Analgesic efficacy and haemodynamic effects of nefopam in critically ill patients

Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Comparison with Intrathecal Morphine and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumor treatment provides ergonomic advantages to surgeons and improves surgical outcomes. However, moderate-to-severe pain is unavoidable even after minimally invasive surgery. Despite the growing interest in multimodal analgesia, few studies have directly compared its efficacy with intrathecal morphine, a traditional opioid-based analgesic. Methods: We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of multimodal analgesia compared with that of intrathecal analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN at our institute between 2020 and 2022. Among the 334 patients who met the inclusion criteria, intrathecal analgesia using morphine 200 µg was performed in 131 patients, and multimodal analgesia, including transversus abdominis plane block and intraoperative infusion of paracetamol 1 g and nefopam 20 mg, was administered to 105 patients. The remaining 98 patients received postoperative IV-PCA alone. Results: As the primary outcome, the area under the curve of pain scores over 24 h was significantly lower in the intrathecal analgesia and multimodal analgesia groups than in the IV-PCA group (89 [62-108] vs. 86 [65-115] vs. 108 [87-126] h, p < 0.001). Cumulative opioid requirements were also significantly lower in the intrathecal analgesia and multimodal analgesia groups at 24 h after surgery (p < 0.001). However, postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly increased in the intrathecal analgesia group (27.5% vs. 13.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia with a transversus abdominis plane block is an efficient analgesic method with fewer adverse effects compared to other analgesic methods. Our findings suggest the efficacy and safety of a multimodal approach for opioid-sparing analgesia after RAPN in the current opioid epidemic.

Y-site compatibility of intravenous medications commonly used in intensive care units: laboratory tests on 75 mixtures involving nine main drugs

Objectives

Patients hospitalized in intensive care units often require multiple drug infusions. Due to limited intravenous accesses, concomitant administration of drugs in the same infusion line is often necessary. Compatibility studies of Y-site administration are available in the literature, but data of several combinations are lacking. Previous work from d’Huart et al. have performed an observation of the administration of injectable drugs in three adults ICUs and identified a list of Y-site administration without compatibility data. The objective of this study was to test the physical compatibility of the main drugs of this list used in pairs in Y-site infusions in critical care units, in order to provide new compatibility data to the literature, and to secure the administration of intravenous drugs.

Methods

The physical compatibility in Y-site of nine drugs with other drugs commonly used in intensive care units has been tested. Examinations were performed on 75 mixtures after their preparation, after 1 and 4-h storage. This evaluation included a visual examination with a search for precipitation formation, color change, gas formation, and a subvisual evaluation: absorbance measurements by UV-visible spectrophotometry at 350, 410 and 550 nm, and Light Obscuration Particle Count Test. The pH evaluation was performed at each time of analysis.

Results

Laboratory tests led to an overall compatibility of 68.0% for all mixtures obtained in this study. Nefopam was found to be quite compatible with other drugs (95.0%). Amiodarone hydrochloride (84.6%), acetylsalicylic acid (80.0%), clonidine hydrochloride (75.0%) and insulin (71.4%) were compatible with other drugs too. Atenolol (42.9%), furosemide (25.0%), heparin sodium (25.0%) showed less compatible results. Pantoprazole sodium (0.0%) was not at all compatible with the other drugs analyzed.

Conclusions

By the results of these laboratory tests, missing compatibility data are now available, providing additional information to the literature.

Adjuvant Analgesic Use in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the efficacy and safety of nonopioid adjunctive analgesics for patients in the ICU.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU

OBJECTIVE

To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU.

DESIGN

Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017.

METHODS

Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified.

RESULTS

The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.

Non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid for pain management in adult patients in the ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To identify the impact of non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid on opioid consumption and its side effects, as well as the analgesic effectiveness in adult patients in the ICU.

METHODS

Only randomized clinical trials using non-opioid analgesics for analgesia in the ICU were included. Pooled analyses with 95% CI were determined.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (mainly surgical and Guillain-Barre syndrome patients) were included. Non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid were associated with a significant reduction in the consumption of opioids when compared with opioid use alone at Day 1 (MD -15.40; 95% CI -22.41 to -8.39; P < .001) and Day 2 (MD -22.93; 95% CI -27.70 to -18.16; P < .001). Non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid were associated with a significantly lower incidence of nausea and vomiting when compared with opioid use alone (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.68; P < .001). Non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid significantly decreased the pain score at Day 1 (MD -0.68; 95% CI -1.28 to -0.08; P = .03) and Day 2 (MD -1.36; 95% CI -2.47 to -0.24; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid analgesics as adjuvants to opioid reduced the consumption and the side effects of opioids in adult surgical and Guillain-Barre syndrome patients in the ICU.

