1
|
Malik AK, Tingle SJ, Varghese C, Owen R, Mahendran B, Figueiredo R, Amer AO, Currie IS, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH. Does Time to Asystole in Donors After Circulatory Death Impact Recipient Outcome in Liver Transplantation? Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00767. [PMID: 38780399 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The agonal phase can vary following treatment withdrawal in donor after circulatory death (DCD). There is little evidence to support when procurement teams should stand down in relation to donor time to death (TTD). We assessed what impact TTD had on outcomes following DCD liver transplantation. METHODS Data were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry on DCD liver transplant recipients from 2006 to 2021. TTD was the time from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to asystole, and functional warm ischemia time was the time from donor systolic blood pressure and/or oxygen saturation falling below 50 mm Hg and 70%, respectively, to aortic perfusion. The primary endpoint was 1-y graft survival. Potential predictors were fitted into Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. RESULTS One thousand five hundred fifty-eight recipients of a DCD liver graft were included. Median TTD in the entire cohort was 13 min (interquartile range, 9-17 min). Restricted cubic splines revealed that the risk of graft loss was significantly greater when TTD ≤14 min. After 14 min, there was no impact on graft loss. Prolonged hepatectomy time was significantly associated with graft loss (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.83; P = 0.003); however, functional warm ischemia time had no impact (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.27; P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS A very short TTD was associated with increased risk of graft loss, possibly because of such donors being more unstable and/or experiencing brain stem death as well as circulatory death. Expanding the stand down times may increase the utilization of donor livers without significantly impairing graft outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ruth Owen
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Balaji Mahendran
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Rodrigo Figueiredo
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Aimen O Amer
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Ian S Currie
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Colin H Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Svensson CJ, Öberg J, Dellgren G, Gäbel M, Oras J. Donor heart dysfunction and graft survival in liver and kidney transplants-A register-based study from Sweden. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15333. [PMID: 38739219 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Stress cardiomyopathy in donors can potentially affect graft function and longevity. This study aims to investigate the association between echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and/or the presence of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in organ donors, and short- and long-term liver and kidney graft survival. Our secondary aim was to link graft survival with donor and recipient characteristics. METHODS All donors considered for liver and kidney donation with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2006 and 2016 were matched with their recipients through the Scandiatransplant register. The studied outcomes were graft survival, re-transplantation, and recipient death. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to plot time to event. Multivariate Cox-regression was used to test independence. RESULTS There were 370 liver donors and 312 kidney donors (matched with 458 recipients) with echocardiographic records at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between June 2006 and November 2016. Of patients with LV dysfunction by echocardiography, there were 102 liver- and 72 kidney donors. Univariate survival analyses showed no statistical difference in the short- and long-term graft survival from donors with LV dysfunction compared to donors without. Donor age > 65 years, recipient re-transplantation and recipient liver tumor were predictors of worse outcome in liver transplants (p < .05). Donor age > 65, donor hypertension, recipient re-transplantation, and a recipient diagnosis of diabetes or nephritis/glomerulonephritis had a negative association with graft survival in kidney transplants (p < .05). CONCLUSION We found no significant association between donor LV dysfunction and short- and long-term graft survival in liver and kidney transplants, suggesting that livers and kidneys from such donors can be safely transplanted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Johan Svensson
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Josefin Öberg
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Göran Dellgren
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Markus Gäbel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonatan Oras
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fallani G, Stocco A, Siniscalchi A, Antonini MV, Stella AP, Amato A, Prosperi E, Turco L, Morelli MC, Cescon M, Ravaioli M. Beyond the Concepts of Elder and Marginal in DCD Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Observational Matched-Cohort Study in the Italian Clinical Setting. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11697. [PMID: 37736400 PMCID: PMC10511003 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCD) is a valuable strategy to increase the availability of grafts for liver transplantation (LT). As the average age of populations rises, the donor pool is likely to be affected by a potential increase in DCD donor age in the near future. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate post-transplantation outcomes in recipients of grafts from elderly DCD donors compared with younger DCD donors, and elderly donors after brainstem determination of death (DBD). From August 2020 to May 2022, consecutive recipients of deceased donor liver-only transplants were enrolled in the study. DCD recipients were propensity score matched 1:3 to DBD recipients. One-hundred fifty-seven patients were included, 26 of whom (16.6%) were transplanted with a DCD liver graft. After propensity score matching and stratification, three groups were obtained: 15 recipients of DCD donors ≥75 years, 11 recipients of DCD donors <75 years, and 28 recipients of DBD donors ≥75 years. Short-term outcomes, as well as 12 months graft survival rates (93.3%, 100%, and 89.3% respectively), were comparable among the groups. LT involving grafts retrieved from very elderly DCD donors was feasible and safe in an experienced high-volume center, with outcomes comparable to LTs from younger DCD donors and age-matched DBD donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Fallani
