Long-term outcomes of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy: a population-based study

Breast cancer outcomes after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers versus non-BRCA carriers

Our previous study on breast cancer BRCA carriers disclosed a high local recurrence (LR) rate in patients who underwent skin sparing (SSM) or nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) without postoperative radiation therapy (RT), compared to breast conservation surgery or mastectomy with RT. The current study compares the LR rates in BRCA versus non BRCA carriers after SSM/NSM in relation the receipt of RT.

METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Data collected included patient- (e.g., age), tumour- (e.g., subtype, stage), and treatment-related factors and outcomes. LR was defined as ipsilateral chest wall recurrence. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients (127 BRCA, 128 non-BRCA) were included. Patients who did not receive RT had an earlier disease stage (most N0). No differences were found for LR rate in non-BRCA versus BRCA groups per involved breast and per patient. Comparing the subgroup of patients who did not receive RT, there were no statistically significant differences in LR between non-BRCA versus BRCA (p-value > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in LR for the subgroup of patients who did receive RT (p-value > 0.05). Regardless of BRCA status, patients who received RT had significantly lower LR rates. No differences in overall survival were noted between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm high LR rates after SSM and NSM in patients who are not treated with RT, independent of BRCA-status. This mandate further investigation, as previous studies did not show a benefit of postmastectomy RT in the early breast cancer stage of those patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of 1989 Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstructions: An Analysis of Risk Factors for Failure and Revision Surgery

BACKGROUND

Nipple- or skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is potentially associated with long-term unfavorable outcomes, such as revision surgery and reconstruction failure. This large patient cohort study aimed to provide long-term data on the incidence of these outcomes and to identify predictive risk factors.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2019, 1989 mastectomies with IBR were performed in 1512 women in the authors' institute. A direct-to-implant method was used in 93% and a 2-staged method with tissue expander in 7%. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors associated with revision surgery or reconstructive failure.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 62.2 months. IBR failed in 6.7% of all breasts; thus, a breast was present in 93.3%. Age older than 44 years yielded a 2.6-fold, and radiotherapy, a 1.7-fold increased risk for reconstruction failure. Revision surgery was performed in 60% of all breasts. The mean number of revisions of all IBRs was 1.2 (range, 0 to 8; SD, 1.37). Factors associated with significantly higher rates of revision surgery were age older than 44 years (OR, 1.23), smoking (OR, 1.53), specimen weight greater than 492 g (OR, 1.39), implant volume greater than 422 g (OR, 1.95), and radiotherapy (OR, 1.51). Nipple preservation was protective for both outcomes (OR, 0.71 and 0.42, respectively). Direct-to-implant procedures did not require any surgical revision in 43% of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the necessity of revision surgery in the majority of IBRs, nearly half of the breasts did not require any revision surgery, and long-term reconstruction failure rates are extremely low. Therefore, IBR should be offered to all eligible women undergoing mastectomy, while understanding the risks.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to give an overview of the results of prospective and retrospective studies using allogenic reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer and to make recommendations regarding this interdisciplinary approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted to extract relevant articles from 2000 to 2024. The search was performed using the following terms: (breast cancer) AND (reconstruction OR implant OR expander) AND (radiotherapy OR radiation). Data from the literature on allogenic breast reconstruction and radiation are presented and discussed in relation to toxicity and cosmesis.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Breast reconstruction is also feasible if PMRT is necessary. Patients need to be informed about the relevant risk of capsular fibrosis and implant failure. A planned reconstruction is no reason to forgo PMRT nor is an indication for PMRT a reason to forego implant-based breast reconstruction if desired by the patient. It is important to provide detailed information here to enable shared decision-making. There is still no clear consensus regarding implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and PMRT. However, in clinical practice, both a one-stage (immediate "implant-direct" IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the final implant and a two-stage (immediate-delayed IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the tissue expander (TE) and later exchange of the TE are used; both approaches have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Depending on patient-specific factors and the surgeon's experience and estimates, both IBR procedures are also possible in combination with PMRT. When using a TE/implant approach, completing skin stretching by adequately filling the expander before PMRT may be favorable. This approach is particularly practical when adjuvant chemotherapy is planned but may lead to postponement of radiotherapy when primary systemic therapy is given. According to the latest data, moderate hypofractionation also appears to be safe in the context of the IBR approach. It is important to have a closely coordinated interdisciplinary approach and to fully inform patients about the increased rate of potential side effects.