TRIAL REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews on January 23, 2017, registration number CRD42017055768.

Median effective dose of nefopam to treat postoperative pain in patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Objective

Nefopam is thought to reduce postoperative pain; however, the evidence is insufficient. The recommended dose is 20 mg, and the median effective dose (ED50) in the surgical setting reportedly ranges from 17 to 28 mg. However, nefopam frequently produces inadequate postoperative analgesia. We evaluated the ED50 of nefopam as a single agent in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a numerical pain scale (NPS). When the NPS score was >3, patients were administered a predetermined dose of nefopam. The dose was calculated using the up-and-down allocation technique based on the previous response. The initial dose was 28 mg, with adjustment intervals of 5 mg. An effective response was defined as a decrease in the NPS score to <3 at 30 minutes after infusion.

Results

The ED50 of nefopam was 62.1 mg (95% confidence interval, 52.9–72.9 mg). Eight patients reported pain upon injection, and three were excluded due to severe injection pain and phlebitis.

Conclusions

The estimated ED50 was higher than the predetermined dose based on previous studies. We recommend that the dose of nefopam be chosen after careful consideration of individual variations and clinical settings.

Effects of nefopam on catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing ureteroscopic litholapaxy

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo urinary catheterization may experience postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD). Previous studies have indicated that drugs with antimuscarinic effects could reduce the incidence and severity of CRBD. Accordingly, this study was carried out to investigate whether nefopam, a centrally acting analgesic with concomitant antimuscarinic effect, reduces the incidence and severity of CRBD.

METHODS

Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II and aged 18-70 years who were scheduled to undergo elective ureteroscopic litholapaxy participated in this double-blinded study. Patients were divided into control and nefopam groups, comprising 30 patients each. In the nefopam group, 40 mg nefopam in 100 ml of 0.9% saline was administered intravenously. In the control group, only 100 ml of 0.9% saline was administered. All patients had a urethral catheter and ureter stent inserted during surgery. The incidence and severity of CRBD, numerical rating scale (NRS) score of postoperative pain, rescue pethidine dose, and side effects were recorded in the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery.

RESULTS

The incidence (P = 0.020) and severity (P < 0.001) of CRBD were significantly different between the control group and the nefopam group. The NRS score of postoperative pain (P = 0.006) and rescue dose of pethidine (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the control group than in the nefopam group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of nefopam in patients scheduled to undergo ureteroscopic litholapaxy reduced the incidence and severity of CRBD, NRS score of postoperative pain and analgesic requirements.

Effects of nefopam on emergence agitation after general anesthesia for nasal surgery: A prospective, randomized, and controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Emergence agitation (EA) occurs frequently after nasal surgery. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists and analgesics, such as fentanyl, have been shown to prevent EA. Nefopam inhibits the NMDA receptor and shows a potent analgesic effect. We investigated the effects of nefopam on EA in patients undergoing nasal surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind study, 100 adult patients were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 groups (each n = 50). Patients received 20 mg of nefopam in 98 mL of saline for 20 minutes immediately after induction of anesthesia (nefopam group) or 100 mL of saline (control group) in the same manner. After surgery, the incidence and degree of EA, time for extubation, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events were evaluated by an observer blinded to the group allocation.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of EA was lower in the nefopam group than in the control group (34% [17/50] vs 54% [27/50], respectively; P = .044). The incidence of severe EA was also lower in the nefopam group than in the control group (8% [4/50] vs 38% [19/50], respectively; P = .001). Heart rate (HR) was higher in the nefopam group than in the control group from the end of surgery to 3 minutes after extubation (P = .008). Time for extubation and adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nefopam infusion is effective in preventing and reducing the severity of EA after nasal surgery without a delay in extubation. However, caution is required regarding the increase in HR.

Comparison of effect of electroacupuncture and nefopam for prevention of postanesthetic shivering in patients undergoing urologic operation under spinal anesthesia

Background

Shivering during spinal anesthesia is a frequent complication and is induced by the core-to-peripheral redistribution of heat. Nefopam has minimal side effects and prevents shivering by reducing the shivering threshold. Electroacupuncture is known to prevent shivering by preserving the core body temperature. We compared the efficacies of electroacupuncture and nefopam for the prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia.

