed by evidence-based medicine. The quick turnover rate of patients in the operating room and patient safety and satisfaction, have also further changed the way we practice anesthesia. The use of intrathecal (IT) opiates as an effective form of postoperative pain relief has been established for many years. Morphine was the first opioid used by IT route. In clinical practice, morphine is regarded as the gold standard, or benchmark, of analgesics used to relieve intense pain. Perhaps for this reason, IT morphine has been used for over 100 years for pain relief. IT morphine is one of the easiest, cost-effective and reliable techniques for postoperative analgesia and technical failures are rare. And yet there is no consensus amongst anesthesiologists regarding the dose of IT morphine. Like all other methods of pain relief, IT morphine also has some side effects and some of them are serious though not very common. This review article looks into some of the key aspects of the use of IT morphine for post-operative analgesia and various doses for different procedures are discussed. This article also describes the side effects of IT morphine and how to treat and prevent them.

Anesthetic premedication: new horizons of an old practice

The practice of anesthetic premedication embarked upon soon after ether and chloroform were introduced as general anesthetics in the middle of the 19(th) century. By applying opioids and anticholinergics before surgery, the surgical patients could achieve a less anxious state, and more importantly, they would acquire a smoother course during the tedious and dangerous induction stage. Premedication with opioids and anticholinergics was not a routine practice in the 20(th) century when intravenous anesthetics were primarily used as induction agents that significantly shorten the induction time. The current practice of anesthetic premedication has evolved into a generalized scheme that incorporates several aspects of patient care: decreasing preoperative anxiety, dampening intraoperative noxious stimulus and its associated neuroendocrinological changes, and minimizing postoperative adverse effects of anesthesia and surgery. Rational use of premedication in modern anesthesia practice should be justified by individual needs, the types of surgery, and the anesthetic agents and techniques used. In this article, we will provide our readers with updated information about premedication of surgical patients with a focus on the recent application of second generation serotonin type 3 antagonist, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants.

Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update

Pruritus is a troublesome side-effect of neuraxial (epidural and intrathecal) opioids. Sometimes it may be more unpleasant than pain itself. The prevention and treatment still remains a challenge. A variety of medications with different mechanisms of action have been used for the prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, with mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and the pharmacological therapies available to manage opioid-induced pruritus. The literature source of this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 2012. The search results were limited to the randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and non-systemic reviews.

[Antidepressant drugs : a reasonable therapy for pruritus?]

Pruritus represents one of the most bothersome symptoms of skin and internal diseases, and can also occur without an underlying detectable cause. It is well known that chronic pruritus seriously affects the quality of life in patients. The management of pruritus is challenging, especially if the underlying cause is not identifiable. Besides therapy with increased dosage of non-sedating H1-antihistamines, which is often not successful in severe pruritus, tri- or tetracyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors are recommended for therapy, as discussed in this review.

Pruritus: management algorithms and experimental therapies

Pruritus (itch) is a major symptom in many dermatologic as well as systemic diseases and has a dramatic impact on the quality of life in these patients. The symptom of itch has to be treated on the basis of its pathophysiology and its underlying disease. In daily practice, a "quick" diagnosis of the underlying disease is often difficult, although a rapid relief of the itch is desired. We often treat patients on the basis of the symptomatology. A rational therapeutic ladder for a symptomatic therapy is useful until the final diagnosis has been confirmed. There are probably many subtypes of pruritus, just as there are many diseases that cause itch. The pathophysiology in many subtypes of pruritus is still poorly understood, hindering a rapid and targeted treatment strategy. An extensive diagnostic workup is often required to determine the final cause(s) of the itch. Thus, in daily life, physicians often start with a more or less rational therapeutic strategy to combat the debilitating itch. We present possible therapeutic ladders that form the basis for effective therapeutic itch strategies in various diseases. On the basis of our current knowledge about the different pathophysiologies of itch, on clinical trials or case reports, and our own clinical experience, we aim to present therapeutic ladders for the rapid as well as long-term management of itch. Finally, we summarize current exciting developments of experimental strategies in itch research and in clinical development for itch therapy.

