Electrocardiographic and blood pressure alterations caused by intravenous injection of ropivacaine - a study in piglets

OBJECTIVES

Objective signs to detect inadvertent intravascular injection of local anesthetics are essential in the anesthetized pediatric patient. For early detection of intravenous bupivacaine administration, it was shown that an epinephrine containing test dose reliably provoked T-wave alterations, changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure, whereas intravenous injection of plain bupivacaine could not be detected until high doses were applied. This study investigates electrocardiographic and hemodynamic alterations caused by intravenous ropivacaine.

METHODS

Twenty-four piglets, anesthetized with sevoflurane, were randomized into two groups: Group R received as test dose plain ropivacaine 0.2% and group RE, ropivacaine 0.2% + epinephrine 5 μg·ml(-1) . Under stable conditions, 0.2 ml kg(-1) of the test solution was intravenously injected. Twenty minutes later, 0.4 ml kg(-1) was applied. A positive effect was defined as HR increase ≥ 10 bpm, increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 15 mmHg, T-wave increase ≥ 25% baseline. In another setting ropivacaine was intravenously infused until cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

After injection of 0.2 or 0.4 ml kg(-1) test solution, a positive increase in HR and MAP was found in 0% of group R and in 100% of group RE. An increase in T-wave ≥ 25% was found in 42% of group R and in 100% of group RE. During intoxication, T-elevation was seen in 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

An epinephrine containing test dose ropivacaine reliably provoked T-wave elevations and increases in HR and MAP. A small dose plain ropivacaine caused T-elevations in a remarkable percentage, whereas higher, quite toxic doses provoked T-elevations in most of the pigs.

Recent developments in paediatric neuraxial blocks

Paediatric anaesthesia and paediatric regional anaesthesia are intertwined. Almost all surgeries unless contradicted could be and should be supplemented with a regional block. The main objective of this review is to elaborate on the recent advances of the central neuraxial blocks, such as application of ultrasound guidance and electrical stimulation in the pursuit of safety and an objective end point. This review also takes account of the traditional technique and understand the benefits as well the risk of each as compared with the recent technique. The recent trends in choosing the most appropriate peripheral block for a given surgery thereby sparing the central neuroaxis is considered. A penile block for circumcision or a sciatic block for unilateral foot surgery, rather than caudal epidural would have a better risk benefit equation. Readers will find a special mention on the recent thoughts on continuous epidural analgesia in paediatrics, especially its rise and fall, yet its unique importance. Lastly, the issue of block placements under sedation or general anaesthesia with its implication in this special population is dealt with. We conducted searches in MEDLINE (PubMed) and assessed the relevance of the abstracts of citations identified from literature searches. The search was carried out in English, for last 10 years, with the following key words: Recent advances in paediatric regional anaesthesia; ultrasound guidance for central neuraxial blocks in children; role of electrical stimulation in neuraxial blocks in children; complications in neuraxial block. Full-text articles of potentially relevant abstracts were retrieved for further review.

Caudal blocks

Caudal anesthesia is the single most important pediatric regional anesthetic technique. The technique is relatively easy to learn (1), has a remarkable safety record (2), and can be used for a large variety of procedures. The technique has been reviewed in the English (3) and French (4) literature, as well as in German guidelines (5) and in pediatric anesthesia textbooks (6).

Controversial issues in pediatric regional anesthesia

Regional anesthesia in children has reached in the last decades a widespread approval and today is a valid and effective technique used in the daily activity in many pediatric centres. Data from surveys and studies show the very low rate of complications and suggest that the use of regional techniques in children is at least as safe as general anesthesia alone. Despite these evidences there are aspects still creating discussions on the best approach to avoid or prevent risks and on the way to make this techniques more and more reliable and safe. Compartment syndrome, test dose, loss-of-resistance technique and blocks performed under general anesthesia are examples of, sometimes, never-ending stories; this review without the presumption to solve every problem shows the more recent data to offer, if possible, the best updated-answer on these topics.

[Bupivacaine toxicity and propofol anesthesia : animal study on intravascular bupivacaine injection]

BACKGROUND

Several reports have confirmed the efficacy of Intralipid® (containing soya bean oil, egg phospholipids, glycerin and water) in the therapy of systemic local anesthetic intoxication. Pretreatment with Intralipid® shifted the dose-response to bupivacaine-induced asystole in rats. Whether intravenous anesthesia with propofol in the widely used medium chain triglyceride lipid emulsion increases the therapeutic range of systemically administered bupivacaine or not is unknown and was investigated in this study.