Methods

Ninety patients scheduled for elective urological surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into the control group (Group C, n = 30), the electroacupuncture group (Group A, n = 30), and the nefopam group (Group N, n = 30). Groups C and A received 100 ml of isotonic saline intravenously for 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia, while Group N received nefopam (0.15 mg/kg) mixed in 100 ml of isotonic saline. Group A received 30 minutes of electroacupuncture before receiving anesthesia. Shivering scores, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, body temperature and side effects were recorded before, and at 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia.

Results

The incidence of postanesthetic shivering was significantly lower in Group N (10 of 30) and Group A (4 of 30) compared with that in Group C (18 of 30)(P < 0.017). Body temperature was higher in Group N and Group A than in Group C (P < 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters were not different among the groups.

Conclusions

By maintaining body temperature during spinal anesthesia, electroacupuncture is as effective as nefopam in preventing postanesthetic shivering.

Analgesia in Neurocritical Care: An International Survey and Practice Audit

OBJECTIVE

To characterize analgesic administration in neurocritical care.

DESIGN

ICU pharmacy database analgesic delivery audits from five countries. A 31-question analgesic agent survey was constructed, validated, and e-distributed in four countries.

SETTING

International multicenter neuro-ICU database audit and electronic survey.

PATIENTS

Six ICUs provided individual, anonymized analgesic delivery data in primary neurological diagnosis patients. Prescriber surveys were disseminated by neurocritical care societies.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Analgesic delivery data from 173 patients in French, Canadian, American, and Australian and New Zealand ICUs suggest that acetaminophen/paracetamol is the most common first-line analgesic (49.1% of patients); opiates are the "second line" in 31.5% of patients; however, 33% patients received no second agent. In the 2.3% with demyelinating disease, gabapentin was the most likely second analgesic (50.0%). Third-line analgesics were scarce across sites and neuropathologies. Few national or regional differences were found. The analgesic preference rankings noted by the 95 international physicians who completed the survey matched the audits. However, self-reported analgesic prescription rates were much higher than pharmacy records indicate, with self-reported prescribing of both acetaminophen/paracetamol and opiates in 97% of patients and gabapentin in 45% of patients. Third-line analgesic variability appeared to be driven by neuropathology; ibuprofen was preferred for traumatic brain injury, postcraniotomy, and thromboembolic stroke patients, whereas gabapentin/pregabalin were favored in subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, spine, demyelinating disease, and epileptic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Opiates and acetaminophen are preferred analgesic agents, and gabapentin is a contextual third choice, in neurocritically ill patients. Other agents are rarely prescribed. The discordance in physician self-reports and objective audits suggest that pain management optimization studies are warranted.

Ten Myths and Misconceptions Regarding Pain Management in the ICU

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to expose common myths and misconceptions regarding pain assessment and management in critically ill patients that interfere with effective care. We comprehensively review the literature refuting these myths and misconceptions and describe evidence-based strategies for improving pain management in the ICU.

DATA SOURCES

Current peer-reviewed academic journals, as well as standards and guidelines from professional societies.

STUDY SELECTION

The most current evidence was selected for review based on the highest degree of supportive evidence.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were obtained via medical search databases, including OvidSP, and the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE database via PubMed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

After a comprehensive literature review, conclusions were drawn based on the strength of evidence and the most current understanding of pain management practices in ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Myths and misconceptions regarding management of pain in the ICU are prevalent. Review of current evidence refutes these myths and misconceptions and provides insights and recommendations to ensure best practices.

Population pharmacokinetics of nefopam in elderly, with or without renal impairment, and its link to treatment response

AIMS

Nefopam is a nonmorphinic central analgesic, for which no recommendation exists concerning adaptation of regimen in aged patients with or without renal impairment. The objective was to describe the pharmacology of nefopam in aged patients to obtain guidelines for practical use.

METHODS

Elderly patients (n = 48), 65-99 years old, with severe or moderate renal impairment or with normal renal function, were recruited. Nefopam (20 mg) was administered as a 30 min infusion postoperatively. Simultaneously, a 1 min intravenous infusion of iohexol was performed, in order to calculate the glomerular filtration rate. Blood samples were drawn to determine nefopam, desmethyl-nefopam and iohexol plasma concentrations. Nefopam and desmethyl-nefopam concentrations were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach with Monolix version 4.1.3. The association between pharmacokinetic parameters and treatment response was assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A two-compartment open model was selected to describe the pharmacokinetics of nefopam. The typical population estimates (between-subject variability) for clearance, volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral volume were, respectively, 17.3 l h(-1) (53.2%), 114 l (121%), 80.7 l h(-1) (79%) and 208 l (63.6%). Morphine requirement was related to exposure of nefopam. Tachycardia and postoperative nausea and vomiting were best associated with maximal concentration and the rate of increase in nefopam plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the nefopam pharmacokinetic predictors for morphine requirement and side-effects, such as tachycardia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. In order to maintain morphine sparing and decrease side-effects following a single dose of nefopam (20 mg), simulations suggest an infusion time of >45 min in elderly patients with or without renal impairment.