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Stocco
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Siniscalchi
- Department of Transplant Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marta Velia Antonini
- Ospedale “Maurizio Bufalini”—Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Romagna, Cesena, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Adriano Pasquale Stella
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Amato
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Prosperi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Turco
- Department of Internal Medicine for the Treatment of Severe Organ Failure, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Morelli
- Department of Internal Medicine for the Treatment of Severe Organ Failure, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Policlinico di Sant’Orsola, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Richards JA, Gaurav R, Upponi SS, Swift L, Fear C, Webb GJ, Allison MED, Watson CJE, Butler AJ. Outcomes of livers from donation after circulatory death donors with extended agonal phase and the adjunct of normothermic regional perfusion. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1112-1115. [PMID: 37079886 PMCID: PMC10416677 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
The liver performs important functions that are essential for life. If the liver fails, patients will die unless they receive a new liver from a donor (transplant). Unfortunately, there are not enough livers for everyone and some patients die while waiting for a suitable organ. This article describes a novel technique that allows resuscitation and testing of a potential donor liver so that more patients can safely receive a transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Richards
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University and in partnership with NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rohit Gaurav
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara S Upponi
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa Swift
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Corrina Fear
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gwilym J Webb
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael E D Allison
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University and in partnership with NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew J Butler
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University and in partnership with NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watson CJ, MacDonald S, Bridgeman C, Brais R, Upponi SS, Foukaneli T, Swift L, Fear C, Selves L, Kosmoliaptsis V, Allison M, Hogg R, Parsy KS, Thomas W, Gaurav R, Butler AJ. D-dimer Release From Livers During Ex Situ Normothermic Perfusion and After In Situ Normothermic Regional Perfusion: Evidence for Occult Fibrin Burden Associated With Adverse Transplant Outcomes and Cholangiopathy. Transplantation 2023; 107:1311-1321. [PMID: 36728501 PMCID: PMC10205116 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deceased donor livers are prone to biliary complications, which may necessitate retransplantation, and we, and others, have suggested that these complications are because of peribiliary vascular fibrin microthrombi. We sought to determine the prevalence and consequence of occult fibrin within deceased donor livers undergoing normothermic ex situ perfusion (NESLiP) and evaluate a role for fibrinolysis. METHODS D-dimer concentrations, products of fibrin degradation, were assayed in the perfusate of 163 livers taken after 2 h of NESLiP, including 91 that were transplanted. These were related to posttransplant outcomes. Five different fibrinolytic protocols during NESLiP using alteplase were evaluated, and the transplant outcomes of these alteplase-treated livers were reviewed. RESULTS Perfusate D-dimer concentrations were lowest in livers recovered using in situ normothermic regional perfusion and highest in alteplase-treated livers. D-dimer release from donation after brain death livers was significantly correlated with the duration of cold ischemia. In non-alteplase-treated livers, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that D-dimer levels were associated with transplant survival ( P = 0.005). Treatment with alteplase and fresh frozen plasma during NESLiP was associated with significantly more D-dimer release into the perfusate and was not associated with excess bleeding postimplantation; 8 of the 9 treated livers were free of cholangiopathy, whereas the ninth had a proximal duct stricture. CONCLUSIONS Fibrin is present in many livers during cold storage and is associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. The amount of D-dimer released after fibrinolytic treatment indicates a significant occult fibrin burden and suggests that fibrinolytic therapy during NESLiP may be a promising therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J.E. Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University in partnership with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen MacDonald
- Specialist Haemostasis Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Bridgeman
- Specialist Haemostasis Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Brais
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sara S. Upponi
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Theodora Foukaneli
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Swift
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Corrina Fear
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Selves
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University in partnership with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Allison
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Hogg
- Statistics and Clinical Research, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Kourosh Saeb Parsy
