Reactive Oxygen Species Induced Upregulation of TRPV1 in Dorsal Root Ganglia Results in Low Back Pain in Rats

Background

Dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) contain sensory neurons that innervate intervertebral discs (IVDs) and may play a critical role in mediating low-back pain (LBP), but the potential pathophysiological mechanism needs to be clarified.

Methods

A discogenic LBP model in rats was established by penetration of a lumbar IVD. The severity of LBP was evaluated through behavioral analysis, and the gene and protein expression levels of pro-algesic peptide substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in DRGs were quantified. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in bilateral lumbar DRGs was also quantified using dihydroethidium staining. Subsequently, hydrogen peroxide solution or N-acetyl-L-cysteine was injected into DRGs to evaluate the change in LBP, and gene and protein expression levels of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) in DRGs were analyzed. Finally, an inhibitor or activator of TRPV1 was injected into DRGs to observe the change in LBP.

Results

The rats had remarkable LBP after disc puncture, manifesting as mechanical and cold allodynia and increased expression of the pro-algesic peptides SP and CGRP in DRGs. Furthermore, there was significant overexpression of ROS in bilateral lumbar DRGs, while manipulation of the level of ROS in DRGs attenuated or aggravated LBP in rats. In addition, excessive ROS in DRGs stimulated upregulation of TRPV1 in DRGs. Finally, activation or inhibition of TRPV1 in DRGs resulted in a significant increase or decrease of discogenic LBP, respectively, suggesting that ROS-induced TRPV1 has a strong correlation with discogenic LBP.

Conclusion

Increased ROS in DRGs play a primary pathological role in puncture-induced discogenic LBP, and excessive ROS-induced upregulation of TRPV1 in DRGs may be the underlying pathophysiological mechanism to cause nerve sensitization and discogenic LBP. Therapeutic targeting of ROS or TRPV1 in DRGs may provide a promising method for the treatment of discogenic LBP.

Anatomic zone division and clinical significance of the lumbar sinuvertebral nerves

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Discogenic low-back pain (DLBP) is one of the primary causes of low back pain (LBP) and is associated with internal disk disruptions and is mainly transmitted by the sinuvertebral nerve (SVN). The lack of a universal understanding of the anatomical characteristics of the SVN has compromised surgical treatment for DLPB.

PURPOSE

This study aims to elaborate on the anatomical characteristics of the SVN and to discuss their possible clinical significance.

STUDY DESIGN

The SVNs were dissected and immunostained in ten human lumbar specimens.

METHODS

The SVNs at the segments from L1-L2 to L5-S1 in ten human cadavers were studied, and the number, origin, course, diameter, anastomotic branches, and branching points of the SVNs were documented. Three longitudinal and five transverse zones were defined in the dorsal coronal plane of the vertebral body and disc. The vertebrae were divided longitudinally as follows: the region between the medial edges of the bilateral pedicles is divided into three equal parts, the middle third is zone I and the lateral third on both sides are zones II; the areas lateral to the medial margin of the pedicle were zones Ⅲ.The transverse zones were designated as follows: a)superior margin of the vertebral body to superior margin of the pedicle; b) between superior and inferior margins of the pedicle; c) inferior margin of the pedicle to inferior margin of the vertebral body; d) superior margin of the disc to the midline of the disc; and e) midline of the disc to the inferior margin of the disc. The distribution characteristics of SVNs in various zones were recorded, and tissue sections were immunostained with anti-NF 200 and anti-PGP 9.5.

RESULTS

The SVNs are divided into main trunks and deputy branches, with 109 main trunks and 451 deputy branches identified in the 100 lumbar intervertebral foramens (IVFs). The main trunks of the SVN originate from the spinal nerve and/or the communicating branch, but the deputy branch originating from both roots was not observed. All the main trunks and deputy branches of the SVNs originate from the posterolateral disc (Ⅲ d and Ⅲ e). The deputy branches of the SVN primarily innervate the posterolateral aspect of the intervertebral disc (Ⅲ d 46.78%, Ⅲ e 36.36%) and the subpedicular vertebral body (Ⅲ c 16.85%). The main trunk of the SVNs passes primarily through the subpedicular vertebral body (Ⅲ c 96.33%) and divides into ascending, transverse, and descending branches in the IVF: Ⅲ c (23/101, 22.77%) or spinal canal: Ⅱ c (73/101, 72.28%), Ⅱ d (3/101, 2.97%), Ⅱ b (2/101, 1.98%). The main trunk possesses extensive innervation, and except for the most medial discs (Ⅰ d and Ⅰ e), it almost dominates all other zones of the spinal canal. At the segments from L1-L2 to L5-S1, 39 ipsilateral anastomoses connecting the ascending branch to the main trunk or spinal nerve at the upper level were observed, with one contralateral anastomosis observed at L5.

