1
|
Kim E, Choi CH, Lim JA, Lee SY, Choi E, Kim J. Eighth Cervical Nerve Root Block During Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Decreases Pain Caused by Posterior Portal Placement but Increases Horner Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:217-228.e4. [PMID: 37355189 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the intensity of pain on posterior portal placement between a C5-C7 root block (conventional interscalene brachial plexus block [ISBPB]) and a C5-C8 root block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS In this prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized to receive either a C5-C7 root block (C5-C7 group, n = 37) or a C5-C8 root block (C5-C8 group, n = 36) with 25 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the pain intensity on posterior portal placement, which was graded as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), or 2 (severe pain). The secondary outcomes were the bilateral pupil diameters measured 30 minutes after ISBPB placement; the incidence of Horner syndrome, defined as a difference in pupil diameter (ipsilateral - contralateral) of less than -0.5 mm; the onset of postoperative pain; and the postoperative numerical rating pain score, where 0 and 10 represent no pain and the worst pain imaginable, respectively. RESULTS Fewer patients reported mild or severe pain on posterior portal placement in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (9 of 36 [25.0%] vs 24 of 37 [64.9%], P = .003). Less pain on posterior portal placement was reported in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (median [interquartile range], 0 [0-0.75] vs 1 [0-1]; median difference [95% confidence interval], 1 [0-1]; P = .001). The incidence of Horner syndrome was higher in the C5-C8 group than in the C5-C7 group (33 of 36 [91.7%] vs 22 of 37 [59.5%], P = .001). No significant differences in postoperative numerical rating pain scores and onset of postoperative pain were found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS A C5-C8 root block during an ISBPB reduces the pain intensity on posterior portal placement. However, it increases the incidence of Horner syndrome with no improvement in postoperative pain compared with the conventional ISBPB (C5-C7 root block). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hyuk Choi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung A Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - So Young Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunjoo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghae Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mutter T, Logan GS, Neily S, Richardson S, Askin N, Monterola M, Abou-Setta A. Postoperative neurologic symptoms in the operative arm after shoulder surgery with interscalene blockade: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:736-749. [PMID: 35289378 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02229-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative neurologic symptoms (PONS) in the operative arm are important complications of shoulder surgery and interscalene blockade (ISB). This systematic review aimed to compare the risk of PONS between ISB and other techniques, and the relative safety of different agents used in ISB. METHODS Our systematic review followed Cochrane review methodology and was registered in PROSPERO. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and CENTRAL (Wiley) from inception to June 2020 was completed. We included randomized or quasi-randomized trials of patients (> five years old) undergoing shoulder surgery with any ISB technique as an intervention, compared with any other nonregional or regional technique, or ISB of alternate composition or technique. The primary outcome was PONS (study author defined) assessed a minimum of one week after surgery. RESULTS Fifty-five studies totalling 6,236 participants (median, 69; range, 30-910) were included. Another 422 otherwise eligible trials were excluded because PONS was not reported. Heterogeneity in when PONS was assessed (from one week to one year) and the diagnostic criteria used precluded quantitative meta-analysis. The most common PONS definition, consisting of one or more of paresthesia, sensory deficit, or motor deficit, was only used in 16/55 (29%) trials. Risk of bias was low in 5/55 (9%) trials and high in 36/55 (65%) trials, further limiting any inferences. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the need for a standardized PONS outcome definition and follow-up time, along with routine, rigorous measurement of PONS in trials of ISB. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42020148496); registered 10 February 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Mutter
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Gabrielle S Logan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Sam Neily
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Scott Richardson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Nicole Askin
- Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marita Monterola
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Ahmed Abou-Setta
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wardhan R, Nimma SR. Ultrasound-Guided Upper Trunk Perineural Catheter for Shoulder Surgery: A Description of Catheter Technique. Cureus 2020; 12:e11095. [PMID: 33123419 PMCID: PMC7584319 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Interscalene brachial plexus block is frequently utilized for anesthesia and analgesia of complex and painful shoulder surgeries. But unintentional phrenic nerve blockade is a bane to the existence of this technique. Single-injection upper trunk blockade has emerged as a promising approach that appears to preserve phrenic nerve function better than the interscalene approach. The purpose of this case series is to describe the sonoanatomy, technique, and utility of a continuous upper trunk block, not previously described in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Wardhan
- Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toma O, Persoons B, Pogatzki‐Zahn E, Van de Velde M, Joshi GP. PROSPECT guideline for rotator cuff repair surgery: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia 2019; 74:1320-1331. [PMID: 31392721 PMCID: PMC6771830 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Rotator cuff repair can be associated with significant and difficult to treat postoperative pain. We aimed to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after rotator cuff repair. A systematic review using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in English from 1 January 2006 to 15 April 2019 assessing postoperative pain after rotator cuff repair using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. Out of 322 eligible studies identified, 59 randomised controlled trials and one systematic review met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative and intra-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol, cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, intravenous dexamethasone, regional analgesia techniques including interscalene block or suprascapular nerve block (with or without axillary nerve block) and arthroscopic surgical technique. Limited evidence was found for pre-operative gabapentin, perineural adjuncts (opioids, glucocorticoids, or α-2-adrenoceptor agonists added to the local anaesthetic solution) or postoperative transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Inconsistent evidence was found for subacromial/intra-articular injection, and for surgical technique-linked interventions, such as platelet-rich plasma. No evidence was found for stellate ganglion block, cervical epidural block, specific postoperative rehabilitation protocols or postoperative compressive cryotherapy. The analgesic regimen for rotator cuff repair should include an arthroscopic approach, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dexamethasone and a regional analgesic technique (either interscalene block or suprascapular nerve block with or without axillary nerve block), with opioids as rescue analgesics. Further randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the influence of the recommended analgesic regimen on postoperative pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Toma
- Institute for AnaesthesiologySpital STS AGThunSwitzerland
- University of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - B. Persoons
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesSection AnaesthesiologyKU Leuven and University Hospital LeuvenBelgium
| | - E. Pogatzki‐Zahn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain MedicineUniversity Hospital MünsterGermany
| | - M. Van de Velde
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesSection AnaesthesiologyKU Leuven and University Hospital LeuvenBelgium
| | - G. P. Joshi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain ManagementUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTXUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Kim JY, Song KS, Kim WJ, Park YH, Kang H, Woo YC, Shin HY. Analgesic efficacy of two interscalene blocks and one cervical epidural block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24:931-9. [PMID: 26063452 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3667-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite its effectiveness in other surgeries, studies on continuous epidural block in upper-extremity surgery are rare because of technical difficulties and potential complications. This study compared postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (UCISB) and fluoroscopy-guided targeted continuous cervical epidural block (FCCEB) in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS Seventy-five patients were randomly and equally assigned to groups FCCEB (0.2%), UCISB75 (0.75%), and UCISB20 (0.2%) according to the initial ropivacaine dose (8 ml). The background infusion (0.2% ropivacaine at 5 ml/h), bolus (3 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine), and lockout time (20 min) were consistent. Respiratory effects [respiratory discomfort (modified Borg scale), ventilatory function, and hemidiaphragmatic excursion (ultrasound)], analgesic quality [pain severity at rest and motion attempt (VAS-R and -M), number of boluses, analgesic supplements, and sleep disturbance], neurologic effects, procedural discomfort, satisfaction, and adverse effects were evaluated preprocedurally and up to 72 h postoperatively. RESULTS FCCEB caused less respiratory depression and sensorimotor block, but had less analgesic efficacy than UCISBs (P < 0.05). FCCEB caused nausea, vomiting, and dizziness more frequently (P < 0.05) and had lower patient satisfaction than UCISBs (P < 0.05). UCISB75 can cause severe respiratory distress in patients with lung disorders. Other variables were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS UCISB20 may provide superior postoperative analgesia and is the most recommendable postoperative analgesic method in ARCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Randomized controlled trials, Therapeutic study, Level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Yoon Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Sup Song
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Joong Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Hee Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Cheol Woo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwa-Yong Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, 224-1 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Borgeat A. Reply from the authors. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:482. [PMID: 23404969 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|