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University in partnership with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Will Thomas
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- Specialist Haemostasis Laboratory, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rohit Gaurav
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University in partnership with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J. Butler
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Organ Donation and Transplantation, at the University of Cambridge in collaboration with Newcastle University in partnership with National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Roy Calne Transplant Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ivanics T, Claasen MPAW, Patel MS, Giorgakis E, Khorsandi SE, Srinivasan P, Prachalias A, Menon K, Jassem W, Cortes M, Sayed BA, Mathur AK, Walker K, Taylor R, Heaton N, Mehta N, Segev DL, Massie AB, van der Meulen JHP, Sapisochin G, Wallace D. Outcomes after liver transplantation using deceased after circulatory death donors: A comparison of outcomes in the UK and the US. Liver Int 2023; 43:1107-1119. [PMID: 36737866 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Identifying international differences in utilization and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) after donation after circulatory death (DCD) donation provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and population-level insight. METHODS Adult (≥18 years) LT data between 2008 and 2018 from the UK and US were used to assess mortality and graft failure after DCD LT. We used time-dependent Cox-regression methods to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for risk-adjusted short-term (0-90 days) and longer-term (90 days-5 years) outcomes. RESULTS One-thousand five-hundred-and-sixty LT receipts from the UK and 3426 from the US were included. Over the study period, the use of DCD livers increased from 15.7% to 23.9% in the UK compared to 5.1% to 7.6% in the US. In the UK, DCD donors were older (UK:51 vs. US:33 years) with longer cold ischaemia time (UK: 437 vs. US: 333 min). Recipients in the US had higher Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores, higher body mass index, higher proportions of ascites, encephalopathy, diabetes and previous abdominal surgeries. No difference in the risk-adjusted short-term mortality or graft failure was observed between the countries. In the longer-term (90 days-5 years), the UK had lower mortality and graft failure (adj.mortality HR:UK: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.49-0.80); graft failure HR: UK: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91). The cumulative incidence of retransplantation was higher in the UK (5 years: UK: 11.9% vs. 4.6%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS For those receiving a DCD LT, longer-term post-transplant outcomes in the UK are superior to the US, however, significant differences in recipient illness, graft quality and access to retransplantation were seen between the two countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto.,Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto.,Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Madhukar S Patel
- Division of Surgical Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Emmanouil Giorgakis
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Rockefeller Cancer Center Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shirin E Khorsandi
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK.,Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Parthi Srinivasan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andreas Prachalias
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Wayel Jassem
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Miriam Cortes
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Blayne A Sayed
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kate Walker
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Taylor
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Department of Statistics, National Health Service Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jan H P van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto
| | - David Wallace
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Disparities in the Use of Older Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Allografts in the United States Versus the United Kingdom. Transplantation 2022; 106:e358-e367. [PMID: 35642976 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the characteristics and posttransplant survival of patients who received donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts from donors aged >60 y. METHODS Data were collected from the UK Transplant Registry and the United Network for Organ Sharing databases. Cohorts were dichotomized into donor age subgroups (donor >60 y [D >60]; donor ≤60 y [D ≤60]). Study period: January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015. RESULTS 1157 DCD LTs were performed in the United Kingdom versus 3394 in the United States. Only 13.8% of US DCD donors were aged >50 y, contrary to 44.3% in the United Kingdom. D >60 were 22.6% in the United Kingdom versus 2.4% in the United States. In the United Kingdom, 64.2% of D >60 clustered in 2 metropolitan centers. In the United States, there was marked inter-regional variation. A total of 78.3% of the US DCD allografts were used locally. One- and 5-y unadjusted DCD graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom versus the United States (87.3% versus 81.4%, and 78.0% versus 71.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). One- and 5-y D >60 graft survival was higher in the United Kingdom (87.3% versus 68.1%, and 77.9% versus 51.4%, United Kingdom versus United States, respectively; P < 0.001). In both groups, grafts from donors ≤30 y had the best survival. Survival was similar for donors aged 41 to 50 versus 51 to 60 in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the United Kingdom, older DCD LT utilization remained low in the United States, with worse D >60 survival. Nonetheless, present data indicate similar survivals for older donors aged ≤60, supporting an extension to the current US DCD age cutoff.
Collapse
|
8
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:372-380. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|