CONCLUSION

The zone distribution characteristics of SVNs are similar across all levels. Comparatively, the proportion of double-root origin and the number of insertion points of the SVNs increased at the lower level. The three types of anastomosis offer connections between SVNs at the same level and at different levels. The posteromedial disc is innervated by corresponding and subjacent main trunks, with the posterolateral disc mainly innervated by the deputy branch.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Detailed information and zone distribution characteristics of the lumbar SVNs can help improve clinicians' understanding of DLBP and improve the effectiveness of treatments targeting the SVNs.

Origin, branching pattern, foraminal and intraspinal distribution of the human lumbar sinuvertebral nerves

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The lumbar sinuvertebral nerve (SVN) innervates the outer posterior intervertebral disc (IVD); it is thought to mediate discogenic low-back pain (LBP). Controversy, however, exists on its origins at higher (L1-L2) versus lower (L3-L5) lumbar levels. Additionally, lack of knowledge regarding its foraminal and intraspinal branching patterns and extensions may lead to iatrogenic damage.

PURPOSE

To systematically describe the origins of the L2 and L5 SVNs, their morphological variation in the intervertebral foramen (IVF) and intraspinal distribution.

STUDY DESIGN

Dissection-based study of 20 SVNs with histological confirmation in five embalmed human cadavers.

METHODS

The origin, branching pattern and distribution of the L2 and L5 SVNs was investigated bilaterally in five human cadavers using dorsal and anterolateral dissection approaches. Parameters studied included somatic and/or autonomic SVN root contributions, foraminal SVN morphology and course, diameter, branching point, intraspinal distribution and IVD innervation pattern. Nerve tissue was confirmed by immunostaining for neurofilament and S100 proteins.

RESULTS

The SVN and its origins was identified in all except one IVF at L2 and in all foramina at L5. At L2, the SVN arose in nearly 90% of sides from both somatic and autonomic roots and at L5 in 40% of sides. The remaining SVNs were formed by purely autonomic roots. The SVN arose from significantly more roots at L2 than L5 (3.1 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3, respectively; p=.022). Four different SVN morphologies could be discerned in the L2 IVF: single filament (22%), multiple (parallel or diverging) filament (33%), immediate splitting (22%) and plexiform (22%) types, whereas the L5 SVN consisted of single (90%) and multiple (10%) filament types. SVN filaments were significantly thicker at L2 than L5 (0.48 ± 0.06 mm vs. 0.33 ± 0.02 mm, respectively; p=.043). Ascending SVN filaments coursed roughly parallel to the exiting spinal nerve root trajectory at L2 and L5. Branching of the SVN into ascending and descending branches occurred mostly intraspinal both at L2 and L5. Spinal canal distribution was also similar for L2 and L5 SVNs. Lumbar posterior IVDs were innervated by the descending branch of the parent SVN and ascending branch of the subjacent SVN.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVN at L2 originates from both somatic and autonomic roots in 90% of cases and at L5 in 40% of cases. The remaining SVNs are purely autonomic. In the IVF, the L2 SVN is morphologically heterogeneous, but generally consists of numerous filaments, whereas at L5 90% contains a single SVN filament. The L2 SVN is formed by more roots and is thicker than the L5 SVN. Intraspinal SVN distribution is confined to its level of origin; lumbar posterior IVDs are innervated by corresponding and subjacent SVNs (ie, two spinal levels).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings indicate that L5 discogenic LBP may be mediated both segmentally and nonsegmentally in 40% of cases and nonsegmentally in 60% of cases. Failure of lower lumbar discogenic pain treatment may be the result of only interrupting the nonsegmental pathway, but not the segmental one as well. Relating SVN anatomy to microsurgical spinal approaches may prevent iatrogenic damage to the SVN and the formation of postsurgical back pain.