A randomized controlled trial of fentanyl in the pre-emptive treatment of pain associated with turning in patients under mechanical ventilation: research protocol

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and safety of fentanyl with placebo as pre-emptive treatment for pain associated with turning in patients in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND

Turning is frequently a painful procedure in this setting. Pre-emptive administration of supplementary analgesia may help decrease this pain. However, medical literature on pre-emptive analgesia in these patients is scarce.

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

METHODS

This study will assess the benefits and risks of pre-emptive analgesia with fentanyl compared with placebo on turning-associated pain. Eighty patients will be recruited from among those older than 18 years and needing mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Behavioral Pain Scale. Primary outcome will be pain intensity between the baseline and 30 minutes after turning, measured by the area under the curve of the pain scale scores. Secondary outcomes will be the usefulness of physiological parameters and the Bispectral Index to measure pain and the safety of pre-emptive fentanyl in turning. The study protocol was approved in February 2011.

DISCUSSION

If pre-emptive fentanyl is more effective than placebo and reasonably safe, the results of the current study may change nursing attitude in managing turning in critically ill patients. As a consequence, pain may be decreased during this nursing procedure.

Palliative care in the ICU: relief of pain, dyspnea, and thirst--a report from the IPAL-ICU Advisory Board

PURPOSE

Pain, dyspnea, and thirst are three of the most prevalent, intense, and distressing symptoms of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In this report, the interdisciplinary Advisory Board of the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) Project brings together expertise in both critical care and palliative care along with current information to address challenges in assessment and management.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of literature focusing on intensive care and palliative care research related to palliation of pain, dyspnea, and thirst.

RESULTS

Evidence-based methods to assess pain are the enlarged 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for ICU patients able to self-report and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool or Behavior Pain Scale for patients who cannot report symptoms verbally or non-verbally. The Respiratory Distress Observation Scale is the only known behavioral scale for assessment of dyspnea, and thirst is evaluated by patient self-report using an 0-10 NRS. Opioids remain the mainstay for pain management, and all available intravenous opioids, when titrated to similar pain intensity end points, are equally effective. Dyspnea is treated (with or without invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation) by optimizing the underlying etiological condition, patient positioning and, sometimes, supplemental oxygen. Several oral interventions are recommended to alleviate thirst. Systematized improvement efforts addressing symptom management and assessment can be implemented in ICUs.

CONCLUSIONS

Relief of symptom distress is a key component of critical care for all ICU patients, regardless of condition or prognosis. Evidence-based approaches for assessment and treatment together with well-designed work systems can help ensure comfort and related favorable outcomes for the critically ill.

Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project)

INTRODUCTION

A quality-improvement project was conducted to reduce severe pain and stress-related events while moving ICU-patients.

METHODS

The Plan-Do-Check-Adjust cycle was studied during four one-month phases, separated by five-month interphases. All consecutive patients staying more than 24 hours were evaluated every morning while being moved for nursing care (bathing, massage, sheet-change, repositioning). Phase 1 was considered as the baseline. Implemented and adjusted quality-interventions were assessed at phases 2 and 3, respectively. An independent post-intervention control-audit was performed at Phase 4. Primary-endpoints were the incidence of severe pain defined by a behavioral pain scale > 5 or a 0 to 10 visual numeric rating scale > 6, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE): cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension, hypotension, desaturation, bradypnea or ventilatory distress. Pain, SAE, patients' characteristics and analgesia were compared among the phases by a multivariate mixed-effects model for repeated-measurements, adjusted on severity index, age, admission type (medical/surgical), intubation and sedation status.

RESULTS

During the four studied phases, 630 care procedures were analyzed in 53, 47, 43 and 50 patients, respectively. Incidence of severe pain decreased significantly from 16% (baseline) to 6% in Phase 3 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.33 (0.11; 0.98), P = 0.04) and 2% in Phase 4 (OR = 0.30 (0.12; 0.95), P = 0.02). Incidence of SAE decreased significantly from 37% (baseline) to 17% in Phase 3 and 21% in Phase 4. In multivariate analysis, SAE were independently associated with Phase 3 (OR = 0.40 (0.23; 0.72), P < 0.01), Phase 4 (OR = 0.53 (0.30; 0.92), P = 0.03), intubation status (OR = 1.91 (1.28; 2.85), P < 0.01) and severe pain (OR = 2.74 (1.54; 4.89), P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe pain and serious adverse events are common and strongly associated while moving ICU patients for nursing procedures. Quality improvement of pain management is associated with a decrease of serious adverse events. Careful documentation of pain management during mobilization for nursing procedures could be implemented as a health quality indicator in the ICU.