Oncoplastic Surgery with Volume Replacement versus Mastectomy with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Early Postoperative Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

 Two common surgical approaches for breast cancer are breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy with implant-based breast reconstruction (MIBR). However, for large tumors, an alternative to MIBR is oncoplastic surgery with volume replacement (OPSVR). We performed a comprehensive analysis comparing OPSVR with MIBR, with our aim to focus on the 30-day postoperative complications between these two techniques.

METHODS

 We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2020. Only breast cancer patients were included and were divided according to the surgical technique: OPSVR and MIBR. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent risk factors for total, surgical, and wound complications.

RESULTS

 A cohort of 8,403 breast cancer patients was analyzed. A total of 683 underwent OPSVR and 7,720 underwent MIBR. From 2005 to 2020, the adoption of OPSVR gradually increased over the years (p < 0.001), whereas MIBR decreased. OPSVR patients were older (57.04 vs. 51.89 years, p < 0.001), exhibited a higher body mass index (31.73 vs. 26.93, p < 0.001), had a greater prevalence of diabetes mellitus (11.0 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). They also had a higher ASA classification (2.33 vs. 2.15, p < 0.001), shorter operative time (173.39 vs. 216.20 minutes, p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of outpatient procedures (83.7 vs. 39.5%, p < 0.001). Outcome analysis demonstrated fewer total complications in the OPSVR patients (4.2 vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001), including lower rates of surgical complications (2.2 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) and wound complications (1.9 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.005) compared with MIBR patients. Multivariate analysis identified OPSVR as an independent protective factor for total, surgical, and wound complications.

CONCLUSION

 OPSVR has become a favorable technique for patients with breast cancer. Even in patients with higher comorbidities, OPSVR demonstrates safe and better outcomes when compared with MIBR. It should be considered a reasonable and safe breast surgical option in the appropriate patient.

Advances in Etiology and Prevention of Capsular Contracture After Breast Implantation

Capsular contracture (CC) is one of the most common complications of breast implant usage in breast augmentation or reconstruction. The CC approach can cause breast hardening, pain, and varying degrees of deformity, affecting the quality of life of patients. Considerably, it has become one of the most common reasons for frequent surgeries. Nonetheless, the etiology and pathogenesis of CC remain unclear. Moreover, there exist still a lot of uncertainties regarding prevention and treatment measures. In this article, we present discussions on the research status of the etiology, pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment measures of CC. In summary, this study provides a reference for further research on CC and clinical use.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Identification of sentinel lymph node macrometastasis in breast cancer by deep learning based on clinicopathological characteristics

The axillary lymph node status remains an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, and nodal staging using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routine. Randomized clinical trials provide evidence supporting de-escalation of axillary surgery and omission of SLNB in patients at low risk. However, identifying sentinel lymph node macrometastases (macro-SLNMs) is crucial for planning treatment tailored to the individual patient. This study is the first to explore the capacity of deep learning (DL) models to identify macro-SLNMs based on preoperative clinicopathological characteristics. We trained and validated five multivariable models using a population-based cohort of 18,185 patients. DL models outperform logistic regression, with Transformer showing the strongest results, under the constraint that the sensitivity is no less than 90%, reflecting the sensitivity of SLNB. This highlights the feasibility of noninvasive macro-SLNM prediction using DL. Feature importance analysis revealed that patients with similar characteristics exhibited different nodal status predictions, indicating the need for additional predictors for further improvement.

A BRILLIANT-BRCA study: residual breast tissue after mastectomy and reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Different types of mastectomies leave different amounts of residual breast tissue. The significance of the residual breast volume (RBV) is not clear. Therefore, we developed an MRI tool that allows to easily assess the RBV. In this study we evaluated factors associated with RBV after skin or nipple sparing mastectomy (SSM/NSM) in breast cancer BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers who underwent both therapeutic and risk reducing SSM/NSM and its relation to breast cancer outcomes using an innovative MRI-based tool.

METHODS

Data of breast cancer BRCA PV who were treated between 2006 and 2020 were retrieved from of the oncogenetics unit databases. Only patients who underwent SSM/NSM and had a postoperative breast MRI available for analysis were included. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathological features, and outcomes. The MRI tool was developed by a breast cancer imaging laboratory. A logistic regression test and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the associated risk of increased RBV. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to correlate tumour-patient specific factors and RBV, and a Kaplan-Meier curve to show the probability of locoregional relapse.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients undergoing 89 mastectomies were included. At a median follow-up of 98 months, 5 local, 2 regional, and 4 distant recurrences were observed. RBV was not significantly related with breast cancer outcomes (p value = NS). A higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher RBV (p < 0.0001). A larger number of involved axillary nodes was associated with a smaller RBV (p = 0.025). The RBV on the risk-reducing mastectomy side was significantly higher compared to the breast cancer side (p value = 0.007). Local recurrences occurred in the vicinity of the primary tumour.

Residual breast tissue after mastectomy and reconstruction: A substudy of the Spatial location of breast cancer local rECurRence aftEr masTectomy (SECRET) project

The current project is part of the Spatial location of breast cancer local rECurRence aftEr masTectomy (SECRET) study (NCT06130111). Herein we compared the chest wall thickness after non-skin sparing mastectomy (non-SSM) with the chest wall thickness after SSM, as a surrogate for residual breast tissue after mastectomy.

METHODS

The study was approved by the ethics committee of relevant institutions. Data of patients with a local recurrence (LR) after non-SSM was collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR); data of patients undergoing SSM were collected from Sheba Medical Center. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the cohorts. Chest wall thickness was measured on postoperative images.

RESULTS

Out of 4949 patients who underwent mastectomy from the NCR cohort, a total of 173 (3.5 %) had a LR at 5 years, of these a total of 153 patients included in the non-SSM cohort. The median age was 59 years (age 33-92), LR occurred at a median of 23.6 months (2.5-60 months). The SSM cohort included 84 patients, with a median age of 38.4 years (28-63.5), overall, 5 LRs occurred at a median of 15 months (5-46 months). The SSM cohort had significantly thicker chest walls compared to non-SSM (p < 0.001). Most LRs in both groups occurred in the subcutis.

CONCLUSION

The chest wall thickness differed according to mastectomy procedures. Most of the LR occurred at the subcutis. The role of residual breast tissue and residual cancer in relation to type of mastectomy should be further investigated.

Surgical complications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for breast cancer in women over 65 years

BACKGROUND

While immediate breast reconstruction rates in breast cancer are increasing, they remain low in women over 65 years old. The aim was to investigate surgical outcomes in women older than 65 years receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.

METHOD

The population-based Stockholm Breast Reconstruction Database includes all adult women with breast cancer receiving an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in Stockholm, Sweden, 2005-2015. Primary outcomes within 30 days from immediate breast reconstruction were: infection requiring antibiotics and reoperation on. Implant removal was a secondary outcome. Women more than 65 years were compared with younger age groups. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were applied for the primary outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier analysis for the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 1749 cases of immediate breast reconstruction, 140 (8.0%) were in women more than 65 years. Median follow-up was 74 months (1-198). Postoperative infection was not more common in women older than 65 years old (22 of 140, 15.7%) than in women under 65 years old (303 of 1609, 18.8%; P = 0.221). Reoperation on was more frequent in women older than 65 years than in other age groups (more than 65: 8.6%; 50-64: 6.5%; 40-49: 3.5%; less than 40: 1.6%; P < 0.001), however, age older than 65 years was not an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR 1.00, 95% c.i. 0.44 to 2.28). Overall, 6-year probability of implant removal was 11.4%, (8.1% due to complications and 3.3% due to patient preference). There was no statistically significant difference between age groups for either reason (P = 0.085 and P = 0.794 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Older age alone was not associated with worse surgical outcomes after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in highly selected patients older than 65 years when compared with their younger counterparts.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.

Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap and Silicone Implant Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

About 30% to 50% of women with breast cancer undergo mastectomy, and approximately 50% of them will receive adjuvant radiotherapy (ART). This study evaluates the medium- and long-term impact of ART after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous (LDM) flap and silicone implants.

METHODS

Clinical, surgical, and oncological data were retrospectively collected and analyzed based on the medical records of 176 patients who had undergone IBR with LDM flap and silicone implants.

RESULTS

The data showed that 7.4% of patients had a history of previous radiotherapy, 56.3% received ART, 31.8% developed capsular contracture with a mean follow-up of 58.1 months, and 14.2% of surgeries were categorized as procedures with a prolonged operating time, lasting above 1 SD of the observed mean. Those who experienced prolonged operating time (odds ratio, 4.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-12.93; P = 0.003) and those who received ART (odds ratio, 7.38; 95% confidence interval, 3.18-17.10; P < 0.001) were more likely to develop capsular contracture. Thirty-two patients (18%) underwent capsulectomy with implant replacement, and 7 patients (4%) had the implant removed. The mean time between IBR and reoperation was 29.1 months. Patients who received ART were 2.84 times more likely to experience reconstruction failure or undergo implant-related reoperation ( P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that IBR with LDM flap and silicone implant followed by ART is a safe procedure, resulting in low rates of reconstruction failure. However, ART increased the likelihood of capsular contracture development and implant-related reoperation, having a negative effect on reconstructed breasts.

Pathology and resection margins following mastectomy prior to immediate breast reconstruction

Risk of local recurrence (LR) (and even distant disease-free survival) after mastectomy is associated with margin status. Furthermore, the vast majority of LR are located at the anterior (superficial) margin. Margins in mastectomy are considered anatomical borders and not true resection margins; such a conception may erroneously lead to underestimation of the risk of LR after mastectomy. If dissection is accurate along the fascia, only skin, subcutaneous tissue and minimal residual breast gland tissue (rBGT) are expected to remain in the patient. However, the subcutaneous fascia is an inconsistent anatomical structure that may be absent in almost half of patients. Studies and routine clinical practice suggest that resection may frequently, though often focally, be within the breast glandular tissue leaving various amounts of rBGT. Such areas may be nidus for subsequent de novo or recurrent premalignant or malignant disease. There is no consensus on handling of close/positive margins and intervention is extrapolated from studies on breast conserving surgery with subsequent radiotherapy. Handling of a close/positive margin is complicated by poor correlation between the ex vivo findings on the specimen and the attempt to relocate the area of concern in a patient with reconstructed breasts. In this clinical practice review, we strongly advocate for reporting of the lesion-to-margin distance in mastectomies to collect further evidence on the association between LR and margin status.

The King is in the altogether: Radiation therapy after oncoplastic breast surgery

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy, and the majority of the patients are diagnosed at an early disease stage. Breast conservation is the preferred locoregional approach, and oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is becoming more popular. This narrative review aims to discuss the challenges and uncertainties in target volume definition for postoperative radiation after these procedures, to improve radiation therapy decisions and encourage multidisciplinary.

Protocol for the T-REX-trial: tailored regional external beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases - an open, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial

INTRODUCTION

Modern systemic treatment has reduced incidence of regional recurrences and improved survival in breast cancer (BC). It is thus questionable whether regional radiotherapy (RT) is still beneficial in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastasis. Postoperative regional RT is associated with an increased risk of arm morbidity, pneumonitis, cardiac disease and secondary cancer. Therefore, there is a need to individualise regional RT in relation to the risk of recurrence.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this multicentre, prospective randomised trial, clinically node-negative patients with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC and 1-2 SLN macrometastases are eligible. Participants are randomly assigned to receive regional RT (standard arm) or not (intervention arm). Regional RT includes the axilla level I-III, the supraclavicular fossa and in selected patients the internal mammary nodes. Both groups receive RT to the remaining breast. Chest-wall RT after mastectomy is given in the standard arm, but in the intervention arm only in cases of widespread multifocality according to national guidelines. RT quality assurance is an integral part of the trial.The trial aims to include 1350 patients between March 2023 and December 2028 in Sweden and Norway. Primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 5 years. Non-inferiority will be declared if outcome in the de-escalation arm is not >4.5 percentage units below that with regional RT, corresponding to an HR of 1.41 assuming 88% 5-year RFS with standard treatment. Secondary outcomes include locoregional recurrence, overall survival, patient-reported arm morbidity and health-related quality of life. Gene expression analysis and tumour tissue-based studies to identify prognostic and predictive markers for benefit of regional RT are included.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial protocol is approved by the Swedish Ethics Authority (Dnr-2022-02178-01, 2022-05093-02, 2023-00826-02, 2023-03035-02). Results will be presented at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05634889.

Optimising post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures

Surgical techniques for breast cancer have been refined over the past decades to deliver an aesthetic outcome as close as possible to the contralateral intact breast. Current surgery further allows excellent aesthetic outcome even in case of mastectomy, by performing skin sparing or nipple sparing mastectomy in combination with breast reconstruction. In this review we discuss how to optimise post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and breast reconstructive procedures, including dose, fractionation, volumes, surgical margins, and boost application.