Chronic pruritus in the absence of specific skin disease: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy

Chronic pruritus is a major and distressing symptom of many cutaneous and systemic diseases and can significantly impair the patient's quality of life. Pruritus perception is the final result of a complex network involving dedicated nerve pathways and brain areas, and an increasing number of peripheral and central mediators are thought to be involved. Itch is associated with most cutaneous disorders and, in these circumstances, its management overlaps with that of the skin disease. Itch can also occur without associated skin diseases or primary skin lesions, but only with nonspecific lesions secondary to rubbing or scratching. Chronic itch with no or minimal skin changes can be secondary to important diseases, such as neurologic disorders, chronic renal failure, cholestasis, systemic infections, malignancies, and endocrine disorders, and may also result from exposure to some drugs. The search for the cause of pruritus usually requires a meticulous step-by-step assessment involving careful history taking as well as clinical examination and laboratory investigations. Few evidence-based treatments for pruritus are available. Topical therapy, oral histamine H(1) receptor antagonists, and phototherapy with UV radiation can target pruritus elicitation in the skin, whereas antiepileptic drugs, opioid receptor antagonists, and antidepressants can block signal processing in the CNS.

Human opioid μ-receptor A118G polymorphism may protect against central pruritus by epidural morphine for post-cesarean analgesia

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal or epidural morphine used for post-operative analgesia frequently induces central type pruritus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of central type pruritus induced by epidural morphine for post-cesarean analgesia and the A118G polymorphism of the human μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1).

METHODS

Pregnant women (212) received pure epidural morphine (2 mg) twice per day for post-cesarean analgesia. Blood samples were collected and sequenced with high-resolution melting analysis to detect three different genotypes of OPRM1 (AA, AG and GG). We interviewed all candidates 24 h post-operatively to record the clinical phenotype with subjective complaints and objective observations.

RESULTS

The genotyping revealed that 99 women (46.7%) were AA, 88 (41.5%) were AG and 25 (11.8%) were GG. Sixty-two of 212 women suffered from significant pruritus (29.2%), and 150 of 212 women had non-significant pruritus (70.8%). In genotype AA, 33 patients (53.2%) experienced significant pruritus, 26 (41.9%) in genotype AG and 3 (4.8%) in genotype GG. The G allele was a statistically independent protective factor for individuals developing pruritus, and the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio was 0.27. There was a trend for progressively decreasing severity scores among the three groups, with the lowest severity score (0.72) for pruritus in the GG group.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of significant pruritus in the recessive type (GG) was significantly lower compared with the dominant types (AA+AG). The recessive G allele in the A118G polymorphism may have protective effects against significant pruritus after epidural morphine for post-cesarean analgesia.

Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks

Neuraxial analgesia is widely accepted as the most effective and the least depressant method of providing pain relief in labor. Over the last several decades neuraxial labor analgesia techniques and medications have progressed to the point now where they provide high quality pain relief with minimal side effects to both the mother and the fetus while maximizing the maternal autonomy possible for the parturient receiving neuraxial analgesia. The introduction of the combined spinal epidural technique for labor has allowed for the rapid onset of analgesia with minimal motor blockade, therefore allowing the comfortable parturient to ambulate. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia techniques have evolved to allow for more flexible analgesia that is tailored to the individual needs of the parturient and effective throughout the different phases of labor. Computer integrated systems have been studied to provide seamless analgesia from induction of neuraxial block to delivery. New adjuvant drugs that improve the effectiveness of neuraxial labor analgesia while decreasing the side effects that may occur due to high dose of a single drug are likely to be added to future labor analgesia practice. Bupivacaine still remains a popular choice of local anesthetic for labor analgesia. New local anesthetics with less cardiotoxicity have been introduced, but their cost effectiveness in the current labor analgesia practice has been questioned.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2008

This paper is the 31st consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2008 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).