Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study

Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in inflammatory bowel disease in pediatric and young adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis, often necessitates surgical intervention in cases of severe or refractory disease. Although biologic therapies have significantly reduced the need for surgery, operative management remains essential for certain patients. The choice between laparoscopic (laparoscopy group [LG]) and open conventional surgery (open group [OG]) continues to be a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of LG and OG in pediatric patients with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies comparing LG and OG outcomes in pediatric patients with IBD. Key outcomes analyzed included major and minor postoperative complications, reoperations, readmissions, operative time, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, analyzing 3417 patients, with 1399 (41%) undergoing OG and 2018 (59%) undergoing LG. Our analysis revealed no significant differences in major postoperative complications, reoperation, and readmissions between LG and OG (P = .114, P = .082, and P = .641, respectively). However, LG was associated with shorter hospital stays (6.04 vs 8.35 days; P < .05). Conversions from LG to open surgery amounted to a total of 153 (7.57%). Open surgery had a significantly shorter operative time (173.8 vs 195.5 min; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Both laparoscopic and open conventional surgeries are safe, effective, and reliable in managing pediatric IBD. Although open surgery offers shorter operative times, laparoscopy reduces hospital stay and minor postoperative complications. The choice of approach depends on the surgeon's experience and patient-specific factors.

Modern Trends of Drain Placement in Primary Bariatric Surgery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 526,723 Patients

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic drain use during primary bariatric surgeries continues despite previous literature cautioning against their routine use. Modern drain utilization and associated outcomes remain largely poorly studied which limits selective utilization and perhaps may lead to excess morbidity and healthcare resource utilization. This study aimed to reassess current trends of drain use in primary bariatric procedures, factors driving surgeons to place drains, and patient outcomes associated with drain placement.

METHODS

Patients undergoing the most common primary bariatric surgery operations from 2020 to 2022 were included using the Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. Two cohorts were created, a drain placed (DP) cohort and no drain (ND) cohort, which were then compared in terms of baseline characteristics, rates of complications, and length of stay. Multivariate modeling was performed to assess the effect of drains on various complications and factors associated with drain placement.

RESULTS

Of 526,723 included patients, drain utilization decreased across operative years (8.7% in 2020 to 6.1% in 2022, p < 0.001). Factors associated with drain placement in multivariate models included older age, higher BMI, partially dependent functional status, renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, hypoalbuminemia, and non-sleeve anastomotic procedures. Drain placement was associated with increased risk of numerous complications on bivariate analysis, which was still significant in multivariate analysis, including 30-day serious complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.24, p < 0.001), anastomotic leak (aOR 2.1, p < 0.001), organ space infection (aOR 2.0, p < 0.001), reoperation (aOR 1.2, p = 0.036), and excess length of stay (LOS, aOR 1.45, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of prophylactic drain placement during primary bariatric surgical procedures has decreased in recent years and patients with drain placement seem to have increased 30-day morbidity, including longer length of stay. Independent predictors of drain placement include increased age and metabolic burden along with anastomotic procedures. Surgeons should be judicious in selecting patients for drain placement and future prospective, controlled studies may better answer drain placement association with complications.

INDEPSO-ISPSM consensus on peritoneal malignancies - Enhanced recovery after surgery in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Background

The role of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery and/or Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is evolving, with promising results that improve patient outcomes. This consensus exercise was carried out to address and standardize components of the ERAS protocol pertinent to the Indian context.

Method

The modified Delphi method was employed with two rounds of voting. All fifty invited specialists agreed to vote. There were 30 questions addressing the key elements of ERAS protocols. They were broadly distributed across four sections: Prehabilitation, Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative elements. A consensus was achieved if any one option received > 70 % votes (strong consensus > 90 %). If consensus was not achieved in round 1, the question was moved to round 2.

Results

After rounds I and II, 48/50 (95.8%) of invited panelists voted for the questions. The highest rate of 'skipped question' was 6% in both rounds. A consensus was obtained for 28/30 (93.33%) questions, and strong consensus was obtained for 5/30 (16.6%) questions. No consensus was obtained for two questions. Some of the panelists' recommendations contradicted the standard ERAS guidelines, such as using intraperitoneal drains in all patients and mechanical bowel preparation for left-sided colonic or rectal resections.

Conclusion

Despite some limitations, this consensus exercise represents a significant step toward advancement and pioneering efforts to improve patient outcomes by implementing and standardizing ERAS protocols in CRS and/or HIPEC tailored for India.

EARLY REFEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL CANCER SURGERY REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY

BACKGROUND

Multimodal protocols such as Acceleration of Total Postoperative Recovery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery propose a set of pre- and post-operative care to accelerate the recovery of surgical patients. However, in clinical practice, simple care such as early refeeding and use of drains are often neglected by multidisciplinary teams.

AIMS

Investigate whether early postoperative refeeding determines benefits in colorectal oncological surgery; whether the patients' clinical conditions preoperatively and the use of a nasogastric tube and abdominal drain delay their recovery.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort carried out at the Cascavel Uopeccan Cancer Hospital, including adult cancer patients (age ≥18 years), from the Unified Health System (SUS), who underwent colorectal surgeries from January 2018 to December 2021.

RESULTS

275 patients were evaluated. Of these, 199 (75.4%) were refed early. Late refeeding (odds ratio - OR=2.1; p=0.024), the use of nasogastric tube (OR=2.72; p=0.038) and intra-abdominal drain (OR=1.95; p=0.054) increased the chance of infectious complication. Multivariate analysis showed that receiving a late postoperative diet is an independent risk factor for infectious complications. Late refeeding (p=0.006) after the operation and the placement of an intra-abdominal drain (p=0.007) are independent risk factors for remaining hospitalized for more than five days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Refeeding early in the postoperative period reduces the risk of infectious complications. Using abdominal drains and refeeding late (>48h) for cancer patients undergoing colorectal surgery are risk factors for hospital stays longer than five days.

Low Rates of Short-Term Anastomotic Complications After Kono-S versus Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis

INTRODUCTION

The Kono-S (KS) anastomosis for Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with improved endoscopic and clinical long-term outcomes. Ileocolonic anastomoses in CD are associated with an unacceptable anastomotic complication rate - up to 40%. Investigation of short-term benefits of KS is thus warranted. Here, we evaluate 90-d postoperative complications following KS versus side-to-side stapled anastomosis in patients with CD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control conducted at our tertiary medical center; data retrieved are from cases between January 2019 and May 2023. Thirty-eight consecutive patients with CD who underwent KS were matched with 38 patients who underwent side-to-side stapled anastomosis. Patients were initially age and sex matched; then, characteristics including body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and disease severity indicated by inpatient status, preoperative laboratory values, steroid and disease modifying drug use were compared between cases and controls, using chi square, t-test, or Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Cohorts did not differ in the aforementioned characteristics with the exception of higher preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the KS group. There was no difference in operative approach, or complications between groups; one patient undergoing KS required return to operating room for fascial dehiscence, while two in the side-to-side stapled group required return to operating room for anastomotic complications. KS operative times were significantly longer.

CONCLUSIONS

KS is associated with an acceptable rate of short-term complications. In our matched series of 38 patients, we had no anastomotic leaks or bleeds in our KS group. Adoption of this technique may provide immediate postoperative benefits in addition to long-term disease reduction.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of morbidity and pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy with versus without prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage

BACKGROUND

The omission of a prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage has been under debate in pancreatic surgery due to the high-risk of complications and especially of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Recently, the second randomized controlled trial (RCT) and two propensity score-matched comparative studies assessing risks and benefits of a no-drainage policy versus prophylactic drainage after distal pancreatectomy (DP) have been published. This systematic review with meta-analysis provides an updated summary of the available evidence on this topic.

METHODS

RCTs and nonrandomized comparative studies (NCS) investigating outcomes of no drainage versus drainage after DP were searched systematically in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Random effects meta-analyses were performed, and the results presented as weighted odds ratios (OR) or mean differences with their corresponding 95% CI. Subgroup analyses were performed to account for interstudy heterogeneity between RCTs and NCS.

RESULTS

Two RCTs and six NCS with a total of 3610 patients undergoing DP were included of whom 1038 (28.8%) patients did not receive prophylactic drainage. A no-drainage policy was associated with significantly lower risks of POPF (OR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.56; P <0.00001), reduced major morbidity (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P =0.008), less reinterventions (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.95; P =0.02), and fewer readmissions (OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54-0.88; P =0.003) as well as shorter length of hospital stay (mean differences -1.74, 95% CI: -2.70 to -0.78; P =0.0004). Subgroup analyses including only RCTs confirmed benefits of the no-drainage policy.

CONCLUSION

A no-drainage policy is associated with reduced POPF and morbidity and can therefore be recommended as standard procedure in patients undergoing DP.

Meta-analysis of postoperative incision infection risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery

Objective

To evaluate the risk factors for postoperative incision infection in colorectal cancer, this meta-analysis aimed to identify key variables impacting infection incidence following colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Utilizing a meta-analytical approach, studies published from January 2015 to December 2022 were systematically collected and analyzed through the assessment of factors like body mass index, diabetes, albumin levels, malnutrition, and surgical duration.

Results

The meta-analysis of eleven high-quality studies revealed that elevated BMI, diabetes, low albumin levels, malnutrition, and extended surgical duration were associated with increased infection risk, while laparoscopic procedures showed potential for risk reduction.

Conclusions

This study underscores the significance of preoperative risk assessment and management in mitigating postoperative incision infections in colorectal cancer patients. The findings present actionable insights for clinicians to enhance patient prognoses and overall quality of life.

Implementing a no-drain policy for extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis in a real-life setting: analysis of outcomes and surgeons' adherence

AIM

Recent evidence has questioned the usefulness of anastomotic drain (AD) after low anterior resection (LAR). However, the implementation and adoption of a no-drain policy are still poor. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of the implementation of a no-drain policy for rectal cancer surgery into a real-life setting and the adherence of the surgeons to such policy.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent elective minimally invasive LAR between January 2015 and December 2019 at two tertiary referral centers. In 2017, both centers implemented a policy aimed at reducing the use of AD. Patients were retrospectively categorized into two groups: the drain policy (DP) group, comprising patients treated before 2017, and the no-drain policy (NDP) group, consisting of patients treated from 2017 onwards. The endpoints were the rate of anastomotic leak (AL) and of related interventions.

RESULTS

Among the 272 patients included, 188 (69.1%) were in the NDP group, and 84 (30.9%) were in the DP group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. AL rate was 11.2% in the NDP group compared to 10.7% in the DP group (p = 1.000), and the AL grade distribution (grade A, 19.1% (4/21) vs 28.6% (2/9); grade B, 28.6% (6/21) vs 11.1% (1/9); grade C, 52.4% (11/21) vs 66.7% (6/9), p = 0.759) did not significantly differ between the groups. All patients with symptomatic AL and AD underwent surgical treatment for the leak, while those with symptomatic AL in the NPD group were managed with surgery (66.7%), endoscopic (19.0%), or percutaneous (14.3%) interventions. Postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups. Three years after implementing the no-drain policy, AD was utilized in only 16.5% of cases, compared to 76.2% at the study's outset.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a no-drain policy received a good adoption rate and did not affect negatively the surgical outcomes.

Impact of intra-abdominal drains in emergency gastrointestinal surgery: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal drains are often placed in emergency gastrointestinal surgery procedures with the aim to prevent the formation of intra-abdominal collections (IAC) and aid in their early detection. However, the evidence for this is debated. This scoping review aims to evaluate the current evidence for their use in this setting.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary studies published between January 2000 and September 2023 that assessed intra-abdominal drain placement and post-operative IAC formation in emergency gastrointestinal surgery were included.

RESULTS

A total of 26 articles were identified. There was no strong evidence to suggest that prophylactic intra-abdominal drain placement influences the formation of IAC in emergency gastrointestinal procedures. There was a suggestion that drain placement may increase the rate of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. However, current studies on the topic are of poor quality and high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

The undifferentiated use of drains in emergency gastrointestinal surgery should not be encouraged. Drain placement should be specific to the clinical context. Higher quality research is warranted to better understand the influence drain placement has on post-operative outcomes.

To drain or not to drain: A propensity score analysis of abdominal drainage after colorectal surgery for endometriosis

AIM

To assess the benefit of prophylactic abdominal drainage (AD) after colorectal surgery for endometriosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 215 patients who underwent colorectal surgery for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach in our center from February 2019 to July 2023. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis (1:1 ratio) identified two groups of patients with similar characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were then compared.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohort, 151 patients (70 %) had AD at the end of surgery and 64 (30 %) did not. Clinical characteristics and surgical procedures were comparable between the groups after PSM. After PSM, AD was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a greater number of postoperative complications (p = 0.03). There were no differences for readmission, repeat surgery, or severe postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort of patients undergoing colorectal resection for endometriosis using a mini-invasive approach, prophylactic AD was not found to be beneficial.

A case of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, sigmoid volvulus, and massive pneumoperitoneum in a young female patient

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is an uncommon phenomenon that is especially rare in young patients and can result in bowl ischemia and perforation if left untreated. Furthermore, pneumoperitoneum is almost always a concerning imaging finding and in the context of recent colonic resection may be a sign of anastomotic leakage.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of a young female patient with postpartum ACPO who subsequently underwent a hemicolectomy with colorectal anastomosis. The patient's hospital course was complicated by massive postoperative pneumoperitoneum that resulted in resection of the anastomosis and creation of an end colostomy. However, despite this measure, there was recurrent pneumoperitoneum on cross-sectional imaging 36 h later. This was treated non-operatively and the remainder of their hospital course was uneventful.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

A potential etiology for ACPO during pregnancy may be due to compression of parasympathetic plexus nerves by the gravid uterus. Idiopathic pneumoperitoneum has been documented on a number of occasions, though this is generally in older patients. It can present with signs of peritonitis or can be asymptomatic. Simultaneous pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum is rare and may be due to the transmission of air from the peritoneum to the mediastinum and thorax. The pneumoperitoneum itself may be due the air leakage through the significantly distended colon into the peritoneum.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ACPO following pregnancy and associated pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and recurrent pneumoperitoneum suggest a communicating defect between the thoracic, mediastinal, and peritoneal cavities. Furthermore, the possibility of underlying colonic dysmotility should be considered prior to the restoration of large bowel continuity.

Risk factors for severe morbidity and definitive stoma after elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis: a multicenter national cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the decision to perform elective surgery, it is of great interest to have data about the outcomes of surgery to individualize patients who could safely undergo sigmoid resection. The aim of this study was to provide information on the outcomes of elective sigmoid resection for sigmoid diverticular disease (SDD) at a national level.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who had elective surgery for SDD (2010-2021) were included in this retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Patients were identified from institutional review board-approved databases in French member centers of the French Surgical Association. The endpoints of the study were the early and the long-term postoperative outcomes and an evaluation of the risk factors for 90-day severe postoperative morbidity and a definitive stoma after an elective sigmoidectomy for SDD.

RESULTS

In total, 4617 patients were included. The median [IQR] age was 61 [18.0;100] years, the mean ± SD body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 4 kg/m2, and 2310 (50%) were men. The indications for surgery were complicated diverticulitis in 50% and smoldering diverticulitis in 47.4%. The procedures were performed laparoscopically for 88% and with an anastomosis for 83.8%. The severe complication rate on postoperative day 90 was 11.7%, with a risk of anastomotic leakage of 4.7%. The independent risk factors in multivariate analysis were an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3, an open approach, and perioperative blood transfusion. Age, perioperative blood transfusion, and Hartmann's procedure were the three independent risk factors for a permanent stoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This series provides a real-life picture of elective sigmoidectomy for SDD at a national level.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Comité National Information et Liberté (CNIL) (n°920361).

Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort

BACKGROUND

In Italy, surgeons continue to drain the abdominal cavity in more than 50 per cent of patients after colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement on early adverse events in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A database was retrospectively analysed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 21 covariates. The primary endpoint was the postoperative duration of stay, and the secondary endpoints were surgical site infections, infectious morbidity rate defined as surgical site infections plus pulmonary infections plus urinary infections, anastomotic leakage, overall morbidity rate, major morbidity rate, reoperation and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95 per cent c.i.

RESULTS

A total of 6157 patients were analysed to produce two well-balanced groups of 1802 patients: group (A), no abdominal drain(s) and group (B), abdominal drain(s). Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of postoperative duration of stay >6 days (OR 0.60; 95 per cent c.i. 0.51-0.70; P < 0.001). A mean postoperative duration of stay difference of 0.86 days was detected between groups. No difference was recorded between the two groups for all the other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that placement of abdominal drain(s) after elective colorectal surgery is associated with a non-clinically significant longer (0.86 days) postoperative duration of stay but has no impact on any other secondary outcomes, confirming that abdominal drains should not be used routinely in colorectal surgery.

Risk Factors for Rectal Stump Leakage After Discontinuity Resection: Stump Length Matters Most

BACKGROUND

Discontinuity resection is commonly conducted to avoid anastomotic leakage in high-risk patients but potentially results in rectal stump leakage. Although risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been widely studied, data on rectal stump leakage rates and underlying risk factors are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To determine rectal stump leakage rates following Hartmann's procedure and to identify patient-and surgery-associated risk factors.

DESIGN

A retrospective study with univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify risk factors of rectal stump leakage. A subgroup analysis of scheduled operations was performed.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.

PATIENTS

Patients were included who underwent discontinuity resection with rectal stump formation between 2010 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures included rectal stump leakage rates, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and necessity for further invasive treatment.

RESULTS

Rectal stump leakage occurred in 11.78% of patients. Rectal stump leakage rates varied considerably depending on the surgical procedure performed and were highest following subtotal pelvic exenteration (34%). Diagnosis of rectal stump leakage peaked on postoperative day 7. A short rectal stump ( p = 0.001), previous pelvic radiotherapy ( p = 0.04), chemotherapy ( p = 0.004), and previous laparotomy ( p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for rectal stump leakage in the entire patient collective. In patients undergoing scheduled surgery, a short rectal stump was the only independent risk factor ( p = 0.003). Rectal stump leakage was not associated with increased 30-day mortality but prolonged length of hospitalization and frequently necessitated further invasive treatment.

LIMITATIONS

Study results are limited by the retrospective design, a high number of emergency operations, and the mere inclusion of symptomatic leakages.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal stump leakage is a relevant complication after discontinuity resection. Risk factors should be considered during surgical decision-making when both discontinuity resection and abdominoperineal resection are feasible. See Video Abstract.

FACTORES DE RIESGO PARA LA FUGA DEL MUN RECTAL DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN POR DISCONTINUIDAD LA LONGITUD DEL MUN ES LO MS IMPORTANTE

ANTECEDENTES:La resección de discontinuidad se realiza comúnmente para evitar la fuga anastomótica en pacientes de alto riesgo, pero potencialmente da como resultado una fuga del muñón rectal. Si bien los factores de riesgo de fuga anastomótica se han estudiado ampliamente, los datos sobre las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal y los factores de riesgo subyacentes son escasos.OBJETIVO:Determinar las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal después del procedimiento de Hartmann e identificar los factores de riesgo asociados con el paciente y la cirugía.DISEÑO:Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con análisis univariado y multivariado para identificar los factores de riesgo de fuga del muñón rectal. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de subgrupos de las operaciones programadas.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Universitario de Heidelberg, Alemania.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a resección de discontinuidad con formación de muñón rectal entre 2010 y 2020.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Las principales medidas de resultado incluyeron las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal, la mortalidad a los 30 días, la duración de la hospitalización y la necesidad de un tratamiento invasivo adicional.RESULTADOS:La fuga del muñón rectal ocurrió en el 11,78% de los pacientes. Las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal variaron considerablemente según el procedimiento quirúrgico realizado y fueron más altas después de la exenteración pélvica subtotal (34%). El diagnóstico de fuga del muñón rectal alcanzó su punto máximo en el día 7 del postoperatorio. Un muñón rectal corto (p = 0,001), radioterapia pélvica previa (p = 0,04), quimioterapia (p = 0,004) y laparotomía previa (p = 0,03) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de fuga rectal. Fuga del muñón en todo el colectivo de pacientes. En los pacientes sometidos a cirugía programada, el muñón rectal corto fue el único factor de riesgo independiente (p = 0,003). La fuga del muñón rectal no se asoció con un aumento de la mortalidad a los 30 días, pero con una duración prolongada de la hospitalización y con frecuencia requirió un tratamiento invasivo adicional.LIMITACIONES:Los resultados del estudio están limitados por el diseño retrospectivo, un alto número de operaciones de emergencia y la mera inclusión de fugas sintomáticas.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga del muñón rectal es una complicación relevante tras la resección por discontinuidad. Se deben considerar los factores de riesgo durante la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas cuando son factibles tanto la resección por discontinuidad como la resección abdominoperineal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Inflammatory biomarker signatures in post-surgical drain fluid may detect anastomotic leaks within 48 hours of colorectal resection

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of colorectal cancer is surgical resection and primary anastomosis. Anastomotic leak can affect up to 20% of patients and creates significant morbidity and mortality. Current diagnosis of a leak is based on clinical suspicion and subsequent radiology. Peritoneal biomarkers have shown diagnostic utility in other conditions and could be useful in providing earlier diagnosis. This pilot study was designed to assess the practical utility of peritoneal biomarkers after abdominal surgery utilising an automated immunoassay system in routine use for quantifying cytokines.

METHODS

Patients undergoing an anterior resection for a rectal cancer diagnosis were recruited at University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff between June 2019 and June 2021. A peritoneal drain was placed in the proximity of the anastomosis during surgery, and peritoneal fluid was collected at days 1 to 3 post-operatively, and analysed using the Siemens IMMULITE platform for interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, CXCL8, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were recruited (22M:20F, median age 65). Anastomotic leak was detected in four patients and a further five patients had other intra-abdominal complications. The IMMULITE platform was able to provide robust and reliable results from the analysis of the peritoneal fluid. A metric based on the combination of peritoneal IL-6 and CRP levels was able to accurately diagnose three anastomotic leaks, whilst correctly classifying all negative control patients including those with other complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates that a simple immune signature in surgical drain fluid could accurately diagnose an anastomotic leak at 48 h postoperatively using instrumentation that is already widely available in hospital clinical laboratories.

EuroSurg Collaborative†. Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study

AIM

Intraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery.

METHOD

COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time-to-diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement.

RESULTS

Some 725 patients (median age 68.0 years; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48-5.02, p = 0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.61-1.90, p = 0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67-2.36, p = 0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.36, p = 0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.87-2.99, p = 0.128).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery.

Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care

BACKGROUND

This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care.

METHODS

Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL.

RESULTS

Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.

High adherence to enhanced recovery pathway independently reduces major morbidity and mortality rates after colorectal surgery: a reappraisal of the iCral2 and iCral3 multicenter prospective studies

Background:

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) offers lower overall morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay after colorectal surgery (CRS); high adherence rates to ERAS may significantly reduce major morbidity (MM), anastomotic leakage (AL), and mortality (M) rates as well.

Methods:

Prospective enrollment of patients submitted to elective CRS with anastomosis in two separate 18- and 12-month periods among 78 surgical centers in Italy from 2019 to 2021. Adherence to ERAS pathway items was measured upon explicit criteria in every case. After univariate analysis, independent predictors of primary endpoints (MM, AL, and M rates) were identified through logistic regression analyses, presenting odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

Results:

An institutional ERAS status was declared by 48 out of 78 (61.5%) participating centers. The median overall adherence to ERAS was 75%. Among 8,359 patients included in both studies, MM, AL, and M rates were 6.3%, 4.4%, and 1.0%, respectively. Several patient-related and treatment-related variables showed independently higher rates for primary endpoints: male gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class III, neoadjuvant treatment, perioperative steroids, intra- and/or postoperative blood transfusions, length of the operation >180’, surgery for malignancy. On the other hand, ERAS adherence >85% independently reduced MM (OR, 0.91) and M (OR, 0.25) rates, whereas no mechanical bowel preparation independently reduced AL (OR, 0.68) rates.

Conclusions:

Among other patient- or treatment-related variables, ERAS adherence >85% independently reduced MM and M rates, whereas no mechanical bowel preparation independently reduced AL rates after CRS.

Gaborit L, Hilder A, Kalyanasundaram K, Liu G, Pockney P, Varghese C, Wright D, Vu J, Xu W, TASMAN Collaborative. Study management strategies to optimize student- and trainee-led collaborative research

The collaborative research model is a powerful approach to answering surgical research questions that empowers and inspires medical students and trainees. The Opioid PrEscRiptions and usage After Surgery (OPERAS) study is a student- and trainee-led international multi-centre prospective cohort study developed in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. In this article, we will discuss (i) how the OPERAS study was conceptualized and structured; (ii) the channels through which information and education were communicated to collaborators; (iii) how data was stored in a secure and user-friendly fashion and (iv) the lessons learned and expected goals for the future. We aim to describe how collaborative research studies can be designed to support early career researchers to make valuable contributions to the literature.

EuroSurg Collaborative. Acute PresentatiOn of coLorectaL cancer - an internatiOnal snapshot (APOLLO): Protocol for a prospective, multicentre cohort study

AIM

The primary aim of the study is to describe the variation in the operative and nonoperative management of emergency presentations of colon and rectal cancer in an international cohort. Secondary aims will be to develop a risk prediction model for mortality and primary anastomosis and validate risk criteria of large bowel obstruction (LBO) in patients with previously known colorectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or awaiting elective surgery.

METHOD

This prospective, multicentre audit will be conducted via the student- and trainee-led EuroSurg Collaborative network internationally over 2023 with 90-day follow-up. Data will be collected on consecutive adult patients presenting to the hospital in an unplanned and urgent manner with colorectal cancer (CRC) due to malignant LBO, perforation, CRC-related haemorrhage, or other related reasons. Primary outcome is 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include rates of stomas, primary anastomosis, stenting, preoperative imaging, and complications or readmissions.

CONCLUSION

This protocol describes the methodology for the first international audit on the management of acutely presenting CRC. This study will utilise a large collaborative network with robust data validation and assurance strategies. APOLLO will provide a comprehensive understanding of current practice, develop risk prediction tools in this setting, and validate existing trial results.

Routine placement of abdominal drainage in pouch surgery does not impact on surgical outcomes

The evidence does not support the routine use of abdominal drainage (AD) in colorectal surgery. However, there is no data on the usefulness of AD, specifically, after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study is to assess post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing IPAA with or without AD at a high volume referral center. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing IPAA with AD (AD group) or without AD (NAD group) was performed. Baseline characteristics, operative, and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. A total of 97 patients were included in the analysis, 46 were in AD group and 51 in NAD group. AD group had a higher BMI (23.9 ± 3.9 kg/m² vs 21.9 ± 3.0 kg/m²; p = 0.007) and more commonly underwent two-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA compared to the NAD group (50.0% vs 3.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in anastomotic leak rate (6.5% AD vs 5.9% NAD group; p = 1.000), major post-operative complication (8.6% vs 7.9%; p = 0.893); median length of stay [IQR] (5 [5-7] days vs 5 [4-7] days; p = 0.305) and readmission < 90 days (8.7% vs 3.9%; p = 0.418). The use of AD does not impact on surgical outcome after IPAA and question the actual benefit of its routine placement.

The Nuts and Bolts of Implementing a Modified ERAS Protocol for Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: Group Practice vs. Solo Practice

AIM: The ERAS protocol consists of multiple items that aim to improve the outcomes of patients receiving surgery. Adhering to the protocol is difficult. We wondered whether surgeons practicing the ERAS protocol in a group would improve patient outcomes. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection for benign disease or malignancy from November 2017 to December 2018 were collected and reviewed retrospectively. According to the physician’s ward round strategy, the patients were categorized into two groups, either by solo practice or group practice. Results: This study enrolled 724 patients and divided them into two groups according to the practice method: group practice (n = 256) and solo practice (n = 468). The group practice cohort had less postoperative morbidity (14.0% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.048) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (mean: 6.6 ± 3.2 vs. 8.6 ± 5.5, p < 0.05) than the solo practice cohort. Group practice (p < 0.001), natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) procedure (p < 0.001), and blood loss >50 mL (p = 0.039) significantly affected discharge within 5 days postoperatively in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Group practice based on a modified ERAS protocol shortens postoperative hospital stays with fewer morbidities compared with solo practice in which patients receive elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection vs. transanal total mesorectal excision in overweight patients with low rectal cancer

Objective

Anus-preserving surgery in overweight patients with low rectal cancer has been a challenge due to the narrow operating space. Intersphincteric resection (ISR) was once a standard therapeutic option for low rectal cancer. The effectiveness of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in treating this group of patients remains uncertain as a new surgical strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of taTME with ISR in overweight patients with low rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 53 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 31 cases and ISR in 22 cases. The surgery-related data, pathological manifestations of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared.

Results

Patients in both groups completed the surgery successfully. There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, anastomotic distance from the anal verge and ileostomy between the two groups (P > 0.05). TaTME group performed or virtually finished resection of the rectal mesentery, and no positive cases of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) or Distal Resection Margin (DRM) were detected in either group. The number of lymph nodes found in surgical specimens did not change significantly between the two groups (P = 0.391). In the subgroup analysis, however, more lymph nodes were detected in female patients undergoing taTME than in male patients (P = 0.028). The ISR group took less time to remove the drainage tubes (P = 0.013) and the same results were obtained in both groups of male patients in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.011). There were no statistically significant differences in time to start liquid diet, time to remove catheters, time to start flatus, time to begin ambulation, postoperative hospital stay, and readmission within 30 days after surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, female patients in the taTME group were initiated ambulation earlier than males in the subgroup analysis (P = 0.034). The difference was insignificant in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

taTME is safe and feasible for the treatment of overweight patients with low rectal cancer.

Antimicrobial Challenge in Acute Care Surgery

The burden of infections in acute care surgery (ACS) is huge. Surgical emergencies alone account for three million admissions per year in the United States (US) with estimated financial costs of USD 28 billion per year. Acute care facilities and ACS patients represent boost sanctuaries for the emergence, development and transmission of infections and multi-resistant organisms. According to the World Health Organization, healthcare-associated infections affected around 4 million cases in Europe and 1.7 million in the US alone in 2011 with 39,000 and 99,000 directly attributable deaths, respectively. In this scenario, antimicrobial resistance arose as a public-health emergency that worsens patients' morbidity and mortality and increases healthcare costs. The optimal patient care requires the application of comprehensive evidence-based policies and strategies aiming at minimizing the impact of healthcare associated infections and antimicrobial resistance, while optimizing the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. The present review provides a snapshot of two hot topics, such as antimicrobial resistance and systemic inflammatory response, and three milestones of infection management, such as source control, infection prevention, and control and antimicrobial stewardship.