Motor and Sensory Impairments of the Lower Extremities After L2 Nerve Root Transection During Total en Bloc Spondylectomy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine motor and sensory impairments of the lower extremities after L2 nerve root transection during total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for spinal tumors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

At our institute, for TES at L3 to L5 lumbar levels, the nerve roots are preserved. However, at the level of L1 and L2, the vertebral resection and spinal reconstruction via a posterior approach is employed with transection of the nerve roots during dissection and resection of the vertebra.

METHODS

This study included 13 patients who had undergone TES for spinal tumors involving L2 between 2007 and 2016. Postoperative motor function of the lower extremities was quantified using the Manual Muscle Testing grade for the iliopsoas (IP) and quadriceps femoris (QF) muscles, and a grade of the modified Frankel Classification. Postoperative sensory impairment was quantified by the sites of lower extremity pain and numbness.

RESULTS

An initial decrease in strength of the IP and QF muscles in more than 60% of the patients, with a decline in the modified Frankel grade in 76.9%, was observed at 1-week after surgery. All patients recovered by the final follow-up, with 12 of the 13 patients walking without a gait aid. The other patient, who had undergone a bilateral dissection of L3 nerve root during TES of L2 and L3, had a mild QF muscle weakness, requiring a cane for walking. Eleven of 13 patients developed pain or numbness in the groin or thigh area after surgery, with the most common area being the anterior aspect of the thigh.

CONCLUSION

Although IP and QF weakness was observed in the majority of patients who underwent bilateral transection of L2 nerve roots during TES, these deficits recovered over time and did not finally affect activities of daily living.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Disruption of the network between Onuf's nucleus and myenteric ganglia, and developing Hirschsprung-like disease following spinal subarachnoid haemorrhage: an experimental study

Purpose/Aim of the study: Auerbach/Meissner network of lower abdominopelvic organs managed by parasympathetic nerve fibres of lumbosacral roots arising from Onuf's nucleus located in conus medullaris. Aim of this study is to evaluate if there is any relationship between Onuf's nucleus ischemia and Auerbach/Meissner network degeneration following spinal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Materials and Methods: Study was conducted on 24 male rabbits included control (Group I, n = 5), serum saline-SHAM (Group II, n = 5), and spinal SAH (Group III, n = 14) groups. Spinal SAH performed by injecting homologous blood into subarachnoid space at Th₁₂-L₄ level and followed three weeks. Live and degenerated neuron densities of Onuf's nucleus, Auerbach and Meissner ganglia (n/mm³) were determined by Stereological methods. Results: The mean degenerated neuron density of Onuf's nucleus was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (152 ± 26, 2 ± 1 and 5 ± 2/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). The degenerated neuron density of Auerbach's ganglia was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (365 ± 112, 3 ± 1 and 9 ± 3/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). The degenerated neuron density of Meissner's ganglia was significantly higher in Group III than in Groups I-II (413 ± 132, 2 ± 1 and 11 ± 4/mm³ respectively, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Onuf's nucleus pathologies should be considered as Auerbach/Meissner ganglia degeneration and also related Hirschsprung-like diseases in the future.

Pulsed radiofrequency in clinical practice - A retrospective analysis of 238 patients with chronic non-cancer pain treated at an academic tertiary pain centre

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pulsed radiofrequency is a non-neurodestructive invasive pain treatment which, in contrast to conventional continuous radiofrequency treatment, does not entail nerve tissue destruction. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the short-term benefits of a broad use of pulsed radiofrequency in clinical practice.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated with pulsed radiofrequency, or who received a diagnostic test block with a local anaesthetic in view of such a treatment, were retrospectively analysed. The patients had been referred to a tertiary pain centre in Sweden. The treatment effect one month after pulsed radiofrequency was retrospectively graded as follows, based on the wordings of the medical records: major improvement; minor improvement; no change; or worsened.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients received 587 interventions from 2009 to 2014. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) was by far the most common treatment indication (57% of patients), followed by CLBP with sciatica (9%). The age at first pulsed radiofrequency was 55 (15-94) years (mean, range), and 65% were female. Thirty-six patients (15%) underwent only a diagnostic test block using a local anaesthetic, i.e., the test block did not lead to treatment with pulsed radiofrequency. A total of 445 pulsed radiofrequency interventions were performed on 202 patients. Dichotomizing data into responders (i.e., minor or major improvement) and non-responders (i.e., worsened or no change), we found that, out of 63 responders to a median branch diagnostic test block (either at the cervical or lumbar level), 33 were responders to the first following median branch pulsed radiofrequency. Hence the positive predictive value of a median branch test block was 52%. In 127 patients, the lumbar level was targeted for median branch pulsed radiofrequency because of clinically suspected lumbar facetogenic pain. Looking at the first treatment, 30% experienced major improvement after 1 month, 16% minor improvement, 36% no change, 5% a worsened situation, and the effect was not assessable in 13% of patients. Lone dorsal root ganglion L2-treatment for suspected discogenic lumbar pain was done on 39 patients and, after one month, the effect was not assessable in 17% of patients, 14% had major improvement, 14% minor improvement, and 55% had no change. In 40 patients, a dorsal root ganglion or a peripheral nerve was targeted because of a non-axial chronic pain condition. There was a plethora of indications, but the most common was by far related to some form of neuropathic pain (52% of interventions, mainly because of neuralgia), followed by chronic nociceptive shoulder pain (8% of interventions).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, after one month, the effect size of a broad and indiscriminate clinical use of pulsed radiofrequency is rather small.

IMPLICATIONS

The clinical effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency has to be investigated further in carefully selected and more homogenous patient groups, in order to define effective treatment niches for this nondestructive invasive treatment method.

The potential impact of various diagnostic strategies in cases of chronic pain syndromes associated with lumbar spine degeneration

Purpose

To study the possible effects of various diagnostic strategies and the relative contribution of various structures in order to determine the optimal diagnostic strategy in treating patients with noncompressive pain syndromes.

Study design

Prospective, nonrandomized cohort study of 83 consecutive patients with noncompressive pain syndromes resistant to repeated courses of conservative treatment. The follow-up period was 18 months.

Results

Nucleoplasty was effective in cases of discogenic pain; the consequences related to false positive results of the discography were significant. The most specific criterion was 80% pain relief after facet joint blocks, whereas 50% pain relief and any subjective pain relief were not associated with a significant increase in the success rate. A considerable rate of false negative results was associated with 80% pain relief, whereas 50% pain relief after facet joint blocks showed the optimal ratio of sensitivity and specificity. Facet joint pain was detected in 50.6% of cases (95% confidence interval 44.1%–66.3%), discogenic pain in 16.9% cases (95% confidence interval 9.5%–26.7%), and sacroiliac joint pain in 7.2% cases (95% confidence interval 2.7%–15%). It was impossible to differentiate the main source of pain in 25.3% of cases.

Conclusion

It is rational to adjust the diagnostic algorithm to the probability of detecting a particular pain source and, in doing so, reduce the number of invasive diagnostic measures to evaluate a pain source. False positive results of diagnostic measures can negatively affect the overall efficacy of a particular technology; therefore, all reasons for the failure should be studied in order to reach an unbiased conclusion. In choosing diagnostic criteria, not only should the success rate of a particular technology be taken into consideration but also the rate of false negative results. Acceptable diagnostic criteria should be based on a rational balance of sensitivity and specificity.

Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block: potential and practice

Paravertebral nerve blocks (PVBs) can provide excellent intraoperative anaesthetic and postoperative analgesic conditions with less adverse effects and fewer contraindications than central neural blocks. Most published data are related to unilateral PVB, but its potential as a bilateral technique has been demonstrated. Bilateral PVB has been used successfully in the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions, sometimes obviating the need for general anaesthesia. We have reviewed the use of bilateral PVB in association with surgery and chronic pain therapy. This covers 12 published studies with a total of 538 patients, and with varied methods and outcome measures. Despite the need for relatively large doses of local anaesthetics, there are no reports of systemic toxicity. The incidence of complications such as pneumothorax and hypotension is low. More studies on the use of bilateral PVB are required.