METHODS

A total of 30 piglets aged 2-6 weeks and weighing 4.5-6.5 kg were randomized into 2 groups and anesthetized with sevoflurane (group S) alone or with propofol 10 mg/kg body weight (BW)/h plus sevoflurane (group PS). After 60 min of steady state anesthesia arterial blood was sampled for assessment of blood gases, acid-base state and triglyceride plasma concentrations. Thereafter bupivacaine 0.125% was continuously infused by an infusion syringe pump through a central venous line at a rate of 4 mg/kg BW/min until invasively measured mean arterial pressure (MAP) was reduced by 50% of initial value. The bupivacaine infusion was stopped, blood for assessment of bupivacaine plasma concentration was drawn and the spontaneous hemodynamic course was observed. Resuscitation was not attempted. Results are presented as median and range. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess differences between the two groups for triglyceride as well as for bupivacaine plasma concentrations measured at MAP 50%. A p-value≤0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Baseline conditions (arterial blood pH, plasma protein and triglyceride plasma concentrations) did not differ significantly between the two groups. After 1 h of anesthesia, triglyceride plasma concentrations were significantly increased in group PS (median 0.69 mmol/l) compared to the corresponding baseline values (median 0.14 mmol/l; p<0.001) and to the 1 h values of group S (median 0.16 mmol/l; p<0.001). The total amount of bupivacaine administered was 9 mg/kg BW in both groups (6-13 mg/kg BW in group S, 5-13 mg/kg BW in group PS). Resulting bupivacaine plasma concentrations were 180 μmol/l (83-686 μmol/l) in group S and 185 μmol/l (130-465 μmol/l) in group PS. However, the total amount of bupivacaine administered and bupivacaine plasma concentrations at MAP 50% did not reveal statistically significant differences between the two groups but a huge variability of both parameters within each group was observed. None of the 30 piglets spontaneously recovered and they died from pulseless electrical activity or from asystolic cardiac arrest. The time from MAP 50% until cardiac arrest demonstrated a large variability but did not reveal significant differences between the two groups. The time to cardiac arrest was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Medium/long chain triglyceride lipid emulsion (50:50) as widely used in propofol solutions did not increase therapeutic safety in cases of intravascular bupivacaine administration in this piglet model.

Impact of propofol on electrocardiographic alterations during intravascular application of bupivacaine--a study in piglets

BACKGROUND

Intravascular application of a small dose of local anesthetics (LA) with epinephrine as well as larger doses of LA under sevoflurane anesthesia results in increase in T-wave amplitude in the electrocardiogram (ECG). The aim of this study was to elucidate whether propofol anesthesia affects these ECG alterations or not.

METHODS

Thirty neonatal pigs were randomized into two groups. Group 1 was anesthetized with sevoflurane, group 2 with sevoflurane plus continuous propofol infusion (10 mg·kg(-1)·h(-1)). A test dose of 0.2 ml·kg(-1) bupivacaine 0.125% + epinephrine 1 : 200,000 was injected intravenously. Arterial pressure was monitored. ECG was analyzed for changes in T-wave amplitude (positive if ≥25% baseline) and heart rate. In another setting, bupivacaine 0.125% was intravenous infused at a rate of 4 mg·kg(-1)·min(-1). ECG was analyzed for alteration in T-wave amplitude and heart rate at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg·kg(-1) bupivacaine infused.

RESULTS

T-wave elevation after the administration of an epinephrine containing LA test dose was similar between the two groups. Increase in heart rate caused by the test dose were significantly higher in group 2 (P = 0.008). During continuous bupivacaine administration, T-wave elevation occurred in 40% and 71% (group 1 and 2) at 1.25 mg·kg(-1), in 80% and 100% at 2.5 mg·kg(-1), and in 93% and 86% at 5 mg·kg(-1) bupivacaine infused.

CONCLUSION

Continuous propofol infusion does not suppress the ECG signs of a systemically administered epinephrine containing LA test dose nor does it suppress the ECG signs caused by high doses of intravenous applied bupivacaine.