The pain, agitation, and delirium practice guidelines for adult critically ill patients: a post-publication perspective

The recently published Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit differ from earlier guidelines in the following ways: literature searches were performed in eight databases by a professional librarian; psychometric validation of assessment scales was considered in their recommendation; discrepancies in recommendation votes by guideline panel members are available in online supplements; and all recommendations were made exclusively on the basis of evidence available until December of 2010. Pain recognition and management remains challenging in the critically ill. Patient outcomes improve with routine pain assessment, use of co-analgesics and administration as well as dose adjustment of opiates to patient needs. Thoracic epidurals help ease patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Little data exists to guide clinicians as to the type or dose of co-analgesics; no opiate choice is associated with better patient outcomes. Lighter or no sedation is beneficial, and interruption is desirable in patients who require deep sedation for specific pathologic states. Delirium screening is probably useful; no treatment modality can be unequivocally recommended, and the benefit of prophylaxis is established only for early mobilization. The details of these recommendations, as well as more recent publications that complement the guidelines, are provided in this commentary.

Comparison of meperidine and nefopam for prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Shivering is a frequent event during spinal anesthesia and meperidine is a well-known effective drug for prevention and treatment of shivering. Nefopam is a non-opiate analgesic and also known to have an anti-shivering effect. We compared nefopam with meperidine for efficacy of prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixty five patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, aged 20-65 years, scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia were investigated. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, meperidine (Group M, n = 33) and nefopam (Group N, n = 32) groups. Group M and N received meperidine 0.4 mg/kg or nefopam 0.15 mg/kg, respectively, in 100 ml of isotonic saline intravenously. All drugs were infused for 15 minutes by a blinded investigator before spinal anesthesia. Blood pressures, heart rates, body temperatures and side effects were checked before and at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia.

RESULTS

The incidences and scores of shivering were similar between the two groups. The mean arterial pressures in Group N were maintained higher than in Group M at 15, 30, and 60 minutes after spinal anesthesia. The injection pain was checked in Group N only and its incidence was 15.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that nefopam can be a good substitute for meperidine for prevention of shivering during spinal anesthesia with more stable hemodynamics, if injection pain is effectively controlled.

Prescribing nonopioids in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

PURPOSE

We searched for factors independently associated with the prescription of multimodal (balanced) analgesia in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of a cohort study, 172 patients who received a combination of 1 opioid with nonopioids, that is, paracetamol and/or nefopam, (multimodal analgesia), were compared with 302 patients who received opioid only on day 2 of their stay in the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

Patients given multimodal analgesia were more likely to have fewer organ failures and received fewer hypnotics compared with patients who received opioid only. They self-reported more frequently their pain level. There were no differences in the daily dose of opioids between the 2 groups. A low illness severity score, no more than 1 organ failure on day 2, the ability to self-rate pain, and a moderate-to-severe pain rated on day 2 were factors independently associated with the prescription of multimodal analgesia on day 2 (all P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In mechanically ventilated patients, the addition of nonopioids to opioids is mostly prescribed for patients with lower illness severity scores and who are able to self-rate their pain intensity. These findings suggest that the concept of multimodal analgesia must be promoted in the intensive care unit.

The transition from acute to chronic pain: might intensive care unit patients be at risk?

Pain remains a significant problem for patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). As research has shown, for some of these patients pain might even persist after discharge and become chronic. Exposure to intense pain and stress during medical and nursing procedures could be a risk factor that contributes to the transition from acute to chronic pain, which is a major disruption of the pain neurological system. New evidence suggests that physiological alterations contributing to chronic pain states take place both in the peripheral and central nervous systems. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review cutting-edge theories regarding pain and mechanisms that underlie the transition from acute to chronic pain, such as increases in membrane excitability of peripheral and central nerve fibers, synaptic plasticity, and loss of the function of descending inhibitory pain fibers; 2) provide information on the association between the immune system and pain and its crucial contribution to development of chronic pain syndromes, and 3) discuss mechanisms at brain levels in the nervous system and their contribution to affective (i.e., emotional) states associated with chronic pain conditions. Finally, we will offer suggestions for ICU clinical interventions to attempt to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain.