European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2024 guidance paper for the management of well-differentiated small intestine neuroendocrine tumours

Both the incidence and prevalence of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours from the small intestine (Si-NET) are gradually increasing. Most patients have non-functioning tumours with subtle GI symptoms and tumours are often discovered incidentally by endoscopy or at advanced disease stages by imaging depicting mesenteric lymph node and /or liver metastases while around 30% of the patients present with symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome. Adequate biochemical assessment and staging including functional imaging is crucial for treatment-related decision-making that should take place in an expert multidisciplinary team setting. Preferably, patients should be referred to specialised ENETS Centres of Excellence or centres of high expertise in the field. This guidance paper provides the current evidence and best knowledge for the management of Si-NET grade (G) 1-3 following 10 key questions of practical relevance for the diagnostic and therapeutic decision making.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES)

BACKGROUND

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Outlook for 615 Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Recurrence Risk after Surgery and Disease-Specific Survival in Advanced Disease

BACKGROUND

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment.

METHOD

We utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3).

RESULTS

In total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.

Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours: 10 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Referral Centre

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) arising from the small bowel are clinically challenging and are often diagnosed at advanced stages. Disease control with surgery alone can be demanding. Multimodal treatment concepts integrating surgery and non-surgical modalities could be of benefit.

METHOD

Retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with SB NET treated at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Data regarding clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and disease trajectory were extracted and summarised. Overall and progression/recurrence-free survival were estimated at 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

154 patients were identified, with a median age of 64 years (range 33-87); 135/154 (87.7%) had stage III/IV disease at diagnosis. Surgery was used in 125 individuals (81.2%), typically with either segmental small bowel resection (60.8%) or right hemicolectomy (33.6%) and mesenteric lymphadenectomy for the primary tumour. Systemic and/or liver-directed therapies were used in 126 (81.8%); 60 (47.6%) had more than one line of non-surgical treatment. Median follow-up was 67.2 months (range 3.1-310.4); overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 91.0% (95% CI: 84.9-94.7%) and 82.5% (95% CI: 72.9-88.9%), respectively. Imaging-based median progression-free survival was 42.7 months (95% CI: 24.7 to 72.4); 5-year progression-free survival was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0-70.6%); 10-year progression-free survival was 18.7% (95% CI: 12.4-26.1). Nineteen patients (12.3%) reached 10 years follow-up without disease recurrence and therefore were considered cured.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with SB NET present in a metastasised stage. Multimodal treatment concepts may be associated with excellent clinical outcomes. Future work should explore optimal approaches to treatment sequencing and patient selection.

Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors-10-Year Experience of the Ottawa Hospital (TOH)

(1) Aim: The prevalence and incidence of small bowel NETs have increased significantly over the past two decades. This study aims to report the 10-year experience of SB-NET management at a regional cancer center in Canada. (2) Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of the clinical and pathological data of patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven SB-NET at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH), Ottawa, Canada between 2011 and 2021. We report the clinicopathological characteristics of these patients, as well as their outcomes data, including survival rates. (3) Results: Between 2011 and 2021, a total of 177 SB-NET cases were identified with 51% (n = 91) of cases being males. The most common sites of the tumors were the ileum 53% (n = 94), followed by the duodenum 9% (n = 16) and jejunum 7% (n = 12). Approximately 24% (n = 42) of the patients had symptoms for over six months prior to diagnosis and 18% (n = 32) had functioning SB-NET during the course of the disease. The majority of patients had locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of presentation with stage III, and stage IV representing 42% (n = 75), and 41% (n = 73) respectively. The majority of patients 84% (n = 148) had well-differentiated histology. One hundred twenty patients underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor including 28 patients (16%) with limited metastatic disease. A total of 21 patients (18%) had recurrence after curative surgery. A total of 62 patients (35%) received first-line somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy for unresectable disease and seven patients had PRRT after progression on SSA. Five years OS was 100%, 91%, 97%, and 73% for stages I, II, III, and IV respectively. In univariate analysis, carcinoid symptoms, T stage, and differentiation were significant predictors for worse overall survival, but not RFS. (4) Conclusions: Compared to published historical controls, our study suggests improvement in the 5-year survival rate of SB-NETs over the last 10 years.

Surgical Approach to Liver Metastases in GEP-NET in a Tertiary Reference Center

Indications for liver resection in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) vary from liver resection with curative intent to tumor debulking or tissue sampling for histopathological characterization. With increasing expertise, the number of minimally invasive liver surgeries (MILS) in GEP-NET patients has increased. However, the influence on the oncological outcome has hardly been described. The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent liver resection for hepatic metastases of GEP-NET at the Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare MILS with open liver surgery (OLS). In total, 22 patients underwent liver surgery with curative intent, and 30 debulking surgeries were analyzed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was longer than progression-free survival (PFS) (10 vs. 24 months), whereas overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly (p = 0.588). Thirty-nine (75%) liver resections were performed as OLS, and thirteen (25%) as MILS. After PSM, a shorter length of hospital stay was found for the MILS group (14 vs. 10 d, p = 0.034), while neither DFS/PFS nor OS differed significantly. Both curative intended and cytoreductive resection of hepatic GEP-NET metastases achieved excellent outcomes. MILS led to a reduced length of hospital, while preserving a good oncological outcome.

18F-DOPA PET/CT at the Forefront of Initial or Presurgical Evaluation of Small-Intestine Neuroendocrine Tumors

Our objective was to compare the respective value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT for initial staging or presurgical work-up of patients with small-intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SiNETs). Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, noninterventional investigation involving 53 non-surgically treated SiNET patients who underwent both ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT within a 6-mo interval without surgical intervention or therapeutic change between the 2 PET/CT studies. Percentage detection rate was calculated according to per-region and per-lesion analyses. Sensitivity for primary tumor detection was assessed in 37 surgically treated patients, taking surgical results (76 SiNETs) as the diagnostic gold standard. Results: ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT individually identified at least 1 primary SiNET in 92% (34/37) of the patients. Intestinal tumor multifocality was confirmed by histology in 8 patients. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT were concordantly positive for tumor multifocality in 5 patients, discordantly positive in 2 patients, and concordantly negative in 1 patient. The detection rate for subdiaphragmatic nodal metastases on per-region-based analysis was 91% and 98% for ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT, respectively (P = 0.18). ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT detected a higher number of abnormal subdiaphragmatic nodes (P = 0.009). Regarding mesenteric nodes only, ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT detected more positive regions (P = 0.005) and nodal lesions (P = 0.003) than ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT, including nodes at the origin of mesenteric vessels. For detection of distant metastases, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT performed equally well on a per-region-based analysis. As compared with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC, ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT detected more hepatic (P < 0.001), peritoneal (P < 0.001), and lung metastases (P < 0.001). Conclusion: ¹⁸F-DOPA PET/CT detected more lesions than ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the studied patients. The respective roles of the two should be discussed in terms of disease staging and treatment selection.

Molecular factors, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors: An update

The prevalence of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) is increasing, and despite recent advances in their therapy, it remains inadequate in patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. These tumors present many challenges concerning the molecular basis and genomic profile, pathophysiology, clinicopathological features, histopathologic classification, diagnosis and treatment. There has been an ongoing debate on diagnostic criteria and clinical behavior, and various changes have been made over the last few years. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal system is a rare but highly malignant neoplasm that is genetically distinct from gastrointestinal system neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The diagnosis and management have changed over the past decade. Emerging novel biomarkers and metabolic players in cancer cells are useful and promising new diagnostic tools. Progress in positron emission tomography-computerized tomography and scintigraphy with new radioactive agents (⁶⁴Cu-DOTATATE or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE) replacing enough octreoscan, has improved further the current diagnostic imaging. Promising results provide targeted therapies with biological agents, new drugs, chemotherapy and immunotherapy. However, the role of surgery is important, since it is the cornerstone of management. Simultaneous resection of small bowel NETs with synchronous liver metastases is a surgical challenge. Endoscopy offers novel options not only for diagnosis but also for interventional management. The therapeutic option should be individualized based on current multidisciplinary information.